Other Sellers on Amazon
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order Paperback – May 26, 1995
| Thomas J. Knock (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
In his widely acclaimed To End All Wars, Thomas Knock provides an intriguing, often provocative narrative of Woodrow Wilson's epic quest for a new world order. The account follows Wilson's thought and diplomacy from his policy toward revolutionary Mexico, through his dramatic call for "Peace without Victory" in World War I, to the Senate's rejection of the League of Nations. Throughout Knock explores the place of internationalism in American politics, sweeping away the old view that isolationism was the cause of Wilson's failure and revealing the role of competing visions of internationalism--conservative and progressive.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 26, 1995
- Dimensions6.06 x 1.05 x 9.06 inches
- ISBN-100691001502
- ISBN-13978-0691001500
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Learn more.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Similar books based on genre
Editorial Reviews
Review
"[This book] challenges virtually every recent historian who has tackled the subject. Knock demands that we see Wilson in a genuinely new framework and succeeds admirably."---Gary J. Ostrower, The American Historical Review
"Now that humanity is possibly drawing closer to ... [a] `Federation of the World,' To End All Wars is an enlightening and valuable introduction to the birth of that noble vision."---Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., The Times Literary Supplement
"Wilson, in his time and through his vocation, transformed the standard of legitimacy in government throughout the world. We are perhaps only beginning to see this and, with the help of Thomas Knock's important work, better understand it."―Senator Patrick Moynihan, author of On the Law of Nations
"A truly great book. It is simply superb in every way."―Senator George McGovern
"A superb, sympathetic account of the intellectual and political milieu surrounding Wilson's League of Nations."―Thomas G. Paterson, author of American Foreign Policy: A History
From the Back Cover
"Wilson, in his time and through his vocation, transformed the standard of legitimacy in government throughout the world. We are perhaps only beginning to see this and, with the help of Thomas Knock's important work, better understand it."--Senator Patrick Moynihan, author of On the Law of Nations
"A truly great book. It is simply superb in every way."--Senator George McGovern
"A superb, sympathetic account of the intellectual and political milieu surrounding Wilson's League of Nations."--Thomas G. Paterson, author of American Foreign Policy: A History
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; Revised ed. edition (May 26, 1995)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691001502
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691001500
- Item Weight : 1.38 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.06 x 1.05 x 9.06 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,539,759 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,324 in US Presidents
- #137,646 in American History
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Thomas Knock is Professor of History and Altshuler Distinguished Teaching Professor at Southern Methodist University and Distinguished Senior Fellow at SMU's Center for Presidential History. He teaches and does research mainly in the the field of 20th century American politics and foreign relations. He earned his bachelor's degree at Miami University of Ohio and his PhD in History at Princeton University.
He is the author of To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order (Oxford University Press/Princeton paperback), which won the Warren Kuehl Prize awarded by the Society of Historians of American Foreign Relations; and The Rise of a Prairie Statesman, The Life and Times of George McGovern (Princeton University Press) which won the 2017 PROSE Award for Biography & Autobiography from the Association of American Publishers. He has also written numerous book chapters and articles in leading scholarly journals (American Quarterly, Political Science Quarterly, Diplomatic History, etc.). In addition, he is the co-author of The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the 21st Century (Princeton University Press); and co-editor (with John Milton Cooper) of Jefferson, Lincoln, and Wilson: The American Dilemma of Race and Democracy (University of Virginia Press); and, most recently, co-editor (with Jeffery A. Engel) of When Life Strikes the President: Scandal, Death, and Illness in the White House (Oxford University Press).
Professor Knock serves on the Editorial Board of Presidential Studies Quarterly and the Board of Trustees of the Woodrow Wilson Presidential Library (of Staunton, Virginia). He has received research grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the American Philosophical Society and has been a Fellow at the Charles Warren Center at Harvard University. He has served as adviser and onscreen commentator for the documentary, Woodrow Wilson, in the American Experience television series on PBS; for the feature documentary, Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern; and for the History Channel series on the American Presidency, To the Best of My Ability.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author commences with an excellent discussion of Wilson and some elements of the Socialist movement. On the one hand he saw them as fellow progressives and on the other hand, as the case with Debs and my grandmother (she was one of the heads of the Socialist Party in NY and I recall many of the details of Wilson and he somewhat heavy handed way of dealing with differing views), he saw them as threats to his unlimited power. Thus there was a love and hate relationship. The author focuses on the productive parts of the relationship in the early years when their interests coincided. Yet the Socialists were not just one group, there were many flavors of Socialism and this, in itself, made it difficult to understand. Wilson as the author indicates tries to benefit from their support.
Then the author discusses the internationalism of Wilson. His interactions with Croly of the New Republic and also with Lippmann, were positive initially and they were supporters. But those relationships were to falter as Wilson exercised his approach to Presidential power.
Wilson seemed to deal with international relations in the almost academic framework that he did with most everything else. For example and as discussed the Mexican War was an out and out fiasco. The US Army wandered around Mexico without maps searching for Villa as an attempt to solidify American interests. It accomplished nothing other than demonstrating that Pershing and his forces were totally unprepared to even capture one wandering band of "outlaws". Regrettably the same leadership sent the Army to France, often coatless and untrained and ill equipped.
The author spends a considerable amount of time discussing the negotiations and Wilsons almost arrogant teacher like approach dealing with very sophisticated politicians in France and the UK.
On p 210 ius the most telling of all descriptions: "Everything reminded me of a faculty committee meeting, rather than a gathering of statesmen." is the quote from one observer. On p 204 the author effectively tells why: "Wilson wrote two constitutions for the League of Nations..."
Namely Wilson had the continuing desire to do the work himself and then try to cajole the others into his way of thinking. These observations are just a few of the battery of focused observations made by the author that demonstrate better than almost all other writers on Wilson his true weakness. Namely he believed he could lead all the others by the power of his intellect and delivering in words fait accompli. But to the old European players at the table the work was often done in classic Byzantine manner, no pun intended.
There are several points which the author has noted adequately covered which I believe are germane to this topic. Specifically:
1. Wilson's Health: Wilson had significant cardiovascular problems, most likely suffering from mild strokes on prior occasions and ultimately, while pushing the League, suffered a massive stroke. His health was always an issue, delimiting the time he spent on ever more complex issues. It would have been fruitful to have melded the health issues into the timing of many of the decisions.
2. Wilson's Second Wife: The death of his first wife and the near instant remarrying to a strong and controlling second wife was undoubtedly a significant factor in his thinking. Yet understanding that has always been a complex task and the author sidesteps this issue. The author treats Wilson as the President and does not reflect on this type of influence. How important this was can be debated but her influence cannot.
3. Wilson and House: House, the self-appointed Colonel, had attached himself to Wilson and for years was apparently the driving force for many of Wilson's efforts, especially towards the end of the War where House actually represented the US with foreign entities, albeit having no real recognized official position. Then almost suddenly at the end of the negotiations there is a break with House, Wilson just seizes the moment and send him off. One can look at the positive and negative side of the Wilson-House relationship but it was clear that House was a significant factor. The author correctly acknowledges House's presence but his influence should have been more extensively explored.
4. Wilson's Limited International Exposure: American Presidents all too often have delimited international experience. Teddy Roosevelt just seemed to bluster his way about and was in effect the first internationally influencing president. But TR's impact was limited. On the other hand Wilson was the first President to fully step upon the world stage. Unlike FDR who had multiple internal advisers as well as building his relationships with Churchill and Stalin, Wilson had not real exposure to the field of international diplomacy. In fact when he completed his PhD at Hopkins he barely got passed his German requirement, and some say barely is being generous. Thus having no alliances, having no experience, and having no understanding of the depth of historical precedents, he walked into the middle of negotiations assuming them to be created of whole cloth. He soon found to the contrary. This would have been of interest to have been developed a bit more.
Notwithstanding the above fine points, personal in nature, this is one of the best works on Wilson available. It manages to tie together all of the key facts and allows the reader to have a better understanding of the man and his abilities and lack thereof. I would strongly recommend this to anyone trying to understand Wilson and more importantly anyone trying to understand the Presidency and the issues that can arise from a poorly prepared person who attains that position. In this case the past is always prologue to the future.
One of the ironies the Knock points out is: with all the major foreign policy issues that would arise with President Wilson's time in office, the 1912 election had almost nothing to do with foreign policy. Knock however is quick to defend Wilson's own remark about how it would be ironic if foreign policy were to cover his Administration. Knock argues that Wilson's comment was based on the content of the election campaign not on his personal study of the issues.
"The election of 1912, like almost all the others of the preceding century, did not hinge on foreign policy. President Taft now and then reflected upon his futile exertions for reciprocal trade with Canada and arbitration treaties with the European powers. Debs viewed foreign policy as irrelevant to working-class interests, just as he had done during the debate over imperialism in 1900. The Progressive platform advocated free passage through the Panama Canal for American coastwise shippers and recommended the construction of two battleships per year, while the Democratic platform called for independence for the Philippines. But none of the candidates said much about even these rather innocuous issues." (pg. 19)
Wilson was an idealist but Wilson was not alone in his idealism. There were many people and movements on both sides of the political spectrum who wanted to change from the theories that used balance of power and national interest in guiding foreign policy, and to replace it with a new internationalism that would embrace the rule of law over nations.
"Jane Addams played a key a pivotal in this wing of the internationalist movement; indeed, she personified its purposes and values perhaps better than anyone else. Dismayed by the failure of the established peace societies to show any muscle, Addams, with the help of Paul Kellogg and Lillian Wald, organized the Woman's Peace party in January 1915. The Woman's Peace party distinguished itself as the first organization of its kind--unlike the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace or the World Peace Foundation--to engage in direct political action (and on a variety of fronts) in order to achieve its goals." (pg.50-1)
There is very little in this book about World War I as a conflict. It discusses how Wilson had America enter as an associate belligerent power rather than an ally. Wilson was disgusted with the allies and their plans to divide up the spoils after the war. Wilson wished for a new way of doing things and the actions of the allies, to him, represented what was wrong with the world.
"In addition to arbitration, Wilson concentrated on disarmament. Sounding much like a card-carrying member of the American Union Against Militarism, he posed to alternatives to his audiences--disarmament through the League or the eventuality of a national security state. Should it stand apart, he argued, the United States would have to be `physically ready for whatever comes.'" (p.261)
Wilson's view of what America might become has become reality. I am not sure his ideas for change were a realistic alternative. The League was not worth much and even the U.N. that replaced it has some terrible flaws. It is ironic that the ship Wilson used to go France in was the called the George Washington. I can think of no president whose views on foreign policy were closer to the exact opposite of Wilson than Washington. I am not talking about entangled alliances either. Washington was a realist who felt that nations would only go along with whatever aligned with their interests. Wilson talked of `equity of nations'. Why would a great power like Great Britain want to be on an equal footing with Luxemburg? Wilson's goals were admirable and maybe one day be attainable, but his methods were questionable at best.

