- Hardcover: 624 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press; 9 edition (February 26, 2004)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0195168070
- ISBN-13: 978-0195168075
- Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 1.6 x 7.8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 3.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 13 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #864,578 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Engineering Economic Analysis 9th Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you increase your sales. We invite you to learn more about Fulfillment by Amazon .
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
About the Author
DONALD G. NEWNAN, Ph.D., P.E., is Professor Emeritus at San Jose State University. TED G. ESCHENBACH, Ph.D., P.E., is a consultant and Professor Emeritus of Engineering Management at the University of Alaska Anchorage. He is the author of Engineering Economy: Applying Theory to Practice, 2/e (OUP, 2003). JEROME P. LAVELLE, Ph.D., is Assistant Dean in the College of Engineering and Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at North Carolina State University.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I like its containt, formulas, examples, alternatives and methods for investments, benefits and expenses, all in the economic way.
I love this engineering economic analysis.
July 31, 2014
I liked it because it was cheap and in good condition. Similar products would be far more expensive.