Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy And The Cognitive Science Of Moral And Legal Judgment Reprint Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-101107680379
- ISBN-13978-1107680371
- EditionReprint
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 26, 2013
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 1.08 x 9 inches
- Print length432 pages
Editorial Reviews
Review
--Noam Chomsky
“John Mikhail’s Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls Linguistic Analogy And The Cognitive Science of Moral Judgment carefully and convincingly explains John Rawls’ remarks in his Theory of Justice about a possible analogy between linguistics and moral theory, showing that most commentators have mischaracterized these remarks and have therefore misunderstood important aspects of Rawls’ early writings. (This is the best account I have read of Rawls.) In addition Mikhail takes the linguistic analogy more seriously than other researchers and develops the beginnings of a kind of moral grammar that is somewhat analogous to the grammar of a language. The grammar he envisions has rules characterizing more or less complex actions, rules that derive partly from Alvin Goldman’s Theory of Action and uses concepts taken from common law. He also speculates on the implications of the possibility that a moral grammar of this sort might account for aspects of ordinary moral judgments, comparing morality with language. I believe that Mikhail’s current work in this area as reported in his book is the most important contemporary development in moral theory.”
--Gilbert Harman, Stuart Professor of Philosophy, Princeton University
"Finally, a book that compares our current knowledge of human morality against the idea of an inborn rule-based system, not unlike universal grammar. With great erudition, John Mikhail carefully discusses all of the steps needed to understand this linguistic parallel, adding a new perspective to the ongoing debate about an evolved moral sense.”
--Frans de Waal, author of "The Age of Empathy" (Harmony, 2009)
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; Reprint edition (September 26, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1107680379
- ISBN-13 : 978-1107680371
- Item Weight : 1.44 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.08 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,514,569 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #529 in Logic (Books)
- #820 in Professional Responsibility & Law Ethics
- #1,836 in Ethics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This is not a total beginner's book. You need some background on Cognitive Sciences and both Normative Ethics and Meta-Ethics. Often Mikhail is highly technical and he can use an entire chapter to cover a relatively unimportant issue. I think Mikhail is too generous to Rawls and attribute to him most of his own greater insights. So, ironically, you don't need much previous knowledge on Ralws' Theory of justice. Some basic understanding on Chomsky's ideas will help, but Mikhail will provide you with most you will need.
Mikhail proposal can be oversimplified by the following points:
1) There are some genetic encodings on our moral cognitions that should be common to all normal people regardless its cultural background.
2) The basic process created by this genetic encoding can be described on a similar way that of a Formal Grammar or any other cognitive process.
3) You can do Empirical research to uncover those invariant moral processes. This should be done by vanilla scientific method: you do some hypotheses and test those hypotheses against empirical data.
4) You have prima facie reason to believe that those processes have Normative force.
But prepare yourself to a MUCH deeper and nuanced analysis of those issues. And Mikhail will provide you with both reliable empirical data from the famous Trolley problems and a convincing cognitive model that match those data. And surprise: the heart of his model (the principle of double effect) has being around at least since Aquinas. Even so, Mikhail version is a master piece of precision.
I think Mikhail is basically the single guy pointing on the right direction while so many are talking no sense. Personally, I only have two critics on him (both unfair, if you take in account his relatively modest program):
a) The idea that our cognitive process can be modeled with some equivalent of a Turing machine is, on my view, wrong. It is true that this is the mainstream view. And even if it is wrong it still provides us with the best cognitive models available. But my own view is that the mind is a non-computable, pattern processor function. This objection is really only important to me, but the urge to adopt a mainstream model make Mikhail unnecessary attached with the Grammar analogy. He restricts himself with ONE kind of cognitive model. This model fits his first set of data, but he must grow past it if he wants his research program to takeoff.
b) His model does not make provision to structural aspects of ethics. I think not everything is genetically encoded and some ethical issues just can't be solved by firmware programmed to deal with hunter-collectors societies. Other that test if a cultural aspect is compatible with our basic wiring, his research program will not provide us with a model to judge the normativity of rules on complex social issues. But I have a intuition that he would answer to this with a: first things first. We first deal with the simpler issues, then we complicate them.
If you want to think Ethics on a different way, this book is for you. But if you hold hard to ideas like Cultural Relativist or Utilitarianism, you will find plenty of reasons to hate the guy that will show how outdated are those ideas.
I bring this up because I don't want you to be turned off by the mention of Rawls if you dismiss him, love him or hate him-- this is pure Mikhail, not Rawls or Chomsky. Rawls is not as good or bad as promoted, and in fact A Theory of Justice is an important read. But Mikhail also refers to a number of his other books to lightly touch on jurisprudence and economics as well.
Mikhail's ideas are novel and difficult. This is a slow, nuanced, highly techno-speak oriented text, and you need either a good grounding in moral theory terms, or Wikipedia close at hand. Chomsky attempts (and still does) to remove grammar from "common use" to a more testable premise base, with the attendant jargon so characteristic of that translation. Mikhail uses the same syllogism and inductive process to (generalize) common moral terminology to a possibly hard wired universal ethics, in the spirit of Chomsky's universal grammar.
For example, the index is wonderful with tiny "sub-snippets" of additional keywords and phrases within each entry, but there is no entry for utility functions. You have to look at cost-benefit if you're pursuing enlightened self interest via reward and punishment, in addition to the universal hard wiring proposed! There also is no entry for Free Will (or will, free) vs. determinism/ cause-effect, and the discussion avoids current interesting issues like how choice works if we're actually living in a sim, as many of the multiverse theories in quantum physics are considering, most particularly Tegmark's amazing new book: Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality .
If you're an attorney or judge, or teach law, this book is a must read much more so than for economists. The reason is that there are numerous, detailed connections between moral theory, Mikhail's innovative new ideas, and jurisprudence, whether common law or case precedent. In the spirit of Chomsky, Mikhail even creates a "periodic table" of moral elements!
If you can work through the technical language, the concepts are refreshing and novel, and will add a completely new dimension to ethics discussions, as would more serious consideration of those choices if this reality IS a sim ala Tegmark et al. Highly recommended for those not too timid about either technical language or philosophical logic. The semantic hair splitting of "usual" philosophy also is either avoided or pointed out as such, and that introspective caution is truly refreshing for any philosopher.
