Buy new:
-23% $16.98$16.98
Delivery Thursday, July 25
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$6.68$6.68
Delivery Friday, July 26
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Prime Deals 1845
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming Paperback – December 6, 2011
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateDecember 6, 2011
- Grade level11 and up
- Reading age13 years and up
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.73 x 8.25 inches
- ISBN-100465025196
- ISBN-13978-0465025190
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought

Climate Uncertainty and Risk: Rethinking Our Response (Anthem Environment and Sustainability Initiative)Judith CurryPaperback$10.86 shippingOnly 1 left in stock (more on the way).
The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and PoliticsRoger A. Pielke JrPaperback$10.32 shipping
Editorial Reviews
Review
Pielke's thoughtful analysis of how climate science has interacted with policy - often not productively - provides new and engaging insights. Moreover, his conclusion about the importance of decarbonization and disaggregating climate policy gives the climate debate a new dimension. By weaving his personal story into the development of these issues, he presents a compelling narrative that deserves a wide readership.”
Kerry Emanuel, Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT
Roger Pielke, Jr., cuts through passions and politics to propose a clear and sober way forward in addressing one of the critical issues of our time.”
The Economist
A bright and provocative book the arguments for an energy-innovation approach to climate change seem currently to be gaining ground For those who want to understand them, this [book] is a very good place to start.”
Slate.com
This year's must-read global warming book.”
John Marburger, Vice President for Research, Stony Brook University and former Science Advisor to President George W. Bush
Roger Pielke, Jr.'s voice in the global warming debate is one of rare common sense. While many authors link anthropogenic climate change with energy technology, Pielke, Jr. goes farther and emphasizes the role of development economics and deep seated social behaviors that cannot easily be addressed. You may not agree with his oblique, pragmatic' proposal for accelerating decarbonization' of society, but you will be hard-pressed to find a better analysis of the thorniest aspects of the climate challenge.”
Neal Lane, Malcolm Gillis University Professor and Senior Fellow in Science and Technology at the Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University; former Science Advisor to President William J. Clinton
"The present climate policy stalemate cries out for a new approach in dealing with a challenge that is unprecedented in scope and complexity. This book offers scientists, policy makers and the general public a critical perspective and thoughtful suggestions for a way forward. It should be read by anyone who cares about the future of the planet and its people.”
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; Reprint edition (December 6, 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0465025196
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465025190
- Reading age : 13 years and up
- Grade level : 11 and up
- Item Weight : 10.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.73 x 8.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,139,704 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #752 in Environmental Policy
- #1,082 in Climatology
- #2,435 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Roger A. Pielke, Jr. has been on the faculty of the University of Colorado since 2001 and is a Professor in the Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). At CIRES, Roger served as the Director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research from 2001-2007. Roger's research focuses on the intersection of science and technology and decision making. In 2006 Roger received the Eduard Brückner Prize in Munich, Germany for outstanding achievement in interdisciplinary climate research. Before joining the University of Colorado, from 1993-2001 Roger was a Scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Roger is a Senior Fellow of the Breakthrough Institute. He is also author, co-author or co-editor of seven books, including The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics published by Cambridge University Press in 2007. His most recent book is The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell you About Global Warming (September, 2010, Basic Books).
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book very informative and pragmatic about climate science. They also appreciate the writing style, saying the book is well-written and clear.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book very informative, masterful, and insightful. They also say the author has a talent for explaining things in understandable terms. Readers describe the book as outstanding, accessible to both lay audiences and students, logical, and impartial. They mention that it's thoughtful, intelligent, fair, and an important book for those studying climate science.
"...The book is the best single book I've read on climate change and climate policy. Pielke writes well and clearly. The book makes its points very well...." Read more
"...Pielke hits three home runs with these chapters. Pielke is thorough in his research and his outstanding quotes all have citations...." Read more
"...enough to get into the details, will find Pielke's book an informative view of the issues...." Read more
"...The logic is impeccable and Pielke does not scream like his critics which means that politicians will probably never get behind his ideas." Read more
Customers find the writing style of the book well-written and clear. They also say the book makes its points very well.
"...Pielke writes well and clearly. The book makes its points very well. It describes how decarbonization is a desirable policy but not at any cost." Read more
"...Beyond that, the book generally is well-written and focuses in on the real problem - what policy options do we have to deal with climate change...." Read more
"...The book is well written and fun to read as he takes you on several interesting and enlightening side journeys...." Read more
"...Pielke writes with great clarity, creativity, and a willingness to challenge assumptions across the political spectrum." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Pielke's position on Carbon Dioxide (C02) and temperature rises is simple is outlined in the first chapter. He believes that C02 is responsible for possibly all but certainly a substantial part of the observed temperature rise in the last 150 years. He also believes that there are other factors involved, referring to his father the renowned climate scientist Roger Pielke Snr who believes that the IPCC is obsessed with C02 emissions and ignores land use change and other factors. He also states that there is considerable uncertainty in climate projections and that this will not go away. The skill in the climate models used is low because they do not have the ability to validate their outcomes against enough data. Pielke contrasts climate models with weather models and states:
It would take 3000 years to obtain as much knowledge of the skill of 100-year climate forecasts as we obtain every month with respect to daily weather forecasts
Pielke goes on to state that attempting to reduce the uncertainty for political purposes is unwise. Pielke also looks at the examples of acid rain and ozone depletion and points out that action was taken on both those issues before international agreements were made and with considerable scientific uncertainty.
After briefly summarizing his view of climate science Pielke goes on to look at the political facts of climate change. Here he says that there is a clear majority of support for action on decarbonisation and that there is political will. He points to large numbers of polls in numerous countries over considerable periods of time that show solid support for decarbonisation policies. Pielke says that people believe there must be trade offs between economic growth and climate policy. Pielke here makes the point that people will not give up much for climate policy and that policies that have a high cost are doomed to failure. He quotes polls showing that an annual cost per household of about $100 is as far as people will support spending on decarbonisation. Finally he makes the point that the technology to decarbonise the economy does not exist and that developing new energy technologies should be at the centre of any effort to decarbonise the economy.
In the third chapter Pielke points out how much energy is going to be required in C21. In the fourth chapter he looks at various decarbonisation policies including those of the UK, Japan, Australia, the US, China and Europe and makes the points that the goals of climate policy in many of these countries are unlikely to be achieved by 2020 as the rates of decarbonisation are substantially higher than have been achieved. He calls the massive efforts to achieve targeted decarbonisation rates magical thinking.
In the 5th Chapter Pielke looks at the technologies that could decarbonise the world economy and handle climate change. He thinks that geo-engineering is unlikely to be successful and is very risky as well. He does, however, think that direct decarbonisation and capture could work. In chapter 6 Pielke looks at how climate policy went wrong. He looks at how abatement to the consequences of climate change has been ignored in favor of mitigation.
In chapter 7 Pielke Jnr goes into some detail about extreme weather events which is one of his main areas of expertise. He points out that in the IPCC reports people have been deliberately misleading about what he has written and have made up what he has said. It's a shocking revelation. Pielke Jnr also highlights some examples of environmental scientists deliberately misleading people with published scientific work. It is, again, a devastating critique. The quotes by the scientists involved are damming. It shows, to a considerable extent, why people distrust environmental scientists and see them as issue advocates with PhDs.
In the 8th Chapter where climate policy has gone wrong is discussed. The revelations in the East Anglia emails are discussed and Pielke describes how he thinks that if climate scientists had not attempted to drive policy by fear and distortion the effects would be far less. Pielke goes on to state how he believes that if issue advocacy was kept out climate science the case would still be sufficient for action but would not be subject to the problems it is now.
Finally Pielke outlines what he thinks the policy regarding climate change should be, which is a low tax of around $10 per tonne of C02 emitted. This suggested solution is similar to the one suggested by Bjorn Lomborg and is also that of the economist Richard Tol.
The book is the best single book I've read on climate change and climate policy. Pielke writes well and clearly. The book makes its points very well. It describes how decarbonization is a desirable policy but not at any cost.
I have to conclude that Pielke is an 80% skeptic, but speaks loudly about spending $Trillions on a problem that isn't causing any problems...SO THAT THE ALARMISTS CAN'T SHUT HIM UP as they have managed to do to many other good scientists that don't toe the Activist Socialist line.
It's 2020 as I write this. Pielkie has been branded a "Climate Denier" by the Activist Science Establishment which after 30 years of culling out non-activists is around 95% of all climate scientists. And Pielke still has a voice...so his crazy stance is working. The Activists hate him and heap ad hominems upon him for providing solid data refuting the urgency of their costly CO2 reduction schemes.
He has been correct about the economic barriers. Lots of Europe is in revolt due to the costs involved...cost that were promised to go down went sharply the other way. They lied about the costs and productivity of renewables.
This book and further studies has steered me firmly into the skeptics column. Climategate, which was worse than Pielke described in the book, made me skeptical. Those emails talked about finding ways to reduce the 1940's warming in the historical data. AND they slowly did that over the years. THEY ERASED THE 1940's warming trend (See Tony Heller's YouTube videos that chronicle these and other transgressions).
The historic data before 1940 lacks the global coverage and resolution to be able to make claims about global temperature averages to THE RESOLUTIONS claimed (tenths of degrees). And then, NOAA and NASA are now doctoring the data to report the lowest temperatures of the large measurement uncertainty interval (plus using "homogenization" to INVENT a lot of missing data) for the early 1900 temperatures and then using the upper levels of the measurement uncertainty interval for recent data...thereby "inventing" more rapid temperature trends... which are POSSIBLE but extremely unlikely. It's corrupt fudging of the temperature record...bad science.
Hypotheses almost always make predictions. The few (only 2) Climate Activist predictions have failed. In Activist Climate Claims we only see alarming temperature increases via a 3 times amplification of the small amount of CO2 warming by additional positive feedback warming from increased humidity (a perfectly plausible assumption...that needs proven). That amplification would be most readily seen in the tropics in the mid to upper troposphere. Weather balloon and (indirect) satellite measurements are seeing at most 1/3 of the predicted amplification, so the prediction fails regarding the amount of amplification. Similarly, the Climate models predicted about 3 x's the warming actually seen so far...another fail. They just claim those failures don't exist...and have failed at every explanation for the failures ever since.
Climate Activists have corrupted the science and cannot be believed without NORMAL SCIENCE REVIEW...and they won't submit to the normal reviews. They would submit if they knew they were right. If they would prove they are right, I WOULD SUPPORT THEM. Instead, they have doubled down on censorship of skeptics and firing of skeptics (like Dr. Ridd in Australia).
I will resist.
Top reviews from other countries
After showing how the current mode of thinking and trying to manage climate change fails even at finding a suitable definition of what "climate change" even is (only the human contribution?) and how funding can bias institutions' decision to in/exclude information in their public facing communications.
Pielke offers more actionable metrics for tracking the progress of decarbonization, than I have seen so far and develops a more promising outline for a path towards achieving it than has been offered so far.
Dr Pielke's argument is essentially that decarbonization of the economy - moving from carbon-intensive coal down to less carbon-intensive hydrocarbons, natural gas, to finally nuclear power and other sources - has been an ongoing process for some time, regardless of anything related to climate change or climate policy. However, since concerns about climate change have generated broad public (and so political) support for active decarbonization policies, we are (or should be) in an ideal position to use intelligent policies towards accelerating energy decarbonization - a desirable process that would happen (or more accurately, is already happening) anyway.
Where the book is most original (in relation to what is most commonly written on this subject), and most critical, is in the specific policies presently followed (or at least, prescribed): that is, the setting of specific carbon emission reduction targets at national level, following (supposedly) rigid deadlines for specific years. The problem with that approach - illustrated perhaps most clearly by the UK's Climate Change Act of 2008 - is that when it has been taken, it was together with a vast underestimation of the efforts and expenses needed towards meeting those goals - far more, in terms of expenditure, that any of the countries who have taken that approach have been politically willing, or financially able, to invest. Thus, whatever politicians may say, they are doomed to failure. The book's conclusion is then that the most sensible approach is to use taxes on carbon to finance R&D towards speeding up the already-ongoing decarbonization process.
At face value, one could hardly disagree with the process of decarbonization as such; the controversy then shifts to the issues of "carbon tax" and "policies" as such - as illustrated by a debate with Dr Pielke in London a few days ago. My own disagreement with the book's reasonings is the level of public support for such policies: Dr Pielke defends the view, in chapter 2, that there is a broad public support, even as he emphasizes that they are conditional to their not compromising economic growth. But then what does "public support" mean, if only for something that would cost nothing?




