- Series: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Book 39)
- Paperback: 400 pages
- Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell; 1 edition (January 12, 2010)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1573317578
- ISBN-13: 978-1573317573
- Product Dimensions: 7 x 0.6 x 10 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,001,470 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, Volume 1181 (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences) 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Scientific Teaching Series
Shop the Scientific Teaching Series from Macmillan.
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Discover books for all types of engineers, auto enthusiasts, and much more. Learn more
Top Customer Reviews
When one considers that Chernobyl and Three Mile Island incidents involved relatively new reactors in their shakedown period, and that we are considering building twenty new reactors, this book commands attention.
The price makes me hesitate before purchase, but it is an incredibly important work.
As Aldous Huxley wrote, facts do not go away just because we choose to ignore them.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The claims in this book are incredible. Essentially they contradict everything UN/IAEA have been publishing. Read morePublished on September 16, 2011 by ossiman
This book arrives at ridiculously high numbers of deaths from Chernobyl by rejecting the common statistical methods of determining cause and effect and instead considering all rise... Read morePublished on August 2, 2011 by Krzysztof Kosinski
This book is being passed off as though it were the product of a study by the New York Academy of Science. Read morePublished on July 4, 2011 by Richard Dee Winmill
One of the three reviewers openly states that he has not read the book yet gives it a five star rating. Surely, one who does that can only give a neutral i.e. 3 star rating. Read morePublished on June 17, 2011 by C Cavanagh