- Series: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant
- Paperback: 476 pages
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press; Revised ed. edition (December 3, 2001)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0521348927
- ISBN-13: 978-0521348928
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 7 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #284,603 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Critique of the Power of Judgment (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant) Revised ed. Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
All Books, All the Time
Read author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more at the Amazon Book Review. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Text: English (translation)
Original Language: German --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
This entirely new translation of Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment follows the principles and high standards of all other volumes in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. This volume includes: for the first time the indispensable first draft of Kant's introduction to the work; the only English edition notes to the many differences between the first (1790) and second (1793) editions of the work; and relevant passages in Kant's anthropology lectures where he elaborated on his aesthetic views.
Top customer reviews
The moral law,as the formal rational condition of the use of our freedom,obligates us by itself alone,without depending on any sort of end as a material condition; yet it determins for us, and indeed does so a priori, a final end, to strive after which it makes obligatory for us, and this is the highest good in the world possible through freedom.
Karl Popper once pointed out Kant's logic as " a priori - justification " in his book.（ K.Popper, ” Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography ” ）
This attack is based on the fact that Kant presupposes ” Lawfulness ” in the First Critique , ” Final end " in the Second Critique and ” Purposiveness " in the Third Critique as " a priori principle " .
Surely, having read three critiques and as far as The Second Critique and The Third Critique are concerned, Popper's accusation should not be neglected easily. Because,according to my own understanding, the First Critique belongs to the logic of " SEIN " , but the Second Critique and the Third Critique belong to the logic of " SOLLEN ".
But apart from logic itself , I was sincerely impressed with Kant's perspective of his philosophy which is based on " free will" and "moral law " , and also his honest confession of the pursuit of " happiness of human being " as a final end .
This book gave me a precious occasion to think once again about what sould be my own principle in my life.
Kant was a professor of philosophy in the German city of Konigsberg, where he spent his entire life and career. Kant had a very organised and clockwork life - his habits were so regular that it was considered that the people of Konigsberg could set their clocks by his walks. The same regularity was part of his publication history, until 1770, when Kant had a ten-year hiatus in publishing. This was largely because he was working on this book, the 'Critique of Pure Reason'.
Kant as a professor of philosophy was familiar with the Rationalists, such as Descartes, who founded the Enlightenment and in many ways started the phenomenon of modern philosophy. He was also familiar with the Empiricist school (John Locke and David Hume are perhaps the best known names in this), which challenged the rationalist framework. Between Leibniz' monads and Hume's development of Empiricism to its logical (and self-destructive) conclusion, coupled with the Romantic ideals typified by Rousseau, the philosophical edifice of the Enlightenment seemed about to topple.
This book is divided into two major sections, the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement, and the Critique of Teleological Judgement. In the part on Aesthetics, Kant sets up for possible judgements - agreeable, good, sublime and beautiful. This relates back to the 'Critique of Pure Reason' (and scholar J.H. Bernard indicates that this framework is sometimes a bit of a shackle placed on Kant). Those things that are agreeable are wholly sensory in character, whereas those things that are good are ethical in nature. Kant argues that those things that are beautiful and sublime fall between the two poles of 'agreeable' and 'good'. Beauty is involved in purpose (teleology), whereas sublimity is that which goes beyond comprehension (and can be an object of fear). This also involves an idea of mind that allows for genius and creative activity.
In the section on teleology, this is a way of looking at things based on their ends (telos), and links to aesthetics in terms of beauty (which has a sense of finality of form) as well as links to scientific purposes - Kant particularly is concerned to explore biology and the telos of the natural world. This also involves physics and logical principles, bringing Kant full circle back to some of the ideas from the 'Critique of Pure Reason'.
This is one of Kant's master works, and while there is much that modern philosophers disagree with, there is also the sense in which no subsequent philosophy can ignore the developments and implications of Kant's Critique project.