Buy new:
$46.65$46.65
FREE delivery:
Feb 27 - 28
Ships from: Spyglass LLC Sold by: Spyglass LLC
Buy used: $20.00
Other Sellers on Amazon
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
+ $3.99 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Churchill's Phoney War: A Study in Folly and Frustration (Studies in Naval History and Sea Power) Hardcover – November 15, 2019
| Graham T. Clews (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$35.49 Read with Our Free App - Hardcover
$46.657 Used from $19.19 6 New from $46.65
Enhance your purchase
Graham T. Clews explores how Churchill, as First Lord of the Admiralty, proposed to fight this new world war, with particular attention given to his attempts to impel the Royal Navy, the British War Cabinet, and the French, toward a more aggressive prosecution of the conflict. This is no mere retelling of events but a deep analysis of the decision-making process and Churchill's unique involvement in it. This book shares extensive new insights into well-trodden territory and original analysis of the unexplored, with each chapter offering material which challenges conventional wisdom. Clews reassesses several important issues of the Phoney War period including: Churchill's involvement in the anti-U-boat campaign; Churchill's contribution to the failures of the Norwegian Campaign; his attitude to Britain's aerial bombing campaign and the notion of his unfettered "bulldog" spirit; his relationship with Neville Chamberlain; and his succession to the premiership.
A man of considerable strengths and many shortcomings, the Churchill that emerges in Clews' portrayal is dynamic and complicated. Churchill's Phoney War adds a well-balanced and much-needed history of the Phoney War while scrupulously examining Churchill's successes and failures.
- Print length360 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherNaval Institute Press
- Publication dateNovember 15, 2019
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-101682472795
- ISBN-13978-1682472798
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Graham T. Clews' Churchill's Phoney War: A Study in Folly and Frustration is a welcome addition ... continuing to fill holes in the larger examination of Churchill's wartime leadership." --The Strategy Bridge
"The achievements of Churchill's Phoney War are considerable.... It places Churchill inside the Phoney War and measures him against his own past (and future), but does not read backward from the later stages of World War Two and the post-war. Refreshingly, it provides an astute chronology and analysis of the period, embedded in but not overloaded by Churchill's and the wider war's context." --The Second World War Research Group
"A valuable study in adding nuance and detail to the literature on a man who is often celebrated and sometimes condemned, but not frequently comprehended." --The Journal of Military History
"Clews reveals how Churchill's "Phoney War" weaknesses, his energy and constant desire to do something, his stubborn loyalty and unwillingness to quit, became strengths while prime minister." --The Daily News
"Churchill's Phony War is a fresh look at the period between the seizure of Poland and the full out assault on the rest of Europe. It provides a significant update from original sources concerning the inside baseball of the British government, notably the War Cabinet, with regard to the period of the Phony War. As such, it provides a significant contribution to understand the Churchill-Chamberlin transition. It also provides insights into the challenges facing liberal democracies in dealing with aggressive authoritarian regimes generating a crisis." --Defense.info
"Churchill's Phoney War must be a standard work of reference for Churchill scholars and, more generally, a study of historical leadership successes and failures. It adds yet another chapter to the life of this fascinating, ruthless and infuriating man." --Australian Naval Institute
"Clews offers an innovative investigation of old material that is neither hagiographic nor polemic. His book is an objective reinterpretation of the events and motivations that brought Churchill to power.... Clews's book is a useful contribution to World War II scholarship." --The Churchill Project
"The author is a good guide, and the systematic approach he adopts is helpful in gaining a better understanding of this unique period of the war and the part played by this famous leader." --Warship
"Churchill's Phoney War is a detailed academic study.... An important, balanced, and much needed comprehensive study of Churchill as First Lord of the Admiralty." --A Blog on Winston Churchill
"The author ... describes well the important relationships and decision-making processes of the period. He is particularly good on the often poorly described relationship between Churchill and Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister he finally replaced in May 1940. A fascinating period brilliantly described." --Baird Maritime
"Churchill's Phoney War is an essential read for anyone with an interest in the war or national leadership in wartime." --StrategyPage
"In a truly interesting and well-written book.... A man of considerable strengths and many shortcomings, the Churchill that emerges in Dr. Clews' portrayal is dynamic and has a complicated personality. Churchill's Phoney War adds a well-balanced and much-needed history of the Phoney War while scrupulously examining both Churchill's successes and his manifold failures." --New Books Network
"This is an excellent book that significantly advances our understanding of Winston Churchill as a naval strategist and the role he played in British planning at the start of the Second World War. Through a forensic examination of official documents and correspondence, Graham Clews overturns existing orthodoxies about Churchill's performance at the Admiralty in 1939-40. A genuinely novel and impressive book, Churchill's Phoney War should be read not just by those with an interest in Churchill and the Second World War at sea, but also by anyone who wants to learn more about the complex business of how strategy is formulated and implemented - and how strategic choices and high politics intersect with decisive effect." --Daniel Todman, Professor of Modern History, Queen Mary University of London, Britain's War: Into Battle, 1937-1941
"An important account of a crucial period in world history." --Jeremy Black is author of Rethinking World War Two
"This is a meticulously researched and important new look at the early months of the Second World War in Europe and Winston Churchill's part in British decision making. The record is set straight and much new light shed on the positive relationship of Churchill and Prime Minister Chamberlain and the true dynamics of the First Lord's rise to the premiership." --Professor Eric Grove, Visiting Fellow, International Institute for Strategic Studies
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Naval Institute Press (November 15, 2019)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 360 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1682472795
- ISBN-13 : 978-1682472798
- Item Weight : 1.6 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.25 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,576,549 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,239 in England History
- #23,936 in World War II History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top review from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Throughout the book, I think a reader must be struck by the timid, pusillanimous, and generally indecisiveness of the British political leadership in the War Cabinet. They simply did not know how to fight a war. They appear to have spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out how to avoid fighting the Germans or doing something that might antagonize them into attacking France. They discussed how to get Sweden and Norway to go to war against Germany, how to send military aid to Finland without going to war against the Soviet Union, sending a British fleet into the Baltic Sea without a base to support it, invading Norway to stop the shipping of iron ore from Narvik to Germany, and even seizing Narvik and then invading Sweden to seize the iron ore mines at Gallivare. I felt there was a considerable amount of unreality about it all.
There are additional examples of unreality. Churchill appointed Frederick Lindemann (later Lord Cherwell) as his “scientific advisor.” In my opinion, Lindemann was a complete fraud. He was wrong about every major issue on which he provided an assessment or opinion. As described in this book during the 1939 – 1940 time period here, he was wrong about German U-boat production and U-boat losses; he was wrong about the effectiveness of the British ASDIC (Sonar to Americans) and Royal Navy anti-submarine tactics; and he was wrong about the supposed effectiveness of RAF bombing on German industry in the Ruhr. This latter subject, admittedly, was a defect in the entire War Cabinet and in Bomber Command. They actually believed that a force of 300 twin-engine bombers attacking German war industry in the Ruhr would affect German army assaults in France and the Low Countries. In fact, at the time 90% of RAF pilots could not even find the cities they were supposed to bomb, let alone find individual factories within the cities. Later in the “Battle of Britain” Lindemann was wrong about the Luftwaffe radio navigation system. In 1942 – 1944 he wrong about the German V-2 rocket. He insisted that the aerial photos of the rockets on their transport wagons were barrage balloons.
There is considerable discussion about the Norwegian campaign of April - June 1940 after the Germans invaded Norway. This was where I felt that the excuses for misjudgment and the justifications for poor decisions really become obvious. The war had started in September of 1939. The British government had considered many schemes concerning Norway in general and Narvik in particular. Yet when the Germans attacked in April of 1940 (seven months after the war began), Chamberlain, Churchill, the War Cabinet in general and the army and navy seem to have had no definite plans at all for responding. It was all mass improvisation. The members of the War Cabinet apparently spent their time making decisions on military deployments and the minutia of war that should have been made by a “Norwegian Theater Commander” and his staff but of course such an entity did not exist.
In my opinion, an excellent book on the British campaign regarding Norway in 1940 is “Anatomy of a Campaign: The British Fiasco in Norway, 1940” by Kiszely (2017). This is the best book I have ever read on the British strategic level decision-making processes and personalities regarding the Norwegian campaign of April – June of 1940. It isn’t merely a recital of all the poor decisions made and who made them. It goes into discussions and analyses of the inappropriate decision making committees and overall decision-making structure and explains why it was almost inevitable that poor decisions would result from the system in place: “The decisions were inadequate in almost every conceivable way. The inability to address questions of strategic priority or decide where the main effort should lie, the vacillation, the avoidance of uncomfortable decisions —all had been demonstrated to the fore. The committee structure was overly bureaucratic and ponderous, occupying too much time of ministers and advisors. In the month of April [1940] alone, the War Cabinet met thirty-one times, the Military Coordinating Committee twenty-one times, and the Chiefs of Staff Committee forty-two times; for the Chiefs [of Staff] a staggering total of ninety four meetings.”
“Churchill showed, throughout the campaign from its earliest inception, an ignorance of, and disdain for, logistics worthy of the cavalry subaltern he once had been… He was largely responsible for some of the worst strategic blunders of the campaign. The Norwegian campaign was not his finest hour. The War Cabinet developed a habit of mind which was not only dangerous but also infectious to those around them – that of wishful thinking.”
As a French general commented “…The British have planned this campaign on the lines of a punitive expedition against the Zulus, but unhappily we and the British are in the position of the Zulus.”





