Buy new:
$7.37$7.37
FREE delivery:
Jan 24 - 25
Ships from: Orion LLC Sold by: Orion LLC
Buy used: $0.96
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $5.49 shipping
100% positive over lifetime
+ $3.98 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Disinformation : 22 Media Myths That Undermine the War on Terror Hardcover – October 24, 2005
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length275 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRegnery Publishing
- Publication dateOctober 24, 2005
- Dimensions6.75 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100895260069
- ISBN-13978-0895260062
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Al Qaeda terrorists are likely to cross the Mexican border
Suitcase nuclear weapons are a real threat
There was no link between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein (and no WMD in Iraq)
That Halliburton made a fortune off Iraq ..then youve accepted some of the most prevalent myths about the War on Terrormyths that are demonstrably untrue. If truth is the first casualty of war, urban legends are the first product of Americas War on Terror. In Disinformation, investigative reporter and terrorism expert Richard Miniter punctures twenty-two myths about terrorism, al Qaeda, and the war in Iraq. He has sifted the written record, met with countless high-level sources, and traveled the globe, from Sudan to the Philippines, Egypt to Iraq, to track down and refute some of the most widely believedand often perniciouslegends of the War on Terror. Provocative but irrefutable, with startling new reporting, Miniter reveals:
Why racial profiling of terrorists wont work
Why Iraq is not "another Vietnam"
Why Osama bin Laden is not a massively wealthy criminal mastermind, was not funded or trained by the CIA, and is not on dialysis
Why poverty doesnt cause terrorism Miniter gives you all the evidence to shoot down disinformation and refute those who mindlessly repeat it. If you want the truth about the War on Terror, start here.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Regnery Publishing; First Edition (October 24, 2005)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 275 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0895260069
- ISBN-13 : 978-0895260062
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.75 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,405,492 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,802 in Terrorism (Books)
- #3,401 in Journalism Writing Reference (Books)
- #158,024 in Humor & Entertainment (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The title of Richard Miniter's book excited me. I know something about the "War on Terror" and its place in the larger cultural civil war going on in America--but not everything. I wanted Miniter's opinion and I paid for it. In "Disinformation: 22 Media Myths That Undermine the War on Terror," Miniter not only puts himself in everybody's crosshairs, but he provides extensive notes on where he got his information. Yes, any decent researcher can "prove" anything by selecting sources that agree with the researcher's premise. So what? Do your own research and put yourself on the line!
For example, the Weapons of Mass Destruction issue has been decided--Saddam DID commit acts that would have resulted in his being convicted on WMD charges in American courtrooms. Check the US vs Evans, USDC, North District of Florida (2005) and US vs Frank Paco Guevara, both convicted under Title 18 USC 2332a of threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction, and both were sentenced to life in prison without parole. These were just two of the cases I found when I did a quick Google search--both men were serving prison sentences when they committed their crime. If this CNN standard seems too harsh for you--sorry! Tim McVeigh's Ryder truck bomb(called VBIEDs by our military in Iraq) and Richard Reid's shoe bomb were labeled WMDs by Clinton Administration officials and the news media. It depends upon what you mean. Of course, you could adapt the racially prejudiced position that if the Iraqis have it, it isn't a WMD.
That's just one issue. I liked Miniter's disproving of two conservative myths, #21 (racial profiling of terrorists works) and #22 (the US border with Mexico is the most likely place for al qaeda terrorists to sneak into the homeland.) Note that all BEHAVIOR profiling has been branded "racial profiling" by the media--for purpose of drawing eyeballs. Islam is not supposed to be confined to any one race or nationality or culture. As for the Mexican/US border--Canada has been the preferred infiltration route since at least 1926, with Prohibition and the ComIntern's war on America.
Suitcase nukes--Miniter is less than accurate. The SADM on display in New Mexico are late 1950's designs. In the 1970's, several different 155mm nuclear projectiles were developed for the US Army. I remember the warheads being classified in the 0.05KT to 0.1KT range and the weight of a standard 155mm projectile is something like 65 pounds--these pocket nukes are less powerful than the Trinity test device exploded in New Mexico on June 1945 (18 KT), the Hiroshima "Little Boy" (12KT), and the Nagasaki "Fat Man" (22KT) bombs of August 1945, and you can verify this with unclassified documents on the Internet or at a decent public library. The Hiroshima bomb had 50 kilograms (about 110 pounds) of enriched uranium and the two plutonium devices had 5 kilos (about 11 pounds) of nuclear material--the difference was in the triggering mechanism. Had the uranium bomb been of the implosion type, I think the little 5-kg ball would have been enough,and would have resulted in an explosion in the 20 kiloton range--but I'm no nuclear physicist. Check with the experts. Anyone with the means to produce nuclear weapons could produce a suitcase bomb mission-tailored in a few weeks--but look at the political fallout for the United States after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. the folks with the power don't want to lose prestige, and the folks without the power don't have the means. Suitcase nukes are not just small physically, but are limited in power. It is unlikely that a single 1 KT nuke would eradicate a small American city of 50,000--though it won't be a thrill for the city's inhabitants. The superpowers planned to use SADMs to blow specific mountain passes or ruin harbors. Only a few were made because the military utility was limited--and political consequences made their use unlikely.
There's more. Miniter taught me some new things, and his reference sections permit me to verify his facts. Can't ask for more than that, and cannot expect that much from bigots and other closed-minded pundits.
According to the author, the data was gathered predominantly in a part of Iraq that saw the worst violence. Also, the people being questioned were asked to estimate how many deaths there were in their "families." In Iraq, "family" includes extended family, not just immediate family. So there is an obvious reason to suspect double-counting.
From the daily body counts in the news media, you'd think the entire country was awash in blood. But the author points out that most of Iraq (especially the north which had been long patrolled by American aircraft) saw little or no violence. This makes the 100,000 figure all the more suspicious.
This questionable figure was rushed to the press shortly before the Nov 2004 elections allegedly to "protect" more Iraqi citizens from being killed. But it's timing would obviously make any calm-thinking reader suspicious.
The author states that there is no way to get an accurate figure on civilian deaths. He provides the reader with another website on which an estimate of about 20,000 is given. Of course, this is still tragic, but it is a far cry from the more apocalyptic exaggerations that continue to be hyped in the current press.
[Oct 19, 2006 - An article was recently published in The Lancet claiming 655,000 civilians have died since the start of the Iraq war. Of course, the antiwar faction is accepting the number without batting an eye. But it would be interesting to hear a competing analysis.]
I also found it interesting that many of the sources cited in this book, e.g. the BBC, are generally considered purveyors of left wing ideology, when they have in fact reported on these very contradictory stories, eg-
"Troops foil Iraq nerve gas bid," BBC News, 2, 2004.
"US reveals Iraq nuclear ambitions," BBC News, July 7, 2004.
The part about Saddam's terrorist training camps was probably the most interesting, equipped with real commercial jets for terrorists to practice on. No doubt modelled on those in the Soviet Union.
After I read this, I read Comrade J and Behind the Desert Storm , which expounded substantially on the Iraq issue, with Comrade J giving lots of great info on the Iraqi oil-for-food scam and Behind the Desert Storm revealing how Saddam, Ghadafi, the Assads, Murbarack, and others were actually Red Arabs whose first allegiance was always to the Soviets and how closely allied Arab or Muslim dictators and Communists have generally been throughout history.
