Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
To the End of June: The Intimate Life of American Foster Care (Ala Notable Books for Adults) Hardcover – August 13, 2013
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Q&A with Cris Beam
Q. Why did you write this book?
A. I’m a foster mother and, through my other books and reporting, I’ve spent a lot of time with people impacted by the child welfare system. I was amazed that we could spend more than 20 billion dollars a year in this country on a system that nobody—not the foster kids, not the foster or biological parents, not the social workers, not the administrators or commissioners—thinks is working. I wanted to find out why.
Q. You adopted your foster daughter, Christina, when she was kicked out of her group home at age 17. Christina is 30 now. What is she up to these days? What is your relationship with her like?
A. Christina is an adult and she’s pretty amazing. She lives in Los Angeles doing HIV outreach and education and goes to college at night. We’re very close, we talk on the phone every other day or so. I feel so lucky, really, to have her in my life.
Q. You interviewed dozens of children, birth parents, foster parents, agency workers, and others in your five years of research. They all must have changed you in some way, but were there a few who especially stuck with you?
A. I spent several years tracking a set of parents in Brooklyn, Bruce and Allyson Green, who were particularly loving and dedicated. They did everything right: they took advantage of all the educational and extracurricular resources available to their foster kids, they loved their foster and biological kids equally, and when the time came, they adopted a girl named Fatimah and had done everything but sign the adoption papers with a girl named Dominique. Both of these girls were 17. Adoption is like the Holy Grail in foster care. In this case though, Fatimah and Dominique panicked. For so long, adoption had been held out as a kind of panacea to all of their prior trauma, and when adoption didn’t fix their lives, they ran away, and ended up worse than before.
I also followed a single mom in Yonkers named Mary who adopted much older kids, kids who had already aged out of the system and were technically adults. These kids also fell outside the fixed lens of child welfare, but they were helped tremendously by adoption. Sometimes the most creative solutions aren’t happening within child welfare itself, but just at its edges.
Q. In what ways is the state of foster care in New York City reflective of the state of systems around the country? In what ways is it different?
A. New York’s child welfare system is an enormous, overburdened bureaucracy with a thousand moving parts, all with different allegiances and poor intercommunication. It’s this bureaucracy, rather than one bad director or singular mal intent, which is so destructive. You’ll see this Kafka-esque quality everywhere. Also, as with our jails and prisons, child welfare is becoming increasingly privatized—in New York and across the country—and this has both useful, and problematic, implications. As far as foster care implementation, New York is somewhere in the middle: there are cities and states with far higher caseloads or longer delays to family reunification, and there are places that do a better job.
Q. About how many children are in foster care in the U.S. this year?
A. The last data we have is from July 2012, and there were 400,540 kids in foster care. The numbers have gone down significantly in the last 15 years, thanks to the 1997 Adoption and Safe Families Act, but the numbers have also changed. We’re seeing the youngest kids getting adopted, but more teenagers than ever are aging out of the system with no resources at all.
Q. Are there any numbers on what percentage of kids in foster care are eventually adopted?
A. It's important to remember that the central goal of foster care is to reunite kids with their birth parents, and in any given year about half of the kids will go home. The trouble is really with the trauma they endure during the separation, shuffling their way through multiple strangers' homes—on average, for close to two years.
There are biological parents who can’t or won’t care for their children, though, and last year about 50,000 foster kids were adopted from foster care and 100,000 foster kids were waiting for prospective parents. On average, the adopted kids had been in foster care for three years and then waited another year to be adopted. But these are averages: some kids will wait much longer, or never be adopted at all. And these figures don’t even include the tens of thousands of kids 16 and older who have given up hope for adoption entirely, deciding to just wait for emancipation from the system as adults.
Q. Why don’t we hear more about these kids?
A. For one, people are afraid to read about child abuse. It’s painful and frightening to think about kids being harmed. In reality, though, the vast majority of kids are removed from their families not for abuse but for neglect—and many argue that “neglect” is a code word for “poor.” We can look at poverty with a more direct gaze, so this may be a way to open the conversation more.
Secondly, there’s a kind of fait accompli attitude around foster care and foster kids in general; we don’t see it as the dynamic, changeable, and changing system that it really is.
Q. Since 2006, Florida’s foster care system has been funded differently from other states’. Their system was recognized as a possible model for other states by President Obama in 2011. What makes Florida unusual? Should other states adopt their way?
Traditionally, and in most states, foster care is funded on a per diem basis: agencies get a certain dollar amount from the federal and state government for every day a child stays in a foster or group home. This financial structure provides a kind of perverse incentive to remove kids from their parents. In 2006, Florida accepted a flat fee, called a waiver, for five years. This meant they only had to remove kids from the most dangerous households and then could spend the rest of the money on things like abuse prevention, drug rehabilitation, and keeping the family stable and secure. Thirty states and counties have now applied for similar waivers, promising a sea change in the way we think about, and approach, child welfare overall. I think it’s quite promising and exciting.
*Starred Review* Whenever newspaper headlines scream about the abuse of foster children, the public is outraged, child protection agencies radically change their policies, and poor children go on living in a hodgepodge of foster care and suffering myriad unintended consequences, according to Beam, whose background includes a fractured childhood and experience as a foster mother. Here she offers a very intimate look at a system little known to most people. Beam spent five years talking to foster children, parents and foster parents, and social workers, mostly in New York. Her profiles include Bruce and Allyson, with three children of their own, taking in as many as five foster children, and Steve and Erin, fostering a child they want to adopt, whose mother signed away her rights on a napkin. Beam also writes about teens who’ve been bounced from home to home, some longing for adoption, others sabotaging their chances out of fear, many hoping for promised aging-out bonuses. Beam offers historical background and keen analysis of the social, political, racial, and economic factors that drive foster-care policies, noting the recent swing from massive removals to support for keeping families together. A very moving, powerful look at a system charged with caring for nearly half a million children across the U.S. --Vanessa Bush
Top customer reviews
Infants come with their own vulnerabilities, but also with the most options. As desirable objects for adoption, the rights and advantages of preserving the family must be weighed against the hope of a new permanent family. As the child ages, so do their options and the memory of the birth family becomes more compelling. Finally, a child "aging out" at 18 or 21, runs great risk of leaving shelter with no meaningful back up or preparation. They are less likely to be prepared for independence, and they lack that great American fall back of moving home.
A society must be judged by its treatment of the least of its citizens. In this case, the outcome of our endeavors is vital to the whole country. It behoove sinus all to consider the facts and opinions presented in this book. The author's prose enables the reader to undertake the task with pleasure. The characters are fascinating and present conundrums that have left me pondering well past the last page.
My only negative is that Cris Beam wrote entirely from the point of being in NYC and dealing with the foster care system in NY. I would really like her to expand her work to be more inclusive of other states - maybe highlight what is working in some places? Or at least explain systems in other states that may be more applicable to families reading this book. I had a hard time relating some of the practices to where I live in Illinois. But overall, this is a very worthwhile read and I hope that the author continues exploration in this field.
It appears her underlying theme is that unconditional love will heal any and all children. It is easy for the general public to believe this simple myth and Ms Beam does child welfare professionals and foster parents a grave disservice by suggesting this is so. I gave this book two stars instead of one simply because there are a few paragraphs scattered throughout the book that show the dilemma faced by child welfare professionals and the limited range of options open to the children in the system. I bought this book to add to the library at our agency but I will not be placing it there. There is simply too much information presented with an agenda here to make this a realistic view of what these children face.