Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$27.99$27.99
FREE delivery: Thursday, Jan 18 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $12.00
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
& FREE Shipping
92% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Debasement of Human Rights: How Politics Sabotage the Ideal of Freedom Hardcover – April 17, 2018
Purchase options and add-ons
Rhodes identifies the fundamental flaw in the Universal Declaration of Human of Rights, the basis for many international treaties and institutions. It mixes freedom rights rooted in natural law―authentic human rights―with “economic and social rights,” or claims to material support from governments, which are intrinsically political. As a result, the idea of human rights has lost its essential meaning and moral power.
The principles of natural rights, first articulated in antiquity, were compromised in a process of accommodation with the Soviet Union after World War II, and under the influence of progressivism in Western democracies. Geopolitical and ideological forces ripped the concept of human rights from its foundations, opening it up to abuse. Dissidents behind the Iron Curtain saw clearly the difference between freedom rights and state-granted entitlements, but the collapse of the USSR allowed demands for an expanding array of economic and social rights to gain legitimacy without the totalitarian stigma.
The international community and civil society groups now see human rights as being defined by legislation, not by transcendent principles. Freedoms are traded off for the promise of economic benefits, and the notion of collective rights is used to justify restrictions on basic liberties.
We all have a stake in human rights, and few serious observers would deny that the concept has lost clarity. But no one before has provided such a comprehensive analysis of the problem as Rhodes does here, joining philosophy and history with insights from his own extensive work in the field.
Review
― Roger Scruton, writer and philosopher
““This is the book that every human rights activist, student, journalist and diplomat should read. With meticulous detail, Aaron Rhodes traces how the international human rights regime has become unmoored from its founding principles, and continues to be corrupted by politics and moral equivalency. The stakes are huge: human rights divorced from an appreciation of freedom and individual liberty puts the liberal democratic order on very shaky foundations.”
― Michael Rubin, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
“Aaron Rhodes throws down the gauntlet to the international community over its approach to human rights. He pulls no punches in criticizing grandees who tilt either to bland technocracy or to an ever-growing list of state entitlements and ‘social justice’ demands. This book makes the definitive case that only by returning to natural rights and focusing on basic individual freedoms can the cause of human rights again advance against authoritarians of all stripes.”
― Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute
“Drawing from deep study and broad experience in the world of international human rights institutions, Aaron Rhodes gives us a devastating account of its intellectual and moral corruption. His exquisitely detailed study shows clearly how the 20th century push to treat economic and social ‘rights’ as human rights has undermined the very idea of human or natural rights, which alone have secured the blessings of liberty for countless millions around the world.”
― Roger Pilon, Director of Policy (1986-87) in the Reagan Administration Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, Department of State
About the Author
- Print length296 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEncounter Books
- Publication dateApril 17, 2018
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions6.25 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-109781594039799
- ISBN-13978-1594039799
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Product details
- ASIN : 1594039798
- Publisher : Encounter Books (April 17, 2018)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 296 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781594039799
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594039799
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 1.33 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,484,435 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #177 in Natural Law
- #1,724 in Political Freedom (Books)
- #2,122 in Human Rights Law (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
That is it; that is all.
Cue the post-WWII period; the advent of the United Nations Organization and the new battle that has been brewing, until it finally was lost – by we good guys – to the forces of collectivism. I’m speaking of the struggle to preserve our concept of human rights.
Human Rights; that term which was never used much by the founders (if at all), though they did talk about “laws of nature and of nature’s God” defended through a constitution. A document to serve the people not as a vehicle for utopian fantasy but instead a practical list of basic protections from a government which is always on the verge of becoming a state; as Lynn Hunt explains in “Inventing Human Rights”. A state – the very idea is utopian, and our old utopianisms do abide, don’t they.
Unfortunately “laws of nature’s God” – we call them natural rights – were too effective to survive. Effective, in that they serve as such an active containing wall against the dictators’ pretensions that they must be undermined. But how to do that? Those of us who studied theology know that the devil is in fact beautiful. What they needed was a bait and switch, something that would “look fairer and feel fouler” as J.R.R. Tolkien once wrote; to weaken the rights which are such an existential threat to them, they needed something lovely.
All this is what Aaron Rhodes’s new book “The Debasement of Human Rights: How Politics Sabotage the Ideal of Freedom” is about; and it is systematic and extraordinarily well researched. And it pulls no punches. Rhodes is a veteran human rights defender who for more than thirty years has stood against the world’s worst totalitarian regimes; varnished over and “looking fair” as were the communist states of eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. His important book outlines the process by which principles of positive law slowly replaced our understanding of fundamental human rights, like a steady salty tide eats out the limestone base under a mighty castle. While we all thought we stood strong, that we had won, that the “end of history” was upon us, slowly fundamental rights of humanity were replaced in favor of positive law bestowed upon partisan politicized states. “Rights” which are not rights at all but entitlements, services provided with varying degrees of success by bloated and often brutal regimes began to overtake basic freedoms by which we protect ourselves from those states and hold them accountable to our consent. Economic, Social and Cultural rights they are called – because who would disagree with that?? – and their very existence demanded a curbing of natural law, starting with our sacrosanct right to property. Because once property is usurped, everything else is easy.
Freedom House has categorized our times as in a “democratic recession” – and this is not a coincidence. As the rights with which we protected our freedoms were eroded from within by the very organizations tasked with protecting those rights, little by little we have lost our liberty until again half of the world is unfree.
So, what to do? Read Aaron Rhodes’s important book. Familiarize yourself with the jargon that is so oft-repeated that it has become second nature to even good people who have not ever had the need to challenge what they are saying. And then, armed with knowledge, make a stand. Because it is now clear who we are standing against – just as it is now clear what the new human rights demand, represented as they are in their highest council by Venezuela, Cuba, Syria and other despot regimes eager to talk about universal healthcare or primary education over the rights to speak and to retain our property. Until, finally, at the end, le deluge. And what good is speaking then?
His discussion of how Marxist governments and international organizations, including the United Nations and its notorious Human Rights Council, have used socialist doctrines to cover up human rights abuses is incontrovertible. Dissidents within the USSR brought a moral clarity to the issue, as do dissidents in Cuba and China today. With the end of the Cold War, however, the picture becomes more complex. Ideologues from both the Right and the Left seek to discredit anything and everything to do with natural law. It has become fashionable to argue that natural rights are merely a construct of the Western democracies, a tool to impose an alien way of life. This position is supported by any number of cultural theorists and post-Modern philosophers, such as the late Richard Rorty, who scoffed at natural rights in the name of pragmatism.
One need not be a post-Modernist to find some flaws in Rhodes’s argument that natural rights are absolute and immutable, everywhere and anywhere the same. It is one thing to reproach the Russian Orthodox Church when its attacks on individualism cover up the crimes of a repressive regime; it is another thing to reproach Switzerland for banning minarets to preserve its historic identity. The application of human rights to religions and minorities hostile to individual liberty not just difficult to manage; in certain cases it may be self-defeating. Germany bans Holocaust-denial; France bans the burqa. Yet the the burqa and the minaret are not merely expressions of belief. They are symbols of territoriality, meant to dominate the landscape. To ignore their implication reduces human rights, at least at times, to an empty abstraction, which is the very thing that Rhodes cautions against.
The concept of natural rights is an enduring principle, but it did not evolve in a vacuum, and it is not absolute. It assumes that men are rational beings capable of directing their passions to constructive ends. It assumes a degree of social stability that does not exist today, where all authority is suspect and no belief goes unquestioned, provided it is someone else’s belief, never one’s own. This closed-mindedness did not begin with the movements of the Sixties, but it flourished then and continues to flourish now, where politics becomes personal and no one is listening. The moral consensus that Rhodes calls for in support human rights has become rare in the very institutions that require it. His book may help provide a much-needed correction.
