Buy new:
-53% $7.97$7.97
$5.03 delivery June 6 - 7
Ships from: American University of Sovereign Nations Books Sold by: American University of Sovereign Nations Books
Save with Used - Very Good
$1.75$1.75
$3.99 delivery June 7 - 13
Ships from: more-than-words Sold by: more-than-words
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court Paperback – June 1, 1999
There is a newer edition of this item:
$12.84
(58)
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Purchase options and add-ons
Operating inside a network of Byzantine secrecy, the United States Supreme Court is the most powerful judicial institution in the world. Nine unelected justices, supposedly insulated from the pressure of politics, are charged with protecting our most cherished rights and shaping our fundamental laws.
In this eloquent, trailblazing account, Edward Lazarus, who served as a clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun, provides an insider's guided tour of a court at war with itself and often in neglect of its constitutional duties. He guides the reader through the Court's inner sanctum, explaining as only an eyewitness can the collisions of law, politics, and personality as the Justices wrestle with the most fiercely disputed issues of our time. Part memoir, part history, and all spellbinding narrative, Closed Chambers provides an intimate portrait--Justice by Justice--of the battles and compromises of the highest court in the land.
--Updated with a new Afterword
"Impeccably researched and impressively documented." --The Boston Globe
- Print length592 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Books
- Publication dateJune 1, 1999
- Dimensions5.42 x 1.31 x 7.98 inches
- ISBN-100140283560
- ISBN-13978-0140283563
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Books; Updated edition (June 1, 1999)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 592 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0140283560
- ISBN-13 : 978-0140283563
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.42 x 1.31 x 7.98 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,160,152 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #156,621 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Although non-lawyers may find his writing a bit technical, particularly on esoteric legal issues, they will nonetheless appreciate his candid views on the justices' decisionmaking process.
And finally a challange to the critics who believe that Lazarus has betrayed his employer: Please explain why we are not entitled to know how the highest court in the land makes its decisions. Congress has public hearings that are broadcast on CSPAN. The President receives more media attention than any other person in the world (absent the late Princess Di) and his minions will write dozens of tell-all books after he leaves office. Why should the Court be exempt from scrutiny? If the justices are embarassed then maybe they should change their ways.
growth of "federalism." Today we are still dealing with what Bork's rejection to the court has wrought and the involvement of clerks in the orchestration of opinion research and writing. There is no "dirt" or "scandal" some would imagine from the hype of behind the scenes action, but you get a healthy view of the dynamic elements in play for this sacred institution. One always will note the caricature of legal history as told by it's witnesses. The book illustrates both how forming of opinion requires interactive correspondence and how it is brokered sometimes through negotiated horse-trading.
The book is not written with extensive legal analysis. It illuminates that however we have held sacred the deliberative body to follow the "original intent" of the constitution and connected law, there is a measure of privilege in the latitude at which justices may arrive at what the law is or ought to be on moral legal issues principally covering conversations on abortion and the death penalty.
The President and the Congress are on a 24 hour news cycle; The Supreme Court is not. So this book is a welcome insight that does the job of giving us important access on how we may better place the 9 leaders who shape our law.
We count on a Supreme Court predisposed more for qualified reasoning than results and to call the shots in an imperfect, politically polarized, atmosphere. Nobility and integrity of character will be important marks for those seeking to shape our rights, and freedom, and the rule of law.
I have also have made reviews on:
Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, Eighth Edition (Hardback), The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court , and Reason and Passion: Justice Brennan's Enduring Influence
My favorite overall on the high court is Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, Eighth Edition . It is great for those that want to study both the court as an institution as well as the politics of the major case issues.
I also recommend:
The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court . The book on Brennan is not intended to be on balance.
He constantly backhanded the conservative clerks with typical liberal name calling, barely mentioned Scalia except in cleverly deceptive ways although clearly Scalia was the dominant intellectual force, more so than Stevens who people have labeled the smartest justice on the court.
Give me a break: Scalia was one of those person's like Michael Jordan, everyone else was just playing for second. But he was portrayed kinda like some ogre instead of the brilliant, charming, funny, supremely talented person that he was
His reverence for Justice Blackmun was unwarranted as Blackmun was perhaps the least qualified and most insecure to be a scotus justice, and was obviously deeply influenced by his work in the medical legal community regarding abortion.
Anytime a liberal advocates for abortion, they always paint liberals who support it such as Ginsburg or others in a sympathetic light. This author was certainly no different. In my opinion, Harry Blackmun and certainly Ruth Bader Ginsburg deserve derision for their written opinions, not admiration
It was a decent and well constructed book, but because of inherent liberal dishonest, I wouldn't want anyone else to read it and wouldn't recommend it




