John Ehrman, whose 'Rise of Neoconservatism' a decade ago is still the essential work on the subject, has returned with the single book one needs to understand the 1980s. His thesis is that Ronald Reagan was a "transformational President" who both reflected and defined his times and thereby indelibly put his stamp on American civil and cultural life in a way that affects us still and will continue to do so for years to come.
'The Eighties' is a balanced, well-researched, engaging, and ultimately persuasive book. Reagan's success, Ehrman argues, was based on two factors; first, Reagan understood and appealled to the natural and moderate conservatism inherent in American politics. Ehrman's case is that Reaganism, despite the shrillness of its critics, turned out to be a moderate conservatism of the center rather than the extremist caricature touted by the left. Second, Reagan was helped immensely by the ineptness of his opponents and their failure to understand America's conservative centrism; to this day, the Democratic party has not managed to come up with a coherent answer to Reagan.
Ehrman is particularly strong describing broad trends without becoming overly dry or academic. His description of the origins of the "culture wars" is very good, as is his discussion of the increasing irrelevance of academia. His introduction contains the clearest and most concise definitions of liberalism and conservatism I have seen. There is a withering assessment of Michael Dukakis as the Democrats' candidate of desperation in the 1988 election against Reagan's Vice President (some guy named Bush, who was elected in a landslide as a proxy for a third Reagan term).
Above all, Ehrman's objectivity prevents 'The Eighties' from becoming a hagiography of Reagan--which is why a few on the far right don't like it. The author faces squarely Reagan's shortcomings, especially his managerial style. But rather than add to the plethora of biographic treatments of the 40th president, Ehrman has wisely focused on how Reagan changed American political life immutably. Whether it's welfare reform, abandonment of confiscatory taxes, or the death of Clinton's health care, we have to give Reagan credit--and, for many of us, he gets our thanks as well.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$35.53
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Roll The Bones Industries
Sold by:
Roll The Bones Industries
(280 ratings)
91% positive over last 12 months
91% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 6 to 10 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$44.90
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
Bahamut Media
Sold by:
Bahamut Media
(15936 ratings)
78% positive over last 12 months
78% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
$42.83
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
tabletopart
Sold by:
tabletopart
(40184 ratings)
91% positive over last 12 months
91% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 6 to 10 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan Paperback – June 13, 2006
by
John Ehrman
(Author)
|
John Ehrman
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length296 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherYale University Press
-
Publication dateJune 13, 2006
-
Dimensions9 x 5.88 x 0.81 inches
-
ISBN-100300115822
-
ISBN-13978-0300115826
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Ehrman's" Eighties is a strikingly successful book and a pleasure to read--it's scrupulously fair-minded, equally nuanced and perceptive in its discussion of cultural and political matters--and (above all) it provides a lucid, convincing, enormously valuable picture of the Reagan administration. Many (probably most) thoughtful, educated Americans still haven't got a clue who Reagan was, what he did, and why he became and remains a revered figure in this country. They need to read Ehrman, the sooner the better."--David Gelernter, Yale University
About the Author
John Ehrman is a foreign affairs analyst for the federal government. He was formerly a lecturer in history at George Washington University and writes on modern American conservative politics. His previous book, The Rise of Neoconservatism, was published by Yale University Press.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Compra tu Kindle aquí, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Compra tu Kindle aquí, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Yale University Press (June 13, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 296 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0300115822
- ISBN-13 : 978-0300115826
- Item Weight : 1.28 pounds
- Dimensions : 9 x 5.88 x 0.81 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#3,139,411 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #18,870 in History & Theory of Politics
- #153,347 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5
9 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on June 16, 2005
Verified Purchase
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2006
Verified Purchase
John Ehrman writes a good review of the Reagan years in "The Eighties, American in the Age of Reagan". Ehrman's style of writing is a very readable replay of the 1980s but grows a bit tiresome as he failingly seeks to hide his own right wing agenda in painting the Reagan years as near perfect times for the United States domestically (he almost completely ignores foreign policy in this book). Those seeking a detailed analysis or any real research or, in fact new ideas, can take this off their reading lists. For those of us who find the more recent years of the late 20th Century to be worthy of review - this can be, for the most part an enjoyable read.
There are many errors of fact that are glaring which makes any critical reader question other arguments the author states as factual. On Michael Milken, Ehman states "to maintain the value of the bonds, he engaged in insider tarding , market manipulation, and self dealing on a colossal scale . . .". Surely any with any knowledge know that the motivation was market share, not the value of the bonds. Colossal? Milken pled to 6 felony counts on very specific transactions, not one having to do with "insider trading". Perhaps the author read as fact overblown books such as James Stewart which were truly worse than night time soap operas.
In a particularly arrogant way, Ehman, who has yet to (and is highly unlikely to) add any significant historical research on the 20th Century, states that C. Vann Woodward, clearly a top historian of the period, "simply was wrong". This comment, sparked by the uproar of Bush I's 1988 presidential compaign, replete with Willie Horton adds, was, according to Woodward "cynical and unscrupulous".
Ehman fails to reconcile the victories of conservatism, and there were many, with the failure of a conservative economic agenda. Clearly one major reason Reagan won election was the burgeoning deficits of the Carter era (still under $70 billion at the end of his administration). Reagan's supply side economics, Laffer curve and all, with tax cuts designed to INCREASE revenue and huge defense spending increases produced budget deficits never before seen in our nations history. It was under a liberal President that the budget was eventually in suplus for four years with Clinton in power. Bush II, who seemingly learned one thing between his father (who faltered) and Reagan (who prospered) and that was keep taxes low and continue to seek to cut them futher. This flies in the face of conservative economic doctrine and, like the fiasco with our Marines in Beruit in 1983, the author simply ignores topics that might weaken his case.
Ehman, as such, can write a nice montage of a period but cannot be expected to generate new ideas or even research old ones. Perhaps he will be the one who gets to write on George W's "successes" as President and can sit with Rummy, Cheney, Hannity and Limbaugh one day soon in the lonely hearts club. I love a good partisan book but please don't try and hide a glaringly jaded and right wing agenda.
There are many errors of fact that are glaring which makes any critical reader question other arguments the author states as factual. On Michael Milken, Ehman states "to maintain the value of the bonds, he engaged in insider tarding , market manipulation, and self dealing on a colossal scale . . .". Surely any with any knowledge know that the motivation was market share, not the value of the bonds. Colossal? Milken pled to 6 felony counts on very specific transactions, not one having to do with "insider trading". Perhaps the author read as fact overblown books such as James Stewart which were truly worse than night time soap operas.
In a particularly arrogant way, Ehman, who has yet to (and is highly unlikely to) add any significant historical research on the 20th Century, states that C. Vann Woodward, clearly a top historian of the period, "simply was wrong". This comment, sparked by the uproar of Bush I's 1988 presidential compaign, replete with Willie Horton adds, was, according to Woodward "cynical and unscrupulous".
Ehman fails to reconcile the victories of conservatism, and there were many, with the failure of a conservative economic agenda. Clearly one major reason Reagan won election was the burgeoning deficits of the Carter era (still under $70 billion at the end of his administration). Reagan's supply side economics, Laffer curve and all, with tax cuts designed to INCREASE revenue and huge defense spending increases produced budget deficits never before seen in our nations history. It was under a liberal President that the budget was eventually in suplus for four years with Clinton in power. Bush II, who seemingly learned one thing between his father (who faltered) and Reagan (who prospered) and that was keep taxes low and continue to seek to cut them futher. This flies in the face of conservative economic doctrine and, like the fiasco with our Marines in Beruit in 1983, the author simply ignores topics that might weaken his case.
Ehman, as such, can write a nice montage of a period but cannot be expected to generate new ideas or even research old ones. Perhaps he will be the one who gets to write on George W's "successes" as President and can sit with Rummy, Cheney, Hannity and Limbaugh one day soon in the lonely hearts club. I love a good partisan book but please don't try and hide a glaringly jaded and right wing agenda.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 6, 2007
The Eighties certainly were a palmy time for American conservatism. Though the conflicts which have eaten away at their majority (until it wasn't a majority any more) were all visible from the beginning, it was hard to worry about them when the day was young and the sledding was fresh. It is revealing, both of that time and our own, that the reviews I see here (most, apparently, written by conservatives) disagree so sharply, both about Ehrman's book and about his topic.
The book is fine, though limited. It is kind (which is to say, evasive) about Reagan's worst excesses. The grand cliche of Eighties Scholarship: that Reagan triumphed by "changing the paradigm" -- that he was foremost a "great communicator" who built a new consensus on the core ideas of American politics -- remains untouched. To get a more accurate assessment of Reagan, you will have to read the critical authors regarding whom a divided conservative movement joins in condemnation. I would suggest instead of this book, Garry Wills' _Reagan's America: Innocents at Home_. It's a far better book, both about the parts of Reagan and his "revolution" that worked, and the parts that just weren't there.
For a book on the destructive aspects of the Reagan years you will also have to look elsewhere. Conservatives have taken to stabbing each other these days, so those golden days in which the knife was reserved for others are now remembered like a football weekend from one's twenties: the air was cool and crisp, the scent of falling leaves was in the air, one's side was mostly winning and everyone one knew was happy.
The book is fine, though limited. It is kind (which is to say, evasive) about Reagan's worst excesses. The grand cliche of Eighties Scholarship: that Reagan triumphed by "changing the paradigm" -- that he was foremost a "great communicator" who built a new consensus on the core ideas of American politics -- remains untouched. To get a more accurate assessment of Reagan, you will have to read the critical authors regarding whom a divided conservative movement joins in condemnation. I would suggest instead of this book, Garry Wills' _Reagan's America: Innocents at Home_. It's a far better book, both about the parts of Reagan and his "revolution" that worked, and the parts that just weren't there.
For a book on the destructive aspects of the Reagan years you will also have to look elsewhere. Conservatives have taken to stabbing each other these days, so those golden days in which the knife was reserved for others are now remembered like a football weekend from one's twenties: the air was cool and crisp, the scent of falling leaves was in the air, one's side was mostly winning and everyone one knew was happy.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse


