Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Continuity and Rupture: Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain Paperback – December 9, 2016
|New from||Used from|
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
About the Author
J. Moufawad-Paul lives in Toronto and works as casualized contract faculty at York University where he received his PhD in philosophy. He shares a living space with his partner, Vicky Moufawad-Paul, a brilliant artist and curator, and his daughter, Samiya, who will invariably lead the revolution once she realizes her Moomin books are not necessarily revolutionary theory. J. Moufawad-Paul blogs regularly at MLM Mayhem and his first book, The Communist Necessity, was published by Kersplebedeb in 2014.
Top customer reviews
If you too have those questions, C&R is definitely the book you want to read. I won’t give a chapter by chapter breakdown- that’s your job. Some things I really loved about the book:
1) I have a better understanding about the meaning of “failure” for the left. Why should we privilege Marxism Leninism Maoism in the present over, say, an anarchist’s theory about organization when none of us have succeeded in overthrowing capitalism for good?
2) This sentence: “In essence, Marxism Leninism is correct while at the same time, Marxism Leninism is incorrect.” BUY THIS BOOK ASAP.
3) Class and Party. What could be a more contentious topic than the most immediate criticism launched by detractors of Marxism Leninism that the Party ends up reproducing the relations of power the revolution itself was supposed to demolish?
4) Class and identity. JMP’s treatment about the tension between identity politics and revolutionary communism is simply one of the best available, and it’s one of the most explosive areas of misunderstanding and hostility for communists.
5) Revisionism was a dusty old concept I understood poorly until I read about it two days ago in C&R. Now I walk around acting like I wrote a book on the subject.
I strongly recommend C&R and believe it will soon become a standard reference text for organizers and communists in the near future.
Aside from that, this book does a phenomenal job at arguing for Maoism. Even if one disagrees with the ultimate conclusions (that Maoism is the next stage in revolutionary science), you will absolutely finish reading it with a better understanding of what Maoism actually is, as it currently exists. If you are at all interested in Marxism, I highly recommend getting a copy of this book for yourself!