- Hardcover: 1496 pages
- Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education / Medical; 3 edition (May 4, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0071744045
- ISBN-13: 978-0071744041
- Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 2 x 11.2 inches
- Shipping Weight: 7.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (28 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #361,863 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Dutton's Orthopaedic Examination Evaluation and Intervention, Third Edition 3rd Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
There is a newer edition of this item:
Featured resources for clinical rotations
Explore these titles for clinical rotations. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
About the Author
Mark Dutton, PT
Allegheny General Hospital
West Penn Allegheny Health System
Adjunct Clinical Instructor, Duquesne University
School of Health Sciences
Mark Dutton is a practicing Physical Therapist at West Penn Allegheny Health System in Pittsburgh, and an Adjunct Professor at Duquesne University. In addition to writing several books for McGraw-Hill, he is also the Editor-In-Chief of the AccessPhysiotherapy, launched in March, 2010.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
The only gripe I have is that there is basically NO goniometry material within this book. I find it very odd, since ROM measurements are such a large part of a PT exam. My classmates and I had to purchase an additional text solely for that aspect (Measurement of Joint Motion, by C. Norkin and D. White--solid text, no complaints). And after said purchase, I somewhat understand why Dutton did not included it; the goni information alone would have increased the text by 1/3 or so. Still, I find this to be a flaw. Though, note that I still gave it 5 stars, demonstrating my pleasure with it otherwise.