Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
79% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
& FREE Shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
OK
Endangering Prosperity: A Global View of the American School Paperback – June 19, 2013
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
The relative deficiencies of U.S. public schools are a serious concern to parents and policymakers. But they should be of concern to all Americans, as a globalizing world introduces new competition for talent, markets, capital, and opportunity. In Endangering Prosperity, a trio of experts on international education policy compares the performance of American schools against that of other nations. The net result is a mixed but largely disappointing picture that clearly shows where improvement is most needed. The authors' objective is not to explain the deep causes of past failures but to document how dramatically the U.S. school system has failed its students and its citizens. It is a wake-up call for structural reform. To move forward to a different and better future requires that we understand just how serious a situation America faces today.
For example, the authors consider the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), an international mathematics examination. America is stuck in the middle of average scores, barely beating out European countries whose national economies are in the red zone. U.S. performance as measured against stronger economies is even weakerin total, 32 nations outperformed the United States. The authors also delve into comparative reading scores. A mere 31 percent of U.S. students in the class of 2011 could perform at the "proficient" level as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) program, compared with South Korea's result of 47 percent. And while some observers may downplay the significance of cross-globe comparisons, they should note that Canadian students are dramatically outpacing their U.S. counterparts as well.
Clearly something is wrong with this picture, and this book clearly explicates the costs of inaction. The time for incremental tweaking the system is long pastwider, deeper, and more courageous steps are needed, as this book amply demonstrates with accessible prose, supported with hard data that simply cannot be ignored.
- Print length147 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBrookings Institution Press
- Publication dateJune 19, 2013
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.37 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-100815703732
- ISBN-13978-0815703730
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"America faces many pressures ranging from achieving long-run fiscal balance to maintaining our strong national security. As Hanushek, Peterson, and Woessmann persuasively show, these pressures could be dramatically lessened by improving our schools."―George P. Shultz, former U.S. Secretary of State
"Just when you thought we'd reached a consensus on the need to dramatically improve America's schools, a chorus is emerging to suggest all is well. Endangering Prosperity contains all the facts and figures needed to put an end to such dangerous and misguided thinking."―Joel Klein, former Chancellor of New York City schools
"If the United States is to continue to be the experiment in liberty and freedom for which those who founded our great country sacrificed their lives, we must find a way to fix our schools. If we continue on the path we are on, we endanger more than just our prosperity, as the authors of this powerful volume make clear."―Jeb Bush, former Governor of Florida
" Endangering Prosperity makes a compelling case that K-12 public education in the United States is lagging compared to its international counterparts―and that the issue extends across the socioeconomic spectrum. The economic costs are simply too great, the authors persuasively argue, to accept the timid incrementalism that too often passes for 'reform.'"―Chris Cerf, Commissioner of Education, State of New Jersey
"Seen from abroad, it is clear that America's schools could do better. Endangering Prosperity accurately describes the challenges facing U.S. schools, but also shows the rewards that could come from improvement."―Sir Michael Barber, former adviser to U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair
About the Author
Eric Hanushek is the Paul and Jean Hanna Senior Fellow in Education at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Paul E. Peterson is the Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government and director of the Program on Education Policy and Governance at Harvard University and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Ludger Woessmann is a professor of economics at the University of Munich.
Product details
- Publisher : Brookings Institution Press (June 19, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 147 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0815703732
- ISBN-13 : 978-0815703730
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.37 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,811,306 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,638 in Government Social Policy
- #4,140 in Education Reform & Policy
- Customer Reviews:
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
One strong contribution in this volume is its revealing racial differences in U.S. PISA performance. While 42% of white students were identified as proficient in math, only 11% of African-American, 15% of Hispanic, and 16% of Native Americans were so identified. Half of students with an ethnic background from Asia and the Pacific Islands were proficient in math - comparable to all students in Belgium, Canada, and Japan, but lower than all students in Korea and Taiwan. U.S. white students, however, are still surpassed by all students in 16 other countries, and more than 25-percentage-points behind all students deem proficient in Korea and Finland. White pupils in the U.S. also trail well behind all students in nations such as Japan, Germany, Belgium, and Canada.
In reading, 20% of white students and 41% of those from Asia and the Pacific Islands were identified as proficient, vs. 13% of African-American, 5% of Hispanics, and 18% of Native American students. White student performance only would place the U.S. in 9th place, trailing by a significant margin all students in Korea, Finland, and Singapore.
The authors contend that countries grow faster where the population has higher achievement, and includes U.S. success back in the 1960s when America was practically the only country with universal secondary schooling for its population. But they then muddy their case by also adding that we then had a free and open labor market, limited intrusion of government, good foreign people coming into the U.S. to work and stay. Probably more important, they also omit referencing the fact that, at the time, the U.S. had the only major manufacturing capacity - thanks to much of the rest of the developed world having been flattened in WWII and the third-world status of Asian areas that had not been. They also are silent about the fact that a main factor driving the surge in Asian economies is their much lower-cost labor inputs.
Continuing, they contend that if U.S. pupil performance had only matched Canada's over the last 20-years, the average paycheck of all American workers would be 20% higher.
Many contend that to fix American schools we need to spend more money, and since 1960 per-pupil inflation-adjusted spending has increased to levels over 4X those then. But pupils in Florida grew even faster than Massachusetts since 1990 (the first availability of state-level data) which moved from 10th in 1990 to first today, while spending about the same in inflation-adjusted dollars. Other research indicates that if we replaced the bottom 5 - 8% of teachers with average teachers we could beat Canadian pupil performance.
Bottom-Line: 'Endangering Prosperity' has some important facts about spending vs. pupil performance. However, their overall assertion about how much better our GDP performance would have been with higher PISA scores is based on poorly-controlled analysis that allows extraneous factors to dominate. It's the old 'correlation does imply causation' fallacy.
(a) The actual learning performance of students, as measured on standardized (cross-country) tests, correlates with different countries' economic performance to a striking degree. (Does growth explain schooling or the other way around? Well, the authors also show that learning in an earlier period links to growth in subsequent periods).
(b) US schools overall are doing a fairly weak job with getting kids to learn key skills, compared to other advanced economies.
(c) With efforts at improvement -- and this is by no means all or even primarily about volumes of money -- jurisdictions can in fact improve their relative and absolute performance, as shown e.g., by states like Maryland, Massachusetts, and Florida.
Of course, there are plenty of people out there with vested interests or axes to grind. Critics will no doubt cavil at the book's analysis, arguing that things are not all that bad... or that it's all the fault of our ethnic heterogeneity. Approach these excuses for complacency with skepticism. And above all read the book.
One strong contribution in this volume is its revealing racial differences in U.S. PISA performance. While 42% of white students were identified as proficient in math, only 11% of African-American, 15% of Hispanic, and 16% of Native Americans were so identified. Half of students with an ethnic background from Asia and the Pacific Islands were proficient in math - comparable to all students in Belgium, Canada, and Japan, but lower than all students in Korea and Taiwan. U.S. white students, however, are still surpassed by all students in 16 other countries, and more than 25-percentage-points behind all students deem proficient in Korea and Finland. White pupils in the U.S. also trail well behind all students in nations such as Japan, Germany, Belgium, and Canada.
In reading, 20% of white students and 41% of those from Asia and the Pacific Islands were identified as proficient, vs. 13% of African-American, 5% of Hispanics, and 18% of Native American students. White student performance only would place the U.S. in 9th place, trailing by a significant margin all students in Korea, Finland, and Singapore.
The authors contend that countries grow faster where the population has higher achievement, and includes U.S. success back in the 1960s when America was practically the only country with universal secondary schooling for its population. But they then muddy their case by also adding that we then had a free and open labor market, limited intrusion of government, good foreign people coming into the U.S. to work and stay. Probably more important, they also omit referencing the fact that, at the time, the U.S. had the only major manufacturing capacity - thanks to much of the rest of the developed world having been flattened in WWII and the third-world status of Asian areas that had not been. They also are silent about the fact that a main factor driving the surge in Asian economies is their much lower-cost labor inputs.
Continuing, they contend that if U.S. pupil performance had only matched Canada's over the last 20-years, the average paycheck of all American workers would be 20% higher.
Many contend that to fix American schools we need to spend more money, and since 1960 per-pupil inflation-adjusted spending has increased to levels over 4X those then. But pupils in Florida grew even faster than Massachusetts since 1990 (the first availability of state-level data) which moved from 10th in 1990 to first today, while spending about the same in inflation-adjusted dollars. Other research indicates that if we replaced the bottom 5 - 8% of teachers with average teachers we could beat Canadian pupil performance.
Bottom-Line: 'Endangering Prosperity' has some important facts about spending vs. pupil performance. However, their overall assertion about how much better our GDP performance would have been with higher PISA scores is based on poorly-controlled analysis that allows extraneous factors to dominate. It's the old 'correlation does imply causation' fallacy.
Top reviews from other countries
This book by Hanushek, Peterson and the German Woessmann is based heavily on the work done by Lynn and Rindermann without citing them in any way.


