Buy new:
$32.68$32.68
$3.99
delivery:
May 11 - 15
Ships from: eQuip Online Sold by: eQuip Online
Buy used: $9.58
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
85% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Does God Hate Women? Hardcover – July 21, 2009
Purchase options and add-ons
An exploration of the role that religion and culture play in the oppression of women
Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom, philosophers and authors, ask probing questions about the way that religion shields the oppression of women from criticism and why many Western liberals, leftists, and feminists have remained largely silent on the subject. Throughout the world, a great many women lead lives of misery and sometimes plain horror. They are often considered and treated as the property of men and have few, if any, rights. Such treatment is generally sustained and protected by a combination of religion and culture. Does God Hate Women? explores instances of the oppression of women in the name of religious and cultural norms and how these issues play out both in the community and in the political arena. Drawing on philosophical concerns such as truth, relativism, knowledge, and ethics, Benson and Stangroom assess the current situation and provide a rallying call for a progressive politics that is committed to universal values.
An exploration of the role that religion and culture play in the oppression of women
Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom, philosophers and authors, ask probing questions about the way that religion shields the oppression of women from criticism and why many Western liberals, leftists, and feminists have remained largely silent on the subject. Throughout the world, a great many women lead lives of misery and sometimes plain horror. They are often considered and treated as the property of men and have few, if any, rights. Such treatment is generally sustained and protected by a combination of religion and culture. Does God Hate Women? explores instances of the oppression of women in the name of religious and cultural norms and how these issues play out both in the community and in the political arena. Drawing on philosophical concerns such as truth, relativism, knowledge, and ethics, Benson and Stangroom assess the current situation and provide a rallying call for a progressive politics that is committed to universal values.
- Print length216 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherContinuum
- Publication dateJuly 21, 2009
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.5 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100826498264
- ISBN-13978-0826498267
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
Discussion of book, contents and potential impact (no review) concerning book's thoughts on Muslim female abuse and Mohammad's 'Child Bride', timesonline.co.uk. 31 May 2009.
Article on book in Muslim Weekly, 5 June 2009.
Article on book by Madeleine Bunting, Guardian, 16 June 2009.
Title and The Times article discussed in Private Eye, June 2009.
'Fans of Richard Dawkins will love it' - Sholto Byrnes, Independent on Sunday
'Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom are the editors of Butterflies and Wheels, the best atheist site on the web. In Does God Hate Women? they forensically dismantle the last respectable misogyny ... By the end of this book-length blast, Benson and Stangroom have left religious hatred of women in rubble. Anybody not addled by superstition will have to conclude that such bigotry deserves neither respect nor deference.' - Johann Hari, New Statesman
Reviewed in The Observer, July 2009.
Author Q & A and title mention in New Statesman.
'At a time when too many people bend over backwards to avoid offending the sensibilities of those with a belief in the supernatural, Benson and Stangroom provide a breath of fresh air. They subject the core beliefs of the world's leading faiths to the rigorous analysis they sometimes escape out of a misplaced fear of giving offence ... All this desperately needs to be said ... As this book reminds us, religion brings with it patriarchal ideas about gender difference which claim to honour women but almost always give men power over them.' - Joan Smith, The Independent
Reviewd in Morning Star, August 2009. http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/culture/books/non_fiction/does_god_hate_women
'The predecessors of today's critics would have hailed [this book] as a feminist classic.' - Standpoint
'We may want to react to the title of this book with a defensive "No, of course not." It will be more useful to acknowledge the challenge posed by the authors' refusal to avoid awk­ward questions. We should consider the extent to which the way, we think, we are presenting our faith matches what those out­side the Church actually perceive.' - Church Times
"As I read Does GodHate Women, I was impressed by the many probing questions that the writersfocused on in the three great monotheistic religions."
Network, February 2010
Reviewd in Morning Star, August 2009. http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/culture/books/non_fiction/does_god_hate_women
'We may want to react to the title of this book with a defensive “No, of course not.” It will be more useful to acknowledge the challenge posed by the authors’ refusal to avoid awkward questions. We should consider the extent to which the way, we think, we are presenting our faith matches what those outside the Church actually perceive.' - Church Times
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Continuum; 1st edition (July 21, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 216 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0826498264
- ISBN-13 : 978-0826498267
- Item Weight : 12.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.5 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,505,939 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #6,800 in Religious Philosophy (Books)
- #26,740 in Women's Studies (Books)
- #733,255 in Religion & Spirituality (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
While there is some mention of Hinduism and Buddhism, the focus is primarily on Islam, and rightfully so. I would have liked to have seen more focus on the fundamental Christian revival of the idea that women belong at home, etc... but given current realities, the focus is in the right place.
I was especially reminded that the media pays no attention to the steady incursion of Sharia law into secular law. This is extremely dangerous to everyone, but especially to women. It's high time everyone wakes up and sees what's really going on. If women are going to be safe, respected members of American society, it is critical that this incursion be stopped here and in Europe.
Read this book. Pass it on to someone else to read next. We are living in very frightening times for women, no matter what pollyanna politically correct BS would have us believe.
Yes, the god the authors discuss hates women with a great and terrible passion. As they state, that god is a bully. Period. Christians and Jews should read this book too... both to be accountable for what misogyny exists in their traditional world views, and to see what is headed this way.
For additional reading on this particular god and his hatred of women, see older works by the incomparable Mary Daly.
I got the book not just because of Benson and Stangroom's excellent reputation as no-nonsense skeptics, but because I wanted a single go-to source I can use or cite as representative of secular liberal opposition to conservative religious insistence on confining women to the domestic and reproductive realm. Does God Hate Women? works very well for this. Not only does the book capture the disgust religious subordination of women often provokes among secular liberals, but the philosophical background of the authors lets them develop a case that has more depth than just an elaboration of discomfort.
The book does not do everything. For example, it will probably resonate little with readers who do not already take a secular liberal point of view. And its arguments opposing group rights and setting aside concerns for cultural integrity are cursory. They will not convince too many who do not already emphasize liberal individualism in their moral outlooks. But all this is not any criticism of Does God Hate Women?. Addressing all such concerns in detail is not the job the authors set for themselves. Instead, they appear (quite sensibly) to keep their argument short and to the point. If the very real suffering presented in the book will not move readers to stand more firmly against conservative religious demands to constrain the lives of women, little else will. A more in-depth analysis of multicultural views, for example, would of dubious relevance to that task.
A must-read for all freethinkers as well as anyone who cares about global feminist issues.
Top reviews from other countries
Benson's evangelistic atheism shows no respect for facts. In reference to 'honour' killings, Benson avoids placing the practice within specific cultural context, denies its geographical perspective and opines, 'religion gives traditions a backbone and a veneer of justification that make it easier to defend traditions and protect them from criticism.' She really should re-read Machiavelli to understand the meaning of realism. Her billious outpourings completely miss the point. Writing 'honour is between the legs of women' Benson refers to 'men who love religion and a putative deity and hate women enough to murder them, even (or rather especially) when they are their own wives, daughters, sisters, mothers'. She blames this on the unseen God and the way in which women are treated as worthless. Her conclusion is based on manifest ignorance. Sociological studies have established that Islamic leaders in rural Pakistan use religion to justify honour killings but that the killings themselves are a cultural phenomenon. In China baby girls are killed for economic and cultural reasons unconnected with religion. They were killed because the culture expected it.
Benson does not offer a meaningful solution to the situation. Her plan is to get rid of "the God who hates women" although, in her mind, such a God does not exist! Getting rid of abuses against females will not be achieved by showing sensitivity towards traditional cultural norms but by changing those norms. To imagine it is easy is foolish. Dowries were abolished in India in 1961 but still exist and will continue to do so until those with the power to change cultural attitudes become part of the process of social change. The colonial experience revealed how ingrained attitudes were when attempts to outlaw female genital mutilation (FGM) were absorbed into the nationalist cause against the foreign 'oppressors'. In many places in Africa that is still the case. It is the countries which practice FGM and endorse 'honour killings' which must change those practices and attitudes. It is countries where immigrants continue the practice that better standards must apply as happened in the USA in 2006.
Benson seeks to blame God and religion for the oppression of women but can only do so by logical gymnastics. FGM pre-dated Islam, Christianity and has no basis in Judaism. Benson claims "that the assertion that FGM predates Christianity and Islam is rendered almost empty by our lack of knowledge of its origins and development." In fact, there is plenty of relevant knowledge and Benson's claim to the contrary destroys her credibility on the subject. She knows Muslim scholars disagree over the question of whether FGM is permitted in Islam, claiming such disagreement proves, "there is no justification for the pretence that it is a settled issue," but fails to see that this undermines her case that it is a practice authorised by a God who hates women. In Africa it is practiced by different ethnic groups and it is not practiced by all Muslims. Benson twists the evidence to reach a pre-determined conclusion stating, 'most people who practice FGM are Muslims; some people who practice FGM are non-Muslims; and many Muslims do not practice FGM." From this she disingenuously concludes, "it follows that the fact that non-Muslims practice FGM and many Muslims do not practice it, does not rule out a causal link between Islam and FGM." She compounds this illogical nonsense by ignoring the fact that many Muslim clerics have publicly demanded the practice be banned.
Benson's commitment to atheism leads her to adopt what she calls a "modern secular rights-based liberalism, that no one should ever be prevented from being fully human; no one should be stunted and limited from birth". This is neither new nor exclusively modern. In nineteenth century liberal Britain cultural attitudes, often fuelled by secular anti-religious groups, encouraged the double standard which sought to ensure marriages took place between virginal females and experienced males. It was the campaigns of the non-secular Josephine Butler which changed social attitudes leading to the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts and the raising of the age of consent from twelve to sixteen. Unlike Benson she relied on evidence not rhetoric.
Benson's criticism of Karen Armstrong's writings on Islam as "tendentious, incomplete and patronising" is equally applicable to her own caricature and dishonest interpretation of Islam. She dismisses the connection "between God and love, theism and compassion," as a modern invention. Clearly she has never read l Corinthians 13 and has made no attempt to distinguish between individual believers and the political structure of organised religion. This is not surprising as she writes as an evangelising atheist rather than an enlightened rational human being. Does God hate women? There's no reason to suppose so. Do some men use religion to excuse murder? Yes - and they, not God, hate women. Benson's tirade is a disservice to women and two stars is being generous.
