OR

Kindle Price:	$38.50
Sold by:	Amazon.com Services LLC

Promotions apply when you purchase

Read with our free app

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.

Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

There was an error. We were unable to process your subscription due to an error. Please refresh and try again.

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels Kindle Edition

by Roger Bezdek (Author), Craig D. Idso (Author), David R. Legates (Author), Format: Kindle Edition

3.8 9 ratings

See all formats and editions

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels assesses the costs and benefits of the use of fossil fuels with a special focus on anthropogenic climate change. It is the fifth volume in the Climate Change Reconsidered (CCR) series produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC).

The NIPCC authors, building on previous reports in the series as well as new literature reviews, find that while climate change is occurring and a human impact on climate is likely, there is no consensus on the size of that impact relative to natural variability, the net benefits or costs of the impacts of climate change, or whether future climate trends can be predicted with sufficient confidence to guide public policies today. Consequently, concern over climate change is not a sufficient scientific or economic basis for restricting the use of fossil fuels.

The NIPCC authors do something their IPCC counterparts never did: conduct an even-handed cost-benefit analysis of the use of fossil fuels. Despite calling for the end of reliance on fossil fuels by 2100, the IPCC never produced an accounting of the opportunity cost of restricting or banning their use. That cost would be enormous. Estimates of the cost of reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by the amounts said by the IPCC to be necessary to avoid causing ~2°C warming in the year 2050 range from the IPCC’s own estimate of 3.4% to as high as 81% of projected global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2050, the latter estimate nullifying all the gains in human well-being made in the past century. Cost-benefit ratios range from the IPCC’s own estimate of 6.8:1 to an alarming 162:1.

The NIPCC authors conclude, “The global war on energy freedom, which commenced in earnest in the 1980s and reached a fever pitch in the second decade of the twenty-first century, was never founded on sound science or economics. The world’s policymakers ought to acknowledge this truth and end that war.”

Chapter 1 describes how economic principles can be applied to environmental issues. The authors explain how economists use observational data (prices, profits and losses, investment and consumption decisions, etc.) to measure and monetize costs and benefits, to understand how people respond to and solve challenges, and to understand why private as well as government efforts to protect the environment sometimes fail to achieve their objectives.

Chapter 2 updates the literature review of climate science in previous CCR volumes. Most notably, the authors say the IPCC has exaggerated the amount of warming likely to occur if the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) were to double and such warming as occurs is likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the global environment or to human well-being. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 catalogue the beneficial impacts of fossil fuels on human prosperity, human health, and the environment. These benefits are enormous yet missing from the IPCC’s massive tomes.

Chapters 6 and 7 address two harms said to be created by the use of fossil fuels: air pollution and what the IPCC calls threats to “human security.” The NIPCC authors show the alleged effects of air pollution have been grossly exaggerated. Similarly, the IPCC’s own literature review shows how weak is the case for claiming climate change intensifies “risk factors” such as loss of property and livelihoods, forced migration, and violent conflict. Chapter 8, the final chapter of the book, critiques the IPCC’s claim that the cost of reducing the use of fossil fuels is justified by the benefits of a slightly cooler world a century hence. New cost-benefit analyses of climate change, fossil fuels, and regulations demonstrate how adaptation to climate change is invariably the better path than attempting to mitigate it by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Print length

784 pages
Language

English
Sticky notes

On Kindle Scribe
Publication date

March 8, 2019
File size

9830 KB
Page Flip

Enabled
Word Wise

Enabled
Enhanced typesetting

Enabled
See all details

Report an issue with this product or seller

S. Fred Singer
659
Kindle Edition
$11.49
Ted Cruz
1,270
Kindle Edition
$14.99
Gregory Wrightstone
2,482
Kindle Edition
$8.99
Jerome R. Corsi
214
Kindle Edition
$14.99
Lynne Balzer
275
Kindle Edition
$4.95
Alex Epstein
1,743
Kindle Edition
in Energy Policy
$11.99

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Dr. Roger Bezdek is an internationally recognized energy analyst, president of MISI, a Washington, DC-based economic, energy, and environmental research firm, co-founder of energy technology firm Cavendish Energy, and Washington editor of World Oil magazine. He is the author or coauthor of 13 books and his writing has appeared more than 300 times in scientific and technical journals, including Science, Nature, Energy Policy, Natural Resources Journal, and Public Finance. He earned a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he served as a faculty member from 1971 to 1974.

Dr. Craig D. Idso is founder and chairman of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change. Since 1998, he has been the editor and chief contributor to the online magazine CO2 Science. He is the author of several books, including The Many Benefits of Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment (2011) and CO2 , Global Warming and Coral Reefs (2009). His writing has appeared in The Quarterly Review of Biology, Energy & Environment, Geophysical Research Letters, Atmospheric Environment, Journal of Climate, Technology, and other science journals. He earned a Ph.D. in geography from Arizona State University (ASU), where he lectured in meteorology and was a faculty researcher in the Office of Climatology.

David R. Legates, Ph.D. is professor of climatology in the Department of Geography at the University of Delaware and an adjunct professor at the university's Physical Ocean Science and Engineering Program and in the Department of Applied Economics and Statistics. Dr. Legates received his Ph.D. in climatology from the University of Delaware, and he has taught at the University of Virginia and served on the faculty at Louisiana State University and the University of Oklahoma. He has been a Research Scientist at the Southern Regional Climate Center, Chief Research Scientist at the Center for Computational Geosciences, and a Visiting Research Scientist at the National Climate Data Center. He has published more than 125 articles in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and monograph series and has made more than 250 professional presentations. His research has appeared in such journals as Academic Questions, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Climatic Change, Geographical Review, Global and Planetary Change, Hydrological Processes, International Journal of Climatology, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar Terrestrial Physics, Journal of Climate, Journal of Geophysical Research, Journal of Hydrology, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science & Education, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, and Water Resources Research. He has contributed to the Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather and Yearbook of Science and Technology. Legates is a Certified Consulting Meteorologist as recognized by the American Meteorological Society and, in 1999, was awarded the Boeing Autometric Award for the best paper in image analysis and interpretation. He has been asked to give expert testimony to the US Congress on five separate occasions.

Dr. S. Fred Singer is one of the most distinguished atmospheric physicists in the United States. He established and served as the first director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service, now part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and earned a U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal Award for his technical leadership. He is coauthor, with Dennis T. Avery, of Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years (2007, second ed. 2008) and many other books. Dr. Singer served as professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville (1971-94) and is founder of the nonprofit Science and Environmental Policy Project. He earned a Ph.D. in physics from Princeton University.

Product details

ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PKFP73N
Publisher ‏ : ‎ The Heartland Institute (March 8, 2019)
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 8, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 9830 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 784 pages
Page numbers source ISBN ‏ : ‎ 1934791458

Best Sellers Rank: #1,280,329 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #1,668 in International Economics (Books)
- #1,800 in Climatology
- #4,167 in Environmental Science (Books)

Customer Reviews:
3.8 9 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

Products related to this item

Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1

Customer reviews

3.8 out of 5

9 global ratings

5 star

70%

4 star

0%

3 star

0%

2 star

0%

1 star

30%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

T. Klein

Eye opening

Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2023

Definitely gives you something to think about.
Lots of information challenging preconceived notions. The Information when you really think about it is very logical.

Helpful

Catherine Bridges

hot air, irrelevant, pseudoscience

Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2019

As an example of their hot air and pseudoscience, consider the claim on Location 1622 of the Kindle edition: "Key elements of the Scientific Method include experimentation, the testing of competing hypotheses, objective and careful peer review, discerning correlation from causation, and controlling for natural variability. In each of these areas, the IPCC and many scientists whose work is prominent in climate science have been shown to fall short (Essex and McKitrick, 2007; Darwall, 2013; Lewin, 2017; Armstrong and Green, 2018).

I decided to check the last reference. It's not peer-reviewed, not published in a respected science journal. It's a Powerpoint presentation a business professor gave at a conference for anthropomorphic climate change deniers! Did it demonstrate the claim quoted? No, it merely repeated the assertion for *one* paper(!) estimating polar bear population. They say the title is bad, that they weren't given the date for a polar bear population estimate, and that we should read this one polar bear paper for ourselves judging by their Scientific Method checklist. (Moreover, their checklist itself is problematic -- the importance of a problem (itself often unclear) and the complexity of experimentation methods do not disqualify something from being properly scientific.)

This isn't science. It's politicking. So this one example turned out to be a self-published political diatribe, not peer-reviewed science. This book appears a repetition of their other book 'Why Scientists Disagree about Climate Change', also verbose undemonstrated accusations filled with self-referential "citations".

So this book is a number of political rabbit holes, and they are hoping the reader will be impressed by appearances, i.e. their scientific-sounding assertions and numerous citations.

7 people found this helpful

Helpful

TW

No hard copy

Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2023

I need a hard copy where can I get it?

Helpful

MarcSpotsTheX

Criticizes, without offering studies of its own

Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2019

Criticizes, without offering studies of its own. A common deceptive ploy, but offers no alternative evidence or theories

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

Jeffrey Van Wagoner

Great summary of the side of the climate debate that is almost never reported on

Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2019

This is an excellent summary of the benefits and costs of fossil fuels put into the context of the climate debate. If brings up many points that are almost never reported on but should be obvious to those that are willing to ask critical questions.

The book is divided into 3 main parts, and each part has 2 or 3 chapters.

Part I covers the foundations of the subject.

Chapter 1 goes over environmental economics and covers the history and the fact that there are both costs and benefits to the use of fossil fuels and points out that free markets and private ownership tend to lead to a cleaner environment, which is what has been happening in the US and other advanced markets.

Chapter 2 is a summary of the climate science and explores the scientific method and what we do and don’t know. It covers the main controversies such as temperature records, climate models, climate sensitivity, and solar activity. It looks at the major impacts such as extreme weather events, melting ice, and sea level rise. It concludes with the scientific uncertainties and the problem with appeals to consensus.

Part II covers the benefits of fossil fuels.

Chapter 3 looks at human prosperity and how most of it is dependent on fossil fuels.

Chapter 4 looks at the human health benefits that we have seen since we switched to fossil fuels and notes that mortality rates are better than ever.

Chapter 5 looks at the environment benefits of fossil fuels. This includes the impact on plants, animals, and aquatic life. CO2 is plant food and warmth means longer growing seasons which is good for life.

Part III covers the costs of fossil fuels.

Chapter 6 explores air quality and notes that without air pollution controls, fossil fuels can be a problem, but with modern air pollution controls, the problems are minimal. The priority should be to help 3rd world nations implement air pollution controls.

Chapter 7 explores the potential issue of human security. It notes that most studies show that a warmer world is actually better for a reduction in wars and improvement in human well-being. A colder climate actually correlates to more wars and famines.

Chapter 8 does a cost benefits analysis and shows that the benefits of fossil fuels far outweigh the costs. This is different than the cost-only analysis that are typically done and reported in the media.

Overall this is a great summary of the issues. It references numerous studies to support its thesis and makes a lot of sense. Worth reading. If you don’t have time to go through the whole book, at least look at the much shorter summary for policy makers.

6 people found this helpful

Helpful