Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil Hardcover
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPeter Smith Pub Inc
- Dimensions5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100844659770
- ISBN-13978-0844659770
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Product details
- Language : English
- ISBN-10 : 0844659770
- ISBN-13 : 978-0844659770
- Item Weight : 10.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) taught political science and philosophy at The New School for Social Research in New York and the University of Chicago. Widely acclaimed as a brilliant and original thinker, her works include Eichmann in Jerusalem and The Human Condition.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Eichmann, in fact, was relatively small-fry in terms of the policies and philosophies of Nazi genocide. He was an apparachnik, no more, no less. He definitely wasn't the 'sadistic killer' the Jerusalem court adjudged him to be. He wasn't even particularly anti-semitic and he wasn't by nature either a torturer or murderer. He was the perfect gear in a complex, illogical and totally cynical machine. If the Nazi political machine had been 'good'-- if it had genuinely tried to help the Jews and all other peoples--Eichmann would have performed his 'good' role with equal dedication and skill. If the system had required Eichmann to perform the role of a Mother Theresa, Eichmann would have tried to prove himself the ideal saint.
Success, order, social standing and acceptance were the gods Eichmann worshipped. With some truth, Eichmann complained that his Nazi leaders misused Eichmann's highest qualities Initially his job was relatively--ahhh--banal. He was to help get Jews out of Germany, sometimes to Palestine, itself. If things had stopped at this point, Eichmann would now be regarded as something of a pro-Zionist. Things, however, didn't stop there and the system gradually, gradually, gradually morphed into an incomparable killing machine. Eichmann morphed right along with it.
Still this is a small part of the story and couldn't justify the Israel's fracturing of international law to kidnap such a non-entity in Buenos Aires. On the face of it, Eichmann simply wasn't worth it. Ben Gurion must have known it but reckoned that Eichmann--and a 'trial' against Eichman--could serve Israeli purposes. Eichmann wasn't the point of the trial. The TRIAL was the purpose of the trial. Eichmann's presence afforded the prosecutors to--once again once--bring forth the voluminous evidence of the Nazi genocidal atrocity. Most of the 'evidence' had absolutely nothing to do with Eichmann. It was an Israeli effort to gain 'justice', publicity and sympathy for the Jewish plight and Israeli survival. As such, it certainly didn't end with Eichmann's death. 'We must never forget', declared Simon Wiesenthal, as he hunted down Nazi war criminals. But what if we run out of 'war criminals'? What happens--as it has already happened--that they are all captured, punished or, especially dead of old age? The category of 'war criminal' therefore reaches downward to young guards drafted into service of a criminal regime. What happens when even these are gone?
No matter. Who are the guilty? Is an Eichmann or even a Heydrich, more evil than Ted Bundy? Bundy--up close and personal--kidnapped, raped, slowly tortured and murdured dozens of young women. Bundy gained physical pleasure and gratification in acts that unquestionably would have made even the most Jew-hating Nazi sick to his stomach. Eichmann, Heydrich and many, many others certainly did more harm, in a numerical sense, than did Bundy. So is evil a function of numbers? Is a person who kills ten people less evil than a person who kills ten thousand? Is a Communist who expedites the murder of an entire class of people, such as the Kulaks of the Soviet Union, less evil than a person who expedites the murder of ethnic groups in Nazi-occupied Europe?
At the same time it can be argued that Bundy and all those like him are 'sick' which somehow moderates the enormity of their crimes. Then again, how do we know they are 'sick'? Does the nature of the crime define mental illness? If so, maybe Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich and Eichmann were simply diseased souls--victims of their heredities and environments--who simply couldn't help themselves when presented with a certain set of circumstances. Maybe none of us are ultimately responsible for anything. I don't know but I do know that any society that adopts this nihilist philosophy--which many 'liberal' western societies have toyed with--the world is genuinely lost.
This book flows very well. The author keeps the flow moving fast from chapter to chapter. She tells you the who on Eichmann, why it was important then in 1963, and goes over the events of the Holocaust. Her information comes straight from the trial transcripts. That adds a new angle to the event, closer to the timeline. I think that adds a lot to the story.
Overall the book is a great history of the Holocaust. It will give you facts that you haven't read before. These facts rattled the world then and I think it would now to anyone who reads it.
The book explains the whole final solution in intimate detail. It walks you through how it started as mercy killings due to low quality of life to a very large complex state owned machine. The book doesn't fill you will the horrible stories. It gives you the bureaucratic dry explanation on how the system worked. You learned how the elite was very much behind the process. That alone is something few other books offer. Through this line you learn that Eichmann was the person who made the whole system run. He made it run as only a Lt. Colonel buried in the bureaucracy who controlled very little. His office got the trains to put the Jews on. Then he coordinated with the camps to take the Jews. He did not run the camps himself. The Nazis also used the local Jews to make their system run. It was their local government which choose the names and Jews at gunpoint which guided them to the chambers in many camps. Their succession of lies to the Jews about a better tomorrow was a critical fuel that made the system run. Everyone would either trade in their neighbor or hung on in hope of a better tomorrow. German society also bore a piece of the guilt. Whole institutions jumped on board to make things happen.
Hannah Arendt also gives you the context from the period. Why the Israeli's conducted trail and the reaction from the world. The process of the trial in a way shaped world attitudes even to today. It brought out the horror of the system out of the shadows to see it was more than a mix of personal stories but it was a state sanctioned machine. I think it explained the system which no one on on the outside understood.
There is one thing from the book I know will upset people. The question today is how can people do this? Why would people do this. The book explains who Eichmann was. He started as a private in the SS. He was an average worker in Germany before that; a salesman. He moved up the SS chain quickly through hard work and taking full advantage of opportunities as they came. He probably would have moved to the top of any bureaucracy, Walmart, Exon, Ford, as he did with the SS. The only difference was then the mission was the Holocaust vs. selling odds and ends at Walmart. His story shows the importance of morals vs. just a good job. He was just a career climber in the business of the day. You can see how this principle of career success alone, outside of morals turns people into monsters. That element alone is what people can see happening tomorrow but won't admit it. That do that because they fear they too might do the same thing to advance or know someone who will.
This book
Top reviews from other countries
If you want a book that only describes the monstrous deeds of the Holocaust, as well as Eichmann's role in it, this is not the book for you. Arendt discusses not just Eichmann's role, but the role other people and organisations had in this "catastrophe". A discussion some people, even to this day, find unpalatable.
I am glad that I have read this book again, as with age (and I hope maturity), I got much more from it than I did all those years ago. In the political climate of 2021 there are parallels with 1920's and 1930's Europe and the rise of populist politicians who don't allow the facts to 'get in the way of a good story'. Let's hope the lessons learned all those years ago are not forgotten and history does not repeat itself!







