Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Emperor's New Mind Reprint Edition
- ISBN-100140145346
- ISBN-13978-0140145342
- EditionReprint
- PublisherPenguin Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1991
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.75 x 1.5 x 9 inches
- Print length480 pages
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Penrose claims that there is an intimate, perhaps unknowable relation between quantum effects and our thinking, and ultimately derives his anti-AI stance from his proposition that some, if not all, of our thinking is non-algorithmic. Of course, these days we believe that there are other avenues to AI than traditional algorithmic programming; while he has been accused of setting up straw robots to knock down, this accusation is unfair. Little was then known about the power of neural networks and behavior-based robotics to simulate (and, some would say, produce) intelligent problem-solving behavior. Whether these tools will lead to strong AI is ultimately a question of belief, not proof, and The Emperor's New Mind offers powerful arguments useful to believer and nonbeliever alike. --Rob Lightner
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Books; Reprint edition (January 1, 1991)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0140145346
- ISBN-13 : 978-0140145342
- Item Weight : 1.13 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 1.5 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #932,355 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,637 in Philosophy (Books)
- #1,895 in Mathematics (Books)
- #2,412 in Computer Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Roger Penrose is definitely one scientist that holds a very strong opinion on this opposite, and I do have to say that he is undoubtedly good at explaining his arguments. This book did a good job at disseminating a set of fundamental ideas from a physics perspective in relation to some very philosophical and mathematical issues. From my reading, there are two streams of ideas in the book. The first one is from mathematics, including the introduction of algorithms, Turing machines and logical proof systems. The second one is from physics, from classical mechanics to relativity and quantum mechanics and beyond. The interaction of these two streams by itself is worth reading by anyone who is pondering on the fundamental doubts of the mind, intelligence and conciousness.
From the first stream, the book’s main argument rests on the Turing halting problem and Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. From these theorems, he argues that machines could not be like humans since it could not know the truthness of these self-referencing statements. I am not yet convinced by this seemingly sound argument, because it rests on the fact that there is certain statement about the system itself that it could not know true or false. We humans could perceive that these incomplete statements are true, because we are not these systems therefore they are not self-referencing statements for ourselves. We do not have an answer to whether we ourselves are free from these incomplete limitations, since if we had the answer it would violate the incompleteness theorems. Who knows, maybe some aliens would think of us as no difference from we think of the machines, and apply a form of Cantor’s diagonalization to say that “look, humans cannot have mind because they cannot understand these true statements that are obvious to us”! As a result, the presumption that humans are free from incompleteness is one most ridiculous hidden idea in the book.
In the second stream, the book became much more constructive. It is a great journey to explore the searching of an explanation for the mind through the vast space of knowledge in physics. However, throughout the arguments, the ideas could only belong to a set of speculations. This is not a surprise since he argues for the necessity of a correct quantum gravity (CQG) theory to explain the human mind, which should ultimately unify quantum mechanics and general relativity under a single mathematical framework. It is the fact that no such theory yet exists that shakes down many of his arguments and made them merely speculations. As a result, this book in my opinion does a very bad job at opposing artificial intelligence in both streams.
In general, the book is still very much enjoyable just because it contains a grand set of fundamental knowledge. It is particularly so reading from a critic point of view. Roger Penrose also has two later books in the same string of thought, which undoubtedly may explain his ideas better and may resolve some of this book’s issues. I am looking forward to reading them as valuable thought excercises, but may be after a few books from some other human endeavors.
The Emperor's New Mind concentrates on the limitations of formal mathematical logic {as implemented in a computer}, and how human consciousness can stretch past these limitations. Much of this argument is based on Godel's theorems about the limitations of formal systems of logic. Penrose concludes that Artificial Intelligence programs will never, no matter how far computer science develops, be able to produce the kind of conceptual understanding which is characteristic of human consciousness. In a metaphysical leap, he proposes that consciousness is an essentially quantum phenomenon. He gives the "collapse of the wave-function," familiar from conventional interpretations of quantum mechanics, an enhanced status as a real physical effect, and proposes that it is mediated by some {not yet fully understood} effect in Quantum Gravity.
Granted that a conscious observer has featured prominently in discussions of the "measurement problem" from the very beginnings of quantum theory, and that no agreed position has emerged in nearly a century of debate, Penrose's proposal to make the collapse of the wave-function an objective process, and to tie consciousness to it, has more merit than the metaphysical flavour might at first suggest.
Top reviews from other countries
Penrose's book has been met with both praise and criticism from physicists and philosophers. Some have argued that his arguments are flawed, while others have found them to be stimulating and insightful. Ultimately, the book is a valuable contribution to the debate about the nature of consciousness, and it is sure to continue to be discussed and debated for many years to come.
From a physicist's point of view, Penrose's book is a tour de force. He weaves together complex ideas from physics, mathematics, and philosophy in a way that is both accessible and engaging. His arguments are well-reasoned and supported by evidence, and he does not shy away from challenging the status quo.
One of the most interesting aspects of Penrose's book is his discussion of quantum mechanics. He argues that quantum mechanics is not fully deterministic, and that this non-determinism is essential for the existence of consciousness. This is a controversial claim, but it is one that has been gaining support in recent years.
Overall, The Emperor's New Mind is a landmark book that has had a profound impact on the way we think about consciousness. It is a must-read for anyone who is interested in the nature of mind and the relationship between physics and consciousness.
C‘était déjà une position dissidente en 1989 et elle semble l’être encore davantage aujourd’hui.
Cependant le fait que l’on parle 30 ans après davantage d‘humain augmenté et de transhumanisme que d‘ intelligence artificielle „forte“ ne témoigne t-il pas d‘une certaine évolution quant aux prétentions démiurgiques de nos savants?
Allons droit au but: ce livre est essentiel à la culture personnelle de tout lecteur fusse-t’il même, comme votre serviteur, allergique aux équations et raisonnements scientifiques.
La question résolue d‘avance par l’intitulé n‘est que prétexte à un tour d‘horizon des grands concepts mathématiques physiques et philosophiques des deux siècles passés.
Tout y est exprimé en termes simples et concis, accessibles même au littéraire égaré qui éludera sans complexe (et sans perte de sens) les passages trop matheux.
Précisons cependant qu‘il s‘agit d‘une lecture exigente et de longue haleine, mais le jeu en vaut la chandelle .







