Buy new:
$44.11$44.11
FREE delivery:
Monday, Feb 13
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: The Reader Eagle
Buy Used: $9.95
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics (Popular Science) 1st Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
There is a newer edition of this item:
Enhance your purchase
mind can do?
In this absorbing and frequently contentious book, Roger Penrose--eminent physicist and winner, with Stephen Hawking, of the prestigious Wolf prize--puts forward his view that there are some facets of human thinking that can never be emulated by a machine. Penrose examines what physics and
mathematics can tell us about how the mind works, what they can't, and what we need to know to understand the physical processes of consciousness.
He is among a growing number of physicists who think Einstein wasn't being stubborn when he said his "little finger" told him that quantum mechanics is incomplete, and he concludes that laws even deeper than quantum mechanics are essential for the operation of a mind. To support this
contention, Penrose takes the reader on a dazzling tour that covers such topics as complex numbers, Turing machines, complexity theory, quantum mechanics, formal systems, Godel undecidability, phase spaces, Hilbert spaces, black holes, white holes, Hawking radiation, entropy, quasicrystals, the
structure of the brain, and scores of other subjects.
The Emperor's New Mind will appeal to anyone with a serious interest in modern physics and its relation to philosophical issues, as well as to physicists, mathematicians, philosophers and those on either side of the AI debate.
- ISBN-100192861980
- ISBN-13978-0192861986
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateDecember 12, 2002
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions7.7 x 1.5 x 5 inches
- Print length640 pages
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"The testament of a brilliant man wrestling desperately--and unashamedly--with the deepest problems of metaphysics --Nature
"Penrose embarks on a sweeping survey of black holes, cosmology and thermodynamics in search of further support. The reader is treated to a tour of much of modern physics before being brought back to the central thesis: that minds must be taken seriously." --Observer
"A pedagogical tour de force, with some dazzling new ways of illuminating the central themes of science." --Times Literary Supplement
"Penrose takes us on perhaps the most engaging and creative tour of modern physics that has ever been written....the reader might feel privileged indeed to accompany Penrose on his magical mystery tour." --Sunday Times
"Will be universally cited by strong AI opponents as the definitive refutation of strong AI....An excellent introduction to the ideas which are involved in the strong AI hypothesis." --Physics World
About the Author
Roger Penrose is the Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize which he shared with with Stephen Hawking for their joint contribution to our understanding of the universe.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (December 12, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 640 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0192861980
- ISBN-13 : 978-0192861986
- Item Weight : 1.03 pounds
- Dimensions : 7.7 x 1.5 x 5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #545,279 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #753 in Artificial Intelligence & Semantics
- #4,132 in Physics (Books)
- #14,527 in Psychology & Counseling
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Roger Penrose is definitely one scientist that holds a very strong opinion on this opposite, and I do have to say that he is undoubtedly good at explaining his arguments. This book did a good job at disseminating a set of fundamental ideas from a physics perspective in relation to some very philosophical and mathematical issues. From my reading, there are two streams of ideas in the book. The first one is from mathematics, including the introduction of algorithms, Turing machines and logical proof systems. The second one is from physics, from classical mechanics to relativity and quantum mechanics and beyond. The interaction of these two streams by itself is worth reading by anyone who is pondering on the fundamental doubts of the mind, intelligence and conciousness.
From the first stream, the book’s main argument rests on the Turing halting problem and Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. From these theorems, he argues that machines could not be like humans since it could not know the truthness of these self-referencing statements. I am not yet convinced by this seemingly sound argument, because it rests on the fact that there is certain statement about the system itself that it could not know true or false. We humans could perceive that these incomplete statements are true, because we are not these systems therefore they are not self-referencing statements for ourselves. We do not have an answer to whether we ourselves are free from these incomplete limitations, since if we had the answer it would violate the incompleteness theorems. Who knows, maybe some aliens would think of us as no difference from we think of the machines, and apply a form of Cantor’s diagonalization to say that “look, humans cannot have mind because they cannot understand these true statements that are obvious to us”! As a result, the presumption that humans are free from incompleteness is one most ridiculous hidden idea in the book.
In the second stream, the book became much more constructive. It is a great journey to explore the searching of an explanation for the mind through the vast space of knowledge in physics. However, throughout the arguments, the ideas could only belong to a set of speculations. This is not a surprise since he argues for the necessity of a correct quantum gravity (CQG) theory to explain the human mind, which should ultimately unify quantum mechanics and general relativity under a single mathematical framework. It is the fact that no such theory yet exists that shakes down many of his arguments and made them merely speculations. As a result, this book in my opinion does a very bad job at opposing artificial intelligence in both streams.
In general, the book is still very much enjoyable just because it contains a grand set of fundamental knowledge. It is particularly so reading from a critic point of view. Roger Penrose also has two later books in the same string of thought, which undoubtedly may explain his ideas better and may resolve some of this book’s issues. I am looking forward to reading them as valuable thought excercises, but may be after a few books from some other human endeavors.
Penrose's main argument is that all computers must necessarily run according to algorithms. Even if someone could somehow construct a "quantum computer" (which is doubtful) this would still be operating in an algorithmic manner. The mind, on the other hand, operates non-algorithmically. As such, no computer nor any machine could ever hope to replicate a mind no matter how advanced said machine may be.
Of course, this is a rather simplified overview of Penrose's argument. To get a better idea of the points he makes, one can do no better than read the book, where the arguments are presented in a good and convincing way.
One criticism I have of the book is that it takes a LONG time to get to the point. In fact, despite being a book about why "strong AI" is implausible, most of the book seems to be about mathematics and theoretical physics. Granted, maths and physics does tie in to Penrose's arguments against "strong AI", but he seems to go into excessive detail. Surely just a brief overview of the maths and physics underlying his arguments would have been sufficient.
As a consequence of all the detail put into all the maths and physics info, the actual arguments about AI don't go into nearly as much detail as they could. This is unfortunate, as I had been hoping for a more detailed set of arguments showing the flaws of "strong AI" claims. Still, what was presented was still pretty well argued.
Overall, an interesting book and a good source of info for understanding why claims about thinking machines don't hold up even close to as well as the claims' proponents would try to have one believe.
The Emperor's New Mind concentrates on the limitations of formal mathematical logic {as implemented in a computer}, and how human consciousness can stretch past these limitations. Much of this argument is based on Godel's theorems about the limitations of formal systems of logic. Penrose concludes that Artificial Intelligence programs will never, no matter how far computer science develops, be able to produce the kind of conceptual understanding which is characteristic of human consciousness. In a metaphysical leap, he proposes that consciousness is an essentially quantum phenomenon. He gives the "collapse of the wave-function," familiar from conventional interpretations of quantum mechanics, an enhanced status as a real physical effect, and proposes that it is mediated by some {not yet fully understood} effect in Quantum Gravity.
Granted that a conscious observer has featured prominently in discussions of the "measurement problem" from the very beginnings of quantum theory, and that no agreed position has emerged in nearly a century of debate, Penrose's proposal to make the collapse of the wave-function an objective process, and to tie consciousness to it, has more merit than the metaphysical flavour might at first suggest.
Top reviews from other countries
This book was cutting edge a couple of decades ago - and has now become over run by advances in computing tech. But it is a great way to fill in the jump from AUTOMATA of the 17th Century and cog wheels to the digital age if you want to know.
There are pages and pages of machine code (all endless series of Zeroes and ONE's in this book that tell a TURING MACHINE how to operate... and- if you are that way inclined- you are asked to check them to see if they would work.
That detail gives you an idea of how informed and grounded the Professor who wrote this book is about the subject. As a non-mathematician I found the rigours fascinating and informative... but I refrained from trying to check the programming for errors.
Some reviewers have recommended reading the book more than once. One reading was enough for me and I followed Penrose's advice by skimming some sections. Nevertheless there is enough in this book to recommend it to anyone interested in what makes us human and what makes humans special.
That said, I found it very interesting and worthwhile to skip through the difficult bits and read what I could understand. You could say that he should have left out all the maths but I find it satisfying that he provides all the technical background that makes him totally convincing.
He raises many philosophical points, not always obviously relevant to his stated subject, and his very open on where he is unsure, or where there are opposing viewpoints to his own. Altogether a worthwhile read, but as another reviewer has pointed out, not for the faint hearted or those only interested in popular science.









