Buy new:
$29.00$29.00
Arrives:
Monday, July 24
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $23.90
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $15.81 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The City and Man Later Reprint Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-109780226777016
- ISBN-13978-0226777016
- EditionLater Reprint
- PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
- Publication dateNovember 15, 1978
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.02 x 5.92 x 0.61 inches
- Print length254 pages
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of products
What is Political Philosophy? And Other StudiesPaperback$16.36 shipping - Lowest Pricein this set of products
Beginning with Heidegger: Strauss, Rorty, Derrida, Dugin and the Philosophical Constitution of the PoliticalPaperback$16.05 shipping - This item:
The City and ManPaperback$15.81 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Jul 24Only 8 left in stock - order soon.
Leo Strauss on Nietzsche's "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" (The Leo Strauss Transcript Series)Leo StraussPaperback$15.81 shipping
On Tyranny: Corrected and Expanded Edition, Including the Strauss-Kojève CorrespondencePaperback$16.92 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Jul 24Only 3 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 0226777014
- Publisher : University of Chicago Press; Later Reprint edition (November 15, 1978)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 254 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780226777016
- ISBN-13 : 978-0226777016
- Item Weight : 14 ounces
- Dimensions : 9.02 x 5.92 x 0.61 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #401,703 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #611 in Philosophy (Books)
- #1,850 in Political Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Don't like philosophical spoilers? Then stop reading this review because the following are, in my view, a few code breakers for interpreting this Straussian text. I'll keep it somewhat brief.
NOMOS: Nomos is conventional, relative truth; a fabricated, normative reality. Even when not explicitly using this word (i.e. the picture in a frame) Strauss is always talking about nomos within his tacit instruction (i.e. the frame around the picture). Through mental constructs, our perception is overlaid with the markings of cultural values, beliefs, ideals, nationalities, habits, lines of thinking, and ways of proceeding. Perception is distorted in accordance with conditioning. First there is a cognition, THEN a cognitive distortion. The `city' overwhelms `nature'. Personally, my ears perk up whenever someone uses the phrase "the real world."
NATURE: Awareness. Simple as that. Awareness precedes thought and hence can't be captured by the modality of thought and other mental phenomena. Before the advent of the city, our natural state (awareness) lies free of values and judgments -On a side note the contemplative practice of meditation may assist us in experientially seeing this. Moreover nature is the `whole', the whole phenomenal world that is. Reminiscent of eastern and Gnostic philosophies, we are the world and the world is us. We lie in ourselves and fail to realize it because we alienate ourselves from ourselves (consciousness becomes fragmented within itself through abstract categories and interpretive schemas).
POLITICS: The interaction between people. But as far as rhetoric is concerned it is the manipulation of nomos for specific consequences. By fashioning mental artifacts that shape and organize experience into specified constellations, philosophers persuade the masses through their mouthpieces that are the politicians. However, those that have broken free from this mental-social immersion (Plato's Cave) are no longer influenced by these political games and are thus free to participate in the further propagation of myths, stand aloof, or divulge this information in the attempt to liberate others. To be just or unjust is the question...or maybe this is a false, dualistic dilemma. After all the entire normative landscape, by being grounded in fiction, is specious to begin with.
RANDOM BITS AND PIECES: Every now and then Strauss throws in a random chunky paragraph or `misplaced' sentence that provides contextual clues. Duly note these clues because their counterparts will most likely appear, indirectly of course, ten or twenty pages down the road. Given these hints we must rotate the text and unlock their true meaning much like a Rubik's Cube. Although I won't quote specific passages I do, however, remember that certain intimations are made: That enlightenment itself is not a myth, that those who Know Themselves are truly wise, and towards the end Strauss even ends with the question Quid Sit Deus (What is God?). In other words, what IS the phenomenal world? From WHENCE do phenomena emerge and fall away to? What is our true nature or, more specifically, who am I, REALLY, once all the constructions and interpretations that I surround myself with have been stripped away?
The eye will never see itself.
Natural Right and History, which addresses more modern and contemporary thought. As always, "modern" begins
with people like Hobbes and Machiavelli, many centuries ago. The book consists of three essays-on Aristotle's
Politics, on Plato's Republic, and on Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesians and the Athenians.
The section on Aristotle has the surprising argument that Aristotle, not Socrates or Plato, was the first political
philosopher. This is surprising because the Republic of course is such a towering book (or set of books). I found
it fascinating on page 47 where Aristotle discusses the change of regime, where the city changes and yet remains
the same.For those who have studied Aristotle before, this makes sense with accidental change, potency and act,
etc. But it also is interesting in regard to recent American politics, where moving from one presidency to the other
is such a dramatic change. For contemporary readers, when the Greeks talk about the city, it's not the city they're
talking about, it's the country. Strauss points out that the phrase "my country right or wrong" applies to the city in
terms of patriotism or spiritedness.
Plato's Republic is discussed in more depth-pages 50 to 60 or so discuss Plato's dialogues in general in a very
illuminating way. "If one quotes a passage from the dialogues in order to prove that Plato held such and such a view,
he acts about as reasonably as if he were to assert that according to Shakespeare life is a tale told by an idiot, full of
sound and fury, signifying nothing. But this is a silly remark: everyone knows that Plato speaks through the mouth not
indeed of his Protagoras, his Callicles, his Menon, his Hippias and his Thrasymachus, but of his Socrates, his Eleatic
stranger, his Timaeus and his Athenian stranger" (p. 50). What many will remember about the Republic is that it's about
justice-but here again Strauss comes to some surprising insights and conclusions.
The discussion on Thucydides moves from philosophy to history, but it is history informed by philosophy, in contrast
with recent thought that tends to reduce thought to the history of the social context from which it arose. Again, I had
a vague picture in my head about the contrasts between Athens and Sparta, much of which probably came from
the viewpoint of Thucydides, but this is oversimplified. The main contrast is that Sparta was old-fashioned and traditional,
where Athens valued enterprise as exemplified by the expedition to Sicily. It was actually Athens that was the stronger
power at the time.




