- Hardcover: 580 pages
- Publisher: Prentice Hall; 2 edition (August 4, 1998)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0130809802
- ISBN-13: 978-0130809803
- Product Dimensions: 1 x 7.2 x 9.8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars See all reviews (54 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #8,835,615 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Criminal Investigation: The Art and the Science (2nd Edition) 2nd Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
"This text overall is very well written and easy to understand. It is student and instructor friendly. It is not overburdened with technical jargon." Harold Frossard, Moraine Valley Community College, Palos Hills, Il--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From the Publisher
This book presents a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of criminal investigation, including documentation, suspect identification, and report writing. The book provides the latest techniques in crime detection, criminal apprehension and prosecution, collection and use of evidence and information, and detailed coverage of specific crimes. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
Where to begin? Wow.
- book begins with a modern case of murder, but it sloppily introduces the history of policing and crime scene investigation; what does it have to do with the history of policing? nothing; what does it have to do with the history of crime scene investigation; nothing. Perhaps it might be setting up the "CSI Effect" later discussed in the chapter; nope - no connection.
- the author tries to define and explain "inductive" versus "deductive" reasoning, and leaves the reader more confused than when they began; likely the author doesn't know the difference, as the explanations appear to be a discussion of synonyms. Inductive reasoning is virtually undefined by the author, but rather suggested through an immediate example. From that weak study, the author expounds into strong and weak deductions. Similarly, the author tries harder to define deduction, and ends up with "reasoning based on specific pieces of evidence to establish proof...". What? That's the definition? No, it is not. Wait until he adds "abduction" to the mix.
- on page 23 we learn that, "A police department's reporting system and the investigative role of patrol car are inextricably bound." Really? A patrol car performs an investigative role which is bound to the department's reporting system? I'll let Ford know that.
- same page contains the unintelligible sentence, "The second provides an opportunity for details of the investigation thus far expended so the follow-up plans do not unnecessarily duplicate tasks already completed." Provides an opportunity for details of the investigation thus far expended so... What? Where did this sentence fragment come from? He is trying to explain the second component of the "reporting system".
- page 24, shows a picture of a sergeant and calls him a "patrol officer"; police recruits know the difference
- page 33, tells the reader, "It is recommended that notes be taken in a bound notebook...", and, "...a small spiral notebook is used." The author suggests that the pages should be permanent so the appearance of removed pages is avoided when submitted during discovery.
- page 37, conversely tells the reader, "...officers should...use...a loose-leaf notebook so the pages can be easily removed and filed." Which notebook should the rookie investigator run out and purchase? I guess stay tuned for the 8th edition.
- page 39, implores us to "Try to use the active voice..."
- page 41, give us a perfect example of the ideal report, except (you guessed it) it uses passive voice ("Subject was read his rights...").
- page 42, tells us that supplemental reports are considerably longer than the initial complaint. Really? Previously the author explained the RAND study which directs officers to conduct most (if not all) the investigation up front and clear the case when capable. That would likely consist of just a single, very detailed initial investigation with maybe a short paragraph from the detective saying he/she read it and the case disposition.
- the author goes in to detail convincing us that digital photography will soon be the standard in CSI documentation; well, it's been that way for some time. Since that trend has passed, and it has been the standard, body-cams and surveillance video are becoming more common; nothing mentioned about those (or at least yet, as I'm crawling to the end of this book). Likewise, no mention of aerial photography (helicopter or drone), yet.
- the author tells us to record (for every one of the 100-200 photos he suggests we take), the f-stop, shutter speed, etc. of the camera settings. No. CSI doesn't do that. You can imagine how long that would take to accomplish even the initial walkthrough photos. The criminal would be deceased of old age by the time this crime scene was processed. Remember, good CSI personnel photograph (or video) virtually everything they do, to document it. Even the author's example photo log has no listing for this data; digital photos record it automatically with the digital photo data.
- crime scene diagramming described is VERY basic and crude; there are many more methods, described in far better terms, in more competent texts (GPS, lasers, etc.). The evidence is found using various search techniques (none of which I find in this text, yet; grid searches, zone searches, inward / outward spiral, parallel, etc.).
- case studies inserted at random points that have no relation to the surrounding text, with no attempt to use them in support of the learning objectives.
I'm on page 63 (out of 611), and I have only pointed out less than half of the errors I find. This...is...painful.
The basics of criminal investigation are covered within the textbook - advanced topics such as criminal interrogation and procedures are briefly discussed but they are not the main focus of this book. This textbook provides an excellent foundation for the criminal justice student who is planning a career in law enforcement.
This is a must have for any futre investigator.
There is an error on the very first page. The murder that opens the book has the wrong date of offense. (pg. 3) I figured this out quickly when I turned the page because the second page has the correct date. It doesn't seem to be too big of a deal because I can't figure out why that murder was used. In fact, I can't figure out most of the "real cases" used. They don't support the recent points made. They just seem to be randomly stuck in the text.
This seems to be a common problem with this text. The book talks about the history of policing in England but has pictures of wanted posters for Jesse James on the same page. (Pg. 5 and 6) The book feels disjointed.
Then the issue of basic writing comes up. On page 18, the author says that investigating criminal in the US is different than in England. He goes on to tell me how it is structured in the US, but never addresses how it is currently set up in England. If he is going to make a compare/contrast opening statement, then he needs to compare/contrast!
About half of the "key terms" are not defined in the text. They are in the glossary, but this is the first text I've seen where so many aren't in the actual text. The ones he DOES define are TERRIBLE. The previous reviewer was spot on regarding the inductive/deductive/abductive reasoning. I knew what they were before I read this book. He still managed to confuse me!
And what the heck is a "culinary investigation?" (pg. 25)
This is just the first chapter. It is going to take me forever to read this terrible textbook.