Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 (The Liberation Trilogy) Paperback – September 16, 2008
|New from||Used from|
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Amazon Best of the Month, November 2007: Topping a Pulitzer Prize-winning effort is tough; finding originality in a World War II narrative is even tougher. Yet Rick Atkinson accomplishes both with The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944. His previous work, An Army at Dawn, won the 2003 Pulitzer in history, but Atkinson has managed to set the bar even higher with his second installment in "The Liberation Trilogy." He descends upon each battlefield with rich historical perspective, tactical analysis, and chilling frontline observations. Cocksure Hollywood bravado is sparse, as Atkinson depicts soldiers fighting for honor, not glory. "We did it because we could not bear the shame of being less than the man beside us," explains one soldier's diary. "We fought because he fought; we died because he died." The result is an incredible portrayal of the courage, sorrow, and determination that came to define our greatest generation. --Dave Callanan
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Atkinson surpasses his Pulitzer-winning An Army at Dawn in this empathetic, perceptive analysis of the second stage in the U.S. Army's grassroots development from well-intentioned amateurs to the most formidable fighting force of World War II. The battles in Sicily and Italy developed the combat effectiveness and the emotional hardness of a U.S. Army increasingly constrained to bear the brunt of the Western allies' war effort, he argues. Demanding terrain, harsh climate and a formidable opponent confirmed the lesson of North Africa: the only way home was through the Germans: kill or be killed. Atkinson is pitilessly accurate demonstrating the errors and misjudgments of senior officers, Field Marshal Sir Harold Alexander, Gen. Mark Clark and their subordinates commanding corps and divisions. The price was paid in blood by the men at the sharp end: British and French, Indians and North Africans—above all, Americans. All that remained of the crew of one burned-out tank were the fillings of their teeth, for one example. The Mediterranean campaign is frequently dismissed by soldiers and scholars as a distraction from the essential objective of invading northern Europe. Atkinson makes a convincing case that it played a decisive role in breaking German power, forcing the Wehrmacht onto a defensive it could never abandon. (Oct. 2)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top customer reviews
How does a country learn how to wage war? Germany developed the concept of total war as a way of overcoming the reasons for its loss in World War I. Rather than becoming bogged down in trench warfare, Germany was determined to overwhelm and overawe the rest of Europe. Terror and destruction of this scale can't be easily faced up to simply by desire or will alone; it also requires leadership, logistics, and training. "[T]he first eighteen months of war for the United States had been characterized by inexperience, insufficiency, and, all too often, ineptitude. A long seasoning, still unfinished, was required, a sorting out: of strong from weak, effective from ineffective, and, as always, lucky from unlucky."(p 8). "The New York Times veteran military correspondent Hanson Baldwin, after a long trip through the war zone, had concluded ... 'the greatest American problem is leadership: the Army so far has failed to produce a fraction of the adequate officer leadership needed.'" (p 8) The learning would continue through Italy and pay off in Europe after D-Day.
The strategy for the war in southern Europe was weak; British and American leaders had different views that had to be reconciled. Churchill was fond of talking about the "soft underbelly of Europe" as if looking at it on a map made it so. Regardless, "The Allies had a plan where there had been no plan, but whether it was a good plan remained to be seen. Certainly it was vague. How Italy should be knocked out was left to the theater commander, General Eisenhower, and the concomitant goal of containing 'the maximum number of German forces' implied a war of attrition an opportunism rather than a clear strategic objective." Maybe tying up the German Tenth Army was enough; one benefit was that it provided some relief for the Russians as they started their push back out of Russia.
Although Eisenhower often urged instead of ordered, Atkinson argues he was exactly what was needed "He was indeed a compromiser, a coordinator, but that was precisely what this war - this total, global war - required. Eisenhower had long recognized that in such an existential struggle the most robust coalition would likely prevail." The allies had to learn to work with each other in the battle for Sicily which was successful but not as successful as it could have been. "Eisenhower, notwithstanding his growth since TORCH [the African campaign] ten months before, all too often he still failed to grip the reins of his command, day by day and hour by hour. He had yet to become a great commander because he had yet to demonstrate the preeminent quality of a great captain: the ability to impose his will on the battlefield". (p174).
The other generals had glaring weaknesses as well. General Montgomery dithered and dallied when jumping over the Messina Strait between Sicily and Italy. "Eisenhower had prodded Montgomery to jump the strait sooner, but Eighth Army 'wanted everything fully prepared' before moving. Again Eisenhower did not insist." Atkinson quotes C.J.C Molony's official British history of the Italian campaign saying "[Montgomery] 'had the unusual gift of persuasively combining
very bold speech and very cautious action.' Again and again he chose limited objectives, which were attacked only after a painstaking accretion of men and matériel in such quantities that he could 'scarcely fail, given tim, to take that objective' as Molony wrote". (p300) Atkinson argues that the problem was due at least partially to the "limits of this huge conscript army, including the capacity of staff officers and junior commanders to handle the immensely complex requirements of modern war." (p 300)
American field generals are not spared either. General Mark Clark is excoriated for putting his personal glory ahead of what was good for the war effort. After three failed attempts to take Monte Cassino the allies pushed through. Clark, instead of cutting through German lines turned and headed to Rome, the political, but not strategic, prize. "Yet the harsh truth remains: with duplicity and in bad faith, Clark contravened a direct order from a superior officer". (p 548) Neither did Clark give credit to his subordinates if it meant he could garner more credit.
Despite the lack of clear objectives and limitations of the generals, the Allies did win the Italian campaign. The generals, training, will, and logistics were good enough to overcome German advantages of interior lines of defense. American logistics and organization finally overwhelmed Germany. "To keep a single GI fighting for a month in Italy required more than half a ton of matériel." ... In February 1944, the U.S. Army shipped 3 million tons of cargo overseas, parsed into 6 million separate supply items that included not only beans and bullets but mildew-resistant shoelaces and khaki-colored pipe cleaners." (p 450).
And that is the largest lesson I take away from reading this trilogy and other WWII histories: the arsenal of democracy turned the tide. There is such an enormous amount of organization and planning to support the rifle companies on the front, the artillery companies supporting them and the strategic air war. General George C. Marshall was the key this transformation; for a definitive analysis of this, read the biography "General of the Army: George C. Marshal, Soldier and Statesman" by Ed Cray (Cooper Square Press).
This triology is a must read for those who want a comprehensive understanding of the United States role in Europe during World War II. I recommend that you read the series in order. I did not and miss the story of growth and improvement of the allies during the war.
He closes his discussion soon after the conquest of Rome, which makes sense for such a long volume, thought it left me eager to hear his views on the remained of the march to the Po Valley. Was it even necessary? Anyway, Atkinson never lets you miss the suffering and harshness of life for the ordinary GI, or for the civilians blasted by the American way of war...
(written by a onetime GI, RVN class of 1969-70)