Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

3.5" Chocolate Shop Oversized Hershey's Kiss Christmas Ornament

1.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Airstream
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Product Description


From the Chocolate Shop Collection
Item #HY0211
Officially licensed merchandise

Overized Hershey's Kiss ornament wrapped in shiny silver foil
Fully dimensional ornament
Comes ready-to-hang on a silver cord

Dimensions: 3.5"H x 3.25"D
Material(s): foam/foil


Product Information

Product Dimensions 6.7 x 6.4 x 6.2 inches
Item Weight 0.3 ounces
Shipping Weight 0.3 ounces
Manufacturer Kurt Adler
ASIN B0093B6URE
Customer Reviews
1.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

1.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #2,321,905 in Home and Kitchen (See Top 100 in Home and Kitchen)
#14,906 in Home & Kitchen > Seasonal Décor > Ornaments
#37,437 in Home & Kitchen > Home Décor > Home Décor Accents > Ornaments

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
100%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By nallred on February 18, 2014
Verified Purchase
This ornament was very disappointing. It is a white plastic "kiss" shape covered with aluminum foil. I know it is white plastic because the aluminum foil covering isn't secure. I didn't pay much for this item - you get what you pay for. i ultimately got on the Hershey website and ordered three glass ornaments shaped like Hershey kisses. They are much better. This was a waste of money and I threw it away.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse