Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations
by
A. R. Luria
(Author),
Michael Cole
(Editor),
Martin Lopez-Morillas
(Translator),
Lynn Solotaroff
(Translator)
&
1
more
|
A. R. Luria
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0674137325
ISBN-10:
9780674137325
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Get everything you need
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Luria brings a rare genius to the task, managing, as he has in his past books, to find the germ of generality in the everyday particulars to which he brings his observational skills.”―Nature
From the Back Cover
In the early 1930s, Alexander Romanovich Luria set out with a group of fellow Russian psychologists for the steppes of central Asia. Their mission: to study the impact of the socialist revolution on an ancient Islamic cotton-growing culture and to establish guidelines for a viable Marxist psychology. The data collected among several remote groups of Uzbeks and Kirghiz supported the original hypothesis: the very structure of human cognitive processes differs according to the way in which social groups live out their various realities. For Luria, the legitimacy of treating human consciousness as a product of social history legitimized the Marxist dialectic of social development. The penetrating observations Luria drew from it, have cast new light on the workings of cognitive activity.
About the Author
A. R. Luria was Professor of Psychology at Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Michael Cole is Professor of Communication and Psychology and Director of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition at the University of California, San Diego.
Michael Cole is Professor of Communication and Psychology and Director of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition at the University of California, San Diego.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0674137329
- Publisher : Harvard University Press (January 1, 1976)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 175 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780674137325
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674137325
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.48 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#819,079 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #353 in Behaviorism Psychology
- #507 in Behavioral Psychology (Books)
- #5,308 in Medical General Psychology
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
4.9 out of 5
8 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2019
Verified Purchase
Out of print book needed for research.
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2016
Verified Purchase
Luria conducted some of the most insightful research ever done about the how the ways we use language influences our thinking. This is a great book.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Socio-Historical Psychology Integrating Macrohistory Into Psychological Processes
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2017
Bruce Lerro Author: Forging Promethean Psychology: From the Middle Ages To The End of the 19th century
Socio-historical psychology: putting the macro-social world into psychology
This is an extraordinary book not only for its time, but for right now. The Russian socio-historical school (including Luria) claim that changes in socio-historical institutions (such as the emergence of science, capitalism, absolutist states and media (printing press, newspapers, coined money)demand changes in occupational skills by individuals in order to do their job. These changes in job requirements then became internalized as psychological transformations first at work and then at home and in leisure activities.
As these institutional processes change over history, so do the psychological
processes. For example, the 17th century was a vital time in developing a scientific methodology for experiments. It was also a time when merchants needed to increase the speed with which goods were consumed and produced. In the case of capitalism, this resulted in the increasing use of coined money, paper money and promissory notes and bills of exchange. In learning to use these symbolic tokens, people had to reason differently. It can be argued that Piaget’s formal operation thinking either didn’t exist before the 17th century or it was only developed in a weak form.
At a micro-level, Vygotsky has been called the father of cooperative learning. Vygotsky and his colleagues believed that all higher psychological processes begin and end as social processes. They originate first in structured, meaningful, cooperative and recursive local interpersonal relations between people. Only later do these skills become internalized, private and independent functions, which individuals can carry out alone. Finally these skills are reapplied to the social world to larger contexts at a higher order of complexity.
Vygotsky’s work concentrated on how children learn over a very short period of time. However, it tells us little about how adults learn over the course of generations. But how about when a new economic system (capitalism) or technology (the printing press) revolutionized society as a whole? What happens to adults and their children when new systems emerge which require new occupations as well as upgrades of existing ones over many generations? Can this be traced? This is where Luria comes in.
In the former Soviet Union, Vygotsky, Luria and Leontiev set out to develop a new socialist psychology, separating itself from the rationalist and empiricist traditions in the West. These rationalist and empiricist traditions treated the psychology of the individual as separated from the social and historical context in which he was produced. In the late 1920’s Luria set out to demonstrate how the most basic psychological processes such as perception, the concept of self, how objects are categorized, and how people reasoned were changed by dramatic historical changes such as Russia’s transition to state socialism.
To do this Luria asked questions to three groups: peasants who still lived on farms relatively untouched by the revolution. These were compared to peasants who moved from the farms to factories in the cities as well as those going to schools in cities. What Luria found were very different answers given depending on whether people lived on farms or in cities and whether within the cities they went to school or worked in factories.
It is very sad to me that more historians have not taken Luria up and developed socio-historical psychologies for different historical periods. I’ve attempted to this in my own work.
Socio-historical psychology: putting the macro-social world into psychology
This is an extraordinary book not only for its time, but for right now. The Russian socio-historical school (including Luria) claim that changes in socio-historical institutions (such as the emergence of science, capitalism, absolutist states and media (printing press, newspapers, coined money)demand changes in occupational skills by individuals in order to do their job. These changes in job requirements then became internalized as psychological transformations first at work and then at home and in leisure activities.
As these institutional processes change over history, so do the psychological
processes. For example, the 17th century was a vital time in developing a scientific methodology for experiments. It was also a time when merchants needed to increase the speed with which goods were consumed and produced. In the case of capitalism, this resulted in the increasing use of coined money, paper money and promissory notes and bills of exchange. In learning to use these symbolic tokens, people had to reason differently. It can be argued that Piaget’s formal operation thinking either didn’t exist before the 17th century or it was only developed in a weak form.
At a micro-level, Vygotsky has been called the father of cooperative learning. Vygotsky and his colleagues believed that all higher psychological processes begin and end as social processes. They originate first in structured, meaningful, cooperative and recursive local interpersonal relations between people. Only later do these skills become internalized, private and independent functions, which individuals can carry out alone. Finally these skills are reapplied to the social world to larger contexts at a higher order of complexity.
Vygotsky’s work concentrated on how children learn over a very short period of time. However, it tells us little about how adults learn over the course of generations. But how about when a new economic system (capitalism) or technology (the printing press) revolutionized society as a whole? What happens to adults and their children when new systems emerge which require new occupations as well as upgrades of existing ones over many generations? Can this be traced? This is where Luria comes in.
In the former Soviet Union, Vygotsky, Luria and Leontiev set out to develop a new socialist psychology, separating itself from the rationalist and empiricist traditions in the West. These rationalist and empiricist traditions treated the psychology of the individual as separated from the social and historical context in which he was produced. In the late 1920’s Luria set out to demonstrate how the most basic psychological processes such as perception, the concept of self, how objects are categorized, and how people reasoned were changed by dramatic historical changes such as Russia’s transition to state socialism.
To do this Luria asked questions to three groups: peasants who still lived on farms relatively untouched by the revolution. These were compared to peasants who moved from the farms to factories in the cities as well as those going to schools in cities. What Luria found were very different answers given depending on whether people lived on farms or in cities and whether within the cities they went to school or worked in factories.
It is very sad to me that more historians have not taken Luria up and developed socio-historical psychologies for different historical periods. I’ve attempted to this in my own work.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 19, 2011
Alexander Luria's book Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations was published in 1976. Most of Luria's observational data was collected in the early 1930's during a time of radical restructuring in the Soviet Union. Alexander Luria was one of the founders of cultural-historical psychology. Luria wrote this book I believe to show the sociohistorical roots of all basic cognitive processes.
Luria believed that the structure of thought depends upon the structure of the dominant types of activity in different cultures. This book was written at a time when there was an opportunity to observe how all of the reforms happening during this time not only changed the broadening of outlook but also changes in the structure of cognitive process. Luria's work was at the time very ground breaking. His work was primarily focusing on cross-cultural psychology. The aim of the research in this book was to analyze the sociohistorical shaping of mental processes.
Luria focused primarily on cognitive processes like perception, deduction and inference, reasoning and problem solving, imagination, and self-analysis and self-awareness. Luria looked at the cultural development of undereducated minorities in a remote part of central Asia to collect his data. One of the main arguments of Luria in his book is that many mental processes are social and historical in origin. I thought that Luria did a very detailed job during the time period he was collecting data of creating a solid picture of the different types of cognitive processes humans go through of different cultural backgrounds. Each chapter in this book gives an account of the tools he used as a researcher to study his subjects. For each area of cognitive process, Luria would do tests with subjects he was studying. He first explains at the beginning of each chapter why it is important to do that particular cognitive process and explains the historical and cultural foundations of being able to perform a cognitive process. Luria then proceeds to demonstrate the cognitive process with his subjects and shows that data collected while working with them.
I believe this book is very relevant to our time due to the fact that we live in a nation of hundreds of different cultures coinciding. Our classrooms are made up of students of different cultural backgrounds and historical backgrounds. This work can provide further insight to how students of different cultures and the history of their cultures play into their human consciousness and the process in which they learn. This book has helped me as an educator better understand how my students learn and how their cultural background and history play a role in how my students learn. It is also relevant to how we teach students and differentiate the instruction to meet their needs.
Luria believed that the structure of thought depends upon the structure of the dominant types of activity in different cultures. This book was written at a time when there was an opportunity to observe how all of the reforms happening during this time not only changed the broadening of outlook but also changes in the structure of cognitive process. Luria's work was at the time very ground breaking. His work was primarily focusing on cross-cultural psychology. The aim of the research in this book was to analyze the sociohistorical shaping of mental processes.
Luria focused primarily on cognitive processes like perception, deduction and inference, reasoning and problem solving, imagination, and self-analysis and self-awareness. Luria looked at the cultural development of undereducated minorities in a remote part of central Asia to collect his data. One of the main arguments of Luria in his book is that many mental processes are social and historical in origin. I thought that Luria did a very detailed job during the time period he was collecting data of creating a solid picture of the different types of cognitive processes humans go through of different cultural backgrounds. Each chapter in this book gives an account of the tools he used as a researcher to study his subjects. For each area of cognitive process, Luria would do tests with subjects he was studying. He first explains at the beginning of each chapter why it is important to do that particular cognitive process and explains the historical and cultural foundations of being able to perform a cognitive process. Luria then proceeds to demonstrate the cognitive process with his subjects and shows that data collected while working with them.
I believe this book is very relevant to our time due to the fact that we live in a nation of hundreds of different cultures coinciding. Our classrooms are made up of students of different cultural backgrounds and historical backgrounds. This work can provide further insight to how students of different cultures and the history of their cultures play into their human consciousness and the process in which they learn. This book has helped me as an educator better understand how my students learn and how their cultural background and history play a role in how my students learn. It is also relevant to how we teach students and differentiate the instruction to meet their needs.
16 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1










