Buy new:
-48% $12.90$12.90
FREE delivery May 16 - 22
Ships from: Books'r us (We ship worldwide!) Sold by: Books'r us (We ship worldwide!)
Save with Used - Very Good
$6.45$6.45
FREE delivery May 17 - 20
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Seattle Sold by: ThriftBooks-Seattle
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Dirty Little Secrets : The Persistence of Corruption in American Politics Hardcover – April 9, 1996
Purchase options and add-ons
Fact: The Christian Coalition's 1994 voter guides appear to have been skewered to favor Republican candidates in key congressional races across the country, in direct contravention of federal election law.
The truth is, the politicians couldn't be happier dickering over the remains of the welfare state. Because, as you'll learn in Dirty Little Secrets, there is probably not a politician in America who does not benefit directly, personally, and continually from the status quo.
Fact: The state Democratic party in Tennessee paid sums in excess of six figures to a number of groups and organizations for various political services in 1994. The problem? None of the groups actually exist, except on paper.
Our Politicians, from those in the highest reaches of the Republican and Democratic parties to those in the humblest state congressional districts, evade, massage, and even break the law in order to hold on to power. But instead of merely unmasking corrupt politicians in every region of the country, Dirty Little Secrets analyzes why corruption persists in American politics, despite scandal after scandal, and in spite of periodic bursts of reform.
Fact: On the eve of the 1994 elections, mock "pollsters" called up thousand of voters in one Wisconsin congressional district to ask whether their electoral decisions would be influenced if they knew one of the candidates was a lesbian.
Most politicians want to do the right thing. But they also want to be reelected, and the system is far stronger than any honest man or woman. The influence of money and the intricacies of the levers of power make it easier for politicians to ignore the law than to obey it. In Dirty Little Secrets you will read of the conservative movement's hidden manipulations in 1994, and learn the truth about Newt Gingrich's twenty-year program of political destabilization. The history of the corrupt House the Democrats built with the help of liberal interest groups stands revealed. And Larry J. Sabato and Glenn R. Simpson expose the corrupt and illegal tactics both parties have used for decades to protect and promote their own power.
Fact: In 1994, in Alabama, one local election was decided by three hundred votes. Seventeen hundred ballots cast in that election were illegally admitted absentee ballots, some of them submitted by dead people.
Sabato and Simpson's fresh reporting and thousands of hours of background research include interviews with influential politicians, consultants, and political operatives, Freedom of Information Act requests, and thousands of pages of obscure campaign reports. They prove corruption is not about bad apples or colorful local traditions. And they offer a completely original plan for reform--Deregulation Plus--that will frighten both parties and make the American electorate smile for the first time in years. Dirty Little Secrets pulls together the corruption story from all parts of the country so overwhelmingly that no one--from the White House to your house--will be able to deny that political reform must be one of the key issues of the 1996 election campaign.
- Print length430 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateApril 9, 1996
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100812924991
- ISBN-13978-0812924992
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From Library Journal
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
From the Inside Flap
Fact: The Christian Coalition's 1994 voter guides appear to have been skewered to favor Republican candidates in key congressional races across the country, in direct contravention of federal election law.
The truth is, the politicians couldn't be happier dickering over the remains of the welfare state. Because, as you'll learn in Dirty Little Secrets, there is probably not a politician in America who does not benefit directly, personally, and continually from the stat
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Crown; First Edition (April 9, 1996)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 430 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0812924991
- ISBN-13 : 978-0812924992
- Item Weight : 1.6 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,308,126 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #22,803 in True Crime (Books)
- #115,616 in Social Sciences (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The chapter on Voter Fraud in particular is now quite timely. They point out that voter fraud is rampant throughout the U.S., but somehow the media rarely talks about it. Now everyone is shocked about the goings-on in the Presidential election in Florida, but if more people had acted on the findings in Dirty Little Secrets perhaps we'd have reformed things by now.
Why do I insist on the distinction? It's important because it affects how we think about reforming the system. Reforms addressing the role of money in politics are different than reforms addressing sleazy campaigns.
Though the authors wrongly mix corruption and dirty tricks throughout their book, their last chapter on reforms does a much better job distinguishing the two. It presents a pretty clear analysis of causes and effects, and the recommendations are pretty sensible.
The book rests on a series of stories about candidates Jones or Smith behaving badly. It must be admitted that these candidates and their staffs do behave badly indeed. But how typical are these examples? The book has no evidence that they are widespread, other than the fact that their interviewees said, "Everybody does it." Well, I am sure that not *everybody* does it, and even Sabato and Williams interviewed some people who don't do it. Any reformer might start with the honest politicians and think about how we can make more of them, rather than trying to make fewer dishonest politicians.
Why do candidates and staffs engage in dirty tricks? Sabato and Williams say that these tricks help them win. Do they? Sabato and Williams have no evidence other than the beliefs of their interviewees.
What does that tell us about our ethical heroes who refuse to engage in dirty tricks? Presumably, they do it because not doing dirty tricks help *them* win. Does ethical probity help a candidate win? Perhaps. Do the answers to these questions matter - - a lot - - for how we think about reforming the system? Almost certainly.
As these comments suggest, I found much of the book unsatisfactory in analytical terms. However, it's built on a great litany of dirty tricks. Chapter after chapter tells stories about both corruption and dirty tricks, and it's a real eye-opener despite my objections above.
Finally, the authors make much of the fact that the book is written by a journalist and a political scientist, presumably gaining from the strengths of each approach. However, the book reads like straight journalism, so it's not clear what, if anything, "political science" contributed. Not that there's anything wrong with that.


