- Paperback: 448 pages
- Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional; 1 edition (April 1, 2010)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0201362988
- ISBN-13: 978-0201362985
- Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 1.1 x 9.2 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (38 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #102,530 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Design of Design: Essays from a Computer Scientist 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
From the Back Cover
Making Sense of Design Effective design is at the heart of everything from software development to engineering to architecture. But what do we really know about the design process? What leads to effective, elegant designs? The Design of Design addresses these questions. These new essays by Fred Brooks contain extraordinary insights for designers in every discipline. Brooks pinpoints constants inherent in all design projects and uncovers processes and patterns likely to lead to excellence. Drawing on conversations with dozens of exceptional designers, as well as his own experiences in several design domains, Brooks observes that bold design decisions lead to better outcomes. The author tracks the evolution of the design process, treats collaborative and distributed design, and illuminates what makes a truly great designer. He examines the nuts and bolts of design processes, including budget constraints of many kinds, aesthetics, design empiricism, and tools, and grounds this discussion in his own real-world examples-case studies ranging from home construction to IBM's Operating System/360. Throughout, Brooks reveals keys to success that every designer, design project manager, and design researcher should know.
About the Author
Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., is Kenan Professor of Computer Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is the recipient of the National Medal of Technology, for his work on IBM’s Operating System/360, and the A. M. Turing Award, for his “landmark contributions to computer architecture, operating systems, and software engineering.” He is the author of the best-selling book The Mythical Man-Month, Anniversary Edition (Addison-Wesley, 1995).
Discover books for all types of engineers, auto enthusiasts, and much more. Learn more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top customer reviews
So, despite some disappointment with his computer architecture book, I had the highest hopes. I now see that they might have been unrealistically high. The entire notion of "design" is so broad that any global statement about it becomes vacuous. He does state some undeniable truths: that design can be taught and learned, and that typical computer science (CS) curricula do little in that regard. (Art students look at great art. Writing students look at great writing. CS students rarely see code other than their own homework.) He also emphasizes the undeniable value of internship as part of a formal education, drawing not only on historical and contemporary apprenticeships, but on medical interns, engineering programs that incorporate work experience, and the traditions of post-bachelors acedemia. Although he didn't mention "lab rotations," those serve much the same purpose. And, as one might expect of an engineer, academic, and self-described scientist, Brooks spends a lot of time on data-gathering and analysis as a means of personal growth - a discipline that can have great value if taught well, and that seems impossible to teach well.
But, for all its good, I would have trouble building a curriculum or career around what I read here. It exposes the diffuseness of "design" by drawing on a computer operating system, a beach house, and a textbook as examples. Individually, they're good examples (even if the beach house example borders on the smug). But, as a set, the differences become so great that the threads common among the three become tenuous - much of the substance those threads originally had was lost in whittling each down to something that could be compared to the others.
So, although I had high hopes for this text, it never solidified into a solid body of knowledge for me. As essays, each chapter worked well individually. The seemed only individuals to me, though, milling around each other, sharing a common book cover and table of contents, but little else. Clear messages and transferrable knowledge suffered, not just because too many apples compared themselves to too many oranges, but because the book seemed like a squadron of essays flying in close formation rather than a single, unified whole.
Not to say there aren't people thinking of these and contributing to the growing academic field of game design. But many of the best video game development practices remain intuitive and undocumented. It is exciting at least, to see how much room for growth there is to grow in such areas. The distilled wisdom of the author's experience in computer hardware and software design, as well as the historical perspective provided in this book have proved invaluable for me. This book has really expanded my big-picture view of the "design" profession as more than just the sum of its parts.
The first chapters provide an illuminating and concise look at the meta-field of design (with a focus on computer hardware and software design) and the models historically developed to describe it. The later chapters on designing a beach house and additional were initially harder to relate to, however important as a personal touch to show the author's own struggles and growth at mastering a new design discipline and (more importantly) documenting his own process with an academic precision that ultimately made them worthwhile.
I'd give it 5 stars it if were not for a boring chapter I ran across a couple of days ago :)