Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Buy Used
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Super Fast Shipping. Thanks For Supporting the Little Guys. Average overall wear. Nice interior pages.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Dictatorships and double standards: Rationalism and reason in politics Hardcover – 1982

4.7 out of 5 stars 6 customer reviews

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
$58.83 $0.01

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
click to open popover

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 270 pages
  • Publisher: Simon and Schuster (1982)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0671438360
  • ISBN-13: 978-0671438364
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,064,604 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Important Information

Example Ingredients

Example Directions

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 6 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By Orrin C. Judd VINE VOICE on October 13, 2005
Format: Hardcover
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, former Ambassador to the United Nations under Ronald Reagan, is the author of one of the three most famous essays in the history of American foreign policy, "Dictatorships and Double Standards," Commentary (November 1979)--the other two being George F. Kennan's call for "containment" of the Soviet Union and The End of History by Francis Fukuyama. In it she argued that it was incumbent on the United States to differentiate between authoritarian regimes and totalitarian regimes. Authoritarian regimes she argued, like Iran and Nicaragua, though they obviously did not meet our preferred standards of democratization, were fundamentally just harsh, but traditional, governments of countries which had known no other type of government and were perhaps not yet ready for democracy :

"Traditional autocrats leave in place existing allocations of wealth, power, status, and other

resources, which in most traditional societies favor an affluent few and maintain masses in poverty.

But they worship traditional gods and observe traditional taboos. They do not disturb the habitual

rhythms of work and leisure, habitual places of residence, habitual patterns of family and personal


Essentially, the autocracies protect their own power and wealth, but leave most other aspects of life relatively untouched. As the name implies, they are more concerned with who in society will wield authority, i.e. themselves, than with imposing any particular ideology. Because this is the case, they in fact preserve many of the institutions upon which democracy can later be built, whether the Church or corporations or other civic organizations.
Read more ›
7 Comments 18 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This collection of work expanded my understanding of governing systems, institutions and the leaders that run them. It's not an easy read and you may want a dictionary at your side, but the complex thoughts benefit greatly from the rich vocabulary. Much of the subject matter is history that I've lived through like most Americans born during and just after the "baby boom." I can't say this book is a "must read" for everyone. However, I'm sure you'll enjoy it if you're looking for new perspective or just curious to learn a bit more about how the person you just voted for may think!
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Kirkpatrick wrote a book that deserves to be more widely read.

The title refers to the American tendency which has never left us, even during supposedly conservative eras, of assuming that all dictatorships are alike or that so called right wing dictatorships are worse than socialist or communist dictatorships. The chapter dealing with that issue is the most famous.

She draws a distinction between autocrats and totalitarian rulers. The former are not democratic and can be brutal. Their brutality aims to keep them in power and maintain their privileges. But they don't just use force. The rulers have familial and often historic ties to the ruled. They create patronage and dispense largesse. Unless seriously opposed, they generally leave people alone to do business, worship, and conduct family life. They often allow some measure of freedom of the press and tolerate some criticism. Generally, they only notice those who try to overthrow them.

Life continues for most people as it always have. They live by tradition and custom. This means that most are poor and that life is bounded by the family, the village, the ethnicity, and the religion. There is a lot of injustice, especially by modern western standards. But life is not totally arbitrary. There is law. There is custom by which the people can protect and exercise such rights as they have. Their situation is akin to that in Europe when it was ruled by kings and most were peasants. It is possible that such societies can become richer, raise the living standard, and become more democratic.

Totalitarian rulers, however, are not just content to have power. They want the state to own everything and all loyalty to be to the state.
Read more ›
1 Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse