Other Sellers on Amazon
$15.22
+ $6.97 shipping
+ $6.97 shipping
Sold by:
Duba Studios
Sold by:
Duba Studios
(285 ratings)
87% positive over last 12 months
87% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$25.54
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Ambis Enterprises
Sold by:
Ambis Enterprises
(17324 ratings)
84% positive over last 12 months
84% positive over last 12 months
Only 10 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
DeGaulle: The Rebel 1890-1944 (Norton Paperback) Paperback – May 17, 1993
by
Jean Lacouture
(Author),
Alan Sheridan
(Translator)
|
Jean Lacouture
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length640 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
-
Publication dateMay 17, 1993
-
Dimensions6.2 x 1.7 x 9.3 inches
-
ISBN-100393309991
-
ISBN-13978-0393309997
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Learn more.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Jean Lacouture is a French journalist and historian.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Reprint edition (May 17, 1993)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 640 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393309991
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393309997
- Item Weight : 2 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.2 x 1.7 x 9.3 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,460,404 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,216 in Historical France Biographies
- #3,771 in US Presidents
- #3,899 in French History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
4.9 out of 5
15 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2018
Verified Purchase
Great work about De Gaulle. The author is sometimes harsh in his assessment and does not overlook De Gaulle's faults, but the reader is introduced to a complex man who was arrogant, often wrong, yet also a brilliant and inspirational leader. Highly recommend for anyone wanting to lean more about the individual man and French history.
Reviewed in the United States on October 6, 2018
Verified Purchase
Describes the man behind the militar and political leader.
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2018
Verified Purchase
Answered a lot of my questions
Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2017
Verified Purchase
fantastic!
Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2017
Verified Purchase
A+
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2015
Verified Purchase
excellent a great biography
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2009
It's probably too early to write a good scholarly biography of De Gaulle. "The test of time" might require centuries; and the truth about highly questionable individuals -- Alexander Hamilton, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Dishonest Abe Lincoln, Henry VIII Tutor, and William III of Orange and then men of 1688 -- is flatly denied centuries later by would-be hagiographers, ideological propagandists, and molders of plaster saints. It might be too early because De Gaulle, like Eisenhower, so carefully guarded his private life -- who was always an actor on a stage, playing the self-created role of "General de Gaulle" -- that we're likely not to get the "inside view" of the man anytime soon. Perhaps just as well, he himself quoting, in _Le Fil de l'Épée_ that "no man is a hero to his valet". It might be too early also for the simple reason that the French State doesn't open their files to historians for 50 years.
The author of this two volume study is a journalist, not a historian; yet given a time when the university is swamped with the plague of Cultural Marxists and Sixty-Eighters, maybe it takes a journalist to do the job. That said, the two volumes of this work are probably the best biography that we have so far, at least in English. A pity that it could not have been published as the French edition in 3 vols. One would have wish a bit more about the first 50 years of his life, and more about his views on strategy and command of the military. How close was he to Petain in the 20s? To Charles Maurras? Did he really wish the restoration of the Monarchy? The 2nd vol begins to run thin with the events of 68, as one ought expect for a work published when it was.
Still, the best most complete study so far, to be put alongside Daniel J. Mahoney's study of De Gaulle's political philosophy, _De Gaulle: Statesmanship, Grandeur, and Modern Democracy_, to say nothing of De Gaulle's war memoirs and _Mémoires d'Espoir_. André Malraux's _Les Chênes qu'on abat_ is worth a look.
At the risk of being a hagiographer myself, my own rationale why one can't read enough about this man follows:
The Greatest Man of the 20th Century, who saved his country not once but four times from disaster and shame: 1940, 1958, Algeria 1962, and 1968. A man who gave his country its first workable constitution since 1789. They say the cemeteries are full of people who thought they were indispensable; the cemetery at Colombey-les-Deux-Églises holds one. And when the French rejected him in 1946, he left power to prove to them that they indeed couldn't get along without him; by 1969 his constitution was strong enough to survive without him, and has done well for 50 years.
So yes, an arrogant man, but with much to be arrogant about. He had a respect for two other arrogant yet right men: Churchill and MacArthur. He was said to have thought of himself as St. Joan of Arc; if so, he wasn't far off the mark. And he ruled without trampling on human rights or democracy (1958: "68 years old is too old to begin a career as a dictator").
One who had an uncanny prophetic ability -- foreseeing the French military defeat on 1940. The French High Command ignored his _Le Fil de l'Épée_, _Vers l'Armée de Métier_, and _La France et son Armée_. The GERMAN General Staff did read these books, and so in 1940 France was defeated from a playbook written by a Frenchman. The real father of Blitzkrieg, he was as important for military history and theoretical strategy as for politics.
He foresaw that the 4th Republic wouldn't work, that the 5th would, that Viet-Nam would be a disaster, that it was time to quit Algeria. He knew fully well that Wilsonianism was facade for American hegemony, and so opposed it. He knew also quite well that when push came to shove, the US and the USSR weren't going to risk the nuclear destruction of their cities, and they would use instead Europe for their battlefield; hence his wise opposition to NATO and his pushing a "Third Force". He foresaw that Communism in general and the Soviet Union in particular would collapse from within, and one need only wait them out. He saw clearly the danger also of Anglo-Saxon _cultural_ hegemony -- that continental Europe has a better tradition. He noted clearly one of Huntington's fault lines, the one Huntington omitted, the one that runs along the English Channel: The Brits and Irish don't belong in Europe. Nor Quebec in Canada.
And his greatest achievement: the reconciliation with Germany, overcoming the fault line between Mitteleuropa and Atlantic Europe, as old as the Treaty of Verdun, AD 843. This reconciliation is the cornerstone of European unity -- though he would have wanted a confederation of the countries rather than the current bureaucratic leviathan in Brussels. Of course it took the 2nd Greatest Man of the 20th Century, Adenauer, to bring this reconciliation about. "Unfortunate the country that needs a hero"? -- the view of Brecht, a hopeless utopian. We're always unfortunate.
Read about him.
The author of this two volume study is a journalist, not a historian; yet given a time when the university is swamped with the plague of Cultural Marxists and Sixty-Eighters, maybe it takes a journalist to do the job. That said, the two volumes of this work are probably the best biography that we have so far, at least in English. A pity that it could not have been published as the French edition in 3 vols. One would have wish a bit more about the first 50 years of his life, and more about his views on strategy and command of the military. How close was he to Petain in the 20s? To Charles Maurras? Did he really wish the restoration of the Monarchy? The 2nd vol begins to run thin with the events of 68, as one ought expect for a work published when it was.
Still, the best most complete study so far, to be put alongside Daniel J. Mahoney's study of De Gaulle's political philosophy, _De Gaulle: Statesmanship, Grandeur, and Modern Democracy_, to say nothing of De Gaulle's war memoirs and _Mémoires d'Espoir_. André Malraux's _Les Chênes qu'on abat_ is worth a look.
At the risk of being a hagiographer myself, my own rationale why one can't read enough about this man follows:
The Greatest Man of the 20th Century, who saved his country not once but four times from disaster and shame: 1940, 1958, Algeria 1962, and 1968. A man who gave his country its first workable constitution since 1789. They say the cemeteries are full of people who thought they were indispensable; the cemetery at Colombey-les-Deux-Églises holds one. And when the French rejected him in 1946, he left power to prove to them that they indeed couldn't get along without him; by 1969 his constitution was strong enough to survive without him, and has done well for 50 years.
So yes, an arrogant man, but with much to be arrogant about. He had a respect for two other arrogant yet right men: Churchill and MacArthur. He was said to have thought of himself as St. Joan of Arc; if so, he wasn't far off the mark. And he ruled without trampling on human rights or democracy (1958: "68 years old is too old to begin a career as a dictator").
One who had an uncanny prophetic ability -- foreseeing the French military defeat on 1940. The French High Command ignored his _Le Fil de l'Épée_, _Vers l'Armée de Métier_, and _La France et son Armée_. The GERMAN General Staff did read these books, and so in 1940 France was defeated from a playbook written by a Frenchman. The real father of Blitzkrieg, he was as important for military history and theoretical strategy as for politics.
He foresaw that the 4th Republic wouldn't work, that the 5th would, that Viet-Nam would be a disaster, that it was time to quit Algeria. He knew fully well that Wilsonianism was facade for American hegemony, and so opposed it. He knew also quite well that when push came to shove, the US and the USSR weren't going to risk the nuclear destruction of their cities, and they would use instead Europe for their battlefield; hence his wise opposition to NATO and his pushing a "Third Force". He foresaw that Communism in general and the Soviet Union in particular would collapse from within, and one need only wait them out. He saw clearly the danger also of Anglo-Saxon _cultural_ hegemony -- that continental Europe has a better tradition. He noted clearly one of Huntington's fault lines, the one Huntington omitted, the one that runs along the English Channel: The Brits and Irish don't belong in Europe. Nor Quebec in Canada.
And his greatest achievement: the reconciliation with Germany, overcoming the fault line between Mitteleuropa and Atlantic Europe, as old as the Treaty of Verdun, AD 843. This reconciliation is the cornerstone of European unity -- though he would have wanted a confederation of the countries rather than the current bureaucratic leviathan in Brussels. Of course it took the 2nd Greatest Man of the 20th Century, Adenauer, to bring this reconciliation about. "Unfortunate the country that needs a hero"? -- the view of Brecht, a hopeless utopian. We're always unfortunate.
Read about him.
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2006
An excellent work, it paints a harsh portrait of de Gaulle. A brave man with physical courage to go, he was possibly one of the greatest military thinkers in history. But he was vain, socially and politically unskilled, and an extremely poor judge of those on whom he depended to fulfill his ambitions: Churchill and, especially, Roosevelt.
Unable to gauge these two, or to assess their intentions from their side of the table, he stumbled from miscalculation to miscalculation. Only the greater mistakes of others like Giraud and the fact that most of France was sidelined by occupation and collaboration gave him the opportunities he used and these none too successfully.
Worse for de Gaulle, he could not see, as Roosevelt did so clearly, that post war France would have no greater status than a large U.S. state. Roosevelt toyed with de Gaulle as he would have toyed with any the state governor hopeful seeking his attention. De Gaulle neither understood this nor forgave it. Neither has France.
Unable to gauge these two, or to assess their intentions from their side of the table, he stumbled from miscalculation to miscalculation. Only the greater mistakes of others like Giraud and the fact that most of France was sidelined by occupation and collaboration gave him the opportunities he used and these none too successfully.
Worse for de Gaulle, he could not see, as Roosevelt did so clearly, that post war France would have no greater status than a large U.S. state. Roosevelt toyed with de Gaulle as he would have toyed with any the state governor hopeful seeking his attention. De Gaulle neither understood this nor forgave it. Neither has France.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
J. S. Yorke
5.0 out of 5 stars
De Gaulle by Lacouture
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 16, 2009Verified Purchase
A large,detailed book about De Gaulle, France, and Europe. Very well,and interestingly written. Diifficult to know when, and where leave off reading when one has other things that should get done!
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Michael Bilton
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 26, 2015Verified Purchase
Brilliant
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: charles de gaulle



