Customer Reviews: Daniel: My French Cuisine
Amazon Vehicles GoldBox Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Totes Amazon Cash Back Offer ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis Florida Georgia Line Water Sports

Format: Hardcover|Change
Price:$38.95+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on October 27, 2013
This is a beautiful book with incredible pictures and recipes. For the home cook there is no doubt it can be challenging. Even the ingredients may be hard to come by. However, like any cookbook, there are recipes that are doable for those with experience in the kitchen. The instructions are precise. The list of ingredients can be daunting, but many parts of the recipes can be made ahead. This is great for those of us who have no sous chef in our homes. You can also take just parts of a recipe and use them as you please. I have done this with recipes from the Cafe Boulud cookbook with great success. The plating is particularly great. Where Thomas Keller goes vertical frequently, Daniel goes horizontal on many plates. His presentation can certainly inspire home cooks towards greater visual plating. So experiment, enjoy, and share with friends who truly love great food.
0Comment| 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 29, 2015
Daniel: My French Cuisine

Restaurant Daniel is a pretty upscale restaurant, and I enjoy buying cookbooks from those types of restaurants and challenging myself to replicating meals from those books. Hence I came to Daniel: My French Cuisine, albeit somewhat after it had first made its appearance in the marketplace.
My copy of Daniel arrived with a solid thud, a fitting sound for a book over 1 and ½ inches thick and big enough, when opened, to push my feet off of the coffee table. A quick flip-through. Beautiful pictures throughout. The restaurant recipes involved many steps, but each step was precisely explained, as were the recipes in the section on some of the meals that Daniel cooks at home.
Then, my first test. Did the plating instructions match the restaurant meal photographs? I chose a recipe and flipped back and forth a number of times… and then a number of times more, excited to find that the instructions coincided with the pictures down to the last piece of garnish. My excitement built. If I wanted to, I could make a plate that looked exactly like what I could buy at Restaurant Daniel. Nice!
Now, on to step two: the introduction. Was the point of the book clearly stated. Well, yes it was. In the introduction, Daniel set the parameters and, in a sense issued a reminder (or warning, perhaps) that he has many people involved in the preparation of his restaurant food (brigade is the key word) and that he lives above the restaurant which implies (as he would later state in the last section) that a quick run to the restaurant to pick up some truffles for dinner was not a luxury that many of us have.
Aware, and therefore undaunted, I moved on to a leisurely look at the rest of the book, and my next test: Does the book do what it set out to do in a consistent cohesive fashion?
There are three sections to the book. The first section, and the longest, contains the restaurant “evolutions.” For those who are up to the challenge, this part of the book offers the opportunity to replicate the high level meals as they are at the restaurant. This section is divided into Appetizers, Fish, Meat and Desserts. All the plates are complete in themselves, just as they are served at the restaurant. Notably absent are salads and soups. There is no section called “sides,” nor any section devoted mainly to vegetables. These omissions can be justified, certainly, but their absence should be mentioned. Happily, anything used to produce the food can be found on the sources page, and there were alternatives given for much of the equipment.
The third section of the book is called Daniel Cooks at Home. Again, there are in this section plenty of opportunities for cooks. It has four sub sections, all indicating areas of influence: Alsace, Normandy, Provence, and Lyon. Here the reader will find some of the items previously mentioned as missing from the first section. There are, for example, some sides.
Then, I shifted to the second section. While the first and third sections were filled with energy, challenge, insights into Daniel’s “evolving” of the recipes, and how he actualizes them on plates, this section seemed leaden, and not just because it was more prose or because it did not contain any recipes. The second section is the “Iconic Sessions” section. There is a definition for “Iconic” at the beginning of the section, but these recipes can also be understood as tour de force recipes that exist, for the most part, in the cannon of French Aristocratic cooking. Rococo in nature, they are akin to “Terducken”…a production that involves stuffing a small bird inside a larger one, and that one inside a larger one, eventually stuffing that into a duck, and finishing by stuffing the duck into a turkey. Section two just seems to be out of place. This is not because the concept does not fit into the overall concept of the book(recipes that are connected to Daniel’s life in French cooking), but because it is written as essays by a different person (Bill Buford). While I know that the word essay comes from the French word to walk, as to walk with an idea, “essays” in this section seem more like watching a rhythm-challenged person trying to break dance. Sometimes things go right, sometimes wrong, and many times they embarrassingly uncomfortable to see. Buford is well credentialed, but the whole section lacks the sparkle and energy of the other two sections. His use of the “impersonal “you” comes across as sophomoric (He has been called to task for this before,) and proscriptive, and his frequent focus on himself as frequently befuddled raises the word befuddlement to new levels. In many parts of this section, there are more pictures of Daniel than appearances in the text. In all other sections, Daniel’s voice comes through. Here it is lost or muddled. (For an example of one of many strange inclusions, look over page 288, right column, the last four paragraphs beginning with “I heard it was Carême…” ?????) The reader has to work harder, a lot harder, to see Daniel dealing with bringing these recipes to life in modern times while retaining their “iconic” nature.
(I did learn that Buford sweats a good deal, and he seems to feel that this project that he is involved with is a life or death matter, and that he continues to sweat at being entertaining. He is better when it comes to researched material and providing background for the Iconic Session presentations, but still is heavy handed.)
The photographs in part two raise, but still do not save this section. Discounting the obviously (and sometimes painfully) posed “candids,” there are many pictures that show the concentration, interest, and delight that Daniel has in the whole process of making these foods, and which underscores how intensely he works. (Two of my favorite pictures in this section are on page 300 and the large picture on page 311. You can’t fake that intensity.) The photographs of the final products are technically excellent, but the food itself comes from a much earlier time in culinary history, hence the images tend to be of dense creations whose very visuals may send one’s cholesterol skyrocketing or may make one pause to reflect on scheduling an appointment for an electrocardiogram.
So, on to my last test: Did the book inspire me? For the most part, yes, Because everything was so spelled out in section 1 and 3, I could understand what was going on and see variations if I wished to make things more my own. I could hear Daniel’s voice. In section 2, not so much, or not at all. While interesting to consider, the results suggested to me that there was a reason why many of the “Iconic” recipes have faded or been transmuted into something else.
Generally, there are two groups of people who purchase a high level restaurant based cookbook, those who plan to use it, and those who just like looking at books of this type. The latter group, those whose joy is in the perusing alone, will have much to enjoy: the pictures are beautiful, the text in both the first and third section is interesting, and the book graces a coffee table with elegance, and mass. These readers may even like the Iconic Sessions.
People who have paid out small fortunes for a book like this and have plans to use it at home probably are not (or really should not be) timid cooks. They will appreciate the photographs which are almost schools themselves in Boulud’s style of plating. They will appreciate that the photographs match the plating directions, something that often is a glaring problem in other books of this level. They will appreciate the attention to detail in the recipes. They will appreciate the frequent inclusion of alternative techniques to be used if the suggested equipment is not available. They will appreciate the list of sources that make easier finding what Daniel used in the production of his food.
Both groups may well appreciate being invited into the world of Daniel Boulud. I certainly did, and I have gone through the book many times already, but I feel that the Iconic Recipes could have been either moved to the end or handled by someone who could have made his or her work mesh better with the overall energy of the book.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 9, 2014
I actually purchased two of these, as a permanent memento for the 50th birthday dinner for my brother (one for us, one for he and my sister-in-law). It's a stunning volume. A show stopper (if it weren't so beautiful, it could also be a door stopper it's so large!)

Really I am an avid cook and I know my way around a kitchen. I appreciate fine food prepared by a fine chef. And Daniel in NYC is one of the best meals I've ever had (especially if you count the experience, the service). And it is for that reason, I'll say I love this book, yes, but not as a cook book. DO NOT buy it as such. It is a wonderful compendium of a life in fine cuisine, with recipes from Daniel Boulud's restaurant. It's part chronicle, part food porn, part celebration of a fine man in food. Buy the book to celebrate that, and slowly flip from page to wonderful page to see the things you could never (and should never) make yourself.

For practical, Daniel Boulud-like recipes, buy a book by Dori Greenspan, Boulud's collaborator for books. She's fantastic. And I know Mr. Boulud has other great, practical cook books.

Buy this one to commemorate a stunning treasure that we have here in food. (And if you go to Daniel for a special dinner like I did, buy the book as a gift to remember an unforgettable night.)
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon January 21, 2016
As my family knows, I love to cook, I love to experiment and If I say so myself, I’m not bad. My wife, supporting this view says she is picky when we go out to dinner because I do things so well she wants to try things I haven’t done. So when a new cook book from a premier French restaurant in New York showed on my wish list, my family knew it would be well received under the Xmas tree.

I love it but this is not for the beginner. Usually I can plow through a cook book, marking recipes I like with little scraps of paper going “‘I’ll do that, that, not that…” this is harder. This is for those special meals and while I’m getting ideas it is clearly stuff that will challenge me. If I’m pausing I think the casual chef might well be in over their own head. I know that sounds boastful but I’m one of those people who makes his own ketchup and honey mustard. I have two different home fryers, one for battered foods one for ‘naked’ foods. I can’t buy breaded fish sticks because my wife says my own fish and chips have spoiled her. I’m not boasting here. I’m just trying to set expectations. I enjoy futzing around in the kitchen and this, as fun as it is to read through, makes me pause.

It is a wonderful cook book full of his views on food and some interesting ways to go with food, but it is NOT for the beginner.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 9, 2013
The book divided in three section: dishes from eponimous restaurant, classical French dishes and Daniel at home. All three parts are amazing and useful and practical for me as chef at the restaurant, the only thing I didn't particularly enjoy is pictures of the dishes, they seems rather dated and overlytouched. But the recipes are great anyway.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 10, 2014
if you are amateur or you are chef and looking to improve your skills this book you can learn to many things from it , i recommend strongly and specially for chefs you wont be sorry
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on February 19, 2014
I love everything about Daniel's book and if you really read it, it's good enough for everyday or above average foodies. The pix are great, and the history is legendary. Thanks, Daniel for something accessible for the mass foodie's in the world. The book lives up to it's behemoth weight, but on Prime, no big deal! Thanks, D!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 29, 2013
Over the years, America’s greatest chefs have documented their creative process through aspirational books that set a new bar for the profession – from Jean-Louis Palladin’s 1989 COOKING WITH THE SEASONS to Thomas Keller’s 1999 FRENCH LAUNDRY COOKBOOK. Daniel Boulud’s 2013 DANIEL is a masterwork of equal scale and scope.

Documenting the cooking that has led his eponymous restaurant to take its place among “The World’s 50 Best Restaurants” (San Pellegrino’s 2013 list anointed it as #29), DANIEL celebrates a contemporary expression of French cuisine through the soulful interpretation of a French-born chef who is today every bit as much an American as a Frenchman.

While this book will be most treasured by professional chefs aspiring to the world-class level of artistry Daniel Boulud personifies, it will also be of interest to avid home cooks seeking outstanding recipes – whether for court bouillon (a flavored liquid used to poach vegetables, eggs, etc.) or for the best Wild Mushroom Tarte Flambee we have ever tasted.

Legendary French chef Fernand Point believed “The duty of a good cuisinier is to transmit to the next generation everything he has learned and experienced.” Through eight books (including this latest), Daniel Boulud is at the forefront of leading chefs in the generosity with which he is sharing his vast culinary knowledge.

With gorgeous four-color photographs by Thomas Schauer and essays by The New Yorker’s Bill Buford, DANIEL (which was co-written with Sylvie Bigar) is a book for the ages – one that future generations will consult for a glimpse into the mind and heart of one of the greatest chefs of our lifetime.

--Karen Page and Andrew Dornenburg, James Beard Award-winning authors of THE FLAVOR BIBLE
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 11, 2014
Not for the faint of heart , challenging but very rewarding. Definitely for a more advanced cook.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 11, 2015
Oui, excellent. Detailed recipes for the serious chefs. I love the pictures. Have worked on a few recipes already. I constructed an awesome seafood tower with blanched vegetables and appropriate sauces. :)
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse