Buy new:
-61% $19.35$19.35
Delivery Tuesday, January 14
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Acceptable
$9.99$9.99
Delivery Monday, January 13
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Tech and Media
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Eliminationists 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
The Eliminationists describes the malignant influence of right-wing hate talk on the American conservative movement. Tracing much of this vitriol to the dank corners of the para-fascist right, award-winning reporter David Neiwert documents persistent ideas and rhetoric that champion the elimination of opposition groups. As a result of this hateful discourse, Neiwert argues, the broader conservative movement has metastasized into something not truly conservative, but decidedly right-wing and potentially dangerous.
By tapping into the eliminationism latent in the American psyche, the mainstream conservative movement has emboldened groups that have inhabited the fringes of the far right for decades. With the Obama victory, their voices may once again raise the specter of deadly domestic terrorism that characterized the far Right in the 1990s. How well Americans face this challenge will depend on how strongly we repudiate the politics of hate and repair the damage it has wrought.
- ISBN-100981576982
- ISBN-13978-0981576985
- Edition1st
- PublisherRoutledge
- Publication dateMay 1, 2009
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.43 x 0.65 x 8.5 inches
- Print length288 pages
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Alt-America: The Rise of the Radical Right in the Age of TrumpHardcover$6.99 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
In God's Country: The Patriot Movement and the Pacific NorthwestPaperback$6.99 shippingOnly 1 left in stock (more on the way).
C Street: The Fundamentalist Threat to American DemocracyHardcover$6.99 shippingOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2011With the talk today over the lack of civil discourse in our nation, its impact on the terrorist attack outside a supermarket in Phoenix, AZ, and Mark DeMoss announcing his intention to disband his "Civility Project," this book couldn't have come at a more appropriate time.
Author David Neiwert starts out with the story of David Adkisson, the man who went into a Church in Knoxville, killing three people, hell bent on killing all the liberals he could find. Three conservative books found in his home apparently aroused him to action. He refers to such books by his subtitle, "How Hate Talk Radicalized the American Right," which he says lead to the title, "The Eliminationists." Events since then, leading to the death of a doctor in KS and the shooting of a Congresswoman in AZ, bear out his thesis and make this a worthwhile read.
Elimination has been a part of our history ever since settlers arrived in the New World. First, the Native American was eradicated by starvation, exposure, and murder. With slavery abolished, the freed African became a threat, especially to the chastity of white women (supposedly). A reign of American terror spread with lynchings happening every year for decades. Hundreds or thousands attended some of them, as entertainment. Next, whole communities of Asians were segregated and in some cases, massacred. That continued with the internment of Japanese Americans in World War II.
The author's point is that not only has it always been with us, it never left us, and it has a chance to grow, especially through the talk of the radicalized right whose ideas, once considered extreme and irrational are now making it to the mainstream. Once radical talk becomes mainstream, it is not long before people take action based on such talk. And the radical right is doing the same thing that our forebears did to the American Indian, freed slave and Asian. They are creating enemies of anyone with a different political point of view until enemies take on the characteristics of non-humans. The eliminationist feels he has a legitimate reason for killing the enemy and becoming a hero, because you cannot be hero unless you have enemies.
The radical talk he describes is from the right and has two approaches to seizing power: seeing liberals as competitors rather than partners in citizenship and seeing liberals as objects to be eliminated. At the same token, Niewert does not see liberalism as blameless. To him, the liberal charge of fascism has been used so often and in so many circumstances, as to become meaningless. Liberal feelings of intellectual superiority also do nothing to enhance rational dialogue between conservative and liberal. A confrontational face-off will contribute only to a downward spiral of events and contention.
The incremental inroads of extremism are almost imperceptible and if allowed to continue will one day mean that democracy is lost and fascism, in an American form, has replaced it.
David Neiwert's writing is useful and presented in an interesting and compelling way. His historical insights are significant and are important to his argument of a growing intolerance and division in this country.
Don't eliminate this from your list of things to read. It's a calm and rational talk about hate talk.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 8, 2016If you want to see where right-wing hate talk has led us, read this book. I have believed that Limbaugh, Coulter, Palin, Malkin and those of their ilk have created a paranoia-filled fantasy for many in this country. Alex Jones now makes a very good living off creating phony conspiracies which feed the paranoia. These right-wing hacks need to be held to account for their inciting rhetoric.
We have to realize at some point that this rhetoric is creating lone wolf extremists willing to die and take a lot of people with them. Unfortunately, the internet gives some of these paranoid extremists access to those of like mind, which has led to the creation of many militia groups, the Bundy family's delusional beliefs regarding the federal government, sovereign citizens, posse comitatus, etc. Make no mistake, these groups are extremists and they do not want to have productive discourse with anyone who disagrees with their point of view. They want to eliminate (i.e., exterminate) you.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 29, 2009Back in 1962, within shouting distance of my neighborhood in Pasadena, California, lay that hotbed of anti-liberalism: Orange County. Back then, Orange County was home to Goldwaterites, hell and damnation religionists, John Birchers and other right-wing groups. Nowadays, it's home to many of their successors.
We often saw Birchite handbills and posters which warned about the Communist conspiracy that was overtaking a weak, emasculated Liberal America. We found the Birchers mysterious, furtive, and frankly, didn't pay much attention to them. But then along came the Birchite campaign against the fluoridization of the drinking water in southern California.
My father, a dentist, having seen the positive effects of fluoride on his patients' teeth, could not believe that a policy which had clear, visible and demonstrable benefits, could be opposed on the outlandish, unscientific grounds that fluoridation was a Communist plot to emasculate American men. Under the pressure of the Birchites' pamphleteering and local publicity stunts, a number of my father's patients actually became worried enough about fluoride to confess their fears about the dangers of fluoride in the drinking water. He attended public meetings on the issue and was shouted down by Birchites. He even lost a few patients over it.
With the aid of the THE ELIMINATIONISTS: HOW HATE TALK RADICALIZED THE AMERICAN RIGHT, I can see now that water fluoridation is an early example of right-wing eliminationism as described by David Neiwert in this important book. One can see in fluoridation in nascent form, a scare campaign that calls into question liberal government's motives, draws together people with disparate beliefs into the same anti-liberal, anti-democratic, anti-secular crusade, and effectively stops any reasonable cross-border discussion from taking place.
I can now see in this campaign how right-wing scare campaigns came to both target the body to induce maximum terror and obedience, and came to stop any form of reasonable discussion: Birchers identified fluoride as Liberal plot intended to weaken or kill Americans. The answer? Flouride must be eliminated from the water supply. And by extension, liberal policies. (Admittedly, this early example is almost quaint as compared to the language and strategies we hear nowadays. The Birchites stopped at Liberal policies, but as Neiwert points out, the new right wing goes all the way to advocating the elimination of liberals altogether.)
The justification for the war in Iraq targeted the body, too, of course. The horrific effects of chemical weapons used by Saddam Hussein were invoked first as emblems of Iraq's evil -- weapons the US helped supply in the 80s. Then we were told a tale of a smoking gun that was a mushroom cloud -- a nuclear attack on America coordinated by the stealthy, anti-Christian agents of Al Queda. In nearly every case, the eliminiationist strategy is to offer a false Either/Or choice: Life (conservatism) or Death (liberalism). How many times did you hear this justification for the war in Iraq: "We've got to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here."
THE ELIMINATIONISTS also includes with an especially good discussion of Jonah Goldberg's pernicious screed "Liberal Fascism." He aptly cites Robert O. Paxton's "Anatomy of Fascism" -- another must-read dissection of right wing tactics. All in all this is a necessary and important book that will help readers to guard against the predations of the eliminationist tendencies of the right-wing. As Neiwert points out, the John Birch Society and its many offspring have since 9/11 gone mainstream in the voices of Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, et. al., and all those who follow their lead. And, as we've recently seen, they're not going away anytime soon.
Top reviews from other countries
Kindle CustomerReviewed in Canada on May 27, 20095.0 out of 5 stars A cautionary view of a country on a precipice
If you, like me, are concerned about the bitterness and hatred that fills our political arenas, this is a 'must read' for your library.
The right wing hate mongers have driven the U.S. to the present low state of human philosophical and political interactions. What were in previous times shunned as being fringe thoughts and misplaced ideals are now being brought under the broad and tattered tent of conservatism. At the same time the initial values of conservatism, namely fiscal responsibility and a strong and fluid national defense, were cast aside in a flurry of tax cuts for the rich and an illegal and unprovoked war. The 'middle' of the political spectrum has drastically shifted to the right over the past three decades. The actual right is now comprised of an amalgumation of extreme, fringe ideals which, at times, appear to make strange bedfellows with one another. In the meantime the left has drifted away from its concerns for the common man and bends towards corportism and the 'middle' now comprises what was formerly viewed as right wing, Republican platforms.
The author, however, issues a strong cautionary statement in his closing. In order for the democratic, progressive stance to survive it cannot be caught up in the same hate mongoring that spews forth from the present conservative base. This will only give the extremists more fuel for the hate-filled fire shown through their eliminationist excercizes against all persons who do not agree with their slanted and xenophobic view points.





