Buy new:
$34.92$34.92
FREE delivery:
Tuesday, March 19
Ships from: Book Workshop Sold by: Book Workshop
Buy used: $6.65
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $6.75 shipping
74% positive over last 12 months
+ $4.98 shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Do Federal Social Programs Work? 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
Addressing an issue of burning interest to every taxpayer, a Heritage Foundation scholar brings objective analysis to bear as he responds to the important―and provocative―question posed by his book's title.
Of course, the answer to that question will also help determine whether the American public should fear budget cuts to federal social programs. Readers, says author David B. Muhlhausen, can rest easy. As his book decisively demonstrates, scientifically rigorous national studies almost unanimously find that the federal government fails to solve social problems. To prove his point, Muhlhausen reports on large-scale evaluations of social programs for children, families, and workers, some advocated by Democrats, some by Republicans. But it isn't just the results that matter. It's the lesson to readers on how Americans can―and should―accurately assess government programs that cost hundreds of billions of dollars each year.
At the book's core is an insistence that we move beyond anecdotal reasoning and often-partisan opinion to measure the effectiveness of social programs using objective analysis and scientific methods. At the very least, the results of such analysis will, like this book, provide a sound basis for much-needed public debate.
- ISBN-101440828032
- ISBN-13978-1440828034
- Edition1st
- PublisherPraeger
- Publication dateApril 9, 2013
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.94 x 9.21 inches
- Print length416 pages
Editorial Reviews
Review
"David Muhlhausen has brought together the results of the most important evaluations of federal social programs, laid out those results in full technical detail, and thereby done me and every other student of social policy an invaluable service. Anyone who wants to dispute his conclusion that federal social programs have failed must confront the evidence he presents--and that evidence is overwhelming."--Charles Murray, WH Brady Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Review
"David Muhlhausen has brought together the results of the most important evaluations of federal social programs, laid out those results in full technical detail, and thereby done me and every other student of social policy an invaluable service. Anyone who wants to dispute his conclusion that federal social programs have failed must confront the evidence he presents―and that evidence is overwhelming."
--Charles Murray, WH Brady Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Praeger; 1st edition (April 9, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1440828032
- ISBN-13 : 978-1440828034
- Item Weight : 1.75 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.94 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,723,094 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,567 in Political Ideologies
- #4,949 in Economic Policy
- #5,633 in Economic Policy & Development (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

David B. Muhlhausen, Ph.D. is Research Fellow in Empirical Policy Analysis at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis. Muhlhausen has emerged as one of the top Washington experts on criminal justice programs, particularly law enforcement grant programs administered by the Justice Department. He has been called on to testify before Congress on the new challenges and needs of local enforcement as they take the lead in homeland security, as well as on the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program and other initiatives that fall under the department.
In 2001, U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs Chairman Joseph Biden called a hearing specifically to discuss a Muhlhausen analysis of the COPS program that found the program to be ineffective in reducing violent crime. “I want my motive straight out front so everybody understands,” Biden at the hearing. “I want to have a hearing on what has been, from The Heritage Foundation and other places, criticism that the COPS program does not work.” In addition to testifying several times on federal law enforcement grants, Muhlhausen has testified on improving evaluation research done by the Department of Justice, the deterrent effect of the death penalty, innovative policing strategies, parole policy, delinquency prevention policy, prisoner reentry issues, and the National Voter Registration Act.
Additionally, Muhlhausen has produced research on the impact of voter ID laws on voter turnout. His research strongly indicates that voter ID laws have little to no effect on voter turnout. The legislative committees from Kansas and Texas have sought Muhlhausen expert testimony on voter ID laws. Muhlhausen in recent years delved into voter registration issues. His analysis of voter registration at welfare agency offices helped debunk myths that welfare reform led to lower-income Americans becoming disenfranchised.
An expert in not only criminal justice policy and election reform but in evaluating the performance of government programs, Muhlhausen came to Heritage from the staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he specialized in crime and juvenile justice policy. Before that, he served as a manager at a juvenile correctional facility in Baltimore.
Muhlhausen’s essays have appeared in Forbes, The Washington Post, and The Washington Times. His television appearances include the PBS “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,” MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” CNN’s “Lou Dobbs Moneyline,” and FOX News Channel’s “O'Reilly Factor” and “Special Report.”
He holds a doctorate degree in public policy from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County and a bachelor's degree in political science and justice studies from Frostburg State University. As an adjunct professor of public policy at George Mason University, Muhlhausen teaches program evaluation and statistical methods to graduate students.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Some progressives, like John Dewey, argued that freedom is useless when you live in poverty. Court cases, like USA versus Butler, argued that the Federal government can spend all the money it wants. But hang on, what will the voters say? I can imagine the conservatives in the Deep South saying “tax, and I vote you out” while the liberals in the “Blue States” will say “make it an entitlement and tax the rich to pay for it.” It was FDR that started many of the Federally funded enterprises, like the Hoover Dam and the TVA, but at the same time, a recent book called “Rainwater Harvesting” shows that flood control and other environmental improvements can be done with no money, just a lot of manpower. Groups like Common Ground, which creates farms in empty lots, run more on labor than money.
The book doesn’t favor one side over the other. It makes good use of charts for data, education, health, etc. Unfortunately, it doesn’t use case studies (like “The Poor Among Us”) and doesn’t discuss blue-collar apprenticeships, high school internships, or requiring municipal projects to hire local residents. Then again, a lot of these programs exist only on the local level. Perhaps it’s easier for a city or town to manage local programs than for the Federal government to manage something across 2000 miles?
