Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Dawn of Man: THE STORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION Hardcover – June 21, 2000
| Robin McKie (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
Enhance your purchase
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherDK ADULT
- Publication dateJune 21, 2000
- Dimensions8.74 x 0.86 x 11.06 inches
- ISBN-100789462621
- ISBN-13978-0789462626
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
One of the few unique attributes of humans, which sets us apart from our nearest living relatives, the chimps, is a concern with our own history. Although anthropologists and archaeologists have conducted serious scientific investigation of our ancestry for well over 150 years, it is still a bit surprising how little we know.
The quest to discover our story is a bit like trying to put together a jigsaw puzzle without a picture to tell us what the finished puzzle should look like. To further the metaphor, we also have no idea how many pieces there are altogether, and the few pieces we do have are mostly incomplete. Practically any new bit of evidence can change our idea of the overall picture, so the story of human evolution is constantly changing. As science editor for Britain's Observer newspaper, McKie is able to provide a very readable and up-to-date account of our remarkable story.
One of the most compelling questions explored by McKie concerns our relationship with the Neanderthal people, who died out 30,000 years ago. Comparison of Neanderthal DNA with that of living humans suggests that our ancestors did not interbreed with the Neanderthals. Recently, however, skeletons have been found that seem to show a complete mixture of Neanderthal and modern human (Cro-Magnon) characters. In Dawn of Man, McKie quotes extensively from interviews with the scientists who work on human prehistory, so we get as close as possible to the bare bones of the story. The excellent text, art work, photos, and graphics in Dawn of Man make it a capable stand-alone, very attractive for the general reader. --Douglas Palmer
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Product details
- Publisher : DK ADULT; First American Edition (June 21, 2000)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0789462621
- ISBN-13 : 978-0789462626
- Item Weight : 1 pounds
- Dimensions : 8.74 x 0.86 x 11.06 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,259,091 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #10,714 in Evolution (Books)
- #124,891 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Science editors and writers, not anthropologists, tend to author the most readable books. You get the clearest language, explanations and occasionally even literary eloquence and poetic poignancy. They usually are more objective with more balanced perspectives – as they usually don’t try to promote a particular interpretations. They understand lay reader‘s needs and been trained to write good succinct English in an entertaining fashion to hold the readers interest. Which makes them a good source for introductory books – this book is very much an introductory book.
As Science and Technology Editor for the UK’s Observer, a science columnist for the Guardian and author of several popular trade science books Robie Mckie fits the mold. This book was written to accompany a BBC mini-series and includes some of its entertainment values. That the BBC chose him to write this book for them say a great deal - he is a very talented writer. This book is one of the easiest and entertaining anthropology books I have ever read... However, the book is becoming outdated; otherwise it would be the first book I recommend to someone getting interested in the field. I still recommend it, just not to read by itself. (see “Rating and Value” below).
General Summary:
The book traces the evolution development (progressions) over time in the transition from early hominids to modern Homo sapiens (us). To paraphrase the publisher’s comments it is a well written scientific story full of paleontologist detectives whose theories and foibles add to the Story.... Plentifully adorned with photos and drawings – which seems to be a reasonable summary (especially for a publisher!). For your time and coinage, you will get a good overview of the field, exposure to some detail and a taste of the character of paleo-anthropology..
Format and Text Content:
The book generally (not rigidly) follows the time line of hominid evolution and each chapter tends to deal with the major classes of Hominids.
• Supposedly 200 pages of “meat” but with -88 equivalent pages of illustrations = 122 equivalent pages of text
• The publisher used "sidebars" – similar to introductory textbooks – to provide more general anthropological information as background to the main text. Usually they are located where pertinent to the main text, but for those who have bought the text but not yet read it – see "Finally" section below for some possible improvements.
Illustrations:
Illustrations are offered to support the text, but include too much filler and fluff. I suspect this may be because it was written to parallel the TV mini-series. Still - some are worthwhile (see "Finally" section below). They include photographs, drawings, and diagrams of hominid fossils and anatomy and their discovers, photos and maps of key fossil sites, reconstructions of hominids /early man, artifacts, charts, diagrams and maps – some out-of-date including the Time line, and artistic representations of Hominid behavior – taken with large artistic license as well as some blurry images taken from the TV series showing people dressed in hokey ape suites.
There are just under 100 graphics and about half are reasonably good the rest is filler/fluff/distraction.
Rating and Value:
I rated this a book a 4 because its dated, and because its many funky photos drag it down. It is a very well written Introductory book who otherwise should have been rated a 5..
At this time I saw used ex-library books offered for 1 cent, "Good" rated books at $0.78, "Very Good" at $3 and "New" at less than $10. Book is worth all these prices, but I personally wouldn’t buy it new because I usually write in the margins – unless the book has outstanding presentation value and I don’t feel there is a lot of value in this book beyond its writing.
If you’re new to the subject I would recommend you read it but only if you buy a more recent introductory text too, like Carl Zimmer’s Smithsonian Institute Intimate Guide to Human Origins (which is also somewhat dated and less detailed) or Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews’ The Complete World of Human Evolution. (which is more advanced than this book but up to date). If you can get all three (recommended) read Carl first, then this book and then Chris’s book. By then you will have a reasonable background to get into more advance popular trade books.
DATED but Not Entirely Out of Date:
To paraphrase Amazon.com’s review: Trying to make sense of hominid origins is a like trying to assemble a jigsaw puzzle with no idea what it should look like or even an idea how many pieces there should be,. The few pieces we do have are mostly incomplete. The connections between are often unclear. And such factors as dates and relationships are constantly shifting. And we don’t know which pieces belong to our puzzle and which belong to another (there are apparent contradictions in evidence). To make matters worst, anthropologists can’t even agree on the basics such as classification and often can’t even discuss matters in a civil and professional manner... Practically any new bit of evidence can change our idea of the overall picture, so the story of human evolution is constantly changing. Paleo-anthropology is not a field for timid
Content Summary:
General information about the fossils and the major sites of discovery and their significance to human evolution and origins. It covers major Fossil Classes up to to Homo sapiens – but missing the earliest and most recent discoveries... (Historically, discovery of Hominids proceeded from Neanderthal backwards in time – in the opposite direction of their evolution. Only the last 10 years has seen substantial infill in later specimens.) Some dates covered have been changed, so take the dates with a grain of salt.
Each species deals with its major biological traits and conjectures made about its capabilities and behavior – such as possible indicators of cannibalism and ability to use language. (A lot of this is speculation; later books have discounted some of it.
More Detailed Content - (if you want it. - If you skip this section and buy the book anyway, see the last section = "Finally":)
Book begins with Hominid tracks that appear human – made by an early but not the earliest hominid in order to discuss the earliest important evolution trait: bipedality. It then back steps to fill in the first part of “the Story and then retraces back again to Australopithecine afarensis - the Lucy species and probable makers of the tracks and their discovery. It includes a side bar called Bones of contention – about the famous nastiness and conflict in the profession but it only hint at this nastiness. This is not a profession field for the thin-skinned.
The next chapter begins by discussing species classification “splitters or lumpers.” Robin emphasizes our evolution was not linear, but more like a bush of species progressively pruned by nature. He evokes the Star Wars Bar as a working model for most of Hominids history where multiple species existed at the same time. (To me very distorted, but entertaining.) The chapter covers diversity of specifies before the evolution of species before the more clearly modern species appeared. It includes the appearance of the first stone tools and discusses the lack of knowledge on who produced them. But as Mckie says “It is clear that the intellectual gulf had indeed been crossed by our ancestors more than 2 million years ago….Man the tool make had arrived.” Pg 61. The evidence indicates that those ancestors had diversified its diet and that in turn opened up new evolutionary avenues to walk down.
There is also human interest stories about anthropologists, Raymond Dart and Robert Bloom, the Leakeys, (later in chapter 4 he covers Eugene Dubois and the discovery of Homo erectus), All outline the historical difficulty in the field and the difficulty of getting fossils accepted, Not a profession for the timid either.
Chapter 3 bring us to the African Homo ergaster/erectus – ancestors whose bodies take on a more human appearance (tall, hairless, probably capable of sweating, efficient runners etc) and whose brain capacity makes a significant jump up along with an improvement is stone tools. In Chapter 4 he continues with Homo erectus' expansion into Asia and ends with a discussion on how a change in diet may have affected hominids. And Chapter 5 discusses the next stage of evolution with Homo heidelbergensis in Africa and then Europe and the later fossils in Spain - with their increase in more human like traits and evidence of more human like behaviors.
Chapter 6 is about the famous Neanderthal and discusses the historical bias against this species (which hasn’t totally disappeared). Neanderthals were the first species to intentionally bury their dead which might suggest the possibility of religion. There is evidence of care for the injured, elderly and frail. (not the first species to do so) they made advancements in technology and culture over their ancestors that allowed them to inhabit the colder north. But they also lived hard, violent lives – which may have been related to their focus on hunting large animals for meat. Then they suddenly disappeared, just as Cro-Magnons (modern Homo sapiens) entered their territory. Chapter ends with a brief discussion of the “bitter dispute” on why this occurred.
Next chapter talks about theories of how Homo sapien sapien evolved. The work of- Chris Stringer and others in putting forth what has been called the “Recent Out of Africa” (ROA or Out of Africa 2) since earlier migrations from Africa are known to have occurred, such as for Homo erectus. The Multiregionalist - the opposing position - is given just a minimal amount of exposure. Probably because, ROA has become the dominant theory.
DNA analysis is finally introduced in a sidebar, followed up by a discussion related to evaluating Neanderthal DNA and that for the human population. The biggest shortcoming in this book is all the recent advanced made in DNA and laboratory analysis since it came out. Among other things the books reported failure to find Neanderthal’s DNA in Homo sapien genes is out of date. More recently the Multiregional Theory has made a partial come back, with the finding of Neanderthal and two other species in Homo sapien DNA. In truth the jury is still out on this one, but most anthropologist still feel Africa has the predominant role in modern human ancestry.
The final chapter covers the explosive blossoming of Modern Homo sapiens culture and our conquest of the whole earth. Art, social structure and aspects of culture are discussed. But language – one of the most important trait/invention only gets a very brief discussion – A second major fault. There are other theories not investigated, and symbolic reasoning, potential brain alterations are also only very briefly hit upon and the book came out before the revolution in gene evolution theory.
..
A few explanations are given for Homo sapiens replacement of Homo Neanderthal – but it’s only lightly touched upon. The agricultural revolution is mentioned, but again little real discussion is made about it. The chapter pretty much ends with the final expansion into the Americas (again very briefly discussed.) and a brief mention about Jarod Diamond’s thesis on why European culture came to dominate the world.
I like the way the book concludes. In the second to last paragraph McKie says:” The common theme of this evolutionary epic in that in the face of increasing climatic uncertainty, human beings evolved more and more flexible responses.” Very succinct summing up!
The author says in the last paragraph: “The end result is a species that is now capable of searching for an explanation for its own existence on Earth. Quoting Richard Dawkins “Intelligent life on a planet comes of age when its first works out the reason for its own existence.” By that definition we have arrived.” (In effect, this is science’s “Creation Mythology” – but one that is still evolving).
Finally:
For those who have bought the text but not yet read it. The following changes in reading sequence of the sidebars are offered to make some of them more time-coherent
• Earth’s Restless Climate pg 80-81 – moved to the front. McKie rightly notes changing climate, and its subsequent effect on habitats and fauna drove human evolution. It deserves a more prominent place at the front of the book, highlighting this engine of early hominid evolution. Read it first
• (Last) Common Ancestor (pg 20) – about Miocene ape should have been near the front.
• Pg 54-55 The Piltdown hoax is a floater, should have proceeded A. africanus and Robert Dart (pg 40) because it was a factor in anthropology’s rejection as Africa as the site of early Hominid origins.
• Move Masters of Stone found there (128-129 ) up to pg 58-59
• Fire Power (pg 160-161) move up at least to 128-129 (now accepted as least as early as 800 MYA)
The following 50 illustrations I found worthwhile and suggest you pay particular attention to those with asterisks (which indicate exceptional quality).
• Photographs of fossils (27*,34,42,58, 60,74, 82, 128,136,149)
• Drawings, and diagrams of hominid fossils and anatomy (pg 19*,21,86-87*,88, 109*,111*)
• Some Key fossil sites photos (52, 62, 64-65, 95,153 )
• Some Key fossil sites maps (63, 77*, 159)
• Reconstructions of the fossil sites habitat (165)
• Reconstructions of hominids /early man (84*,135*, 148*, 163)
• Laetoli earliest hominid tracks (13-15*)
• Artifacts (57, 65, 104,126,127, 158,178, 179, 192-193,194, 195,196,197,198,208)
• Charts and maps (80-81, 83,101,105-106-107,164,202-203,204-205) – some out of date
In the course of surveying the last 5m years of human evolution, McKie brings out some fascinating evidence relevant to important contemporary debates. I look at these in this review.
(The page references are to McKie's book.)
In terms of diet, our pre-Homo ancestors were herbivorous (vegetarian) and our digestive system is basically unchanged since that time. However, there were immense evolutionary advantages in our ancestors also consuming meat - indeed, without consuming meat we might still be the Australopithecene genus which preceded Homo through to 2m years ago.
Climate change gave the Australopithecenes the stark alternative: adapt or perish. Some of our ancestors adapted, becoming tool makers and omnivores (and Homo) rather than herbivores. They also survived - as meat eaters with a herbivorous gut.
McKie quotes Richard Potts: "About 2.5m years ago, hominids encountered great fluctuations in the climate. At the same time we see the appearance of stone tools. That is no coincidence. They indicate that at least one hominid species was responding to these changes by becoming even more adaptable, rather than becoming specialized in the way that robustus and bosei did. By making tools, dietary choices became greater. Not only could people skin the large dead and doubtless smelly carcasses they occasionally found, they could crack open their bones for marrow. In addition tools would have helped pound and break down vegetables and nuts that could otherwise only have been eaten by animals with specialized dentures, and also helped dig up tubers rich in protein and calories. Just as Australopithecines responded to oscillating climates by walking, by becoming more versatile movers, so did the first members of the Homo line 2m years later. They made tools and became more versatile eaters" [66f]. The richer diet led to bigger brains, bigger brains led to intellectual growth and intellectual growth led to: (a) improved memory (including mental resource maps of the terrain and the seasons), (b) the ability to co-operate and take advantage of social complexity, (c) the ability to solve problems which led to the ability to create and use tools. These benefits in turn led to a more reliable diet which was also richer [114]. "We became less tethered to our habitats. Our ancestors' behaviour was becoming increasingly diverse, our menus more adventurous" [67]. Meat eaters were more free to migrate so they could survive, herbivores being more limited to the spread of their familiar staple plants [96]. The complexity of societies, the importance of memory and skills led to adults having a benefit beyond their reproductive age - they had knowledge and culture (wisdom) to pass on, not just physical genes[115].
The second theme concerns the evolution of human society and the differentiation of male and female roles.
Humans had a small pelvic gap for the birth canal, yet a more intelligent species would need a larger head to accommodate the large brain. A larger head could not fit through the pelvic gap. The evolutionary response was twofold: (a) for humans to be born while their brain was still relatively small. This means that mothers needed to provide intensive care (suckling, nurturing, warmth) while the brain developed. If mothers devoted themselves to nurturing, they need the reliable support of others [88]. The second response was (b) for women to evolve wider hips. This development survives today: women are less efficient bipedalists than men. The male shape was better adapted than the female shape for many of the activities of being the provider [89]. Because human brains take years to develop, there is a need for sustained social bonds (families) to support the maturing human for the duration of its immaturity (i.e., its childhood).
The third theme concerns the physical activities of our ancestors. "The numerous injuries on Neanderthal skeletons pointed to a dangerous, perhaps violent, side to their lives. Trinkaus analyzed the bones of 17 Neanderthals who had 27 traumatic wounds. They were mostly injured to the head and upper body. I got a statistical fit with rodeo riders; they get thrown off their animals a lot. In other words, it looked like Neanderthals were being flung around by the creatures they hunted. Not for them the low-risk, careful business of stalking and spearing. They went in for the kill and paid the consequences. These were people with physical prowess beyond the aspirations of even the best Olympic athletes [157f]." Survival in this environment would have evolved a body suited to vigorous, intense exercise, not gentle aerobics.
The fourth theme concerns the use of fire. This is important for us as the historical timing of its regular use can indicate whether our diet should - for scientific rather than aesthetic reasons - include cooked meat. Sites 500,000 years old have no signs of fire. Some hearths and the remains of burnt bones have been found in China 300,000 to 400,000 years ago. Fireplaces do not appear regularly until about 40,000 years ago [160], just 1700 generations, not long in evolutionary terms.
The fifth theme concerns mental and emotional skills, apart from quick reactions and coordination. McKie's beautiful account indicates that people who were tenacious and innovative were survivors. More than that, it was those who had social skills - who trusted others and were trusted in return, who showed compassion [90, 154, 156-7], who sustained long-term relationships of trust [80f] (and love?), who contributed to the group who survived best of all. People with good memories and who organized their thoughts in a way that could be communicated effectively (a) for immediate practical purposes [124] and (b) down the generations were also at a premium. Remember, the oral tradition was the only tradition.
This beautiful book is superbly illustrated.
