Kindle
$8.99
Available instantly
Buy new:
-39% $10.99
Delivery Thursday, August 1
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: Blake Academic
$10.99 with 39 percent savings
List Price: $18.00

The List Price is the suggested retail price of a new product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier, or seller. Except for books, Amazon will display a List Price if the product was purchased by customers on Amazon or offered by other retailers at or above the List Price in at least the past 90 days. List prices may not necessarily reflect the product's prevailing market price.
Learn more
FREE International Returns
No Import Fees Deposit & $15.77 Shipping to Finland Details

Shipping & Fee Details

Price $10.99
AmazonGlobal Shipping $15.77
Estimated Import Fees Deposit $0.00
Total $26.76

Delivery Thursday, August 1
Or fastest delivery Wednesday, July 17. Order within 9 hrs 57 mins
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$10.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$10.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$6.37
FREE International Returns
Shipped fast and reliably through the Amazon Prime program! Book may contain some writing, highlighting, and or cover damage. Shipped fast and reliably through the Amazon Prime program! Book may contain some writing, highlighting, and or cover damage. See less
Delivery Wednesday, July 31
Or fastest delivery Thursday, July 18. Order within 9 hrs 12 mins
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$10.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$10.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other sellers on Amazon
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future(Or, Don 't Trust Anyone Under 30) Paperback – May 14, 2009

4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars 406 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$10.99","priceAmount":10.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"10","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"Qgl7UDG3SXAZQjubgYQ8N6Vpm0QLDM6wOC9H5heOlJeRIVS7olWnrTvfE1ji437vrSobt1goUqaOT2wej42fTSBgKjOigLS0IlLqs4Dl%2F8TNRjXg%2FAnZyeYAGEIb5Mbf3YuONJi58NYDjmCYSBsj0RnnoQThxsADzDLl3JrLGfsROc9l5YYVGCj%2Fb6ZwzD2T","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$6.37","priceAmount":6.37,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"6","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"37","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"Qgl7UDG3SXAZQjubgYQ8N6Vpm0QLDM6w0H6THOLA3bMmfk2jdNjC%2FZ4tezMBfZq%2FPDN0jUBGCDLxKQk7pqtG%2Fb37herG%2F0cBcLCl10Mv28P3BKU6ZSxoSkWID3lByMqGG4JkOVXIjcok1kxv5k3m0Ypk5iKtqYq7I3KZyPE76yYKxbr7i6qflRnzfdqceJHf","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

This shocking, surprisingly entertaining romp into the intellectual nether regions of today's underthirty set reveals the disturbing and, ultimately, incontrovertible truth: cyberculture is turning us into a society of know-nothings.

The Dumbest Generation is a dire report on the intellectual life of young adults and a timely warning of its impact on American democracy and culture.
 
For decades, concern has been brewing about the dumbed-down popular culture available to young people and the impact it has on their futures. But at the dawn of the digital age, many thought they saw an answer: the internet, email, blogs, and interactive and hyper-realistic video games promised to yield a generation of sharper, more aware, and intellectually sophisticated children. The terms “information superhighway” and “knowledge economy” entered the lexicon, and we assumed that teens would use their knowledge and understanding of technology to set themselves apart as the vanguards of this new digital era.
 
That was the promise. But the enlightenment didn’t happen. The technology that was supposed to make young adults more aware, diversify their tastes, and improve their verbal skills has had the opposite effect. According to recent reports from the National Endowment for the Arts, most young people in the United States do not read literature, visit museums, or vote. They cannot explain basic scientific methods, recount basic American history, name their local political representatives, or locate Iraq or Israel on a map.
The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future is a startling examination of the intellectual life of young adults and a timely warning of its impact on American culture and democracy.
 
Over the last few decades, how we view adolescence itself has changed, growing from a pitstop on the road to adulthood to its own space in society, wholly separate from adult life. This change in adolescent culture has gone hand in hand with an insidious infantilization of our culture at large; as adolescents continue to disengage from the adult world, they have built their own, acquiring more spending money, steering classrooms and culture towards their own needs and interests, and now using the technology once promoted as the greatest hope for their futures to indulge in diversions, from MySpace to multiplayer video games, 24/7.
 
Can a nation continue to enjoy political and economic predominance if its citizens refuse to grow up? Drawing upon exhaustive research, personal anecdotes, and historical and social analysis,
The Dumbest Generation presents a portrait of the young American mind at this critical juncture, and lays out a compelling vision of how we might address its deficiencies. The Dumbest Generation pulls no punches as it reveals the true cost of the digital age—and our last chance to fix it.

Frequently bought together

$10.99
Get it as soon as Thursday, Aug 1
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Sold by Blake Academic and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
+
$10.67
Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$12.92
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
spCSRF_Control
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"If you're the parent of someone under 20 and read only one non-fiction book this fall, make it this one. Bauerlein's simple but jarring thesis is that technology and the digital culture it has created are not broadening the horizon of the younger generation; they are narrowing it to a self-absorbed social universe that blocks out virtually everything else."
-Don Campbell, USA Today

"An urgent and pragmatic book on the very dark topic of the virtual end of reading among the young."
-Harold Bloom

"Never have American students had it so easy, and never have they achieved less. . . . Mr. Bauerlein delivers this bad news in a surprisingly brisk and engaging fashion, blowing holes in a lot of conventional educational wisdom."
-Charles McGrath, The New York Times

"It wouldn't be going too far to call this book the
Why Johnny Can't Readfor the digital age."
-Booklist

"Throughout
The Dumbest Generation, there are . . . keen insights into how the new digital world really is changing the way young people engage with information and the obstacles they face in integrating any of it meaningfully. These are insights that educators, parents, and other adults ignore at their peril."
-Lee Drutman, Los Angeles Times
 

About the Author

Mark Bauerlein is a professor of English at Emory University and has worked as a director of Research and Analysis at the National Endowment for the Arts, where he oversaw studies about culture and American life. He lives with his family in Atlanta.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ TarcherPerigee; First Edition (May 14, 2009)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 253 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1585427128
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1585427123
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 10.6 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.73 x 8.96 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars 406 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Mark Bauerlein
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Mark Bauerlein is a professor of English at Emory University and has worked as a director of Research and Analysis at the National Endowment for the Arts, where he oversaw studies about culture and American life, including the much discussed Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. His writing has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, The Weekly Standard, Reason magazine, and The Chronicle of Higher Education, among many other publications and scholarly periodicals. A frequent lecturer, he has been called one of the Independent Women's Forum's "favorite intellectuals," and has been praised by columnist George Will as "dazzling."

Customer reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
406 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the content insightful and important, but they describe the writing style as poorly written, snobby, and elitist.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
38 customers mention "Content"27 positive11 negative

Customers find the book's content insightful, important, and provocative. They also say the book is well-documented, reasoned look at America's dumbest and a valuable contribution to an ongoing debate over how to best educate. Readers also mention that the message is important, interesting, poignant, and to the point.

"...The key contribution of this book is some extremely eye-opening evidence/data that lofty and pervasive claims about the "educational benefits of..." Read more

"...decade-and-a-half out, Bauerlein, however, has the stats and strong counter-arguments to the more optimistic interpretations...." Read more

"...I stopped reading after four chapters because the statistics were mind numbing, and I couldn’t tell if the behavioral studies cited by the author..." Read more

"...The author first highlights the problem. The statistics are very clear, we aren't getting any smarter in spite of the growing use of technology in..." Read more

16 customers mention "Writing style"4 positive12 negative

Customers find the writing style of the book phenomenally poorly written, cumbersome, and preachy. They also say the arguments are bad, with little citations. Customers also describe the tone throughout the work as snobby and elitist. They say the book has the shabbiest sort of entitlement mentality.

"...busy trying to search for pretty words, but many parts of his argumentation are empty and contradictory...." Read more

"...of this in today's youth, which has developed the shabbiest sort of entitlement mentality, ignorant of its own ignorance, if not actually proud of it..." Read more

"...The book is easy to read and flows well. The author first highlights the problem...." Read more

"...all I firmly agree that the latest generation of students are dumber than a door nail and from what I gathered from other reviews most people agree..." Read more

Hey, you kids get off my lawn!
1 Star
Hey, you kids get off my lawn!
"The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise."~SocratesTake the technology out of this steaming diatribe and you have exactly what adults have been saying about kids for at least five thousand years. How about instead of blaming kids, we put the dreaded commie brain washing liberal arts studies BACK in schools so the kids have the chance to be exposed to literature, art and critical thinking instead of churning out generation upon generation of cubicle jockeys?
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on January 8, 2010
People fault Bauerlein for being an alarmist and a curmudgeon. He does come across that way at times, especially because of his tongue-in-cheek title (most seem to miss the sarcasm he intends). But his critics consistently misunderstand his most valuable arguments.

The key contribution of this book is some extremely eye-opening evidence/data that lofty and pervasive claims about the "educational benefits of digital technology" are more marketing rhetoric than empirically-verified reality. Bauerlein is correct--and does a superb, if dry, job of demonstrating--that parent and educator attitudes toward technology and its "usefulness" are disturbingly uncritical. Much of the evidence in this book (often cleverly cited from pro-technology folks and studies) shows that technology IMPEDES education and maturity as much or more than it promotes it.

Teachers will consider much of this evidence and Bauerlein's claims to be "obvious," but the value of the contribution is that very top-level educators and education writers have NOT been upfront about these issues. An overwhelming majority of those folks--including, not surprisingly, those who have staked their careers on being innovative and digital-savvy educators--have instead "wowed" the general public with hype about moving learning/education into a new (digital) era. Largely, this occurred to justify the explosion of online universities, which are capitalizing on an excellent business (education is the only commodity in which the consumer consistently demands LESS for his/her money: "Take my tuition, but don't make me learn anything or take tests or write papers..." etc.). Those same online programs are now the subject of legislation in many states, who are trying to block Master's and Ph.D's earned from such programs from being employed at traditional univerisites. Why? Because anecdotal and statistical evidence consistently shows that those programs are not actually providing people with the rigor and skill that is needed to justify the degree. Only those seeking basic technical skill and knowledge from such programs are really served--to a varying degree--by an online program. They deliberately cater to our cynical cultural attitude that "all you really need is the certificate to get a job." Since the economy turned, people are now starting to find out differently, the hard way.

Wisely anticipating that readers will rebut his statistics by saying "statistics can be made to prove whatever you like," Bauerlein draws on data and reports often compiled by folks who have a vested interest in JUSTIFYING and DEFENDING the benefits of technology (folks such as those behind the "free laptop to every student" program). What he uncovers is that even they are often forced to admit that their well-intended embrace of technology turned out to have NO measurable benefit on learning or--in several cases--a measurably NEGATIVE effect on learning.

As an English/Writing professor, I've seen many of the detrimental effects on study habits, integrity, and maturity that he describes. His views are not just curmudgeonly (I myself am only 32 years old and was on the front edge of the digital explosion.) I love technology and know how to use it well, but in the decade I've been teaching college (as a grad student for 7 years, and now as a professor for 3), I have observed a significant shift in student values--especially with regard to insularity, egoism, and the decline of intellectual discourse among younger peer groups.

Bauerlein doesn't claim or think technology is evil. His essential point is that it is misused. The principal, oft-touted benefit of technology is CUSTOMIZATION. You can now tailor your entertainment and news to get only what you want and nothing that you don't. From a logical and a practical perspective, this almost certainly guarantees the increasing insularity of an individual's viewpoints. They can wrap themselves in a digital cocoon (24/7) of their own values and never have to hear or encounter a dissenting word. This is, as Bauerlein implies, very dangerous, and he includes a number of representative quotes from young persons which shows (quite startlingly) how unapologetic a new generation is becoming about silencing every viewpoint but their own. Hence, I think, the rapid spread of conspiracy theories and radical politics into the popular sphere... views that once were marginal and relatively unappealing to the masses now are becoming surprisingly "popular" while more responsibly reasoned views get silenced because they lack the hype and appeal of the loud, irresponsible voices that now dominate the Internet and politics in general.

Is there such a thing as "too much freedom"? Perhaps there is, Bauerlein suggests, when you can become free to control what viewpoints reach your ears and which don't. This is something very different than the dangers of TV or other old curmudgeonly concerns. And Bauerlein shows this well by pointing out that pullitzer-prize-winning journalists have been replaced at some major news outlets by teenagers who are more savvy at blogging and working up hits from site visitors. The result is a general "dumbening" of our culture, and there is good reason to believe that it will lead to far more damaging repercussions in society than any of the comparatively silly preceding fears (like TV "rotting your brain"). Read it with an open mind (not a technological- or generational-defensiveness), and you are sure to learn some very important things about the responsible and irresponsible uses of technology.

The real importance of this book is that so many of these views have not been admitted into popular awareness. As we expect our first baby, I can't tell you how many parents have told us how important it is to get our baby using a Fisher Price laptop as soon as possible so she can "get comfortable" with technology and "thrive" later. Ugh. I can tell you with total certainty that the only folks who consistently use technology responsibly are those who do NOT grow up with it initially. That is how they learn to appreciate, not abuse, its efficient benefits. Bauerlein confirms this by sharing the statistic that the ONLY age group who consistently uses the Internet to learn (rather than to avoid the "discomfort" of encountering information they don't already understand or know) are folks aged 55+!

By the way, Bauerlein's point is NOT that prior generations were any more intellectually inclined that youths today, or even that they were any smarter. His point is that they had FEWER OPPORTUNITIES TO AVOID LEARNING (less opportunity to "plug in" to whatever they liked, at any given moment of the day) than previous generations. He implies (rightly, I think) that all human beings are naturally lazy and prefer entertainment to education, but for previous generations, the cartoons eventually ended and were followed by news, or Tiger Beat magazine would run out of pages and you might have to find something else to read. Now, you can plug in 24/7 and--if you wish--watch nothing but YouTube clips of folks kicking themselves in the testicles or lighting their farts on fire. Think about that for a moment... it is very, very dangerous to live in a world where immature folks can feed ONLY that desire if they choose. What is EVER to push them to something more substantive or mature? Maybe boredom isn't such an unhealthy thing for a person after all... Maybe it is NOT the best idea to give kids a DVD to watch on family trips just to shut them up... Maybe they should have to read, or exercise their imaginations, or learn to be silent for a 6-hour car ride even when it bores them. I'm musing here, but trying to show you how truly important it is to consider the "benefits" of technology in a much more critical manner than society and educators have heretofore done.
26 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2023
Given the author's arguments about tradition and his politics, which are Catholic-libertarian, I figured this would be a far more opinion-driven jeremiad. Upon re-reading a decade-and-a-half out, Bauerlein, however, has the stats and strong counter-arguments to the more optimistic interpretations. Furthermore, Bauerlein is concerned about the effects of instant gratification through technology and focusing on telling students their immediate worth. This book came out when I started teaching and I read it then and largely rolled my eyes. Reading this now after 15-years in the educational profession, Bauerlein was more right than he even knew (as he articulates in his most recent book). While the technological references are dated, the only arguments that don't see relevant was his fear of the de-politicization of millennials because of their ignorance.

His critique is accurate, but I do think what is driving the problems is far more than just the cultural turn. Bauerlein mentions Christopher Lasch but doesn't contextualize the current educational decline in it's political economic context and thus he doesn't really have a way to reverse the problems. He is right that the abnegation of responsibility of educations and the problems of technology, but we can't easily reverse the technological problems and the political-economic problems of babyboomers, where Bauerlein thinks the problem began, was rooted in cultural changes related to economic changes. Lasch understood this, particularly in his pre-1984 works, whereas Bauerlein acknowledges it may be a problem but doesn't really propose an answer to it. I look forward to his recent sequel to the book to see how his analysis has matured.
5 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2011
"Postman contrasted George Orwell's 1984 nightmare, in which totalitarian power is imposed from without, to Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, in which people enjoy so many mechanisms of pleasure that they "adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think." Bradbury and Postman form high points in a tradition of media commentary that claims the screen "atomizes" individuals, isolating and pacifying them while purveying illusions of worldly contact."
The Dumbest Generation, Screen Time, pages 103-104, paperback edition

I began reading Dr. Mark Bauerlein's book due to its mention in Dr. Diane Ravitch's Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and School Choice Undermines Education. In combination, both books were cathartic.

As a means to an end, I took and passed a certification exam for teaching math and physics at the high school level. There were no high-tech firms hiring at the time in my field. Both schools I worked at seemed interested in my background, and thought my years in the semiconductor industry as an engineer and a web master for my youngest son's basketball booster club would provide a bridge that kids could cross; I'd give "real world" experiences to problems in Algebra, Pre-Calculus and Science. I could, and I did.

I found myself witness to the "entertainment-industrial-complex," the notion that for education to have value, it must be a performance. At a few Saturday teacher trainings, I heard just that: "as a teacher, you must have `stage presence.'" Or the other one I'm fond of: "it's important that the kids get to know things about you...that they like you."
Like became a relative term. Since I was in the industry, mastery was my goal and objective every day that I stood to teach. Confiscating cell phones, disrupting an argument that started the night before on Facebook; explaining a concept I'd lectured on in class DURING an exam was not.
Two of my college engineering professors from a generation ago:

"Good morning! Sixty-three percent of you will FLUNK this course!"

"My name is __________. EVERYTHING you've heard about me is true. I will take drop slips at this time!"

In a classroom of 200+ kids, neither of these gentlemen were the least interested in being "friends" with me. The second prof went from 250 students to 7: I as physics major and the other six chemistry majors. He flunked the chemistry majors. The former essentially announced proudly a failure rate that would get you fired in secondary education (1st high school: 10% or less, 2nd: 15% or less). No, in the previous generation, they challenged me and my classmates: "you want this? Come and GET it!" Any student had a right to major in science and engineering; it was a privilege to actually acquire a degree. That is what these gentlemen communicated. Mind you, I did have professors that were more approachable and had a sense of humor. They were no less strict in their dictum: MASTERY. Your goal was to become her/his colleague, a living, breathing representation of what they could transfer into another; possibly a graduate student if you showed you had "the chops," and knew your way around the Dewey Decimal System at the school library. That took sacrifice, dedication and concentration.

That was before "the Google," and phone apps.

Dr. Bauerlein has accomplished a literary anthropological study of what is wrong with America, education and the future of our nation.

"... people enjoy so many mechanisms of pleasure that they `adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.'"

CNN published an article on the web titled Does life online give you `popcorn brain'? See: [...]
Quoting the article: "...constant stimulation can activate dopamine cells in the nucleus accumbens, a main pleasure center of the brain.

"Over time, and with enough Internet usage, the structure of our brains can actually physically change, according to a new study. Researchers in China did MRIs on the brains of 18 college students who spent about 10 hours a day online."

This is apparently becoming a health concern, especially in developing minds and the full-embrace of technology in the classroom. As one teacher put it to me "we're kind of like television, she said." The kids either tune us in or tune us out."
Her statement reminded me of the book "Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business," by Neil Postman (deceased). His commentary centered on the advent of 24-hour news in the 1980s: CNN was the first such network that has since spawned others. Children that used to stay up to watch the "snow" on TV as stations signed off now have 24-hour entertainment, hundreds of cable channels to surf and an Internet to post information to Facebook, Myspace and Twitter.

I saw kids with phones that have apps I could only envy. Everyone could seem to afford an I-phone, yet no one seemed to have the cash-on-hand for a TI-83/84 calculator. Taking a cell phone from a child was almost oxymoron when his mother was texting him at the time you confiscated it. A $15 fine is the only sanction a teacher can levy: providers have fought technologies that would block cell phone signals because of the bottom-line: the kids are making them a truckload of cash for every tweet, text and social network update while you discuss: series and parallel circuits (that they promptly flunk on the next exam). The same child will follow you to the office and pay the fine; everyday if necessary. You eventually succumb to the shear pressure of policing, classroom management and drill-drill-drill the vaunted standardized exam for the school's rating (and your job).

"We're kind of like television": we can be tuned in or tuned out at will. It's never the child's fault if he/she fails. The teacher obviously didn't connect, control their class or wasn't "entertaining enough." I'd personally gotten emails asking me to "bond" with the parent's child. (Even typing that was creepy!) The replied suggestion to another parent to take the cell phone from her child herself got this response: "I just read what you said. It wouldn't have occurred to me to do that."

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States Ranks 15th in Reading Literacy, 19th in Mathematical Literacy and 14th in Scientific Literacy, see: Who's No. 1? Finland, Japan and Korea, Says OECD: [...]

So quietly, subtlety we've become a nation of entertainment addicts, I-phones with apps, games, texting and academic distractions. The development of young minds used to be simple before levels of video games were invented. Now we compete with them and with what the latest "reality show" is (I believe the kids I previously taught were viewing "What Chili Wants" from TLC fame:[...]).

And if I was not entertaining, be it Algebra 1, Pre-Calculus or Math Lab, I was TLC would have crooned: a "scrub."

I am out of secondary teaching, thankfully back in the semiconductor industry, something I understand and I think appreciates me, my skillsets and the dilemma our country is in.

Alas, our students are not prepared for college, civic responsibilities, critical thinking, problem-solving skills or life. That justifies outsourcing, hurts our nation financially and puts us on a troubling course.

I suggested a documentary be done on Dr. Ravitch's book. I think that much of The Dumbest Generation as well, but my suggestion for Dr. Bauerlein's excellent read is a game show:

"Who's Smarter than a Baby Boomer?"

Limitations: no Internet, no phone apps, no phones, no life lines.
Weapons: memorized times tables, slide rules, Encyclopedia Britannica and/or Dewey Decimal System, pencils and/or chalk.

Contest would take place in a notable library, moderated by college professors and AP teachers for respective categories. It could make a valid point.

En Garde!

Reginald L. Goodwin
[...]
31 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Subrata Datta
3.0 out of 5 stars Shape of Things to Come
Reviewed in India on January 21, 2018
First let me admit that I am not competent to comment on the American education system and the threats that jeopardize its future.

In this book, Buerlein, who teaches English in a university and is a commentator on “culture and American life”, argues that the digital age is taking the students away from the realm of liberal arts. As a result they are not growing up to be an informed and involved citizen which is the very foundation of a democratic society.

Buerlein also criticizes the mentors – parents, teachers and others guardians of society – for abdicating their responsibility and lapping up the youth culture: “Fewer books are checked out of public libraries and more videos. More kids go to the mall and fewer to the museum. Lunchroom conversations never drift into ideology, but Web photos pass nonstop from handheld to handheld. If parents and teachers and reporters don’t see it now, they’re blind.”

What is true of America of last decade is true of India of this.

The advent of smartphone and social media, Facebook and WhatsApp is changing the societal landscape of the country beyond recognition.

Are all social media bad? No.

But indiscriminate use of social media – much of it of recreational variety – is beginning to have a deleterious effect on a country that is caught between its 21st century ambitions and 19th century traditional mores.

Laden with statistics Dumbest Generation makes for a dismaying reading.

But Buerlien’s call is unlikely to the heeded.
One person found this helpful
Report
Øώΐng ∏øìß™ÿn-Œw₶ń
5.0 out of 5 stars good result
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 17, 2017
gave this to a youngster, they deleted their social apps as a result. neat outcome
One person found this helpful
Report
Brandvoyant Srl
2.0 out of 5 stars Not a sensational essay
Reviewed in Italy on October 7, 2013
It seems that the author is interested just in demolishing the new generation instead of understanding the big shift it is producing in its approach to pop culture, community and everyday life. Mentioned by Time Magazine as a preconceived adversion
Angelo
5.0 out of 5 stars Comprehensive evidence that supports my experiences teaching adolescents
Reviewed in Canada on August 9, 2009
I am very impressed with this book. As a high school Physics and Mathematics teacher, I have noticed an alarming decline in fundamental skills and intellectual curiosity in my students over the last ten years. The rhetoric expounding that technology and the Web promotes "problem-solving" and "higher-order thinking" in students has only become more strident in the last decade -- unfortunately, these outcomes have proven to be an illusion, as clearly demonstrated by the results of many esteemed surveys and skill tests referenced in Bauerlein's book. My experiences in the classroom have proven to me that "problem-solving" and "higher-order thinking" cannot occur without a mastery of the fundamentals of the discipline, and now, after reading this book, I understand why my students are lacking these prerequisite skills.

While the Web is indeed an amazing resource for those of us with an interest in history, civics, the arts and the sciences, the Web does not create that intellectual curiosity in adolescents. In fact, the data referenced in this book proves that teenagers use technology almost exclusively as a social networking tool, and the time spent in peer interaction is taken from pursuits that would actually benefit the intellectual growth of our youth. Even Bill Joy, cofounder of Sun Microsystems, is skeptical of the learning potential of blogging and games: "It sounds like it's a lot of encapsulated entertainment... This ... sounds like a gigantic waste of time. If I was competing with the United States, I would love to have the students I'm competing with spending their time on this kind of crap." Perhaps this explains why more than 50% of the engineering doctorates granted by American universities go to foreign students.

How ironic that, at a time when technological innovations lead the global economy, illiteracy and innumeracy are overtaking our youth as a direct result of using this technology.

By the way, to the reviewer who admittedly did not bother to read this book, yet proclaimed that it was a waste of money: sadly, you proved the author's point quite well.

I highly recommend this book to all educators and parents, and everyone who has an interest in nurturing the potential of our next generation.
18 people found this helpful
Report
vonMoltke
4.0 out of 5 stars Exposing the low point reached (and the long way down still ahead)
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 9, 2017
Having started reading this book with big expectations, one could easily fall into disappointment about a couple of points. But this should not overshadow the overwhelming interest brought about the main matter: the mounting ignorance, passivity and blankness of the younger generations, the latter worse than the former. And this is one reason this book is worth reading through (although the very people that does desperately need to read it and ponder over it, by definition, doesn’t read at all).
Although the author concentrates describing U.S. teenagers, the analysis can too much easily be applied to their European counterparts, in highlighting their lack of interest in anything even loosely linked with what has defined “Culture“ over human history, in their spending their time (a time that will never come back) stupefied at some kind of screen reading or posting idiocies), and in their subsequent inability to understand, let alone to cope with, the most basic topic of politics, law, science or history. And this also shedding some light over the claimed “other“ skills developed by our youngsters instead, in fields raised to higher ranks by the current apologists of the new era and the new medias, as, for instance, IT: as a matter of fact, only a tiny portion of people spending their lives scrolling down FB pages or gawking at funny youtube pranks develops some proficiency in computer science (if any).
This is really bad news for not just the future, but the actual present of our post-modern societies, in spite of all the boasted technological development and welfare. We can actually witness the results of this retreat of large portion of society from the public sphere into online isolation, and noting that this portion is composed by those generations usually driving human societies toward change and innovation, will just make the picture more depressing.
As the pars destruens is clear and convincing, so the pars construens of this book falls short of expectations. This is not that I disagree with the author when he claims that the only way to break this vicious deadlock of visual content and alienation would be to foster reading, participation and a reappraisal of the Past. It’s that I don’t believe the appeal to the “American tradition” will help to face the causes of the deadlock in any sensible way. I even find questionable if anything dating from 1776 can even be defined as “tradition”: such a thing originates not in a barely two centuries time span, neither in a materialist-rooted culture, as the enlightenment-formed one of the Declaration of Independence was. Moreover, the author did not even address another much disturbing topic, although one can easily sense it by reading his narrative of teenagers deserting museums and libraries while crowding Apple or other media-stores: the structural interdependence among the development of a marketing-based, consume-centered economy, and a stolid, blank and easily manipulated public eager to waste his own money, and life, on it. Until our finance-driven economy will put its stakes on this kind of market, appeals to art, culture and smart readings will be short-lived.
Said this, the book is anyway a stimulating read that get all the points of the recent years’ cultural degeneration. If there is any remedy to this, that’s another matter.
2 people found this helpful
Report