Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$8.43$8.43
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $5.96
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
The Constitution in 2020 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-100195387961
- ISBN-13978-0195387964
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateMay 26, 2009
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.1 x 6.1 x 0.9 inches
- Print length355 pages
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Reva B. Siegel is Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Professor of Law at Yale Law School, where she teaches constitutional law, antidiscrimination law, and legal history, and serves as faculty advisor to the American Constitution Society chapter. Professor Siegel's writing draws on legal history to explore questions of law and inequality, and to analyze how courts interact with representative government and popular movements in interpreting the Constitution. Much of her recent work analyzes how progressive and conservative movements have struggled to shape constitutional law in matters concerning race, sex, and the family over the last several decades. She is currently writing a series of articles exploring the genesis of the "traditional family values" coalition and the evolving strategies of the anti-abortion movement.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (May 26, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 355 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195387961
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195387964
- Item Weight : 1.29 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.1 x 6.1 x 0.9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,512,952 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #578 in Constitutional Law (Books)
- #788 in Political Ideologies
- #1,224 in Constitutions (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
For example, in my own field of comparative law, Vick Jackson (unarguably the world's leading scholar in comparative constitutional law), argues that U.S. courts should be allowed to refer to foreign law (a proposition with which I agree). In doing so, she rationalizes that progressives should support such a goal because they believe that it is "better to know more than to know less" - as if all conservatives were ignoramuses who disdained knowledge. Knowing more is one thing, but the debate around the use of foreign law concerns HOW that knowledge is used. While some Republican politicians may be ignoramuses, I don't think anybody could accuse John Roberts of that crime. Another of her arguments is that the judiciary is under attack when judges are restricted in their use of foreign law. This ignores the fact that Congress does have a constitutional right to determine what constitutes law and restrict the judiciary's jurisdiction. At most, Jackson's claim constitutes fear-mongering. Rather, the real debate over the use of foreign law is 1) whether U.S. judges can and will ever understand it well enough to apply it (something I frankly don't think will happen since U.S. judges know U.S. law), and 2) whether using foreign law circumvents the democratic process and imposes foreign norms on U.S. citizens. I think there are responsible ways to use foreign law, Jackson's article doesn't address this nuance.
I had expected more from the country's top constitutional law scholars. Maybe they didn't treat these articles seriously and this isn't their best works. Admittedly, these types of compendium books rarely represent the best scholarship but rather aim for general audiences. Nonetheless, if this book was intended to make a case for liberal constitutionalism, it doesn't succeed.
It provides a wonderful introduction to progressive legal thought for law students and lay people alike. The chapters are very accessible, and clearer than your typical law review article -- this is definitely a book written for the general public, not for constitutional scholars. And the essays cover the whole gamut of legal issues, from first amendment rights to social and economic rights to citizenship issues.
Moreover, the book pulls together essays from the leading progressive thinkers of our time. If any ideas are likely to shape the progressive legal agenda for years to come, it is those of the contributors to this volume.
This collection of essays will be extremely valuable for people interested in learning more about progressive legal thought.






