Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$29.04$29.04
FREE delivery: Friday, Dec 15 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: DojoBooks
Buy used: $13.94
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Confessions of a Sociopath: A Life Spent Hiding in Plain Sight Hardcover – May 14, 2013
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Spiral-bound
"Please retry" | $26.35 | — |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $46.95 | $7.79 |
Purchase options and add-ons
Confessions of a Sociopath takes readers on a journey into the mind of a sociopath, revealing what makes the tick and what that means for the rest of humanity. Written from the point of view of a diagnosed sociopath, it unveils these men and women who are “hiding in plain sight” for the very first time.
Confessions of a Sociopath is part confessional memoir, part primer for the wary. Drawn from Thomas’ own experiences; her popular blog, Sociopathworld.com; and current and historical scientific literature, it reveals just how different – and yet often very similar - sociopaths are from the rest of the world. The book confirms suspicions and debunks myths about sociopathy and is both the memoir of a high-functioning, law-abiding (well, mostly) sociopath and a roadmap – right from the source - for dealing with the sociopath in your life, be it a boss, sibling, parent, spouse, child, neighbor, colleague or friend.
As Thomas argues, while sociopaths aren't like everyone else, and it’s true some of them are incredibly dangerous, they are not inherently evil. In fact, they’re potentially more productive and useful to society than neurotypicals or “empaths,” as they fondly like to call “normal” people. Confessions of a Sociopath demystifyies sociopathic behavior and provide readers with greater insight on how to respond or react to protect themselves, live among sociopaths without becoming victims, and even beat sociopaths at their own game, through a bit of empathetic cunning and manipulation.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateMay 14, 2013
- Dimensions6 x 1 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100307956644
- ISBN-13978-0307956644
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Q&A with M. E. Thomas
Q. Were you always aware that you were different?
A. Yes, though when I was young, I thought maybe it was just because I was smarter than everyone else. I saw things that other children did not see, was aware of the adult world in a way that even my smart siblings were not—awkward interactions from the end of an affair, why my grandpa treated my dad differently from his other children (he was adopted), and so on. I knew other people did not see these things because I would reference them and get blank stares in return. I learned to keep things to myself, even to pretend I didn’t see them. Those were probably some of my first attempts to wear a mask of normalcy.
Q. What are the common characteristics/behaviors shared by most sociopaths? Do they describe you, too?
A. Lack of remorse or concern for hurting or stealing; being deceitful, manipulative, impulsive, irritable, aggressive, and consistently irresponsible; failure to conform to social norms; and being unconcerned about people’s safety, including their own. You need to have at least three of these to be a sociopath. I have them all, to varying degrees.
Q. You believe that sociopaths have a natural competitive advantage. Why?
A. Sociopaths have several skills that lend themselves to success in areas such as politics and business: charm, an ability to see and exploit weaknesses/flaws (which in politics is called “power-broking” and in business, “arbitrage”), confidence, unflagging optimism, an ability to think outside the box and come up with original ideas, and a lack of squeamishness about doing what it takes to get ahead.
Q. If you don’t have a sense of morality, or feel the emotions that most people do, how are you able to operate in the world without being detected?
A. I think everyone learns to lie about his or her emotions to a certain extent; I just take it a step farther. People ask, “How are you?” and you respond, “fine,” even though you had a fight with your spouse that morning, have a sick child, or any multitude of things that make it hard for you to feel fine about almost anything in your life. You could honestly answer the question, but you don’t because overt displays of strong emotion in ordinary social interactions are not accepted. Most of the time I don’t need to show any emotion at all, and I try to limit the times that I do by begging off attending funerals, weddings, etc. When I do show up to these functions, I try to mimic the other attendees. If I’m dealing with a person one-on-one, I just try to reflect their emotions; usually they’re distracted enough by their own overflowing emotions not to notice my lack of them.
Q. Research shows that one in twenty-five people is a sociopath, yet most of us believe we’ve never met one. Are we just kidding ourselves? Are you able to spot them?
A. Statistically, everyone has met at least one sociopath; in fact, most people will have a close encounter with a sociopath at some point in their lives, either as a friend, family member, or lover. Sometimes I can tell who they are. I find that many successful sociopaths will leave deliberate clues as to what they are, the thought being that only other sociopaths would recognize them. I think sociopaths, like serial killers, often have a yearning to be acknowledged for who they are. They want people to admire their exploits, and that is hard to get when they are completely hidden, so they make small compromises.
From Booklist
Review
"[A] gripping and important book…revelatory…quite the memorable roller coaster ride.”—New York Times Book Review
"[F]ascinating...part memoir, part psychological treatise, and entirely not to be trusted."—Boston Globe
"The goal of Confessions is to redefine sociopathy—or at least to shake off the stigma associated with it. And Thomas accomplishes both. Through her honest portrayal of herself as a highly capable yet deeply flawed individual, she demystifies her disorder."—Scientific American
“[F]ascinating stuff, and Thomas delivers…riveting…chilling….Her incisive observations about human nature can be breathtakingly pointed.”—Cleveland Plain Dealer
"An essential, unprecedented memoir…intelligent, measured…[H]er arguments against using the diagnosis as an indicator of evil or a pre-emptive reason to imprison are a slam-dunk. This is a critical addition to narratives of mental illness, deepened by the awareness that we're reading someone whose most intense motivation is ‘acquisition, retention, and exploitation of power’.”—Publishers Weekly, starred review
"Fascinating and compelling as well as chilling, Thomas’ memoir offers a window into the mind of a portion of the population that usually remains shrouded in mystery and fear."—Booklist, starred review
"[Thomas] invites us into her courtroom, classroom and bedroom to witness how her behavior has stunted her work life and made her love life difficult....Much here is chilling, but there are also cracks that make you ache for her....A work of advocacy for greater awareness of sociopathy’s reach and conduct."—Kirkus Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Crown; 1st edition (May 14, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0307956644
- ISBN-13 : 978-0307956644
- Item Weight : 15 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #820,261 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,637 in Popular Psychology Personality Study
- #1,742 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- #24,124 in Memoirs (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This author epitomizes the child abuse victim’s narrative. Her father was violent and abusive to her and his other children, and her mother was a self-absorbed, dysfunctional enabler, and both of them sometimes provided adequately for their children and sometimes did not. She describes in the book a few violent episodes and painful dysfunction, such as her father beating her and how he left punching marks on the doors and walls of the house, and yet says point blank that she was never abused. This author swears to the tune of so much repitition it appears she is trying to convince herself more than others of the following two things: 1) that her parents were amazing, did a wonderful job, and loved their children truly, and 2) that she herself was born defective, a sociopath, not normal. This is the stereotypical, worldwide and extremely common child abuse victim’s narrative: idolize the abusers, blame yourself. The child abuse victim will blame herself and happily create a story that she was herself to blame for the mistreatment, claiming to herself and to others that she was “born bad” or “born wrong” – all to protect her image of her parents as wonderful and loving. All children in abusive homes do this, and many carry the story throughout their adulthoods too. They must do this to enable bonding with their abusers at their young age, and as a result of needing to bond with their abusers, they develop a certain set of skills – particularly, they develop a lack of empathy, an inability to connect with others, and manipulation, having to effectively shut down parts of their humanity to tolerate the abuse and to form trauma bonds to their attackers despite it.
Yet this author is clearly entirely unaware of how she has herself mentally bought the age-old and tired child abuse story. She is oblivious to how common and normal her self-story is; indeed, I fully believe that she fully believes her own story – a story built throughout her life and strengthened, first to protect her image of her parents in her child’s mind, and then to avoid dealing with her painful past in her adult mind.
Critical reviewers here have rightfully doubted that this adult victim of child mistreatment is truly a sociopath, hypothesizing instead that she is narcissistic. This is also what I perceived as well. Narcissistic Personality Disordered (NPD) people are hungry for attention, low in empathy, manipulative and malicious, and enjoy feelings of immense superiority to others. Naturally, with so many people being diagnosed with NPD (a disorder known to often result from child abuse/neglect as a coping mechanism) a diagnosis or a self-concept of NPD no longer offers one the special attention or feelings of superiority any longer. So it makes sense that this woman has labeled herself a sociopath – and then sought out a professional with the explicit goal to be diagnosed as a sociopath after having spent years studying up on the disorder herself first – to provide herself with a stronger self-story that would reinforce the child abuse victim’s narrative of “I was born defective, like this, and my parents are loving and wonderful to have so carefully raised little defective me.”
Indeed, this story insulates her from having to face the harsher reality that is much more likely and far less rare than being born a sociopath: that her family’s abuse, violence, and dysfunction directly caused her to develop narcissistic traits in order to first cope with the abuse, and then to avoid dealing with the painful aftermath. Even brain scans have shown that child abuse produces many of the same neurological effects one sees in a psychopath’s brain, whether or not those abused do show psychopathic traits/acquire a diagnosis of the disorder. For this reason, brain scans do not at all answer the question of the chicken or the egg.
But this author does not – and will not – realize any of this. Because to realize this would defeat the purpose of her self-story in the first place.
Some people judged this book as boring. I think they took the words of a traumatized and admittedly mentally disordered person in obvious denial (“my father beat me" and "I was never abused") at face value, and failed to exercise any of their own analytical or critical thinking skills in the process of reading. I found this book fascinating. It is thought-provoking in many ways.
Many of the critical reviewers on this page intuitively saw that this woman was deceiving herself, but I think they misguessed at the motives and reasons for her own mental gymnastics and cognitive dissonance. The author prides herself on her self-proclaimed talents for manipulating others, but this author is most adept and skilled at self-manipulation.
Fascinating read. The only reason I gave it four stars instead of five, is because this woman intends to procreate child victims for herself. She idolizes her abusive and dysfunctional parents and the way they “raised” her. Conveniently, she has self-diagnosed and decieved a professional into diagnosing her with an untreatable problem; now she is off the hook for being accountable to deal with her symptoms, just as any Narcissistic Personality Disordered person would most prefer in her life. It is her future child victims for whom I have sympathy.
It seems, to me anyway, that Thomas's parents are the real sociopaths. And, in all honesty, a book about them would seem more interesting. Sociopathy is a spectrum. I believe M.E. Thomas here could be on that spectrum. But I'd conclude she's much more of a narcissist.
There's slight insight and ramblings into the inner workings of a "sociopath's" mind (citied by more insightful people) but the book...as a whole...mostly serves as a way Thomas could sell you how smart, successful, and cunning she is. I rolled my eyes when it only took her the first chapter to blatantly write that she's "smarter than me."
She's more successful. She's attractive. Funny, quick witted, creative, strong. She's the best at sex. The best at most things really. She also claims to have done some really interesting juicy sociopathic things...but can't divulge of them in the book of course. How convenient.
I believe her parents really did a number on her. The insight into her upbringing are disturbing, yet she writes about them lackadaisically and even excuses her parents abuse...clearly manipulating herself more than any victim she claims to have had.
Every story's moral is Thomas proving she's "SO smart!", "SO strong and sexy!" , "SO calm, cool!". Stating she's this ultra predator on another level. Its cringey to read her even gush about how she touches her "fanged" tooth with her tongue when she's ready to "manipulate".
She has heavy emotional trauma stemmed from childhood (due to being raised by ACTUAL sociopaths) which created an unempathetic narcissist that'll probably die alone and childless. And that's a shame. The point of this book is for M.E. Thomas to excuse her parent's terrible parenting and convince YOU, the reader, that she's this fascinating person.
If you're into a broken narcissist writing about how special they are for 300 pages...than proceed to read this book I guess.
Top reviews from other countries
I was delighted to read an honest appraisal of life from the edges of society, a journey of introspection that an intelligent, rational but abnormal person has made. It has taught me a lot about the drivers of behaviour, and although the title is perhaps devised to make you think it’s going to be more exciting than it is, it is in fact true. ME literally confesses all that makes her different, and bares her innermost working and base desires. Shame on the reader for wanting to read more about anguish and terror, I say!
If you want salacious, maybe pick another book. If you want to really understand the spectrum of anti social personality (rather than have your biases confirmed), this is great.
I think you’ll find, as I did, that a spectrum exists in sociopathy depending on the age, experiences and level of self-reflection of the individual. The undesirable traits are still human traits, just as my Asperger’s traits are still human. I have found myself gobsmacked at the gross hypocrisy of the moral majority (who bend the rules to suit their proclivities), and I think the moral majority will find it confronting. It’s meant to be.
ME cautions against the base desire to segregate, punish and extinguish sociopaths - as other out-groups have been treated in the past. A very good point. Understanding and early intervention is going to be the key to helping those with ASPD make their way in the world with as little harm as possible. This book shows that it is possible to have a productive life.
After watching her on Dr Phil - one of the very rare interviews she did- she seemed to be trying to hide her unease with his questions under a bit of a façade, as if trying to convince him and herself that she is truly a sociopath.
From the book she describes sociopaths as cold-hearted, but then in the last chapters she makes an effort to explain that the love (she is strangely able to feel), is one of the few things that kept her from being worse than she could have been justifying her ability to love as that sociopaths just love differently. I have come across sociopaths before and though this is still a subject that requires a lot of development and research, sociopaths do not love, really. If she is, then I would say she might be part of the lighter shade of sociopathy, which her very surprised close friend commenting on Dr Phil about not knowing this side of the author at all, convinced me of.
The book is really easy to read, it's well written and the author has done a lot of research on the sociopath subject.
It sort of glorifies sociopathy, the author does mention some bad things she had to face due to her alleged sociopathy maybe she really has done worse and she doesn't mention them for legal reasons... but it really felt more narcissistic description of herself than sociopathic. I would say she was emotionally damaged at childhood and convinced herself it was better not to feel anything and grow self-centred and selfish... Since I don't know the author, can't really confirm my suspicion.
Overall some of the traits she describes exist in many non-sociopathic people, as people can be selfish, self-centred, manipulative, not feel sorry for killing a hamster like creature, have a certain degree of dishonesty, be rational and still have some degree of empathy, or feeling (love).
It's still worth a read for those interested in this subject, even to just figure out/debate whether this author really is as sociopathic as she claims.
__________________
At the moment of writing this review I hadn't yet finished the book- so after I finished I got to say that I was annoyed with lots of fallacies she wrote, as in associations of the sort -so and so said that geniuses are misunderstood people, sociopaths are misunderstood, therefore all sociopaths are misunderstood genius... - What???!! That really put me off. I understand she can be manipulative, but that made me question her intelligence which at least until those parts I really thought she had.
“ “How Do You Raise a Prodigy?” Andrew Solomon speaks of a prodigy as” a monster that violates the natural order” (…)”
“Perhaps if we treat sociopathic children more like prodigies and less like monsters, they might direct their unique talents (…)”
And there are plenty more examples like that. She picks lines of researchers and studies that say something she wants to attribute to sociopaths and have no relationship whatsoever and then simply puts them together surreptitiously as if they were intrinsically linked!! That made no sense to me, which really is a shame since I actually liked the book and it would have been good to be able to take her somewhat seriously, instead of suspecting she might be a bit delusional, self- aggrandisement apart.
The other thing was that in the last chapter she seems to try to stimulate empathy from the readers, for the sociopaths as "we are not as bad as the world makes us, so be nice to us" type of speech. I always thought sociopaths didn't/don't care for/require empathy of any sort. And I'm yet to meet sociopaths who don't take pleasure in being destructive to others around, to make me feel any empathy for them regardless of any factuality in them being the “spawn of the devil” which I doubt they are - unless they are a fiction character which she also talks about.
It's almost like a rattlesnake asking to be treated nicely for not being able to be nothing but poisonous and bite anyone that comes closer. Difference is rattlesnakes don't have free will.
A harmless sociopath? - perhaps that's what they call “high functioning”, but never met one except in fiction which was a bit my posture with reading this book.
Still doubt she is what she claims, she sounds more a narcissist than sociopath, but enjoyed reading it for the most part.
There are so many contradictions in this book, that I would be surprised if the author is really the master manipulator she claims to be - she can't keep her story straight. She says early on in the book that she was not horribly abused as a child, but then later goes on to describe situations in which her father emotionally abused and psychologically manipulated her and her siblings. He also physically abused her by lashing her with a belt on her back so hard that it left welts. Just another battle for power, according to her.
Another discrepancy that I noted, was that she says that not all sociopaths/psychopaths are criminals, and she belongs to this category. Later in the book, she tells us that while she would like to describe to us the way she has 'ruined' people, she can't due to possible legal backlash it could create.
For the most part though, I did find the book vaguely interesting. I was not offended by her point of view, (as some readers obviously were according to the reviews I've read) although her grandiosity and extreme arrogance did get a little tiresome. Do we really need to know how amazing you think your rack is, and how everyone everywhere is so obviously attracted to you?
An inflated sense of self worth, tales of immoral and heinous treatment of others, and poor justifications for such behaviour should be expected when reading this woman's book. She is, after all (supposedly), a sociopath.
I did find it amusing when she talked about how 'empaths' are governed and controlled by their emotions, while she is free to do anything. She, however, is controlled by the insatiable desire to gain power over others, so while she may think that she's free, she isn't. She will never be content with what she has. She will always want more power, more control, more admirers, more people to manipulate.
I neither loved nor hated this book. It was ok, and I wouldn't read it again.








