Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Definitive Albert J. Sterne Paperback – September 28, 2012
|New from||Used from|
About the Author
I was born in England and lived most of my life in Australia before returning to the UK a few years ago; my dual nationality means that I am often a bit too cheeky, but will always apologize for it. I have been writing fiction for almost thirty years, mostly for the enjoyment of myself and my friends, but writing is my love and my vocation so of course that’s where my dreams and ambitions are. In the meantime, technical writing helps to pay the mortgage, while I also have fun with web design, reading, watching movies and television, knitting, and imbibing espresso. If you would like to know more, please come and join the conversation at juliebozza.com
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
That’s not a book, that’s a major commitment. That’s like a marriage: Is *this* the man I want to divorce?
But much like my first engagement (ha, ha, ha – actually I’m totally serious) I said what the hell, sucked it up and opened my screaming wallet. It was $7.95.
I lost you at $7.95 didn’t I?
Oh, c’mon, people, it’s not some NOOB. It’s Julie Freakin’ Bozza. The other of such wonders as The Apothecary's Garden (love), Butterfly Hunter (no, I haven’t read it, but I OWN it) and Homosapien: A Fantasy About Pro Wrestling. Which is about wrestling, fer chissakes. It’s not my favorite of her books, but it’s at least awesome in its singularity. (It’s a gay romance novel…about wrestling. It bears repeating.) That’s what I love about Julie Bozza; each of her books is so different. She’s eclectic and it shows.
Now. Alfred J. Sterne. He’s kind of a poop. He’s isolated and he likes it that way. No, he’s not isolated because he has social anxiety and he’s just waiting for someone to notice that his rose has not yet bloomed. He really doesn’t like YOU. He’s a genius and he isn’t afraid to tell you he’s a genius. Not to mention that your intelligence is just a micro-drop in the Waterworld-like ocean of his intelligence. If it ever occurred to him to care, he would be confused as to why a simple statement of fact would bother you. Then he would totally dismiss you from his mind.
Somehow, however, he becomes friends, whether he likes it or not, and later more than friends, with rising FBI talent Fletcher Ash. Fletcher is intelligent, handsome & likeable. He has a supportive family. He’s also chasing a serial killer, with Alfred’s help, that completely changes his idea of himself.
This is my experience while reading the book:
I liked it.
I wish Alfred would unclench his butt, for, like, FIVE MINUTES.
I liked Fletcher (or Ash).
I really liked the book.
I really liked Alfred, even if he still needed to unclench.
I HATED THAT &%^*% FLETCHER ASH. I saw it coming, but he really P*&^% ME THE *&^^* OFF. His major mistake is similar, but different, to Tornado’s in Bareback.
I HATED this book.
Did I even want to finish it?
Yes, but I was never reading THIS BOOK again.
I was really liking Albert.
I could understand Ash’s reasoning. Albert's not exactly a talker.
Okay, maybe he’s not such a penis and Alfred’s not a total poop.
The serial killer is super creepy. He’s in some way <i>relatable</i> and that makes him SERIOUSLY SCARY.
This book is fantastic.
I love Ash & Albert.
I love this book but I may never read it again ‘cause it’s such an emotional rollercoaster.
I love this book and I’m going to reread it.
The today: some jerk on Lendle wants to borrow it? But I NEED it. FINE. Read it. I need to share the love anyway.
I think this is a love it or hate it kind of book. I highly recommend it. I want to hug it. And if you don’t want to spend $7.95 I’ll let you borrow it on Lendle. I GUESS.
This is a difficult book for me to categorize. Despite our heroes trying to catch the killer for the most part of the book, I do not think this book is a mystery. We learn the name of the killer several chapters after the book begins, so even though our guys learn his name much later, it is not a surprise for the readers. I guess I would call the book a police procedural or FBI procedural with romance mixed in but not dominating the story.
There is a reason why the killer is revealed to us early - the author gives us several chapters in the book through killer's eyes. Note that these chapters are NOT for the faint of heart. When I was rereading this book for review I wanted to get through these chapters as soon as possible and was skimming some of them. There are probably five or six chapters in the book through the killer's eyes - it is vital and necessary to the story - but I could have done without them, even though it is not that much for a book which has 35 chapters and an epilogue. I thought that one of the themes in the book was to try and understand the killer as much as humanly possible, but I am in general not a fan of figuring how and why monster's mind works, and the sadistic murders just made me sick. I read and reread this book for Albert Sterne and Fletcher Ash, for their characters and their stories. Their friendship and romance are intertwined with trying to catch the killer, so I had to endure him.
Albert Sterne is without any doubt one of the most memorable characters I have ever "met" in the genre of mm romance or in any genre, really. I have to admit though, that when I started the book I expected to meet somebody more unpleasant than Albert ultimately turned out to be. Oh, do not get me wrong, Albert is plenty rude and very blunt, but first of all, he delivers his insults with such wit that I laughed every time it happened, and second his actions to me spoke much more loudly than his words.
I find it amusing that in real life I like people to be polite when they are talking to me and try to be polite myself, but I adore snarky characters in fiction so very much. And even in real life, when a person is blunt to the point of being insulting, if I feel that the person's heart is in the right place, I will still respect that person.
Albert is a forensic pathologist with FBI and he is brilliant in what he does, but not many people like him, because this is how Albert talks to people:
"Dismissed!" And, as Albert reached the door, Jefferson muttered with what sounded like genuine regret, "If we were at war, I could have you shot for insubordination.
Albert snorted. "If I had the time to contradict everything in that rather absurd statement, I'm sure we'd both benefit. But I have a plane to catch".
"Albert caught the tail end of the shared smile, and groaned. "McIntyre, you're wasting my time asking me to be polite, for the sake of an infatuation with the doctor?" They had reached the prep room, where Albert and Celia began cleaning up. Albert pulled on a lab coat over his suit. "You must be trying to prove something trite like opposites attract".
When Albert and Fletcher meet in the course of the investigation that will occupy them for years to come, they are not magically attracted towards each other but they are slowly but surely become friends. Fletcher sees beyond Albert's walls, partially because Fletcher is portrayed as someone who can often read people very well, but I think it is also because he likes Albert and wants to know a complex person behind the façade. Their building relationship was fascinating for me to read about. Every time I thought I figured out their reactions towards each other and the reasons why they reacted that way, both men managed to surprise me.
Albert is a person who likes being in control of his life, so when he realizes that he is in love with the Fletcher, he wonders whether Fletcher is suitable for his love. Albert is a scientist and has built up some walls around his emotions, so of course it made sense to me that he would apply logic and reason to him falling in love.
"But beyond that, what sense did it make for Albert to love a man who seemed to lack qualities, such as self-control, that Albert particularly valued?"
I expected Albert's character to develop so that he would learn to value his emotions more, to open up, etc. But the only obvious changes that happened in Albert were that he tried to accommodate Fletcher a little bit more and be there for him in a way that mattered. But whether those were personality changes or he just let his walls down a little bit, I am not sure. In any event, whatever happened worked perfectly for me.
I was also surprised at Fletcher's reasoning for attempting to take the relationship with Albert from the friendship they shared to a new level. The more the story progressed, the more I wondered several times whether for all his intelligence and being able to read people correctly, Fletcher was lying to himself. I actually ended up thinking that the answer was not that simple. Fletcher could manipulate people very well, but he was also not always honest with himself when analyzing his actions.
I was so happy to see that even when I as a reader could see clearly that these men could not live without each other, Albert does not become a fluffy bunny that was really nice and polite to Fletcher. Oh I thought he was there for Fletcher every time he needed Albert, but the verbal expression of that love was so very Albert every single time. I loved it. I loved that Albert would call Fletcher on his manipulations and self -pity but would still stay.
As Fletcher says at some point in the book:
"This might not be perfect, what we have. It might be fraught with difficulties. You might not be willing to call it love. I might have lost my faith. But, Albert, I've come to realize that it's necessary. You and me together, it's necessary. That's all. Very simple, really. And I'm willing to proceed on that basis".
I also want to note that I do not know how authentic is the description of forensics pathology, FBI procedure and other technical stuff in the book. I felt that the story reflected great deal of research, but I do not know. I believed in it and I thought it was written in a very entertaining way, I was very happy that people who investigate murder were actually shown to do a great deal of actual investigating, but I am not an expert, so check it out and judge for yourself.
I recommend this book very highly, especially if you love snarky, complex heroes and if detailed descriptions of murder with torture do not scare you. A-
The book was a refreshing change from the usual ""m/m-fare"" and had a great mix of a real thriller and romance (although with a character like Albert I am not sure if romance is the right word... ;)) as well as - with Albert - a very intriguing character I would really like to know more about. One problem I had - which is also the reason for the relatively low (compared to how much I liked the book) rating for Character Development - was that I was missing some explanation for why Albert was the way he was.