Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Conflict in the Quorum: Orson Pratt, Brigham Young, Joseph Smith Hardcover – December 15, 2002
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
The conflicts between Apostle Orson Pratt, Joseph Smith, and Brigham Young revolve around the key concepts of apostolic authority, theological harmony, and the role of continuing revelation within the governing body of the LDS church. The Pratt-Smith conflict emerges with the introduction of plural marriage and an alleged illicit affair of Pratt's wife Sarah in 1842. Bergera argues effectively that the 1842 allegation was a response to Sarah's rejection of Joseph Smith's advances. Pratt, his world shattered over the incident, voluntarily withdrew from the church for a time. This led to the misconception that he had been excommunicated. The alleged excommunication would provide Brigham Young with the legitimization needed to realign the governing body in 1875. The first major Pratt-Young conflict began in 1847 with the reorganization of the First Presidency. Pratt contended it was the right of the apostles to lead the church and not a separate quorum or individual. The debates continued for the next two decades over doctrinal issues. Bergera argues effectively that the heart of the conflict lay in Pratt's intellectual reservations over Young's consolidation of power and Young's theological teachings. It was Pratt's striving for a consistent, harmonizing, literal hermeneutic rather than blind acceptance of charismatic authority that led to the difficulties. Bergera's work provides a valuable tool for researchers by including transcripts of previously unpublished apostolic council minutes surrounding the Pratt-Young conflicts. Bergera has made a welcome and significant contribution to the field of Mormon studies. --Kurt Widmer, Religious Studies Review
From the Inside Flap
Pratts response was that he was "not a man to make a confession of what I do not believe. I am not going to crawl to Brigham Young and act the hypocrite. I will be a free man," he insisted. "It may cost me my fellowship, but I will stick to it. If I die tonight, I would say, O Lord God Almighty, I believe what I say."
"You have been a mad stubborn mule," Young replied. "[You] have taken a false position ... It is false as hell and you will not hear the last of it soon."
It was not infrequently that these two strong-willed, deeply religious men argued. Part of the difficulty was that they did so from opposing perspectives--Pratts a rational and independent-minded stance and Youngs a more intuitive and authoritarian position. "We have hitherto acted too much as machines ... as to following the Spirit," Pratt explained in a quorum meeting in 1847. "I will confess to my own shame [that] I have decided contrary to my own [judgment] many times. ... I mean hereafter not to demean myself as to let my feelings run contrary to my own judgment." He issued a warning to the other apostles: "When [President Young] says that the Spirit of the Lord says thus and so, I dont consider [that] ... all we should do is to say let it be so."
For his part, Young quipped that Pratt exhibited the same "ignorance ... as any philosopher," telling him "it would be a great blessing to him to lay aside his books." When Pratt appealed to logic, Young would say, "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."
Ironically, Pratt would have the last word both because Young preceded him in death and because several of Youngs teachings and policies had proven unpopular among the other apostles. One of Youngs counselors said shortly after the
Top Customer Reviews
He wrote in the Preface to this 2002 book, "This is a study in interpersonal conflict and group dynamics. It is a story that illustrates issues of freedom and obedience and the fragile fabric they share... An examination of the controversies arising between nineteenth-century LDS leaders Orson Pratt and Joseph Smith, and later between Pratt and Brigham Young, illustrates the degree to which such disharmony can affect church doctrine, policy, and organization."
Here are some additional quotations from the book:
"(Orson) Pratt was not alone in expressing reservations about forming a First Presidency. Still, a pattern emerged that would be repeated. Pratt would continue to feel the need, or the responsibility, to question (Brigham) Young, who for his part would respond in kind to Pratt." (Pg. 82)
"For the remaining thirty-three years of his life, Pratt would devote himself wholly to the church...Read more ›
The reason I'm only giving this book 2 stars is because I feel I was mislead. In the preface Gary James Bergera claims to primarily use official documentation and maintain an unbiased attitude towards the material he had to work with. This is certainly not the case. It is painfully obvious any evidence demeaning to the prophet is considered "reasonable", even when that evidence could easily go both ways. I also was not impressed by the books he chose as his sources; Bergera selected authors who specifically regarded Joseph as a false prophet and liar, rather than a well rounded selection of sources as the preface claims.
So in short: this book is not for LDS members by any means. Its intent is to discredit the LDS church and its leaders authenticity rather than give an insightful look into early LDS history. One quick look at the other books bought by those who have also purchased Conflict in the Quorum will affirm this. I'm writing this review primarily to warn others so they don't make the same mistake I have.
EDIT (2/2/2014): Wow, it sure is funny to come back and see how much I've changed since writing this review. It's been quite some time, years, but in that time I've been studying church history every night like it was a second job. I don't even know where to begin trying to explain how wrong I was in trusting the word of Joesph Smith. These authors I called out for regarding Joesph as a false prophet and lair: they were right on the money.Read more ›
The story starts with Joseph Smith and Orson Pratt. When Orson's own wife Sarah tells him that Joseph - the living prophet of God - approached her to be a plural wife to him, he is faced with an unbridgeable conflict between his faith and his wife. Orson seems to go temporarily insane. He then seems to resolve the crisis by denying Sarah and clinging to Joseph with a fanaticism that defies understanding. Orson eventually became one of the most strident advocates of polygamy among the Mormons. To keep his faith, he loses Sarah and the family he started with her. His grandson becomes a leading federal lawman persecuting the polygamists of Utah.
But this is just where the story starts to get interesting.
After Joseph is murdered and Brigham Young leads the Mormons to Utah, both Brigham and Orson hold true to their separate personal experiences of Joseph Smith. And they're not the same. Both are determined to convince the world ... or at least the Mormon people ... that their own vision of the doctrine is true. The problem for Orson is that Brigham is the mouthpiece of God and Orson is not.
It would have been easy for Brigham is simply get rid of Orson. At about the same time, another member of Mormonism's ruling council, Amasa Lyman, was summarily drummed out for holding views contrary to established doctrine. Orson had originally baptized Amasa Lyman in the very early days of the Church. But that wasn't Brigham's choice.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
A very detailed book with many many references. It is not a light read. I enjoyed it because of its historical detail and that it clearly explained the theological differences... Read morePublished 7 months ago by Phil Stover
A clear and precise view of the imprecise practice of receiving revelation. If only we could practice so much faith while maintaining our own identity like they did before perhaps... Read morePublished 13 months ago by Quinn
Having read this and others of Bergera's books I'll say this: it's excellent scholarship. This book, as with other titles published by Signature Books, does not aim to redefine... Read morePublished on February 15, 2014 by Schquirrel
I read this book with particular interest as I am a descendant of Orson Pratt and have long heard the stories about Orson's conflicts with Joseph Smith and Brigham Young. Read morePublished on November 7, 2009 by Kenny Kemp
This book addresses a small aspect of mormon history, but significant nonetheless. It helps readers realize the human side to being a prophet. Read morePublished on May 19, 2007 by Dallske