Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Darfur: A Short History of a Long War (African Arguments) Paperback – April 1, 2008
- Print length350 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherZed Books
- Publication dateApril 1, 2008
- Dimensions5.06 x 0.73 x 7.81 inches
- ISBN-101842779508
- ISBN-13978-1842779507
Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Understanding Ethiopia's Tigray WarPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Wednesday, Oct 29
When the War Was Over: Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge Revolution, Revised EditionPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Oct 28
Haiti: The Aftershocks of HistoryPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Oct 28
Congo: The Epic History of a PeoplePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Oct 28Only 18 left in stock (more on the way).
The World After Gaza: A HistoryHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Oct 28
Africa's World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making of a Continental CatastrophePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Oct 28Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Customers also bought or read
- Sudan's Unfinished Democracy: Sub Title the Promise and Betrayal of a People's Revolution Edition
Paperback$28.45$28.45Delivery Fri, Nov 7 - King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa
Paperback$13.66$13.66Delivery Tuesday - Africa's World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making of a Continental Catastrophe
Paperback$22.00$22.00Delivery Tuesday - Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland
Paperback$15.99$15.99Delivery Tuesday - Dancing in the Glory of Monsters: The Collapse of the Congo and the Great War of Africa
Paperback$15.25$15.25Delivery Tuesday - Al-Shabaab in Somalia: The History and Ideology of a Militant Islamist Group
Paperback$26.50$26.50Delivery Tuesday - The Root Causes of Sudan's Civil Wars: Old Wars and New Wars [Expanded 3rd Edition] (African Issues, 38)
Paperback$24.87$24.87Delivery Fri, Nov 7 - Warfare in Independent Africa (New Approaches to African History, Series Number 5)
Paperback$25.86$25.86Delivery Wednesday - A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954-1962 (New York Review Books Classics)
Paperback$12.64$12.64Delivery Tuesday - The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power
Paperback$25.65$25.65Delivery Tue, Nov 11
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Disentangling myth from reality in Darfur is so difficult that the credentials of those who judge events there are particularly important. Those of both authors of this ... work are excellent” ―A masterpiece.
“That is the book Darfur: fast: moving, insightful, elaborate and intriguing; ... So graphic the stories, it is as good as watching a movie on Darfur; you see what you read” ―For anyone who wants to understand the politics of Sudan, the history of the suffering peoples and the possible solutions, this is the right book.
“A very clear-sighted account ... the book I would give first to anyone wanting to become acquainted with the crisis in Darfur.” ―Praise for the First Edition, African Affairs
“The book is an impressive source of detailed information about a conflict that has been grossly over-simplified by most western reporters and advocacy groups.” ―Alan J. Kuperman, Lyndon B. Johnson, School of Public Affairs University of Texas
“Alex de Waal and Julie Flint have written the definitive history of the Darfur conflict. Very detailed and thoroughly documented from first hand sources, the book will quickly become a classic and will correct some of the outside misperceptions of who did what to whom and why. They have written a balanced account of a very disturbing story, made more confused by government and rebel propaganda, by letting participants and eyewitness observers tell their stories.” ―Andrew Natsios, Former Administrator of USAID and US Special Envoy to Sudan
“This is among the best works available on the current Darfur crisis. For a blow by blow account of developments, there is none better.” ―Mahmood Mamdani, University of Columbia
“This brilliant book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the complex history of Darfur and how the very name became synonymous with suffering.” ―Mia Farrow
“The best introduction is Darfur: A Short History of a Long War by Julie Flint and Alex de Waal...their accounts are as readable as they are tragic” ―Praise for the First Edition, Nicholas D. Kristof in 'The New York Review of Books'
About the Author
Alex de Waal is a writer and activist on African issues. He is a programme director at the Social Science Research Council, a fellow of the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and a director of Justice Africa. His books include Famine that Kills: Darfur, Sudan (1989), Famine Crimes: Politics and the Disaster Relief Industry in Africa (1997), Islamism and Its Enemies in the Horn of Africa (2004) and Aids and Power: Why There is No Political Crisis - Yet (2006)
Julie Flint is a journalist and film-maker. She divides her time between London and the Middle East. She has worked on from Colombia to China and has won several awards. She has been writing about Sudan since 1992, initially as Horn of Africa correspondent for The Guardian and later as a freelance with a special interest in human rights. Her work includes the BBC film Sudan's Secret War (1995) and The Scorched Earth (2000) and Darfur Destroyed (2004).
Alex de Waal is a writer and activist on African issues. He is a programme director at the Social Science Research Council, a fellow of the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and a director of Justice Africa. His books include Famine that Kills: Darfur, Sudan (1989), Famine Crimes: Politics and the Disaster Relief Industry in Africa (1997), Islamism and Its Enemies in the Horn of Africa (2004) and Aids and Power: Why There is No Political Crisis - Yet (2006)
Julie Flint is a journalist and film-maker. She divides her time between London and the Middle East. She has worked on from Colombia to China and has won several awards. She has been writing about Sudan since 1992, initially as Horn of Africa correspondent for The Guardian and later as a freelance with a special interest in human rights. Her work includes the BBC film Sudan's Secret War (1995) and The Scorched Earth (2000) and Darfur Destroyed (2004).
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Darfur
A New History of a Long War
By Julie Flint, Alex de WaalZed Books Ltd
Copyright © 2008 Julie Flint and Alex de WaalAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-84277-950-7
Contents
Acknowledgements, viii,Preface to the second edition, ix,
Maps: Sudan, xiii,
Darfur, xiv,
1 The people of Darfur, 1,
2 The Sudan government, 16,
3 The Janjawiid, 33,
4 The rebels, 71,
5 A war of total destruction, 2003–04, 116,
6 Wars within wars, 2005–06, 150,
7 International reaction, 167,
8 The Abuja peace talks, 200,
9 Endless chaos, 230,
Chronology, 277,
Glossary, 281,
Dramatis personae, 283,
Notes, 288,
Bibliography, 307,
Index, 311,
CHAPTER 1
The people of Darfur
Northern Darfur is a forbidding place. It has landscapes of elemental simplicity: vast sandy plains, jutting mountains and jagged ridges, and occasional ribbons of green along the all-too-rare seasonal watercourses. A village, sometimes comprising no more than a cluster of huts made from straw and branches, may be a day's ride from its neighbour. Every place, however humble, counts. A hand-dug well in a dry river bed can be the difference between life and death for a camel herd trekking from the valleys of central Darfur to the desert-edge pastures.
Darfur's people are resourceful and resilient. Extracting a living from this land requires unrelenting hard work and detailed knowledge of every crevice from which food or livelihood can be scratched. A woman living on the desert edge will know how to gather a dozen varieties of wild grasses and berries to supplement a meagre diet of cultivated millet and vegetables, along with goat's or camel's milk. She will know the farms and village markets within a hundred miles or more, and will not hesitate to walk or ride such distances to buy, sell or work.
Nomads move three hundred miles or more twice a year, ranging even further in exceptionally wet or unusually dry years. 'Settled' people move also, migrating to open up new areas of farmland. In the dry sandy areas of eastern Darfur especially, villages grow and die along with their water supplies and the fertility of their soils; in the far south, along the forest edge, the frontier of cultivation creeps southwards every year. Mobility and distance make it difficult to maintain authority: those in power must always contemplate their subjects' option of simply moving beyond reach.
In the centre of Darfur, the extinct volcano of Jebel Marra rises 8,000 feet above the surrounding savanna. The green mountain can be climbed in a day, an arduous trek through orchards, terraced fields and pastures that reach nearly to the lip of the crater. There are wonderful myths about the fertility of the soils on the crater floor and the monstrous creatures that live in the deep waters of the crater lakes. Jebel Marra is the greenest mountain of Sahelian Africa, the only major watershed between the Ethiopian escarpment and the headwaters of the Niger close to the Atlantic Ocean. For many Darfurians this mountain possesses an almost mythical quality. It was when the Fur suspected a government plan to turn Jebel Marra over to the Arabs that Darfur's rebellion reached its point of no return, and the mountain became the rebels' sanctuary and first headquarters.
Yet the historic centre of Darfur is not the highest peak, which lies at the southern end of the massif, but the drier, broken mountains further north. Five centuries ago, in the mountainous triangle between Kutum, Kebkabiya and Korma, centralized states were created. The first was the Tunjur empire, named for a people who still inhabit the region, and whose rulers' castles still stand abandoned on hilltops, ringed by long-dry terraces. Tunjur origins remain an enigma: closely related in myth and language to the Fur, their history and ethnography has yet to be fully written. The successor to their empire was the Fur sultanate, the first Muslim state in Darfur, which emerged in the middle of the seventeenth century. The region takes its name from the homeland (dar) of the Fur.
By 1800, the Fur sultanate was the most powerful state within the borders of modern-day Sudan. In adopting Islam as the official state religion, the Fur sultans also embraced Arabic as a language of religious faith, scholarship and jurisprudence. Both Arabic and Fur were spoken at court. Darfurians – like most Africans – were comfortable with multiple identities. Dar Fur was an African kingdom that embraced Arabs as valued equals.
Dor village
The village of Dor lies north of Kutum, amid lumpy granite hills. It is drier and poorer than most parts of Darfur, but typical in the complicated allegiances of its people. In the middle of the eighteenth century, Dor was governed by a land grant from the ruler of Dar Fur, Sultan Mohamed Teyrab. Throughout this part of Darfur, even today, the chiefly families possess land titles in the form of documents, written on thick paper with a huge seal or stamp the size of a camel's hoof. This document is a hakura, or land grant. The term refers both to the grant and to the land itself.
The hakura of Dor is known as Dar Sueini. Many inhabitants refer to themselves as 'Koraberi', which means 'Fur-Zaghawa' in both those languages. Most of the inhabitants of Dor speak three languages: Fur, Zaghawa and Arabic, the lingua franca of Darfur. The Fur are the largest group in Darfur and Dor lies at their northern extremity; the Zaghawa are a Saharan people, whose homeland lies on the Sudan-Chad border at the edge of the desert. In the millennium-long dessication of the Sahara, the Zaghawa have slowly moved southwards.
Like all Darfur villages, Dor is ethnically mixed. Thirty years ago the village was dominated by four ethnic groups: Zaghawa, Fur, Tunjur and Kaitinga – this last a Fur clan that migrated north and adoped Zaghawa as its language. Some argue that Fur and Tunjur are parts of the same ancient group, and that Kaitinga embraces both Fur and Zaghawa. How could a person's identity be pinned down? It depended on the context. For political allegiance, blood-money payment and marriage considerations, ancestry was most important. But that didn't stop almost half the marriages in Dor crossing ethnic lines. In the marketplace, what mattered most was which language was spoken. A smart merchant would learn as many dialects as possible to gain the confidence of his customers. When dealing with the district tax collector and magistrate, or using the wells to water your animals, what counted was where you lived. If a Fur or Tunjur villager accumulated a lot of animals and chose to move with them seasonally, he might well prefer to call himself 'Zaghawa' or even 'Arab', in line with his livelihood.
A minority of Dor's residents were drawn from a host of other ethnic groups: Seinga, Berti, Jawamaa and Masalit, plus two categories of Arabs: Jellaba and Rizeigat. The Jellaba were traders from the Nile. The Rizeigat of Dor were Darfur Bedouins, members of the powerful Mahamid section. It was an impressive but not untypical array of ethnic groups in one remote village.
Darfur is home to more than 6 million people. There is just one rainy season, lasting approximately from June to September, which brings occasional storms to the arid north and regular showers across the well-watered south. The best cultivation is in the central belt, especially where big seasonal rivers, or wadis, run down from Jebel Marra. But even in the semi-desert, there are hollows that collect rainwater where millet can be grown. There is a span of rural livelihoods, from the poorest farmers who have no livestock, through farmers with sheep, goats and maybe a cow or two (the majority), to purely nomadic herders. Camels do well in the dry north while cattle prefer the wetter south. There is a regular cycle of boom and bust in the livestock economy, as herders acquire and lose animals and rely less or more on cultivation. It was ever thus: the historical records are full of references to settled Arab villages, and Arab sheikhs were granted land for farming by the sultans as far back as records exist.
Dor lies close to one of just three all-season livestock routes to the desert – known as masars – used by camel herders on their annual north-south migrations. Six hours' walk to the east is Wadi Fokhma, one of those rare seasonal watercourses that run northwards from Darfur's central plateau into the desert. Traditionally, the nomads spent the rains and the following three months, October to December, in the desert, grazing their camels on the pastures along Wadi Howar, the last seasonal watercourse before the desert, and further north, where the grasses known as jizu are so succulent that camels can go without water for more than thirty days. Until just a few years ago, this rich grazing land was shared among Darfur's camelmen: Arabs, Zaghawa and Meidob. In January, the herds moved south, spending the winter and dry season in the valleys south of Kutum or travelling into the well-watered districts of south-west Darfur, along the major migration routes that everyone shared.
The people of Dor pay bridewealth and blood money in livestock. With no banks, animals are the store of wealth. At this latitude, keeping a cow, a thirsty animal that needs lots of grass, is little more than a vanity; most of Dor's animals are sheep, goats and camels, the latter traditionally entrusted to Arabs and Zaghawa herders for the northern migration. Not forgetting the ubiquitous donkeys, essential for travel to market and carrying firewood and water.
A few days' travel north, along the seasonal watercourse that serves as the route to the autumn pastures, is Rahad – or Lake Gineik, a vast reservoir, several metres deep in the rainy season, created by an earthen dam. In 1968, a fight began at Rahad Gineik between Zaghawa and Arab herders from the powerful Um Jalul clan of the Mahamid camel-herders. It was provoked by an attempt by Um Jalul herders to disarm a Zaghawa, Mohamed Omar Diko, who was watering his camels. It continued for three days before government troops and the police finally intervened.
'There were many Arabs, but few Zaghawa,' Diko recalled more than forty years after the event. 'The Arabs were well-armed; the Zaghawa had sticks and spears and old guns.'
In 1969, a tribal conference presided over by the sultan of the Masalit and the paramount chief of the Mahamid, Sheikh Hilal Mohamed Abdalla, sentenced twelve Zaghawa and twelve Arabs to ten years' imprisonment each. Mohamed Omar Diko was one of the Zaghawa – even though he fled after he lost his weapon. Looking back almost half a century later, he harboured no grudge at this rough justice. 'There was equal treatment then,' he said. 'Not like now. But after the conference, we lived like snakes and mice. And we were the mice.' The Arabs saw it differently. From that time, they said, the Zaghawa harboured plans to dominate Darfur by acquiring education, money, land and guns.
After the Rahad Gineik trouble, the Zaghawa, Kaitinga and Tunjur ended their practice of entrusting their camels to the Arabs. Zaghawa herders began taking care of the camels from Dor. This showed a pattern which became more and more marked over the next generation: conflict divided groups along ethnic-ancestry lines. As the people of Dor say, 'Conflict defines origins.' Was this because people instinctively clung to their ancestral tribes in times of insecurity? Or was it because, when disputes came to be settled and compensation paid, corporate lineage groups were responsible for paying blood money? The Gineik fight levered open a tribal divide.
Although the two sides at Gineik were Zaghawa and Rizeigat Arabs, the Rizeigat themselves were not united. There was a longstanding dispute between the Mahamid and Mahariya sections. In our analysis of the origins of the Janjawiid, we will examine how this conflict played out over three generations, stoking the fires of violent conflict.
A history of statehood and ethnicity
A host of ethnic groups or tribes – between forty and ninety depending on one's definition – have emerged from Darfur's history. Dar Fur was an independent state for three centuries until 1916. It was one of the most powerful kingdoms in a string of such states positioned on the southern edge of the Sahara desert, trading with the Mediterranean and raiding its southern neighbours. When Napoleon occupied Egypt in 1798, he exchanged letters with the sultan of Dar Fur, which at that time had a trade with Egypt five times the value of that with the kingdom of Sennar, Dar Fur's rival on the Nile. The sultan was wealthy – the greatest merchant in the kingdom – and in theory possessed absolute power. At its zenith in the nineteenth century, Dar Fur's towns were prosperous: a visiting merchant, Mohamed al Tunisi, compared Kebkabiya favourably with country towns in Egypt.
The Dar Fur state was centred in the northern mountains, just south of Dor. The ruling clan here was the Keira dynasty, which gradually expanded its domain southwards. As the state spread its authority, it absorbed farming communities which adopted the Fur language, converted to Islam, and came under the political and administrative suzerainty of the state. They 'became' Fur. During the eighteenth century, the system of hakura land grants was formalized and expanded. The hakura system is commonly described today as 'tribal land ownership', but this is a misnomer in two respects. First, the system was not directly 'tribal'. The hakura-holders were court appointees, entitled to collect dues from the people living in their domain. Often, the hakura head became a local potentate, building a base independent from the sultan, usually by collecting his kinsmen in the area. By these means the office became hereditary and the dominant group the tribe of the hakura chief. Hence the 'tribe' consolidated around the hakura as often as the other way around. In other cases, tribal groups controlled territorial domains regardless of the sovereign's writ: 'The hakura system preceded the sultans,' says Saeed Madibu, head of the southern Rizeigat. 'It is a tradition from the people.' Second, the rights of the hakura owner started off as feudal jurisdiction, and never became freehold title. These subtleties are of more than historical importance: they influenced the political strategies of the land-hungry at the turn of the twenty-first century and can help determine workable solutions for Darfur's crisis.
Only a minority of people within Dar Fur's dominions were, or became, Fur. There were also the Tunjur, Meidob and Zaghawa in the north, the Berti and Birgid in the east, the Masalit in the west and many other smaller groups – all today labelled as 'African' tribes. The Masalit are especially significant. For centuries their villages were in the political no-man's land between Dar Fur and the Wadai sultanate to the west, based in Abeche in today's Chad. Only in the late nineteenth century, as both these powerful states were plunged into crisis, was Dar Masalit able to emerge briefly as an independent polity.
The Arab presence in Darfur dates from the fourteenth century. Darfur's original Arabs fall into two groups: scholars and traders who arrived from the east and the west – the Nile and Arabia, the Maghreb and West Africa – and Juhayna Bedouins who arrived from the north west over several centuries in search of grass and water. The Juhayna Arabs trace their lineage back to the Qoreish tribe of the Prophet Mohamed. Their numbers increased through marriage with Darfurians and through assimilation as indigenous groups claimed Arab descent – partly because adopting an Arab-Muslim identity was a means of protection against enslavement. South of Jebel Marra, the Arabs took to herding cattle – becoming known as Baggara, or cattle-people – while those in the north remained as Abbala, or camelmen. In the sparsely settled south, the Fur sultans recognized the authority of each of the four main Baggara chiefs – Ta'aisha, Beni Halba, Habbaniya and Rizeigat – and in time their administrative jurisdiction became recognized as a hakura or dar (tribal homeland). Their Abbala cousins, moving as nomads in the northern provinces, where all land was already allocated to others, occasionally received small estates, but had no jurisdiction over any sizeable territories. To this day, many Abbala Arabs explain their involvement in the current conflict in terms of this 250-year-old search for land, granted to the Baggara but denied to them. An Arab omda (administrative chief) from North Darfur explained, 'the system of hakura is old and outdated like the feudal system in Europe. The right to [Sudanese] citizenship guarantees a right to a place to live.'
The Rizeigat are the largest and most powerful of the Arab tribes of Darfur. Most live in south-east Darfur, under the tribal authority of the Madibu family. The Rizeigat in northern Darfur and Chad trace the same lineage but have no enduring political connections. They have three sections – Mahariya, Mahamid and Eteifat – and close political connections with two other Arab tribes, Awlad Rashid and Ereigat. Their camels made them rich and influential: the northern Rizeigat were among Darfur's specialist export hauliers across the desert.
On its southern periphery, Dar Fur showed a different and more violent face. It was a slaving machine, hunting the forest peoples for slaves, both for its own domestic and agricultural economy and for export along the 'Forty Days' Road' to Egypt and beyond.
(Continues...)Excerpted from Darfur by Julie Flint, Alex de Waal. Copyright © 2008 Julie Flint and Alex de Waal. Excerpted by permission of Zed Books Ltd.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Zed Books
- Publication date : April 1, 2008
- Edition : 2nd
- Language : English
- Print length : 350 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1842779508
- ISBN-13 : 978-1842779507
- Item Weight : 10.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.06 x 0.73 x 7.81 inches
- Part of series : African Arguments
- Best Sellers Rank: #629,291 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #103 in East Africa History
- #120 in North Africa History
- #252 in African Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2008Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseI purchased this book for my class on Conflict and Conflict Resolution at San Diego State.
This book is very detailed giving all the background on Sudan the country, its different tribes and groups as well as all of the individuals who have held or are seeking power in Sudan.
The book also highlights the regional players and their modivations such as Libya, Chad, Eriteria who are seeking to keep Sudan destablized for their own personal gain.
The authors do an excellent job of also bring to light the international aspects as well as the local and national issues the helped to create the circumstances of the first civil war/ conflict of north vs south Sudan and then Darfur. Not to mention the problems that stem from the international communties poor foresight when it came to resolving the North vs. South Sudan issues and the treaty that has made it impossible to truly resolve the Darfur conflict. Also how the international community and aid agencies shot themselves in the foot by labeling Darfur a genocide - spending more time documenting the genocide than helping people get food and water in that barren land.
However the one criticism I have of this book is the amount of shifting between different eras in history, players (wait till you get to the part about SLA vs SPLA vs SLA W vs SLA M) essentially you need a felt board like they use in military strategies to keep track of the players and their movements around Sudan.
I however despite my critisims highly recommend this book as a primer for anyone interested in Sudan and the root issues of Darfur.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2021Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseNeeded it for English class, passed the class. Quality of the book was good.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2015Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseGood book, recommended reading if you require insight into the crisis in the Sudan
- Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2011Format: HardcoverVerified PurchaseMy review here covers the details that Flint uses in her synopsis. My opinion is in the final paragraph. If you're looking for the specific take of events from the author, read below.
The Darfur conflict is hugely complex, a mix not only of ethnic diversity and languages but of border and international power struggles. The Fur felt they were losing more and more power in their region as the region was split in to three sections, making them minorities in each. Next, huge Chadian Arab migrations flooded the land and its resources in a time of famine and great need. Does this become a war for survival?
JEM, SLA and other rebel groups formed in the last ten years in response to government supported Janjawiid. The SPLA (Southern Sudan) worked alliances with the Darfur rebels. Al-Turabi is said to have made connections with all Darfurians to support his umma party. There are many reasons why Khartoum would be worried about the Darfur and its power sapping energy. AMIS began a mission in Darfur with very little man-power, Nigerian dominance and little structure. The transition to a UN mission never came, even though there was a UNSC resolution 1709.
Activists kept the Darfur in the news, biggest yet in 2004-2005, and even when the conflict had tapered off. It became an activist agenda not always reflecting the facts on the ground. By 2007 until now, the violence had lessened. Taha had negotiated the SPLA's CPA in 2005 and shortly after the government tried to negotiate with Darfur in Abidjon, without the same success.
Flint makes Bashir (president of Sudan) look very counter to the secret negotiations that Taha had with Garang. Yet, somehow, Bashir is the 'hero' of the South for the current independence.
The difference between patronage and representation is motive and unity. The Fur, Zaghawi and Arabs had different objects and goals in Darfur. They did not maintain unity against Khartoum. Even while they all had grievances against the capital they had no strong alliance.
The Darfur story as described here makes its plight appear distant from world politics, lacking any global importance. Darfur has always been more of a moral issue than of any outside nation's personal or national interest. I'd recommend this as a summary of of Darfur's crisis.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2024Anyone who knows Sudan knows Alex de Waal, and this is a great introduction to modern Darfur.
De Waal and Flint actually conducted the interviews and ground research to understand Darfur in the 1980s and 1990s, so they present far more detailed and human pictures of the tribes, the Janjaweed, and the SLA and JEM.
While this is a short book and there is far more information they could have presented on the war itself and especially the international response, any subsequent writing from de Waal on Sudan can fill in the gaps.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2007People professionally concerned with genocide prevention and Darfur recommended this short but outstanding book (there are quite a few others on the crisis) when I needed to supplement my knowledge quickly. Its 134 pages of condensed information are based on prolonged and detailed work in the region and with people who know it well. The complexity of Darfur and its crisis as well as its relationship to other regions of Sudan emerge with balance, but with a clear picture of the horrors being committed. It enlarged my knowledge greatly beyond what I had gleaned from the media and a few days spent with some refugees from Darfur. It discusses events up to early 2005, its publication year, so is not quite up to date. The experts recommended it despite pointing this out, and I'm glad they did.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2007This book is a valuable asset to any library. The only problem I had with this book is trying to read Swahili. I took Introduction to Swahili 101 at Oklahoma City Junior College, but I guess that just was not good enough.
Top reviews from other countries
-
Mor.Reviewed in Germany on May 14, 20133.0 out of 5 stars Da hatte ich mir mehr erhofft...
Bei diesem Buch hatte ich mir vorgestellt, durch die angepriesenen Interviews die Ansichten der Konfliktakteure erfahren zu können. Dies ist leider nicht der Fall.
Trotzdem gibt das Buch einen sehr guten Überblick über die Genese und den Verlauf des Konflikts.
observer100Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 20, 20075.0 out of 5 stars Short, concentrated and excellent
A bunch of people professionally concerned with genocide and Darfur recommended this short but outstanding book when I needed to supplement my knowledge quickly. Its 134 pages of condensed information are based on prolonged and detailed work in the region and with people who know it well. The complexity of Darfur and its crisis as well as its relationship to other regions of Sudan, Chad and Libya emerge with balance, but with a clear picture of the horrors being committed. It enlarged my knowledge greatly beyond what I had gleaned from the media and a few days spent with some refugees from Darfur. It discusses events up to early 2005, its publication year, so is not quite up to date. The experts recommended it despite pointing this out, and I'm glad they did.
MiksReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 6, 20185.0 out of 5 stars exceptional
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchasepublic service as one can get confused from mainstream media coverage.
Craig CalhounReviewed in the United Kingdom on April 6, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Among the best out there.
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseLove it? Well, i thought it a very useful book on a very bad history, necessary to understand a worse present.













