Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

HERTZ DCX 690 6" x 9" 3-Way Coaxial Speakers with Grilles DCX690

5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Technical Details

  • Brand Name: Hertz
  • Model Number: DCX 690
  • MP3 player: N

Product Information

Technical Details

Item model number DCX 690

Additional Information

ASIN B0044AFQYW
Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #6,343 in Electronics > Car Electronics > Car Audio > Speakers > Coaxial Speakers
Date First Available December 26, 2011

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By Michael on March 29, 2013
Verified Purchase
The Australian Hertz distributor has discontinued the Hertz line so I purchased from Woofers after great reviews. Woofers provided excellent service with very fast shipping. The dcx is a quality speaker even in the dcx range and provides phenomenal bass quality!
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I have a pioneer avh-x5500bhs head unit. Swapped my rear deck factory to the hertz 6x9 dcx690 improved sound quality from highs to lows. The 90 watts on the speakers is high for a 50 watts radio but still a great sound
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse