Buy new:
$14.00$14.00
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 4 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Midatlantic Synergy
Buy used: $7.54
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.82 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Conservatives Without Conscience Paperback – August 28, 2007
| John W. Dean (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $4.50 | $3.00 |
Enhance your purchase
In Conservatives Without Conscience, John Dean places the conservative movement's inner circle of leaders in the Republican Party under scrutiny. Dean finds their policies and mind- set to be fundamentally authoritarian, and as such, a danger to democracy. By examining the legacies of such old-line conservatives as J. Edgar Hoover, Spiro Agnew, and Phyllis Schlafly and of such current figures as Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, and leaders of the Religious Right, Dean presents an alarming record of abuses of power. His trenchant analysis of how conservatism has lost its bearings serves as a chilling warning and a stirring inspiration to safeguard constitutional principles.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Books
- Publication dateAugust 28, 2007
- Dimensions5.6 x 0.66 x 8.4 inches
- ISBN-100143038869
- ISBN-13978-0143038863
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
-Booklist, starred review
"A fierce indictment of Republican politicians ... the sheer outrage in Dean's book has power of its own."
-Chicago Tribune
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Books; Reprint edition (August 28, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0143038869
- ISBN-13 : 978-0143038863
- Item Weight : 10.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.6 x 0.66 x 8.4 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #678,080 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #362 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,338 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- #2,750 in U.S. Political Science
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

John Dean served as Counsel to the President of the United States from July 1970 to April 1973. Before becoming White House counsel at age thirty-one, he was the chief minority counsel to the Judiciary Committee of the US House of Representatives, and an associate deputy attorney general at the US Department of Justice. His undergraduate studies were at Colgate University and the College of Wooster, with majors in English Literature and Political Science; then a graduate fellowship at American University to study government and the presidency before entering Georgetown University Law Center, where he received his JD with honors in 1965.
John recounted his days at the Nixon White House and Watergate in three books: Blind Ambition (Open Road 2016), Lost Honor (1982) and The Nixon Defense (2014). After retiring from a business career as a private investment banker doing middle-market mergers and acquisitions, he returned to full-time writing and lecturing, including as a columnist for FindLaw's Writ (from 2000 to 2010) and Justia’s Verdict (since 2010). Donald Trump’s election and presidency resulted in John’s 12th book by return to American authoritarianism, which he examined earlier New York Times best-sellers Conservatives Without Conscience (2006), because authoritarianism is on the ballot in 2020. Thus his study with Bob Altemeyer, Authoritarian Nightmare: Trump and His Followers.
John held the Barry Goldwater Chair of American Institutions at Arizona State University (academic years 2015-16), and for the past decade and a half he has been a visiting scholar and lecturer at the University of Southern California's Annenberg School of Communications. John is a CNN News contributor and analyst, and teaches continuing legal education (CLE) programs examining the impact of the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct on select historic events from Watergate and the Trump presidency with surprising results – see www.WatergateCLE.com
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Take the authoritarian quiz to see if you or any of your friends are authoritarian leaders or followers:
• Here are traits typically found in social dominators and right-wing authoritarian leaders based on extensive testing. To fall within this definition, you must have these traits: Dominating, oppose equality, wants personal power, amoral. Other traits that most, but not all leaders have are: typically men, intimidating and bullying, faintly hedonistic, vengeful, pitiless, exploitive, manipulative, dishonest, cheats to win, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, militant, nationalistic, tells others what they want to hear, takes advantage of “suckers”, specializes in creating false images to sell self.
• Right-wing authoritarian followers have these traits: submissive to authority, aggressive on behalf of authority, and conventional. They are likely to have the following traits: highly religious, moderate to little education, trust untrustworthy authorities, prejudiced (particularly against homosexuals, women, and followers of religions other than their own), mean-spirited, narrow-minded, intolerant, bullying, zealous, dogmatic, uncritical of chosen authority, hypocritical, inconsistent and contradictory, prone to panic easily, highly self-righteous, moralistic, strict disciplinarian, severely punitive, demands loyalty and returns it, little self-awareness, usually politically and economically conservative/Republican.
Social conservatives, whose core members are Christian conservatives, comprise the largest and most cohesive faction of conservatism and typical right-wing authoritarian followers.
They cannot be stopped because their behavior is simply a function of the way they are and how they think, their dispositions, and the way they deal with the world.
And why does nothing seem to change their follower’s minds? The followers of authoritarian leaders crave submission to a powerful authority as a means of alleviating their fears of ambiguity, uncertainty, and complexity. The exaggerated hostility of leaders and talk-show hosts also satisfies a psychological need for antagonism toward the “out group,” reinforces the self-esteem of the conservative base, and increases solidarity within the ranks.
Dean is also an expert on the history of conservatism and its ideas. He lists eight kinds of conservatives and they have different values and goals.
Given the very different beliefs of the various conservative factions, how have conservatives succeeded in coalescing as a political force? The simple answer is through the power of negative thinking, and the ability to find common enemies. The adherents of early conservatism agreed that communism was the enemy, a fact that united them for decades—and hid their differences. Today’s conservatives—especially social conservatives, as opposed to intellectuals and the more thoughtful politicians—define themselves by what they oppose, which is anything and everything they perceive to be liberal. That category includes everyone from Democrats to anyone with whom they disagree, and can, therefore, automatically be labeled a liberal.
The root of the problem of authoritarian leaders and erosion of democracy are Christian evangelicals and fundamentalists, who are somewhere between a quarter and a third of the electorate and 58% of all Republicans. They are the foot soldiers of authoritarian leaders and turn out in great numbers at the polls. Their influence is felt at every level of government.
Without the support of Christian conservatives Republicans cannot even get nominated to local, state, and national offices, because they have become the filter through which all Republicans must pass today. Christian conservatives have a virtual lock on state and local Republican politics, and have totally outmaneuvered their opposition. “In American politics,” wrote Joel Rogers of the University of Wisconsin, “who controls the states controls the nation. The right understands this, and for a generation has waged an unrelenting war to take over state government in America. It has succeeded, in large part because it hasn’t faced any serious progressive counter effort.
Their ultimate goal is to pack federal courts with judges who will do God’s work and stop the right of women to have abortions, stop the teaching of safe sex and evolution in schools, encourage home schooling, ban contraceptives, halt stem cell research with human embryos, ban gay marriage, eliminate the separation of church and state, control the sexual content of cable and network TV, radio, and the internet.
And you can’t get rid of them, their children will become authoritarian too: Authoritarian parents transfer their beliefs to children through religious instruction. Christian conservatives tend to come from strict religious backgrounds, and often prevent their children from being exposed to broader and different views by sending them to schools with like-thinking children, or by home schooling them. This, in turn, results in an authoritarian outlook that remains strong during adolescence—the period when authoritarian personalities are formed and then taken into adult life.
To me this is a Twilight Zone show. Evangelicals are not letting the next generation know anything about anything but the Church and the Bible and racism and hatred of liberals. My god, this is the only time in history when 80 to 90% of people didn’t do back-breaking farming all day and have the luxury of learning about the Universe. To deny your children the wonder and amazement of all that’s around us should be criminal.
This is a long preface because no one reads long posts. I was going to break it up into several posts. But hey, this is a 20 page summary of a 209 page book. If you find it at all interesting, buy the book, I had to leave a lot of good stuff out.
My full review is at energyskeptic, post: Why and how authoritarian evangelicals threaten Democracy
The author forms his analysis using years of research on authoritarian personalities and the results are very enlightening. Authoritarians are drawn to positions of power, particularly political, which is why the Bush administration can contain so many extreme personalities. On the far end of the scale is the "Double High" authoritarian who is both a ruthless leader and slavish follower. G. Gordon Liddy would be classic "Double High" authoritarian. What is most fascinating is the motivation behind extreme authoritarians. It isn't about money or family or friends and it certainly isn't about creating a better world. Everything is about satisfying the self. Ripping off the tax payer may line an authoritarians pockets but it's more about doing it because he or she can. Why would Dick Cheney and George W. Bush be adamant about legalizing torture even though the army is against it and it's been shown to be poor source for generating useful information? Because it satisfies the authoritarian ego to operate without restraint. The good news from John Dean is that authoritarians are marked by overreach and inevitably flame out ala Newt Gingrich and Tom DeLay.
If I have one issue with the book it's John Dean soft peddling of classic conservatives. As someone who has researched conservativism extensively I can safely say that conservativism has been pretty amoral, anti-democratic and anti-equality from its philosophical inception. The author references Russell Kirk's book `The Conservative Mind' but fails to mention that it is essentially a 500 page rip on democracy and contains large sections filled with anti-intellectual rants and praise for virulent racists like John Calhoun. In one section of John Dean's book there is a comparison between conservatives with and those without consciences and the ones with seemed more like idealized fantasies drawn from the author's imagination. In other cases the author is right on the money as when he describes the glue that binds the disparate strains of conservativism as "the power of negative thinking, and specifically, the ability to find common enemies". After the fall of communism, Conservatives needed a new target and looked inward at their arch-nemesis, liberalism. The author writes that Newt Gingrich's attacks on Democrats were, "as severe and confrontational as the struggle with Soviet Communism at the height of the cold war" In response to criticisms of conservative warmongering William F. Buckley wrote, "All civilized men want peace" The caveat is that peace will only be obtained when all divergent ideas are stamped out and even then conservatives will inevitably focus on eradicating unwanted strains within conservativism. Without an enemy conservativism is hollow, it is the hate and intolerance that binds.
This really is a must read book if for nothing else than to help understand the often incomprehensible decisions made by authoritarian leaders. On the subject of Bush's sagging approval ratings with Southern women one supporter was quoted in a recent AP article saying, "I don't care how he governs, I will support him. I'm a Republican through and through." Now ask yourself, how does a fascist state begin?








