Other Sellers on Amazon
$22.29
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Book Depository US
Sold by:
Book Depository US
(909795 ratings)
89% positive over last 12 months
89% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Domestic Revolutions: A Social History Of American Family Life Paperback – April 3, 1989
by
Steven Mintz
(Author),
Susan Kellogg
(Author)
|
Steven Mintz
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length352 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherThe Free Press
-
Publication dateApril 3, 1989
-
Dimensions6 x 1.1 x 9.25 inches
-
ISBN-10002921291X
-
ISBN-13978-0029212912
Journey into Reading
Explore reading recommendations for children ages 6 - 12. See this week's recommendations.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Start reading Domestic Revolutions on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
New releases
Explore popular titles in every genre and find something you love. See more
Product details
- Publisher : The Free Press; Illustrated edition (April 3, 1989)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 002921291X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0029212912
- Item Weight : 15.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.1 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#152,199 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #293 in Sociology of Marriage & Family (Books)
- #1,760 in Historical Study (Books)
- #5,747 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
76 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on June 25, 2020
Verified Purchase
Although dated (copyright 1988), this book is the best source I have found to give a well-researched description of the cultural shifts in family life through American history. The introduction lays out the premise of the book, and the rest of the book backs it up: America family models changed from the "Little Commonwealth" in the Colonial Era, to the "Democratic Family" in the 1800s, to the "Companionate Family" in the early to mid 1900s, to the "Diverse, Permissive Family" of the late 1900s that is riddled with irresponsible individualism and more desire for self-fulfillment than for care of children. Yet despite how pessimistic this sounds, the book also emphasizes that history teaches the resilience of family in the midst of change.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2019
Verified Purchase
This book should be read by anyone studying family patterns and behaviors in America. It is well written and simply fascinating. I have shared mine with Sociology students, Marriage and Family Students and Genealogical Research students.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2015
Verified Purchase
An amazing compilation and analysis of data on marriage and family from the pilgrims to the 1980's. There are times when the data is presented with a bias, but generally the authors are fair. I believe Domestic Revolutions is a title that grabs you but which is overstated -- the notion and pattern of family develops adapts, but the word "revolution" is much too strong.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 5, 2019
Verified Purchase
I'm reading it for a school assignment, but it's an interesting book that everyone should read to understand more about the family at different times and how its history impacts today.
I do not like that it does not let you copy/paste in its digital form. After you reach a certain number of allowed words it blocks it and you can no longer copy.
I do not like that it does not let you copy/paste in its digital form. After you reach a certain number of allowed words it blocks it and you can no longer copy.
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2006
Verified Purchase
This nearly-twenty-year-old book still has much to commend it: comprehensive scholarship, easy-to-read (though not sparkling or tight) prose style, and no heavy-handed ideological agenda (though the author's values and assumptions aren't hard to discern).
On the down side, there's not much by way of interpretive framework, and what's there wavers between incoherence and airy-fairy hand-waving.
On the former, for instance, the authors seem both (a) to want to see a significant set of fairly stable "family values" that lasted from the late eighteenth to mid-twentieth centuries, which are overthrown by late-twentieth century changes, and (b) to show the overwhelming diversity of family life, and the enormous deviations from the alleged stable values, during the same period. But point (b) seems to prove point (a) wrong.
On the airy-fairy issue, they have this notion of "the family" as resilient, rising to all sorts of challenges and adapting to all sorts of strains. But it's hard to tell what they mean by "the family" in that context, since they identify no core set of traits, no base-line definition, that pervades the enormous range of "families" they so effectively describe. One could just as easily use the info they present to argue that "the family"--meaning the child-producing, and/or sex-regulating unit of society--is, as conservatives fear, becoming decreasingly important among forms of human affiliation, more peripheral to decision-making and social life.
The info-overpowering-the-analysis problem even goes to the paragraph-by-paragraph level. Dozens, if not hundreds, of times, the thesis sentences of paragraphs seem grafted on after the fact, with the collation of facts in the particular paragraph at best losely related to the putative thesis, and the theses contradictory of each other in the space of just a page or two. The book reads as if they, or more likely an editor, realized late in the process of writing that the book lacked, but eeded, something resembling a narrative flow, then tried to impose it on a near-final draft. Whatever really happened to produce this phenomenon, much of the book lacks any integral drive or argument, and what's there often seems oddly imprecise relative to the information presented.
Still, the info is great, and well worth thinking about on your own.
A couple of things seem a bit off, to me. They date the rise of the companionate family about a century earlier than other scholars I've read. Well, actually, they do and they don't--after they'd said so much about the rise of the companionate family in the later eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I was surprised then to find a whole chapter that agrees with other scholars that the companionate family was a product of the early twentieth century. Huh? Which was it? My guess is that they mistakenly ascribe a more pervasive social presence and influence to the early foreruners of the companionate family than is accurate.
And while they aren't heavy-handed with their agenda, they frequently say things like, "The government recognized it's obligation," or "The government failed to accept its duty." That seems to me to reflect naivety about "the government," as if it were some separate, pre-existing entity that has inherent obligations, rather than a tool of society that can and does take different forms under different circumstances; and about the social dynamics that create obligations.
But the book is well worth a read. Especially these days, when so much ill-informed blather about "family values" taints public disourse--from both the right and the left--better knowledge of the enormous diversity and flux that have characterized "the family" would help both sides stop being so self-righteous.
On the down side, there's not much by way of interpretive framework, and what's there wavers between incoherence and airy-fairy hand-waving.
On the former, for instance, the authors seem both (a) to want to see a significant set of fairly stable "family values" that lasted from the late eighteenth to mid-twentieth centuries, which are overthrown by late-twentieth century changes, and (b) to show the overwhelming diversity of family life, and the enormous deviations from the alleged stable values, during the same period. But point (b) seems to prove point (a) wrong.
On the airy-fairy issue, they have this notion of "the family" as resilient, rising to all sorts of challenges and adapting to all sorts of strains. But it's hard to tell what they mean by "the family" in that context, since they identify no core set of traits, no base-line definition, that pervades the enormous range of "families" they so effectively describe. One could just as easily use the info they present to argue that "the family"--meaning the child-producing, and/or sex-regulating unit of society--is, as conservatives fear, becoming decreasingly important among forms of human affiliation, more peripheral to decision-making and social life.
The info-overpowering-the-analysis problem even goes to the paragraph-by-paragraph level. Dozens, if not hundreds, of times, the thesis sentences of paragraphs seem grafted on after the fact, with the collation of facts in the particular paragraph at best losely related to the putative thesis, and the theses contradictory of each other in the space of just a page or two. The book reads as if they, or more likely an editor, realized late in the process of writing that the book lacked, but eeded, something resembling a narrative flow, then tried to impose it on a near-final draft. Whatever really happened to produce this phenomenon, much of the book lacks any integral drive or argument, and what's there often seems oddly imprecise relative to the information presented.
Still, the info is great, and well worth thinking about on your own.
A couple of things seem a bit off, to me. They date the rise of the companionate family about a century earlier than other scholars I've read. Well, actually, they do and they don't--after they'd said so much about the rise of the companionate family in the later eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I was surprised then to find a whole chapter that agrees with other scholars that the companionate family was a product of the early twentieth century. Huh? Which was it? My guess is that they mistakenly ascribe a more pervasive social presence and influence to the early foreruners of the companionate family than is accurate.
And while they aren't heavy-handed with their agenda, they frequently say things like, "The government recognized it's obligation," or "The government failed to accept its duty." That seems to me to reflect naivety about "the government," as if it were some separate, pre-existing entity that has inherent obligations, rather than a tool of society that can and does take different forms under different circumstances; and about the social dynamics that create obligations.
But the book is well worth a read. Especially these days, when so much ill-informed blather about "family values" taints public disourse--from both the right and the left--better knowledge of the enormous diversity and flux that have characterized "the family" would help both sides stop being so self-righteous.
24 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2016
Verified Purchase
The product arrived in a timely fashion and in the quality described by the seller.
The text it's self is a good overview of the family in society and how societal influences impact the family. The text does not address all aspects of familial life and needs supplementation but overall is a good foundation.
The text it's self is a good overview of the family in society and how societal influences impact the family. The text does not address all aspects of familial life and needs supplementation but overall is a good foundation.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2019
Verified Purchase
Textbook was delivered as expected
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2019
Verified Purchase
Singlehandedly saved me this semester!! Thank you for writing this wonderful book I loved every bit of it!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: history of life, family history, social history









