Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-57% $11.51$11.51
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: TRIO ALLIANCE
Save with Used - Good
$10.36$10.36
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Martistore
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Counterstrike: The Untold Story of America's Secret Campaign Against Al Qaeda Hardcover – August 16, 2011
Purchase options and add-ons
Inside the Pentagon's secretive and revolutionary new strategy to fight terrorism--and its game-changing effects in the Middle East and at home
In the years following the 9/11 attacks, the United States waged a "war on terror" that sought to defeat Al Qaeda through brute force. But it soon became clear that this strategy was not working, and by 2005 the Pentagon began looking for a new way.
In Counterstrike, Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker of The New York Times tell the story of how a group of analysts within the military, at spy agencies, and in law enforcement has fashioned an innovative and effective new strategy to fight terrorism, unbeknownst to most Americans and in sharp contrast to the cowboy slogans that characterized the U.S. government's public posture. Adapting themes from classic Cold War deterrence theory, these strategists have expanded the field of battle in order to disrupt jihadist networks in ever more creative ways.
Schmitt and Shanker take readers deep into this theater of war, as ground troops, intelligence operatives, and top executive branch officials have worked together to redefine and restrict the geography available for Al Qaeda to operate in. They also show how these new counterterrorism strategies, adopted under George W. Bush and expanded under Barack Obama, were successfully employed in planning and carrying out the dramatic May 2011 raid in which Osama bin Laden was killed.
Filled with startling revelations about how our national security is being managed, Counterstrike will change the way Americans think about the ongoing struggle with violent radical extremism.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherTimes Books
- Publication dateAugust 16, 2011
- Dimensions6.47 x 1.21 x 9.48 inches
- ISBN-100805091033
- ISBN-13978-0805091038
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Editorial Reviews
Review
There is a flood of 9/11 books now coming onto the market, but Counterstrike by Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker of the New York Times should be atop the list of anyone curious about how the U.S. government has grappled with the challenges posed by al Qaeda. (Time.com)
Counterstrike' provides a detailed look at the changes that have occurred and the personalities behind those decisions, as well as the complicated global chessboard of terror networks and sympathetic governments that made adaptation so vital. (The Boston Globe)
This eye-opening account of how the U.S. government has vastly upgraded its counterterrorism efforts since Sept. 11 reminds readers that while the threat from al Qaeda and its affiliates persists, so does the American will to strike back. (Joshua Sinai, The Washington Times)
In Counterstrike, Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, reporters for the New York Times, warn that another catastrophic terrorist event is inevitable, but their behind-the-scenes account of the evolution of U.S. counterterrorism strategy gives officials the highest marks… Counterstrike is a glowing portrayal of the American intelligence community. (Robert D. Crews, San Francisco Chronicle)
Masterful … A fast paced, gripping story… A well reported, well written dive into the arcane world of counterterrorism over the past decade… [Counterstrike] is a significant contribution to our body of knowledge regarding our campaign thus far in the 'Long War' against al-Qaeda and affiliated groups. (Michael Waltz, Foreign Policy)
A must read… After ten years of conflict comes a book that, with amazing clarity, tells how the strategy for the "War on Terror" has dramatically evolved… The authors capture the successes, the failures, the opportunities and the still-lingering gaps over the past decade and look ahead to the nation's future challenges. (Military.com)
The book [Counterstrike] sheds light on offensive U.S. cyber operations almost never discussed by U.S. officials. (Bloomberg.com)
New York Times correspondents Schmitt and Shanker review events after 9/11, focusing on government and military counterterrorism experts who convinced administration ideologues to switch gears… [A] reassuring argument that, after an expensive and massive effort, terrorism seems on the decline. (Kirkus Reviews)
A remarkable detective story by two of the nation's best reporters. With meticulous research and fine storytelling, Counterstrike reveals who, what, when, where, and why in describing the long campaign by the United States government to demolish Al Qaeda and ultimately to kill Osama bin Laden. (Rick Atkinson, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of An Army at Dawn)
Counterstrike lays bare the provocative new ideas that are driving the war on terrorism. Generals often talk about changing the hearts and minds of people in faraway lands, but Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker reveal the importance of changing the hearts and minds of America's defense strategists. This is a groundbreaking intellectual history that is also a great read. (Jessica Stern, author of Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill)
Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker dig deep to tell the story of the covert campaign to defeat Al Qaeda, from the CIA to the Pentagon. Counterstrike is a richly reported work that is a seminal account of the battle between America and Al Qaeda since 9/11. (Peter Bergen, author of The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict Between America and Al-Qaeda)
Filled with amazing characters and details, Counterstrike traces the evolution of America's strategy for stopping the next attack. It's a fascinating story and a great read, too. (Dexter Filkins, author of The Forever War)
Counterstrike scores a direct hit. Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, two of America's most respected national security correspondents, provide pathbreaking reporting on and incisive analysis of the secret war against Al Qaeda after 9/11. This cogent history of America's elusive search for a strategy - essential reading for specialists and concerned citizens alike - should inform our national debate on how best to counter this most urgent threat. (Lee H. Hamilton, former congressman and co-chair of the 9/11 Commission)
Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker have written a brilliant and important account of America's battle with Al Qaeda. It is an exceptional work in that it truly addresses strategic issues and not just the tactical fight. There are critical insights and recommendations provided in this book that make it a must-read for all those who want to understand how we must deal with this complex threat. (General Anthony C. Zinni, USMC (retired))
About the Author
Eric Schmitt is a terrorism correspondent for The New York Times and has embedded with troops in Iraq, Somalia, and Pakistan. Schmitt has twice been a member of Times reporting teams that were awarded the Pulitzer Prize.
Thom Shanker, a Pentagon correspondent for The New York Times, routinely spends time embedded with troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Shanker was formerly a foreign editor and correspondent for the Chicago Tribune, based in Moscow, Berlin, and Sarajevo.
Product details
- Publisher : Times Books; First Edition (August 16, 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0805091033
- ISBN-13 : 978-0805091038
- Item Weight : 1.23 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.47 x 1.21 x 9.48 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,904,002 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,193 in Terrorism (Books)
- #3,235 in Political Intelligence
- #3,621 in National & International Security (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Hi,
My name is Eric Schmitt, and I am a senior writer for The New York Times in Washington D.C. who covers domestic and international terrorism issues.
For two decades, I have covered military and national security affairs for the newspaper. Since the Sept. 11 attacks, I've made 10 reporting trips to Iraq and five trips to Afghanistan to cover American military operations there. In the past three years, I have also reported on counterterrorism operations in Mali, Pakistan and Southeast Asia.
Previously, I reported on demographic and national immigration issues for The Times and covered Congress for five years. During that time, I was one of newspaper's main reporters assigned to the 2000 congressional elections as well as the House and Senate impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton in 1999.
I joined the Washington bureau of The Times in May 1990 as one of the paper's two Pentagon correspondents. I covered the military landing with the Marines in Cap Haitien, Haiti, in September 1994; spent three weeks reporting on the military operation in Somalia in December 1992; and lived for three months in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait covering the Persian Gulf war in 1991.
I have been a reporter with The Times since 1983, with assignments including financial and business news, commercial aviation and the travel industry, and Long Island regional correspondent. I got my start with The Times workin as the assistant to New York Times senior columnist James Reston in 1983-84. Before joining The Times, I covered education issues for The Tri-City Herald in Kennewick, Wash.
I earned a bachelor’s degree in international relations at Williams College, and during that time studied at El Instituto Internacional in Madrid for a year. I attended Harvard University's Executive Program on National and International Security in 1991, and earned a Knight Journalism Fellowship at Stanford University for the 2006-07 academic year.
I've been fortunate enough to share two Pulitzer Prizes. In 1999, I was part of a team of New York Times reporters awarded the Pulitzer for coverage of the transfer of sensitive military technology to China. In 2009, I was a part of a team of New York Times reporters awarded the Pulitzer for coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I am a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I'm 51 and a native of Minneapolis, but I grew up in the San Francisco Bay area. My wife, Felice Berkowitz, and I now live with their two daughters in northern Virginia. I'm a huge San Francisco Giants and Minnesota Twins fan, love to sea kayak, and have run the New York Marathon four times (PB - 3:25).
Cheers!
Customer reviews
Our goal is to make sure every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
With stellar access to all levels of the U.S. Government, Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, in Counterstrike: The Untold Story of America's Secret Campaign against Al Qaeda, provide an unprecedented view of how the U.S. Government, across two administration, has embraced and partially succeeded in creating a `whole of government' strategy to the 21st century's most salient threat.
Schmitt and Shanker have cast the story of America's fight against al Qaeda as it has been waged - at the national strategic level while also transcending to the tactical actions, where Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines stand shoulder to shoulder with intelligence agency analysts and Federal government professionals from Justice, State and Treasure. It's a satisfying tale that weaves the actions and commitment of those 25 to 40 year old professionals with the comments and determination of well-known leaders, such as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Secretary of Defense and the President.
It's a story of the President pushing his agency chiefs to overcome their bureaucratic turf battles to work better together. One example of that success is when an Army Lieutenant leads his platoon near Taji Iraq and detains a terror leader, seizing a major treasure trove of al Qaeda's information on networks and communications. The information reverberates throughout the US Government, enabling scores of follow-on successful operations.
Schmitt and Shanker's best work, however, captures the evolution of national counter-terror strategy. Early on, it was axiomatic that terrorists could not be deterred. The fatalistic perspective made many long for the Cold War and resulted in crafting a less than optimum counter terror strategy.
The authors trace the transformation of deterrence from a rejected concept to a central pillar in the U.S. strategy against al Qaeda. As U.S. officials at all level began to understand al Qaeda better, they appreciated that suicide terrorists valued success and the praise of family. By working to isolate the suicide attacker to killing only themselves coupled with an information campaign that discredits the bomber after the attack - in the eyes of Islam and their families - policy makers realized there are measures to influence suicide attacks at the tactical level.
In parallel, others options became apparent to deter transnational terror operations. Terror networks required terrain - somewhere. As American officials recognized the Northwest territories of Pakistan as al Qaeda's new sanctuary, they went to great lengths to cajole and warn Pakistan political and military leaders that any attack on the U.S. traced back to this area would elicit an overwhelming U.S. military response. When this message was delivered personally by President Obama to his Pakistani counter-part is a staged impromptu meeting, General Ashfaq Kayani got the message. Thus, the U.S. had embraced a deterrent strategy evolved from its Cold War experience and targeted the perpetuator on a personal level and those entities that enabled them on a national level.
The strategy to counter terror networks with global reach requires robust and agile intelligence. General Stan McChrystal captured it perfectly when he said "Every operation is a fight for intelligence." The authors show the balanced decision making that U.S. leaders must now confront when they uncover a terror operative: let him/her continue to operate, permitting a conduit into the terror network - or strike to remove them and possibly lose insight into the organization.
Perhaps nowhere are the challenges of deterrence and exploit/shutdown the terror network greater than in the cyberworld of the internet. Counterstrike captures the cat-and-mouse nature of stalking and blocking terror activities in the gray virtual world. With eye opening revelations, the authors share a few of the successes that the U.S. has enjoyed in their realm that make the Iron Curtain espionage seems like child's play.
The story culminates appropriately with the Abbotabad raid in May 2011. In this operation, the well coordinated, fully integrated instruments of U.S. power are focused and effective. As the CIA and Special Operations Team descended on the objective, their operation was the direct result of a debate among the President's National Security team on how to proceed - Predator Strikes, B-2 bombing, a joint U.S.-Pakistani raid or U.S. only elite raid. There is something satisfying to realize that the fabric of U.S. national security is woven with threads from as many elements of U.S. government as possible - and Abbotabad reflected many of the successful interconnected efforts.
Often stories re-telling the actions of senior level administration officials leave the reader wondering if the author has transformed opinions or suppositions into facts; however, Schmitt and Schanker present a solid and unbiased capturing of the events.
Those who served in DoD, the intelligence agencies and Federal Government will notice that the authors do not dwell on the impact of the Iraqi operation had on the efforts to battle al Qaeda. Those policy struggles are worthy of a separate book unto itself.
Counterstrike's greatest value is not just capturing the rise of deterrence theory in counter terror strategy or the appreciation of cyber operations importance. Rather, it showcases the determination and commitment of countless individuals throughout all levels of the Federal and Military service to get the job. From the Sergeant on patrol to the analyst along the Potomac River to the member of the National Security Council - all contribute.
The author's Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker didn't take the approach of writing this book in a Novel format, but for this type of information that format would not have worked. I found this book to be a lesson on applying common understood textbook marketing approaches to the war on terror. What we have learned from the former "Shock and Awe" approach of the past no longer works; but making Al Qaeda unpopular to those that wish to be martyrs makes all the sense in the world. After reading this book, I find myself watching the news with an eye towards what is the real marketing strategy of this or that announcement from our government. The authors spent quite a bit of time explaining how we have evolved from our previous misunderstanding of how to fight the Al Qaeda to the current approach of educating important Clerics and foreign leaders to the danger in their own backyard. This book is truly an eye opener for the reader that has really no understanding of what our nation is up against and it does help the reader to feel better about what is being done to protect our homeland.
This book is truly worth reading for those that want to have a primer on today's strategy in the middle east and for that matter the world.
It answers questions many have pondered since 9/11: did we learn anything from the attack and what are we doing to leverage our advantages? While questions remain, the greater issue is how we cope with a rapidly changing electronic environment where seconds count. Anyone remotely interested in these issues will read this book to decipher who are heroes and villains.
I'm pleased the authors acknowledge the inherent conflict between the intelligence community and the war fighters. Intelligence operatives want to know as much as they can about our adversaries, without tipping their hand. That information can be used to confuse, mislead, intercept and interrupt enemy operations. The fighters, however, want to attack targets with as few friendly casualties as possible as soon as possible, because that's their mission. Still, unless these two communities can find a way to collaborate, neither can optimize its capabilities.
There are lessons to be learned, certainly. The wiki-leak exposures suggest war fighters might do more to keep intelligence reports within safe hands, without compromising its ability to strike. The defense community might acknowledge it cannot operate independently in a self-contained mode, a challenge to its culture.
After Rumsfeld created the undersecretary of defense for intelligence position, I mentioned to Steve Cambone that this may be Rumsfeld's most lasting and important contribution to national security. It finally authorized someone in the Pentagon to speak with other of the nation's senior intelligence officials on a more equal footing.
After the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon, I directed my associate in the Army's public affairs office, a Pashtun by birth, to seek out the head of the Afghan desk to offer what help he could. Following is how he recalled the event. It's worth a read, to show just how unprepared we were to understand culture and customs.
THE YEAR, 2001; THE PLACE PENTAGON.
"Professor, can you please go to the Afghan Desk, and talk to the newly
appointed Afghan Head."
"Sure," I said to the Deputy Chief of OCPA (Civil), a political appointee, and a
good friend. "What am I supposed to be talking about?"
My friend asked me to just feel the Head out. I agreed, and went out to do his
bidding. At the Afghan Desk, I introduced myself and was taken to the person in
charge. I was expecting a grizzled veteran of Afghanistan; I got a young man of
about 30 years, very pleasant, and very nice to talk to. Wow! He must be a real
hot shot to be sitting in such a chair; probably graduated top of his class in
Political Science. Boy! Was I wrong?
He was an Afghan, so I addressed him in Pashto. It turned out that he did not
know a word of Pashto, and said so. I switched to Dari. His answer was more
astonishing, "I am trying to learn that language, but I barely know a few
sentences, so could we speak in English?"
I looked across at a white gentleman with rather grey hair, who was with him in
the office. He shrugged his shoulders and in fluent Pashto said, "Don't look at
me? I just work here." It turned out that this person had spent some time with
State in Afghanistan.
"Have you ever gone to Afghanistan?" I asked the Head.
He said that he had never been; besides, he was American and didn't like to be
associated with Afghans.
I could see that the conversation was going nowhere, so I took my leave from
both of them and went back to my friend in OCPA. Then I related everything to
him. He looked at me in absolute amazement.
"Are you serious?"
Yes, I was; the government, I don't know?
Am I crazy, or is the world wacky? Talk to me!!
Top reviews from other countries
本書のポイントとして、まずは(1)抑止概念の対テロ戦への適用、(2)政府内各部門の連携の有効性、の2点を挙げることができる。(1)については、冷戦期の抑止概念は狂信的な過激派に効果が無いとされていた通説を打破し、テロリズム・ネットワークのうち非狂信的部分を抑止のターゲットと捉えて、多くの秘密工作を展開する米国政府実務者たちの姿が描写される。(2)については、その秘密工作の過程で、対テロ戦が本格化するより以前には考えられなかったほどに政府内の各部門が有機的に連携し(特に情報機関と軍の部隊、同じく情報機関と外交官)、斬新な成果を挙げていくさまが記されている。
…と、ポイントだけ挙げればとても示唆的な本だということになるのだが、本書は秘匿性の高い政府の活動に関するドキュメンタリーの宿命をまともに背負わされており、それが本書の評価を非常に難しくしている。その宿命とは「書いてあることが本当かどうか分からない」という箇所が極めて多い、ということである。関係機関が多岐にわたり、それぞれが情報を秘匿する義務を負い、しかも各機関の中枢は末梢の部隊の行動を正確に把握できているとは限らず、正確に把握できていたとしてもその内容をそのまま外部の人間に話すとは限らず…ということで、本書のような政府の幹部へのインタビューに依拠する作品はその正確性に確信を持ちづらい。米国のレビュワーの中にも、その観点から極めて低い評価をつける人がいたようである。ただ、少なくとも上で述べた(1)と(2)の2点は、このような宿命を考慮に入れてもなお本書の重要な指摘として評価してよい。
過激派を当面の間は効果的に抑止できても、彼らの変化は速く、巨大な政府組織はその速度についていけない。また、政府内各部門の連携の有効性を示す事例がいくら蓄積されようと、なお官僚的抗争とそれによる業務効率の低下は防げない。そして何より、対テロ戦には伝統的な国家間紛争のような「勝利」という明確な出口はなく、脅威を漸減させ続けることでそこはかとなく「成功」を感じられるのが関の山である―上で述べた2点のポイントから掌を返すこのようなトーンの最終章で、本書は締めくくられる。このトーンが対テロ戦の実務者全員の脳裏を覆っていることもまた、本書中のヴィヴィッドなエピソードの真偽にかかわらず、おそらくは正しいのだろうと思う。