Buy new:
-12% $79.27$79.27
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$63.39$63.39
$3.99 delivery June 27 - 30
Ships from: Goodbookscafe Sold by: Goodbookscafe
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Economic Laws of Scientific Research Paperback – May 15, 1996
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length394 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 15, 1996
- Dimensions6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100312173067
- ISBN-13978-0312173067
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Editorial Reviews
Review
"It is the first book by a practicing scientist to challenge the orthodoxy for decades, and should be read by those who are involved in science or merely wish to promote it." "--Wall Street Journal (Europe)"
Product details
- Publisher : Palgrave Macmillan
- Publication date : May 15, 1996
- Edition : 1996th
- Language : English
- Print length : 394 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0312173067
- ISBN-13 : 978-0312173067
- Item Weight : 1.15 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #251,007 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #56 in Scientific Research
- #79 in Scientific Reference
- #148 in Economic Policy
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2008Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseKealey's excellent exposition on the driving forces of well-directed science was definitely a text which contradicted many of the conceptions which I have developed over the years through "common wisdom." Effectively, the text is a treatise against the Baconian model of economic growth through which scientific research is the primary cause. In the name of such a model, most contemporary policy-makers and scientists insist that it is the role of government to fund "primary research" in order that applications may be derived from it. While one could definitely take this consideration down the epistemological rabbit hole, Kealey merely lays out the facts and statistics which are ultimately bolstered by common sense.
The central argument is that market-directed research is the greater impetus for technological and economic progress than centrally-planned research and technology. Through a whole variety of examples and statistics, the author lies out the overall path of technological development in history and how it developed a need for science, thereby connecting scientific research much more directly to the "situation on the ground" of reality, allowing for productivity (and hence capital) growth in the market as it stands. Additionally, he discusses and refutes many of the contemporary arguments about slow-downs being caused by a lack of funding. Once again, statistics are used to explain the general developmental paths of societies, but common sense once again can verify this by the truism that more complex systems are inherently more difficult to grow with haste.
These remain mere guideposts to Kealey's considerations since the text itself is a comprehensive, yet accessible, historical/statistic reflection on the proper roles of the market and government in scientific research. In an age which ascribes near necessity to the latter and little to the former, this text is an important counter-argument which deserves consideration, in particular because of the strength of its lucid common sense.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2018Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseA thesis that runs counter to the role of the public sector in innovation. Definitely worth a read whether you agree or not.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2015Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseThis is a must read book for anyone who is honestly interested in how scientific discoveries are made, not just the stories we tell ourselves about how they are made, but the facts.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2022Format: HardcoverI read this book when it first came out, and I decided to read it again almost 25 years later. It is on my top 10 list of books that influenced me the most.
I was just beginning my research career when I first read it, and all these years later, everything Kealey wrote about has been confirmed. The science world in the U.S. was a big disappointment to me. I had dreamed of being a scientist, but something wasn't right. I didn't feel any sense of academic freedom. You must stay in your very narrow little niche, or you won't get a grant. And the grant process is very political (e.g., I was advised to somehow connect my research to AIDS if I wanted a grant). I also witnessed a lot of cheating, even in the so-called higher institutions of learning. Publish or perish--absolutely true.
Kealey solidly makes his case that science was much better off with private funding and has been essentially ruined by government funding. I long for the days of the "hobby scientists" he discussed. You will recognize the names and excellent work of these scientists. Most of the greats, it seems, did not finish college. Today, it's all about your credentials on paper, and that is certainly no measure of intelligence or imagination. I now realize that when I dreamed of being a scientist, I was dreaming of a science world that no longer existed.
Why isn't there a cure for cancer after all these years? That would be clear fast to anyone who's spent time in academic research. Can we turn it around? Can we return to the days of private, high-quality science? Can we tax people less so private citizens can fund research? We've done this experiment, and the answer is YES. Now who will have the political will to do it? Seems daunting, but education comes first, so I hope everyone reads Kealey's book. I thank him for writing it!
Top reviews from other countries
John ParkReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 7, 20185.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating
Very interesting book
Dan EvensReviewed in Canada on August 22, 20145.0 out of 5 stars The best thing that could happen to scientific research
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseShould be very widely read. The best thing that could happen to scientific research, and to pure research in academic context in general, is to get the government out of it.







