Other Sellers on Amazon
$23.62
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Books Unplugged
Sold by:
Books Unplugged
(2495 ratings)
87% positive over last 12 months
87% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$20.12
+ $3.98 shipping
+ $3.98 shipping
Sold by:
Mesilla Internet
Sold by:
Mesilla Internet
(3619 ratings)
95% positive over last 12 months
95% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Critics, Monsters, Fanatics, and Other Literary Essays Hardcover – July 5, 2016
by
Cynthia Ozick
(Author)
|
Cynthia Ozick
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$29.99 | $11.98 |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length224 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherHoughton Mifflin Harcourt
-
Publication dateJuly 5, 2016
-
Dimensions5.5 x 0.83 x 8.25 inches
-
ISBN-100544703715
-
ISBN-13978-0544703711
New releases
Explore popular titles in every genre and find something you love. See more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"“A sorceress of silken prose, wholly incapable of platitude, of cliché, of even the stray dead phrase, Ozick can make anything happen with a sentence.”—The New Republic
"A forceful and witty collection of literary criticism by a brilliant critic and novelist."—Shelf Awareness
"Often intricate and lovely leaves from the author's literary tree."—Kirkus Reviews
"'Serious criticism is surely a form of literature,' she posits, and serious readers will agree and find it practiced here."—Publishers Weekly
"A forceful and witty collection of literary criticism by a brilliant critic and novelist."—Shelf Awareness
"Often intricate and lovely leaves from the author's literary tree."—Kirkus Reviews
"'Serious criticism is surely a form of literature,' she posits, and serious readers will agree and find it practiced here."—Publishers Weekly
From the Inside Flap
Cynthia Ozick is one of the sharpest and most distinguished critics in American letters. For decades, her extraordinary readerly sensitivity and deep well of knowledge have informed penetrating judgments that delight and spark debate. Assembling ten years worth of Ozicks nonfiction writing in one volume, Critics, Monsters, Fanatics, and Other Literary Essays is both an exemplar of brilliant criticism and a powerful argument for the vitally important role of the critic, as much now as ever.
With the gauntlet-throwing essay that opens this book, Ozick contends that if literary fiction is to thrive in a culture awash in uncertainty and disruption, we need true critics to make sense of the present, illuminate the past, and point the way forward. The essays that follow reveal Ozick in peak form as she examines writers from the early twentieth century to today. Saul Bellow is here, and Bernard Malamud; Auden and Kafka; William Gass, Martin Amis, and moreall gathered in provocatively named groups with new introductions: Figures, Fanatics, Monsters, Souls. Uncompromising and brimming with insight, these essays are marvels of elegant prose and discerning intellect from one of our most treasured writers.
With the gauntlet-throwing essay that opens this book, Ozick contends that if literary fiction is to thrive in a culture awash in uncertainty and disruption, we need true critics to make sense of the present, illuminate the past, and point the way forward. The essays that follow reveal Ozick in peak form as she examines writers from the early twentieth century to today. Saul Bellow is here, and Bernard Malamud; Auden and Kafka; William Gass, Martin Amis, and moreall gathered in provocatively named groups with new introductions: Figures, Fanatics, Monsters, Souls. Uncompromising and brimming with insight, these essays are marvels of elegant prose and discerning intellect from one of our most treasured writers.
From the Back Cover
"If there is such a thing as a literary pantheon in America, then Cynthia Ozick is surely its Athena . . . Ozick casts sentences that fairly pulse with the electricity of a highly charged mind." Washington Post
"As an essayist, Cynthia Ozick is a very good storyteller. Her arguments are plots . . . They twist and turn, digress, slow down and speed up, surprise with sudden illuminations." New York Times Book Review
"Cynthia Ozick is double-barreled. Shes an inventive and revelatory fiction writer and an exacting, battle-ready critic; an impish writer of conscience and a creative intellectual." Los Angeles Times
[Her] multifaceted intellect continues to bedazzle . . . Ozicks declarative: its not only OK to be smart and sharp-witted and full to the brim with ideas; its what we should all strive for. Baltimore Sun
"Anyone who cares about precise language, transcendent ideas, and the future of the novel will appreciate what Cynthia Ozick has to say. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
"As an essayist, Cynthia Ozick is a very good storyteller. Her arguments are plots . . . They twist and turn, digress, slow down and speed up, surprise with sudden illuminations." New York Times Book Review
"Cynthia Ozick is double-barreled. Shes an inventive and revelatory fiction writer and an exacting, battle-ready critic; an impish writer of conscience and a creative intellectual." Los Angeles Times
[Her] multifaceted intellect continues to bedazzle . . . Ozicks declarative: its not only OK to be smart and sharp-witted and full to the brim with ideas; its what we should all strive for. Baltimore Sun
"Anyone who cares about precise language, transcendent ideas, and the future of the novel will appreciate what Cynthia Ozick has to say. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
About the Author
Author of numerous acclaimed works of fiction and nonfiction, CYNTHIA OZICK is a recipient of the National Book Critics Circle Award and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, the National Book Award, and the Man Booker International Prize. Her writing has appeared in The New Republic, Harper's, and elsewhere. She lives in New York.
Start reading Critics, Monsters, Fanatics, and Other Literary Essays on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 1st edition (July 5, 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0544703715
- ISBN-13 : 978-0544703711
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.83 x 8.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,270,198 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #93 in 21st Century Literary Criticism (Books)
- #378 in 20th Century Literary Criticism (Books)
- #1,829 in General Books & Reading
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
38 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2016
Verified Purchase
Cynthis Ozick's latest collection of literary essays takes one into the presence of a master. The aim permeating this collection is to celebrate the part played by the informed critic in providing a cultivated context for the writer. Ostensibly it's a lament for the loss of that commons of sensibility. Actually it's a re-creation of it. She's herself a one-person critical world -- of appreciation, of nuanced understanding, of recognition -- into which any real writer, past or present, can find admission as a member in good standing. Her discounting of the importance of Amazon reviews, annual awards & celebrity, should not be construed as an attack on anybody in particular, nor as snobbism. She is not founding a clique or a club. On the contrary, her purpose is deeply constructive. She is asserting, in the teeth of the zeitgeist, that the genius of writing occurs and is read on a plane different from the plane of fashion. Does one doubt this? Does one fear to believe it? Does this sound all too idealistic and unworldly? Ozick's own talent as a writer, in full view in this collection, certifies her claim as simply true.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2016
Verified Purchase
Excellent service. I am very satisfied with the book
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2016
Verified Purchase
One can never tire of reading this consummate author's work!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 4, 2016
Verified Purchase
Very lucid prose and thought provoking throughout. Fact is that much of the material is quite Jewish centered, quite naturally, which at times made it somewhat recondite for me.
Reviewed in the United States on June 26, 2016
It is surprising that this book was offered for our consideration. Ozick does not regard Amazon reviewers very highly, certainly not as a group and seemingly begrudgingly in rare instances. Add to this the fact that I am also an academic and I fear that anything I write will not even merit a parentheses in consideration. That said, I write not as a literary critic but as a simple book reviewer.
Book reviewers here on Amazon aren't critics at all. We're more like co-consumers, suggesting whether an item is worth buying based on our experiences. The better reviews add some useful insights, building on the product description in a--hopefully--honest way.
A literary critic isn't in the business of consumer counselor. Rather, a literary critic seeks to understand a written work, putting it into its cultural and historical context, adding insights into ideas and patterns and contributions of the work to broader conversations.
Amazon reviews abound. The work of literary criticism has fallen on rough times. Ozick is an amazing writer. I got this book mostly so that I could learn from her style and approach. I had friends who raved about her work. This skill is quickly apparent not only in style but also in content. Though English lit was one of my least favorite subjects, since I was very young I have loved reading all kinds of books, articles, you name it. I didn't like how critics pulled apart and took the joy out of a text. But it seems I was not given the best examples. Ozick offers a call towards the place and purpose and need for intelligent literary criticism and then, in later essays, describes particular examples, adding a mostly cohesive call towards a dying art in our age of click bait and celebrity distractions.
I wasn't expecting to be drawn in as much as I was. So, yes, I recommend buying this book even if you're not particularly enthralled with the topic of literary criticism. You will be by the end of the first chapter and the rest will make for a valuable treat.
Book reviewers here on Amazon aren't critics at all. We're more like co-consumers, suggesting whether an item is worth buying based on our experiences. The better reviews add some useful insights, building on the product description in a--hopefully--honest way.
A literary critic isn't in the business of consumer counselor. Rather, a literary critic seeks to understand a written work, putting it into its cultural and historical context, adding insights into ideas and patterns and contributions of the work to broader conversations.
Amazon reviews abound. The work of literary criticism has fallen on rough times. Ozick is an amazing writer. I got this book mostly so that I could learn from her style and approach. I had friends who raved about her work. This skill is quickly apparent not only in style but also in content. Though English lit was one of my least favorite subjects, since I was very young I have loved reading all kinds of books, articles, you name it. I didn't like how critics pulled apart and took the joy out of a text. But it seems I was not given the best examples. Ozick offers a call towards the place and purpose and need for intelligent literary criticism and then, in later essays, describes particular examples, adding a mostly cohesive call towards a dying art in our age of click bait and celebrity distractions.
I wasn't expecting to be drawn in as much as I was. So, yes, I recommend buying this book even if you're not particularly enthralled with the topic of literary criticism. You will be by the end of the first chapter and the rest will make for a valuable treat.
16 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 7, 2016
here, in a series of essays, cynthia ozick states her case for literature of a high sort, introduced by a clarion call—more like a cry from the heart. cue the elegiac clarinet, please; from a hillside in duino, if she would cry, who would hear her—anyone?
for the necessity of criticism to separate the wheat from the chaff, she bends, scythe in hand, swiping at amazon customer reviews and book clubs for failing to fall under the red pens of editors and their lack in extended digressive erudition, as she moves up and down her swathe, gleaning, by definition, what is intended as a good crop of literature and shouting why such meager husbandry should be planted, cultivated and harvested.
i fear no critic can meet her standards, except for the uber-passionate book critic, harold bloom who she quotes in the division, MONSTERS. “ ‘At eighty-four, I lie awake at night, after a first sleep, and murmur Crane, Whitman, Shakespeare to myself, seeking comfort through continuity, as grand voices somehow hold off the permanent darkness that gathers though it does not fall.’ These are the yearning yet inflamed intimations not of a poet, but of a lover—a critic who has fallen in love with incantation as a conduit to the Elysian horizon luringly beyond his reach. And like any monster gazing past the rest of us, he stares alone.”
the critic business is a thankless job. but who otherwise is there to tell the brazen autodidact, who frantically rushes out into the night, pacing streets of a city after reading d h lawrence; or the homeless person who cackled aloud at the audacity of ahab, breaking silence in the public library; or the graduate from a master’s program, staking a livelihood on the words of stephan dedalus: ‘And I am not afraid to a mistake, even a great mistake, a lifelong mistake and perhaps as long as eternity too. …’; or the pot washer who cringes with woe while reading of the transgressions in the novels of james baldwin as familiar, that even though it may not be alright, there are other readers who experienced the same feelings and other flaming books awaiting to be read, but the critic? this is what cynthia ozick is getting at—when the sun rises and the exhausted reader sees the city come alive with commerce, where does one find the next book, what voice has passion and conviction enough to engender trust with a sweeping magnitude for the lonesome word afflicted reader, comparable to the writer and the reader?
the reviewer? cynthia ozick answers: What separates criticism from reviewing—intrinsically—is that the critic must summon what the reviewer cannot: horizonless freedoms, multiple histories, multiple libraries, multiple metaphysics and intuitions. Reviewers are not merely critics of lesser degree, on the farther end of a spectrum. Critics belong to a wholly distinct phylum.’
few readers are interested in horizonless freedoms, wanting merely something good to read, or to the find a few of the books listed on their syllabus and call it quits. and fewer are the writers who forge the smithy of their souls to such depths they’re even blind, oblivious and dismissive of their own audience, the only audience who hungers for their words, the literature fanatics. and they won’t find them in classrooms in iowa or hoarding stacks of new yorkers, where short stories share space with ads for designer cosmetics.
in the essays which follow, cynthia ozick not only writes a twenty five page critical essay on lionel trilling and his unfinished novel, she writes an essay on an obscure literary movement of american hebraists, and in her section on the holocaust novel, she writes about h g adler. as little known as these writers are, she opines that without continual literary criticism these obscure writers will be forgotten, and, with them, or without them, lists of names of writers which should be familiar, which were once familiar, the writers she lists in THE LASTINGNESS OF SAUL BELLOW, an essay on the letters of bellow. her lists of names, of authors obscure and illuminated by the lights of fame, are inexhaustible inventories. her essays cover critics, letter writers, biographers and the translated. she doesn’t shy away from criticizing the responses to jewish writings, from updike’s bech to THE ZONE OF INTEREST by martin amis. nor is she out of touch with contemporary literature, two of her essays are provoked by discourses by ben marcus with jonathan frantzen and marilynne robinson with robert alter.
personally, i’m at a loss, more readers, critics and literary writers in literary realm of which she writes, do not mention cynthia ozick’s work. you say you love that of which she speaks, and you have not read TRUST or LEVITATION? really?
for the necessity of criticism to separate the wheat from the chaff, she bends, scythe in hand, swiping at amazon customer reviews and book clubs for failing to fall under the red pens of editors and their lack in extended digressive erudition, as she moves up and down her swathe, gleaning, by definition, what is intended as a good crop of literature and shouting why such meager husbandry should be planted, cultivated and harvested.
i fear no critic can meet her standards, except for the uber-passionate book critic, harold bloom who she quotes in the division, MONSTERS. “ ‘At eighty-four, I lie awake at night, after a first sleep, and murmur Crane, Whitman, Shakespeare to myself, seeking comfort through continuity, as grand voices somehow hold off the permanent darkness that gathers though it does not fall.’ These are the yearning yet inflamed intimations not of a poet, but of a lover—a critic who has fallen in love with incantation as a conduit to the Elysian horizon luringly beyond his reach. And like any monster gazing past the rest of us, he stares alone.”
the critic business is a thankless job. but who otherwise is there to tell the brazen autodidact, who frantically rushes out into the night, pacing streets of a city after reading d h lawrence; or the homeless person who cackled aloud at the audacity of ahab, breaking silence in the public library; or the graduate from a master’s program, staking a livelihood on the words of stephan dedalus: ‘And I am not afraid to a mistake, even a great mistake, a lifelong mistake and perhaps as long as eternity too. …’; or the pot washer who cringes with woe while reading of the transgressions in the novels of james baldwin as familiar, that even though it may not be alright, there are other readers who experienced the same feelings and other flaming books awaiting to be read, but the critic? this is what cynthia ozick is getting at—when the sun rises and the exhausted reader sees the city come alive with commerce, where does one find the next book, what voice has passion and conviction enough to engender trust with a sweeping magnitude for the lonesome word afflicted reader, comparable to the writer and the reader?
the reviewer? cynthia ozick answers: What separates criticism from reviewing—intrinsically—is that the critic must summon what the reviewer cannot: horizonless freedoms, multiple histories, multiple libraries, multiple metaphysics and intuitions. Reviewers are not merely critics of lesser degree, on the farther end of a spectrum. Critics belong to a wholly distinct phylum.’
few readers are interested in horizonless freedoms, wanting merely something good to read, or to the find a few of the books listed on their syllabus and call it quits. and fewer are the writers who forge the smithy of their souls to such depths they’re even blind, oblivious and dismissive of their own audience, the only audience who hungers for their words, the literature fanatics. and they won’t find them in classrooms in iowa or hoarding stacks of new yorkers, where short stories share space with ads for designer cosmetics.
in the essays which follow, cynthia ozick not only writes a twenty five page critical essay on lionel trilling and his unfinished novel, she writes an essay on an obscure literary movement of american hebraists, and in her section on the holocaust novel, she writes about h g adler. as little known as these writers are, she opines that without continual literary criticism these obscure writers will be forgotten, and, with them, or without them, lists of names of writers which should be familiar, which were once familiar, the writers she lists in THE LASTINGNESS OF SAUL BELLOW, an essay on the letters of bellow. her lists of names, of authors obscure and illuminated by the lights of fame, are inexhaustible inventories. her essays cover critics, letter writers, biographers and the translated. she doesn’t shy away from criticizing the responses to jewish writings, from updike’s bech to THE ZONE OF INTEREST by martin amis. nor is she out of touch with contemporary literature, two of her essays are provoked by discourses by ben marcus with jonathan frantzen and marilynne robinson with robert alter.
personally, i’m at a loss, more readers, critics and literary writers in literary realm of which she writes, do not mention cynthia ozick’s work. you say you love that of which she speaks, and you have not read TRUST or LEVITATION? really?
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Peter Kettle
5.0 out of 5 stars
VIVID, BRILLIANT, COGENT
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 30, 2021Verified Purchase
Cynthia Ozick is that rare writer; one who explains and enlarges the reader's experience of reading. She guides us through the tangles of writing, and enthuses us enough to try a writer we may previously have rejected. She has a sharp wit and a fresh outlook. I salute her.
Amazon Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nothing that hasn't been said before, essays on kafka in prague etc.
Reviewed in Canada on August 28, 2018Verified Purchase
It is hard to understand how such an original writer (I was blown away by a novel of her's) can write such.. okay essays.









