Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Connoisseur's Guide to the Mind: How We Think, How We Learn, and What It Means to Be Intelligent Hardcover – January 1, 1991
by
Roger C. Schank
(Author)
Explains what the human mind does when we read a menu, select a wine, sample a dish, argue with a waiter, or recall a favorite meal, and discusses what it means to be intelligent
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSummit Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1991
- Dimensions1 x 5.8 x 8.6 inches
- ISBN-100671678558
- ISBN-13978-0671678555
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Popular titles by this author
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
As artificial intelligence authority Schank tries crab sushi in Tokyo, sips champagne in France and samples the cuisines of Denver, Barcelona, Atlanta and Korea, he uses his culinary experiences to explain short- and long-term memory, the mind's tendency to fill in blanks, how people rely on stereotypes, and such mental processes as inference, expectation, learning and generalization. In an ingenious, gourmandizing romp of a book, Schank, director of Northwestern University's Institute for Learning Sciences, takes hungry minds deep inside the mind's workings. Along the way he offers amusing commentary on the Michelin restaurant guide, Japanese food and "wildly overpriced" wines in fancy U.S. restaurants. Readers meet CHEF, a computer program that creates recipes; FRUMP, a program that reads and summarizes newspaper stories; and JUDGE, a program that metes out judicial sentences for crimes.
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
A connoisseur of food and wine, Schank is also director of Northwestern University's Institute for Learning Sciences and author of Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory ( LJ 12/90). The pursuit of his gustatory pastime serves as a paradigm to illustrate a very credible theory of how the mind works, how we understand, remember, and think. This intriguing model of the thought process involves such elements as prediction, expectation failure, case-based reasoning, and wondering. Readers who can overlook a tendency to ramble and a certain amount of arrogance on the part of the author will be rewarded with a lucid and fascinating theory of intelligence. Schank's highly unusual yet effective approach should encourage thought, lively discussion, and perhaps the sampling of a few bottles of old Bordeaux.
- Laurie Bartolini, Lincoln Lib., Springfield, Ill.
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.
- Laurie Bartolini, Lincoln Lib., Springfield, Ill.
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Kirkus Reviews
Another helping of wit and wisdom from the ever-entertaining author of Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory (1990), etc. Here, Schank, director of the Institute for the Learning Science at Northwestern Univ., uses tales of gourmet dinners he has known to evoke the workings of human memory, the underpinnings of the learning process, and the meaning of true intelligence. ``I love to eat and I love to think,'' claims the author, and since he also enjoys combining unpaid pleasures (eating well) with paid ones (writing books about thinking), his lively discussion of the learning process is filtered through tales of his recent sabbatical in Paris, during which he attempted to experience the best of French cuisine and refine his knowledge of good wines. Such a gustatory adventure provides many excellent examples of the processes by which humans gain knowledge: stereotyping, prioritizing, and ``default filling'' (used, for example, to store ``scripts'' for ordering food at a Burger King and at a three-star French restaurant) free up the brain for more efficient thinking; stymied expectations (here, regarding an old Bordeaux that proves nearly undrinkable) lead to learning; firsthand experience (particularly where good food is involved) leads to learning far more efficiently than the rote transferral of facts. A teacher's role, then, Schank concludes, is not to stuff students with already digested facts, but to arrange for them to experience knowledge firsthand, and motivate them to refine that knowledge on their own. In this, Schank himself rates three stars. A tasty and substantial intellectual treat. -- Copyright ©1991, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.
Product details
- Publisher : Summit Books; First Edition (January 1, 1991)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0671678558
- ISBN-13 : 978-0671678555
- Item Weight : 2.15 pounds
- Dimensions : 1 x 5.8 x 8.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,982,546 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #8,192 in Cognitive Psychology (Books)
- #19,019 in Medical General Psychology
- #91,418 in Psychology & Counseling
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
3.8 out of 5 stars
3.8 out of 5
We don’t use a simple average to calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star. Our system gives more weight to certain factors—including how recent the review is and if the reviewer bought it on Amazon. Learn more
3 global ratings
Zero tolerance for fake reviews
Our goal is to make sure every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2023
This book has a lot of very interesting and useful information about how people learn and how memories are created and stored. The author explains how one learns when expectations are thwarted and the mind then needs to adjust to those expectations via learning. According to the author, our learning occurs in the context of scripts that we develop over time, so for example we have a "restaurant" script, which gives us a workflow of what is supposed to ha[pen at every step of the experience. When that script is violated in some way, then we have to regroup mentally and revise the script. We have now achieved learning. But script disruption only occurs via experiences, which means that to learn you must leave your comfort zone, experience new things and take risks. The problem with the book is that it contains way too many details from the author's experiences, particularly his dining and wine experiences, and turns the book at times into a tedious exercise. For example, multiple pages cataloguing his friends' memories of his birthday party to show how memories vary among people was way too much. Another area is where he share Artificial Intelligence computer instructions to again give an example of a concept. These too tend to be too lengthy and are incredibly boring. The book is still worth reading because of the invaluable information on how we learn. Just skip or skim through the unnecessary details.
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2010
One time when I mentioned to a fellow homeschooling mom that I had enjoyed Roger Schank's
Coloring Outside the Lines
, she recommended this book. I finally got around to reading it, and I have to say that it was a disappointment. The premise sounded intriguing as I both love to cook and am interested in cognitive psychology. But while I really enjoyed certain chapters, I found the author's food & wine snobbery very tedious. He went on and on ad nauseum about how much of a gourmand he is, to the point where he insists on ordering for his dining companions because of his allegedly superior knowledge. I kept having the urge to smack him and tell him to get over himself. I got to the point after 4 chapters of this where I couldn't stomach wading through any more conceited anecdotes that I started skimming (something I hardly ever do) until I got to the final chapter, which I enjoyed.
Skip this one unless you have a high tolerance for hearing how great the author thinks he is.
Skip this one unless you have a high tolerance for hearing how great the author thinks he is.
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2007
In the Connoisseur's Guide to the Mind, Roger Shank uses his love of great food to teach us about how human beings learn and think, primarily through the process of remembering and indexing. I think the best way to learn what a non-fiction book is about is through a series of quotes taken from the book.
If everything happens the way you expected it to happen, you may well be happy, but you won't learn a thing. To learn we need expectation failure. Further, we need expectation failure we can cope with. The failures have to be small rather than large. (p.153)
All important knowledge is in the form of expectations. (p.50)
Expectations come from prior generalizations. (p.155)
"We must evaluate our experiences in terms of what we can learn from them in order to learn from them. Remembering everything actually prevents you from concentrating on what can be learned...
We have a major problem, therefore, when we begin to learn something new. We must alter our knowledge base by adding what we are now processing to what we already know. But where exactly do we add the new information? Where does a new episode belong?
This question is not frivolous, although it is not one that any of us is prepared to answer consciously. To give you a sense of the problem imagine that I have been presented with a long-forgotten Minnesota establishment as a remembrance of the evening, and that, it so happened, I have a copy of the menu of every meal that I have ever eaten. Imagine that I live in a house full of menus. Where should I put the Minnesota menu?
I could choose to file all my menus by date. In that case, the filing would be easy, but the retrieval would be difficult. I would never be able to find this meal unless I knew the date, but I might want to remember a meal by some other more significant aspect associated with it. The food, for example. Suppose that I meet Jean-Francois, and he happens to mention the dessert we ate at Jamin. I immediately rush home to my file of menus to find the one from the particular night at Jamin to which he is referring. But where do I look? If I have filed all the menus by their dates, I will need to recall the date of the meal in question to retrieve the right menu. Well, it was in March of last year; perhaps I can find it this way. But, then he mentions that he thought that the dessert at Zur Trabe was better. Oh my, when was that? A couple of years ago, but I don't even know what time of year. It was on a business trip, and that could have taken place at anytime. I remember the weather was cool, but that just means it wasn't the dead of winter or the middle of summer. No this cannot be a good filing system, but what would be a better one be?
How about if I put all the menus from great meals in one cabinet, filed alphabetically by restaurant name? And how about if I put all the pretty good meals in another cabinet, but this time filed by location? This way, if someone asked me the name of a great restaurant in Florida, I could look it up in the great meal file - otherwise I look for it in the Florida file. But if these files were very big, I'd still have trouble finding anything. Having copies of menus would be better so that I could put the one from Bern's Steak House in the Florida file and in the great wine list file, while hedging on whether it belonged in the great meal file.
The problem here is that this model isn't of much use. We cannot be filing memories by date or by alphabet or by the greatness of the dessert. Particular episodes have to be torn apart and labeled in many different ways. One particular dessert at Jamin is wonderful, and I have had it three times. I remember each meal because they were all special. I remember who was there and what we ate. And, if you mention the names of certain people whom I ate with there and nowhere else, or you mention great restaurants or you mention the best lamb you ever ate, these items will cause Jamin to come to mind, too. Episodes in memory are not menus looking for filing cabinets. We remember something in many different ways by ripping an episode to shreds, putting it in a Xerox machine, and distributing the many copies of the many pieces to many different filing cabinets. (pages 74 & 75)
Language is telegraphic. People say as little as possible, as if they are sending a telegram and paying by the word. Your job as an understander is to figure out what else they would tell you if they had the time and the inclination. (p.59)
The critical thing here is background knowledge. The more you know about a situation, the more you can assume about events that occur within that situation. Scripts represent the default background knowledge that we have without ever having experienced something directly. (p.89)
Learning occurs when we cannot fill a slot with what has usually filled that slot, or when we cannot even determined what slots need to be filled, or when we cannot determined what mental structure should be available to provide slots to fill. (p.52)
Every time we are reminded of some experience by some other experience, the value is in the potential for learning. We cannot remember every experience that happens to us. Instead we remember the exceptions, the oddities, the events that did not conform to our expectations. (p.126)
If everything happens the way you expected it to happen, you may well be happy, but you won't learn a thing. To learn we need expectation failure. Further, we need expectation failure we can cope with. The failures have to be small rather than large. (p.153)
All important knowledge is in the form of expectations. (p.50)
Expectations come from prior generalizations. (p.155)
"We must evaluate our experiences in terms of what we can learn from them in order to learn from them. Remembering everything actually prevents you from concentrating on what can be learned...
We have a major problem, therefore, when we begin to learn something new. We must alter our knowledge base by adding what we are now processing to what we already know. But where exactly do we add the new information? Where does a new episode belong?
This question is not frivolous, although it is not one that any of us is prepared to answer consciously. To give you a sense of the problem imagine that I have been presented with a long-forgotten Minnesota establishment as a remembrance of the evening, and that, it so happened, I have a copy of the menu of every meal that I have ever eaten. Imagine that I live in a house full of menus. Where should I put the Minnesota menu?
I could choose to file all my menus by date. In that case, the filing would be easy, but the retrieval would be difficult. I would never be able to find this meal unless I knew the date, but I might want to remember a meal by some other more significant aspect associated with it. The food, for example. Suppose that I meet Jean-Francois, and he happens to mention the dessert we ate at Jamin. I immediately rush home to my file of menus to find the one from the particular night at Jamin to which he is referring. But where do I look? If I have filed all the menus by their dates, I will need to recall the date of the meal in question to retrieve the right menu. Well, it was in March of last year; perhaps I can find it this way. But, then he mentions that he thought that the dessert at Zur Trabe was better. Oh my, when was that? A couple of years ago, but I don't even know what time of year. It was on a business trip, and that could have taken place at anytime. I remember the weather was cool, but that just means it wasn't the dead of winter or the middle of summer. No this cannot be a good filing system, but what would be a better one be?
How about if I put all the menus from great meals in one cabinet, filed alphabetically by restaurant name? And how about if I put all the pretty good meals in another cabinet, but this time filed by location? This way, if someone asked me the name of a great restaurant in Florida, I could look it up in the great meal file - otherwise I look for it in the Florida file. But if these files were very big, I'd still have trouble finding anything. Having copies of menus would be better so that I could put the one from Bern's Steak House in the Florida file and in the great wine list file, while hedging on whether it belonged in the great meal file.
The problem here is that this model isn't of much use. We cannot be filing memories by date or by alphabet or by the greatness of the dessert. Particular episodes have to be torn apart and labeled in many different ways. One particular dessert at Jamin is wonderful, and I have had it three times. I remember each meal because they were all special. I remember who was there and what we ate. And, if you mention the names of certain people whom I ate with there and nowhere else, or you mention great restaurants or you mention the best lamb you ever ate, these items will cause Jamin to come to mind, too. Episodes in memory are not menus looking for filing cabinets. We remember something in many different ways by ripping an episode to shreds, putting it in a Xerox machine, and distributing the many copies of the many pieces to many different filing cabinets. (pages 74 & 75)
Language is telegraphic. People say as little as possible, as if they are sending a telegram and paying by the word. Your job as an understander is to figure out what else they would tell you if they had the time and the inclination. (p.59)
The critical thing here is background knowledge. The more you know about a situation, the more you can assume about events that occur within that situation. Scripts represent the default background knowledge that we have without ever having experienced something directly. (p.89)
Learning occurs when we cannot fill a slot with what has usually filled that slot, or when we cannot even determined what slots need to be filled, or when we cannot determined what mental structure should be available to provide slots to fill. (p.52)
Every time we are reminded of some experience by some other experience, the value is in the potential for learning. We cannot remember every experience that happens to us. Instead we remember the exceptions, the oddities, the events that did not conform to our expectations. (p.126)





