Buy used:
$199.25
FREE delivery May 15 - 16. Details
Or fastest delivery May 9 - 10. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Amazon book clubs early access

Join or create book clubs

Choose books together

Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil Hardcover

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 1,942 ratings

Great on Kindle
Great Experience. Great Value.
iphone with kindle app
Putting our best book forward
Each Great on Kindle book offers a great reading experience, at a better value than print to keep your wallet happy.

Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.

View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.

Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.

Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.

Get the free Kindle app: Link to the kindle app page Link to the kindle app page
Enjoy a great reading experience when you buy the Kindle edition of this book. Learn more about Great on Kindle, available in select categories.
Provides a report on the trial of Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann, including facts that were exposed after the trial, and presents Arendt's commentary on the controversy created by the report.
Read more Read less

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now

Product details

  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0844659770
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0844659770
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 10.6 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 1,942 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Hannah Arendt
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) taught political science and philosophy at The New School for Social Research in New York and the University of Chicago. Widely acclaimed as a brilliant and original thinker, her works include Eichmann in Jerusalem and The Human Condition.

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
1,942 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2011
Arendt's 'Eichmann in Jerusalem' is a fascinating study at multiple levels. Her knowledge of the history and bureaucracy of the Haolocaust is amazing in and of itself. Her knowledge of Eichmann's participation is also fascinating. At the same time, while not questioning the justice of Eichmann's execution, she is rightly critical--even contemptuous--of the kidnapping and the two years long 'legal' prosecution of Eichmann. At one point she actually denies that her work is a study on the nature of evil but, in my opinion, the totality of Arendt's work is--whether she intended it herself--is precisely a study of a PARTICULAR kind of evil. The subtitle of the book, 'The Banality of Evil', is a fair summation of Arendt's opinion.

Eichmann, in fact, was relatively small-fry in terms of the policies and philosophies of Nazi genocide. He was an apparachnik, no more, no less. He definitely wasn't the 'sadistic killer' the Jerusalem court adjudged him to be. He wasn't even particularly anti-semitic and he wasn't by nature either a torturer or murderer. He was the perfect gear in a complex, illogical and totally cynical machine. If the Nazi political machine had been 'good'-- if it had genuinely tried to help the Jews and all other peoples--Eichmann would have performed his 'good' role with equal dedication and skill. If the system had required Eichmann to perform the role of a Mother Theresa, Eichmann would have tried to prove himself the ideal saint.

Success, order, social standing and acceptance were the gods Eichmann worshipped. With some truth, Eichmann complained that his Nazi leaders misused Eichmann's highest qualities Initially his job was relatively--ahhh--banal. He was to help get Jews out of Germany, sometimes to Palestine, itself. If things had stopped at this point, Eichmann would now be regarded as something of a pro-Zionist. Things, however, didn't stop there and the system gradually, gradually, gradually morphed into an incomparable killing machine. Eichmann morphed right along with it.

Still this is a small part of the story and couldn't justify the Israel's fracturing of international law to kidnap such a non-entity in Buenos Aires. On the face of it, Eichmann simply wasn't worth it. Ben Gurion must have known it but reckoned that Eichmann--and a 'trial' against Eichman--could serve Israeli purposes. Eichmann wasn't the point of the trial. The TRIAL was the purpose of the trial. Eichmann's presence afforded the prosecutors to--once again once--bring forth the voluminous evidence of the Nazi genocidal atrocity. Most of the 'evidence' had absolutely nothing to do with Eichmann. It was an Israeli effort to gain 'justice', publicity and sympathy for the Jewish plight and Israeli survival. As such, it certainly didn't end with Eichmann's death. 'We must never forget', declared Simon Wiesenthal, as he hunted down Nazi war criminals. But what if we run out of 'war criminals'? What happens--as it has already happened--that they are all captured, punished or, especially dead of old age? The category of 'war criminal' therefore reaches downward to young guards drafted into service of a criminal regime. What happens when even these are gone?

No matter. Who are the guilty? Is an Eichmann or even a Heydrich, more evil than Ted Bundy? Bundy--up close and personal--kidnapped, raped, slowly tortured and murdured dozens of young women. Bundy gained physical pleasure and gratification in acts that unquestionably would have made even the most Jew-hating Nazi sick to his stomach. Eichmann, Heydrich and many, many others certainly did more harm, in a numerical sense, than did Bundy. So is evil a function of numbers? Is a person who kills ten people less evil than a person who kills ten thousand? Is a Communist who expedites the murder of an entire class of people, such as the Kulaks of the Soviet Union, less evil than a person who expedites the murder of ethnic groups in Nazi-occupied Europe?

At the same time it can be argued that Bundy and all those like him are 'sick' which somehow moderates the enormity of their crimes. Then again, how do we know they are 'sick'? Does the nature of the crime define mental illness? If so, maybe Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich and Eichmann were simply diseased souls--victims of their heredities and environments--who simply couldn't help themselves when presented with a certain set of circumstances. Maybe none of us are ultimately responsible for anything. I don't know but I do know that any society that adopts this nihilist philosophy--which many 'liberal' western societies have toyed with--the world is genuinely lost.
16 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2016
The Holocaust is an often told story. Hundreds if not thousands of books are written about it. This book, "Eichmann in Jerusalem" has to be the book to read on the subject. The book tells the story of Adolph EIchmann's trial in Jersusalem for crimes committed in the Holocaust during WWII. This is a trial for a person who personally did not kill one Jew. He was a mere Lt. Colonel in a huge bureaucracy, buried deep down in the organizational chart. How can that be? I think the answers in the book chill the average person to the bone. It touches on some subjects out of history that are very dark. It also is frighteningly real for today's world. I know that alone will scare most as well as any haunted house they go through.

This book flows very well. The author keeps the flow moving fast from chapter to chapter. She tells you the who on Eichmann, why it was important then in 1963, and goes over the events of the Holocaust. Her information comes straight from the trial transcripts. That adds a new angle to the event, closer to the timeline. I think that adds a lot to the story.

Overall the book is a great history of the Holocaust. It will give you facts that you haven't read before. These facts rattled the world then and I think it would now to anyone who reads it.

The book explains the whole final solution in intimate detail. It walks you through how it started as mercy killings due to low quality of life to a very large complex state owned machine. The book doesn't fill you will the horrible stories. It gives you the bureaucratic dry explanation on how the system worked. You learned how the elite was very much behind the process. That alone is something few other books offer. Through this line you learn that Eichmann was the person who made the whole system run. He made it run as only a Lt. Colonel buried in the bureaucracy who controlled very little. His office got the trains to put the Jews on. Then he coordinated with the camps to take the Jews. He did not run the camps himself. The Nazis also used the local Jews to make their system run. It was their local government which choose the names and Jews at gunpoint which guided them to the chambers in many camps. Their succession of lies to the Jews about a better tomorrow was a critical fuel that made the system run. Everyone would either trade in their neighbor or hung on in hope of a better tomorrow. German society also bore a piece of the guilt. Whole institutions jumped on board to make things happen.

Hannah Arendt also gives you the context from the period. Why the Israeli's conducted trail and the reaction from the world. The process of the trial in a way shaped world attitudes even to today. It brought out the horror of the system out of the shadows to see it was more than a mix of personal stories but it was a state sanctioned machine. I think it explained the system which no one on on the outside understood.

There is one thing from the book I know will upset people. The question today is how can people do this? Why would people do this. The book explains who Eichmann was. He started as a private in the SS. He was an average worker in Germany before that; a salesman. He moved up the SS chain quickly through hard work and taking full advantage of opportunities as they came. He probably would have moved to the top of any bureaucracy, Walmart, Exon, Ford, as he did with the SS. The only difference was then the mission was the Holocaust vs. selling odds and ends at Walmart. His story shows the importance of morals vs. just a good job. He was just a career climber in the business of the day. You can see how this principle of career success alone, outside of morals turns people into monsters. That element alone is what people can see happening tomorrow but won't admit it. That do that because they fear they too might do the same thing to advance or know someone who will.

This book
192 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Debussy 56
5.0 out of 5 stars the banality of evil
Reviewed in Canada on January 17, 2024
masterpiece on 20th century evil
Client d'Amazon
5.0 out of 5 stars masterpiece
Reviewed in France on March 13, 2022
History, philosophy, moral, and laws converging but still unable to explain and properly judge. This is a masterpiece forever. Strongly reccomended in difficult times!
POM
4.0 out of 5 stars Una lectura obligada
Reviewed in Spain on April 5, 2021
Un despliegue de erudición sobre un hecho histórico redactado independientemente. Buena prosa, tintes irónicos en la descripción de la tragedia de la solución final. La ironía le fue criticada mucho a la autora, pero la misma no es falta de respeto con las víctimas de la barbarie ni condescendencia con los asesinos. Por el contrario, el tinte irónico de algunos pasajes nace de poner de manifiesto los absurdos que acompañaron la gestación de todo este proceso por parte de los nazis y su posterior enjuiciamiento por las potencias vencedoras y el estado de Israel.
Carol Long
5.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic analysis of a complex issue.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 6, 2021
I first read this book over 30 years ago and found it heavy going even then. But a book discussing the Eichmann trial, with all it's complexities, was never going to be a light read. Unlike other reviewers I did not view Arendt as a "self hating Jew", but an incisive thinker who was not afraid to weigh up the evidence (all from public record) and openly and honestly discuss them in this book. That's not to say that I agreed with everything she stated, but she certainly made me think about the notions of guilt and innocence and personal, as apposed to state, responsibilty.

If you want a book that only describes the monstrous deeds of the Holocaust, as well as Eichmann's role in it, this is not the book for you. Arendt discusses not just Eichmann's role, but the role other people and organisations had in this "catastrophe". A discussion some people, even to this day, find unpalatable.

I am glad that I have read this book again, as with age (and I hope maturity), I got much more from it than I did all those years ago. In the political climate of 2021 there are parallels with 1920's and 1930's Europe and the rise of populist politicians who don't allow the facts to 'get in the way of a good story'. Let's hope the lessons learned all those years ago are not forgotten and history does not repeat itself!
30 people found this helpful
Report
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Should we put up with evil?
Reviewed in Brazil on September 4, 2019
Arendt shows how we do, when we shouln't. It was the case of the Germans during the Hollocaust, it was legal. The book is also History, it is a report on the Eichmann jugement.
2 people found this helpful
Report