Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Copernican Revolution Hardcover – April 1, 1997
| Thomas S. Kuhn (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
- Print length297 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFine Communications
- Publication dateApril 1, 1997
- Dimensions6 x 1 x 8.75 inches
- ISBN-101567312179
- ISBN-13978-1567312171
Similar books based on genre
Products related to this item
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Fine Communications; First Edition (April 1, 1997)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 297 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1567312179
- ISBN-13 : 978-1567312171
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 8.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #732,314 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,439 in Astronomy (Books)
- #3,603 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)was professor emeritus of philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His many books include The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I learned a lot from this book. For instance,
1. I learned a bit about solar and celestial navigation.
2. I never even realized that the seasons are of unequal length, now I do and I understand why.
3. I now have a reasonable idea of the complexity of the Ptolemaic (earth-center) view of the cosmos and why it was believed for 2000 years. Kuhn does a great job of explaining and describing the essence of this very complex system.
4. I now understand some of the influences that led Copernicus to believe that the Ptolemaic paradigm needed to be replaced. The reasons for this shift were many and complex, but are clearly stated.
5. I always thought that the system developed by Copernicus was what we believe today, but now I realize that it was much more complex, but that while it was as complex as that of Ptolemy it was not more accurate in its predictions. I also see why some of the incorrect assumptions made by Copernicus led to this complexity and lack of accuracy.
6. I clearly see why in spite of its complexity and lack of increased accuracy the Copernican paradigm gradually replaced the Ptolemaic paradigm, but not without overcoming a considerable amount of resistance.
7. I understand the importance of the contributions of Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler to the ultimate dominance of the Copernican system.
8. I learned how Johannes Kepler, Rene Descartes and Robert Hooke influenced the work of Isaac Newton and that Newton's laws of gravity were not a unique creation of his alone, although its complete mathematical formulation certainly was.
These ideas in this book are presented in a very clear and very accessible manner. I now have to add this book to my short list of those that I think anyone who considers himself/herself well educated should be acquainted with.
This masterpiece was a 1956 case study for Thomas Kuhn. It was on a road that led him to his magnificent theory of scientific revolutions in 1962. All the important conceptions are here, anomaly, crisis, scientific community, and paradigm.
The fatal flaw is in Kuhn’s claim about the nature of the crisis faced by the scientific community in the Renaissance. Crisis is an important conception for Kuhn. It meant that scientists could no longer accept the errors between observed locations of the planets and the predictions made by Ptolemy’s theory. For example, the Viennese astronomers Regiomontanus and Peurbach observed an error of 2 degrees for Mars in 1458. They also found the predicted eclipse of the moon happened one hour later than predicted. They found these errors grotesque.
Kuhn thinks the increasing complexity of the Ptolemaic system sapped its accuracy. This does not fit the facts. Owen Gingerich in “Crisis versus Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution” tested the claim. The predictions used to test it were in printed tabular form called ephemerides issued by various astronomers. These were compared with the actual positions of the planet Mars. Mars is the most difficult planet to predict for the Ptolemaics. The time span was 1270 to 1585. The tables were virtually identical theoretically. The degree of error was also uniform between them. Complexity did not cause inaccuracy. The errors came from something else.
Ptolemy was wrong; Earth did indeed move and was not the center of the universe. It was a premise of Copernicus’ theory that it revolved about the sun and spun on its axis. To predict the location of the planet Mars in the sky, one had to not only know its orbit, but the Earth’s as well. Kuhn claims that this led to no improvement in predicting the planets’ locations in space and time. See page 169 of his text. This is curious, since it mathematically increases the quantitative power of the planetary theory. Was Kuhn correct or not?
Gingerich’s article shows error data for Ptolemaic and Copernican ephemerides. The data sets are in powerful graphical form. They overlap one another in time for comparability. I found the Ptolemaics had a very similar variance in error of about 2.15 with a characteristic lobate error pattern. The Copernicans had a much lower variance of about 0.90 with an interesting dentate pattern. The range of error was much lower for them, too.
Clearly, the astronomers of the Renaissance read Copernicus’ innovative textbook, found that it led to dramatically better results in prediction and adopted it, whether they agreed with its premises or not. One of its early readers was Michael Maestlin. Astronomy at that time was a required course for undergraduates. Tellingly, he used Ptolemaic theory for those classes. He used Copernicus’ text for the graduate program. History knows him as the mentor to Kepler. Their letters are precious.
Finally, Kuhn is mistaken about the complexity of the mathematics of Copernicus. I can tell you it is no more difficult than a class in second year algebra and I encourage all to read it. There are very many insights in it not found in the secondary literature. Read it, know it, and love it. A full English translation by A. M. Duncan is available and recommended.
Charles Pierce Wikman
