Shop top categories that ship internationally
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the authors

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis Hardcover – February 19, 2008

4.1 out of 5 stars 62 ratings

A much-needed and hard-hitting plan, from one of the great Democratic minds of our time, to reform America’s broken health-care system.

Undoubtedly, the biggest domestic policy issue in the coming years will be America’s health-care system. Millions of Americans go without medical care because they can’t afford it, and many others are mired in debt because they can’t pay their medical bills. It’s hard to think of another public policy problem that has lingered unaddressed for so long. Why have we failed to solve a problem that is such a high priority for so many citizens?

Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle believes the problem is rooted in the complexity of the health-care issue and the power of the interest groups—doctors, hospitals, insurers, drug companies, researchers, patient advocates—that have a direct stake in it. Rather than simply pointing out the major flaws and placing blame, Daschle offers key solutions and creates a blueprint for solving the crisis.

Daschle’s solution lies in the Federal Reserve Board, which has overseen the equally complicated financial system with great success. A Fed-like health board would offer a public framework within which a private health-care system can operate more effectively and efficiently—insulated from political pressure yet accountable to elected officials and the American people. Daschle argues that this independent board would create a single standard of care and exert tremendous influence on every other provider and payer, even those in the private sector.

After decades of failed incremental measures, the American health-care system remains fundamentally broken and requires a comprehensive fix. With his bold and forward-looking plan, Daschle points us to the solution.

Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more

Editorial Reviews

Review

ADVANCE PRAISE FOR CRITICAL
“I may not agree with some of the political statements but Senator Daschle is right on target on the need to start a serious dialogue on health care for Americans. His thoughtful health-care proposals will move the process forward. Senator Daschle and I agree on the need for nonpartisanship in coming to grips with this number one domestic problem.” —Bob Dole, former Senate majority leader
“The American health-care system is in crisis, and workable solutions have been blocked for years by deeply entrenched ideological divisions. Sen. Daschle brings fresh thinking to this problem, and his Federal Reserve for Health concept holds great promise for bridging this intellectual chasm and, at long last, giving this nation the health care it deserves.” —Senator Barack Obama (IL)
“This book provides real solutions for America’s broken health care system.” —Senator Harry Reid (NV), Senate majority leader
Critical provides answers to one of the most vexing challenges of our time.” —John Podesta, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress and a former White House chief of staff
“It is a must-read.” —Jerome H. Grossman M.D., senior fellow and director of the Health Care Delivery Project at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government
“Senator Daschle adds to his reputation as a clear thinker and leader.
Critical shows us not only why we must solve our health care crisis but that—with political will—we can.” —Judy Feder, professor and dean at Georgetown Public Policy Institute

About the Author

Tom Daschle is a former U.S. Senator and Senate majority leader from South Dakota. He is currently a special policy advisor at the law firm Alston & Bird LLP, a visiting professor at the Georgetown Public Policy Institute, and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Jeanne M. Lambrew is an associate professor at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas. Dr. Lambrew is also a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. Previously, she worked on health policy at the White House as the program associate director for health at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and as the senior health analyst at the National Economic Council.

Scott S. Greenberger, a former staff reporter at The Boston Globe, is a writer and consultant at Ricchetti, Inc., in Washington, D.C.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Thomas Dunne Books
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 19, 2008
  • Edition ‏ : ‎ 1st
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 240 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0312383010
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0312383015
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.8 x 1.23 x 8.55 inches
  • Best Sellers Rank: #4,314,941 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.1 out of 5 stars 62 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Customer reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
62 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the book readable and well-written, with one review noting its 200 pages of concisely stated elements. Moreover, they appreciate its coverage of healthcare history, with one customer highlighting how it outlines the history of healthcare reform. Additionally, the book receives positive feedback for its approach to expanding coverage and its influence on public policy, with one customer describing it as a reasonable approach to the current situation.

9 customers mention "Readability"8 positive1 negative

Customers find the book easy to read and quick to finish.

"Senator Daschle has written his best book yet on health care in America...." Read more

"Senator Daschle's book is surprisingly good. I award it 4 stars...." Read more

"...the raw numbers, the comparisons to other country's systems is worth the read alone...." Read more

"...The book is an easy read, doesn't cover much in depth, but highlights all of the key points one needs to know to speak intelligently about the..." Read more

6 customers mention "Health care"6 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's approach to health care, with one customer highlighting its focus on effective care for all Americans, while another notes its emphasis on eliminating unnecessary procedures.

"...as the plan unfolds over the next 10 years, and will eliminate unnecessary medical procedures that cripple people physically, and SOME of the newer..." Read more

"...-- REAL HEALTH SECURITY MEANS AUTOMATIC, CONTINUOUS COVERAGE What is health security? Is it just being able to say "I have health insurance?"..." Read more

"...In this case, the efficacious measuring of outcomes of medical service intervention is a crucial aspect of improvement to the "system", but the..." Read more

"...as well as market forces to assure affordable and effective health care for all Americans...." Read more

6 customers mention "Health care history"6 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's coverage of healthcare history, with one customer noting it provides basic facts and serves as an excellent starting point for healthcare debates.

"...with Daschle's solution, this book is an excellent starting point to open a healthcare debate...." Read more

"This very short book is a great synopsis of our current health care situation...." Read more

"...in its review of the history and science of need and opportunity for health care reform...." Read more

"...It also succeeds in arming the reader with the basic facts and lexicon of the health care debate-- no mean feat, given the volume's comparatively..." Read more

4 customers mention "Writing style"3 positive1 negative

Customers appreciate the writing style of the book, finding it concise and easy to read.

"The book looked as good as new. It was not written in. It arrived quickly...." Read more

"...Clear, concise, and fair." Read more

"...The style is what I call journalistesque. That is the writing style is somewhat simplistic in that it mimics speech rather than good writing...." Read more

"...Nonetheless the style permits easy and quick reading...." Read more

3 customers mention "Clarity"3 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the clarity of the book, with one mentioning its concise presentation of 200 pages of elements.

"...The book is 200 pages of concisely stated elements for an affordable health care program...." Read more

"...This book practical,and clear in its message. It is highly recomended for anyone interested in health care and reform. James. B. Kenney, Ph.D." Read more

"...Clear, concise, and fair." Read more

3 customers mention "Coverage"3 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's coverage, with one noting its consistency across all options and another highlighting its proposal for expanding it.

"...-- REAL HEALTH SECURITY MEANS AUTOMATIC, CONTINUOUS COVERAGE What is health security? Is it just being able to say "I have health insurance?"..." Read more

"...He also proposes a way to expand coverage by using an existing insurance plan---the Federal Employees' Health Plan...." Read more

"...uncomfortable, the issue Daschle drives towards is consistency of coverage across all options and, similar to Dr. Dean, a requirement that no one..." Read more

3 customers mention "Influence of politics"3 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's influence on public policy, with one customer noting its reasonable approach to the current situation and another highlighting its strong leadership perspective.

"...to stay informed about today's healthcare crisis and the ideas influencing public policy...." Read more

"...Senator Daschle provides a strong leadership perspective on how to combine the forces of market and government as relates to health care...." Read more

"Senator Daschle brings a thoughtful and reasonable approach to our current situation with a some great ideas. Easy read over a long weekend." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2009
    With the Obama administration now bringing healthcare to the forefront of political agenda, Critical is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand the issues being debated on Capitol Hill. Senator Daschle tackles the long-lingering problems of our national healthcare system, beginning with the roots of insurance a little over a century ago. In part one, Daschle describes the evolution of healthcare in the United States and how over time growing complexity has overloaded the payment protocols and systems established decades ago. Importantly, he describes which initiatives have worked, and why certain plans such as the failed Clinton-era reforms of the 1990s led to political disaster.

    Daschle does an excellent job pointing out the deficiencies in our current system, such as the misaligned incentives of an employer-based healthcare system. As is, employer-provided healthcare is a problem for the morbidly ill - the sick are unable to find work, which deprives them of the treatment necessary to return to health, leading to a vicious cycle. This is not only a financial burden on individuals, but a toll on the greater economy. Start-up companies with smaller pools of workers become challenged with the undue burden of exorbitantly rising costs. Entrepreneurs have less freedom to start new businesses due to the risks of not carrying health insurance. Another unintended consequence arises from our current managed care-based system - patients without insurance are charged much greater fees for service because they do not have the benefit of the negotiated discounts granted by a PPO or HMO.

    In addition to ideas such as the expansion of coverage using federal dollars, the crux of Daschle's cost-containment solution lies in a Health Board. This proposed Board will be a Federal regulatory agency capable of setting rules and standards for healthcare providers. It will set criteria for treatment, and break down the much-too-cozy relationships between industry suppliers and the physicians that deliver their supplies. The Federal Health Board will be a cross-functional agency, designed to cover a more encompassing jurisdiction than the FDA or NIH alone.

    While I applaud the Senator for effectively addressing America's healthcare problem and presenting a well-thought plan, however I personally do not believe a Federal Health Board is a panacea. A number of conflicts could still exist with a Health Board, especially if given unchecked power as suggested in Daschle's plan. With the federal government deciding the best practices for treatment, would this necessarily lead to better care for all individuals? Or would the Federal Health Board deny individuals better, but unproven treatments in exchange for more statistically econometric treatments to the payors? America is now caught in a bind between cost containment, and its thirst for more costly but more experimental sets of treatments.

    Whether you agree or disagree with Daschle's solution, this book is an excellent starting point to open a healthcare debate. It is a must-read to stay informed about today's healthcare crisis and the ideas influencing public policy. Many of Daschle's lines of thinking are evident in political discussion and are likely to appear within upcoming legislation, in some form or another.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 22, 2008
    Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
    Senator Daschle has written his best book yet on health care in America. The book is 200 pages of concisely stated elements for an affordable health care program. It is not "socialized medicine", nor is it mandatory if you are happy with your current plan. It established a Federal Health Board that reviews and negotiates fees from institutions that currently are under-scrutinized for cost and efficiency. The Plan ONLY affects recipients of Federal government health insurance plans, Medicare, Medicaid, and Federal employee insurance. This plan will be a model for private insurance plans to consider. Health care cost for all individuals will decrease as the plan unfolds over the next 10 years, and will eliminate unnecessary medical procedures that cripple people physically, and SOME of the newer drugs that DO NOT improve over existing generic drugs.
    5 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2009
    Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
    Tom Daschle, the new Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Obama administration, understands the health care problem. He "gets it" that millions of Americans do without the health care they need because health insurance is too expensive and, for many, unavailable at any price. He knows that Americans are driven to bankruptcy by their high medical bills, and he repeats in this book many of the horror stories I've heard before and many new ones as well. I am glad that he is listening to these stories.

    He is also aware that getting health insurance through an employer is a practice that no longer works for millions of Americans. He writes about the "increasing number of independent contractors, temporary employees, and part-time employees..." who do not qualify for employer-provided insurance. I have been one of those workers and I've seen the options shrink for anyone who is part of the contingent or self-employed workforce. Daschle has a good sense that an employer-based system cannot meet our needs. Nor, in my opinion, is it fair. Why should people who work for large, prosperous companies get better health care than someone who works for a neighborhood restaurant or does free-lance writing? Why should your employment situation determine whether or not you get health care? No other country on earth has such a system, and many American employers find it an increasing burden that puts them at a disadvantage in a global economy.
    -- HEALTH REFORM -- A LONG TIME COMING
    Daschle gives us a summary of historic events that shaped our current non-system, including a few I didn't know. I didn't realize that Teddy Roosevelt made National Health Insurance part of his platform in 1912 or that the labor movement tried to get government-funded health insurance way back in 1914. It was opposition to this that led some employers to consider providing insurance to their employees. During the Depression years, hospitals tried to keep their beds filled by offering prepaid plans. These later evolved into the Blue Cross plans that originally were based on a social insurance model but later adopted the same practices as commercial insurance companies.

    The modern history of attempts to bring government-funded universal coverage to Americans begins with Franklin Roosevelt. He intended to give us universal health care in the Social Security Act, but, facing serious opposition, mainly from the AMA, he pushed the legislation through without the health care provision. It wasn't until the administration of Lyndon Johnson that we got Medicare and Medicaid. Dachle makes sure we know that he was involved in Bill & Hillary Clinton's attempts to reform health care in the 1990s. Our legacy is an unplanned, almost accidental, health care environment that does not serve the American people and is so expensive that, if costs continue rising at the same rate, health care will consume 100% of our income by 2025. Obviously, this is not sustainable.

    -- HOW DO WE FIX IT?
    While I'm satisfied Daschle understands the severity of the problem, I'm not sure he has a handle on the best solution. I do like his idea of having a national health board that oversees health policy and determines the details of how a reformed health care system should work. He compares this to the Federal Reserve Board which oversees banking and financial institutions. Of course, we now have a financial melt-down, calling into question how effective such boards can be. Any concept of having a group of experts deal with the details of running a complex system like health care or financial markets is subject to the expertise and ethical principles of those who serve on the board.

    But even with Congress just doing the broad strokes, a number of decisions must be made up front. Daschle does not suggest kicking out the insurance companies (who have failed us) and going with a pure government-funded, single-payer system. Why not? He mentions the Massachusetts plan in a favorable light a number of times in the book, but that plan still leaves large numbers of people uninsured, despite the "individual mandate" that all residents must buy insurance. People do not comply because they still can't afford the premiums or feel the skimpy coverage is not worth the price of the monthly premium.

    If you postulate a plan that says "we'll use private insurance, but we'll subsidize people below a certain income level" then you have to have some way to determine who qualifies for the subsidy. You have to create a bureaucracy to constantly requalify people based on their income. You have to make some provision for the fact that people can lose their income and it doesn't conveniently happen at one time of the year when policies come up for renewal. Someone with a job today can pay his premium, but next month when he's laid off, maybe he can't. How fast can you get him a subsidy? Insurance companies cancel people when they don't make a payment. Since peoples' circumstances can change, you will still have people jumping from one plan to being uninsured to another plan, back and forth. The lack of continuity in our coverage is a major problem with what we have, and why I don't buy the argument that "some people like what they have." Do they like that they can lose "what they have" as soon as they can't make a payment or lose their job? Why adopt a system that perpetuates this problem?

    Daschle also talks about expanding use of the Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHB), but he doesn't explain what this is except to call it "a menu of private health plans." If it is just more private insurance, how can it help us out of the mess we have now?

    It seems to me that if you polled the American people and asked if they prefer "what they have now" to a plan that requires no monthly payments and can never be taken away, you'd hear a giant whooshing sound as Americans rushed to Washington to demand such a system from their representatives.

    -- REAL HEALTH SECURITY MEANS AUTOMATIC, CONTINUOUS COVERAGE
    What is health security? Is it just being able to say "I have health insurance?" I may have it today, but I can lose it tomorrow. Real security is a plan in which you are automatically enrolled and from which you can never be cut off. A plan that offers continuity of coverage and of care, that does not require you to requalify or recertify to stay in the plan. It means never having to worry about being bankrupted by sickness. And, in my humble opinion, it also means never having to deal with an insurance company. They are in the denial business, taking your money every month, then doing their best to deny you care when you need it.

    Secretary Dashle, how can you support the concept "build on what we have now" when what we have now has failed us so badly and is so expensive it threatens our total economy? The insurance industry will lie, engage in deceitful tactics, and spend a fortune trying to keep "what they have now" - our money, for which they give us back as little as possible in so-called "benefits."
    10 people found this helpful
    Report