- List Price: $70.00
- Save: $41.21 (59%)
- FREE return shipping at the end of the semester.
- Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with rentals.
Rented from Apex_media🍏
Fulfilled by Amazon
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and .
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
& FREE Shipping
88% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation (Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation) Illustrated Edition
- ISBN-100198526628
- ISBN-13978-0198526629
- EditionIllustrated
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 28, 2006
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.24 x 6.18 x 0.52 inches
- Print length256 pages
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Andrew Briggs was appointed to the Lindsay Chair in Health Policy and Economic Evaluation in June 2005. Previously he held the position of Reader in Health Economics at the University of Oxford's Health Economic Research Centre (HERC). Karl Claxton holds an adjunct appointment at Harvard as an Assistant Professor of Health and Decision Sciences. He is part of a committee that appraises new and existing health care technologies and issues guidance for the NHS on the use of these technologies. He has also contributed to the Task Group which developed guidance for the appraisal of health technologies for NICE. He is co-editor of the Journal of Health Economics. Mark Sculpher is Director of the Programme on Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment at the University of York. He has previously worked at the Health Economics Research Group at Brunel University, and in the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McMaster University in Canada. He is a member of
the NICE Technology Appraisal Committee and he chaired NICE's Task Group on methods guidance for economic evaluation. He is also a member of the Commissioning Board for the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. He is on the editorial boards of Medical Decision Making, Health Expectations and the Journal of Applied Health Economics and Policy.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Illustrated edition (September 28, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0198526628
- ISBN-13 : 978-0198526629
- Item Weight : 14.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 9.24 x 6.18 x 0.52 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #999,858 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #223 in Biostatistics (Books)
- #243 in Epidemiology (Books)
- #425 in Medical Research (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I'm honestly surprised by some of the experienced modelers dislike of this book in the other reviewer comments. It has a very exercise-heavy approach that may be tedious for those too experienced, but I picked this up after doing a theory course and it was the perfect supplement to put some of that work into practice.
There are many, many remedial and beginning books on this subject. The author's here are to be commended for trying to push the field forward towards using more rigorous evaluation methods. There are applied exercises that provide code to interested students who would like to learn how to create their own cost-effectiveness analyses.
It is difficult to argue with the person who called this a manual for health care rationing. There are some in the United States, generally funded by the pharmaceutical or medical device industries, always Republican, who simply reject the notion of rigorously evaluating any health care expenditure for value and utility. These same people often wear three cornered hats, carry don't tread on me flags, and scream about the deficit without any comprehensive that health expenditures are the cause of our deficit. Its an incoherent position and one that has no place denigrating a strong book such as this one.
Very clear explanations. Starting from a pretty basic level dut going deep enought to get a good understanding on the rationale and procedures in modeling
Someone who is not already familiar with the basics of economic evaluation would probably not understand the book. That's because quite a bit of background seems to be assumed, and little basic explanation is given.
Others -- like me -- who do know the basics are likely to be confused because of the poor writing style and the authors' frequent allusions to matters they do not discuss. Take pages 176-179 for instance. There, the authors say that information, once generated "has public good characteristics and is nonrival". As an economist, I know what that means; non-economists will not have a clue. On page 177, they refer to "negative threshold space" -- whatever that is?!? Fig 6.4 on page 178 is missing a curve that is referenced in the text proper. And on page 179, we learn that "... there is no such thing as perfect information but it does place an upper bound on the returns to research". If it does not exist, then how can it "place an upper bound" on anything?
The authors love to claim -- repeatedly that "clearly" something is so and that "it should be clear that" other things are true. I didn't find it so.
Muchas gracias.
Javier González R.
Top reviews from other countries
Thank you.







