Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.98 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism (Enlightenment an Interpretation) Paperback – July 17, 1995
| Peter Gay (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
The eighteenth-century Enlightenment marks the beginning of the modern age, when the scientific method and belief in reason and progress came to hold sway over the Western world.
In the twentieth century, however, the Enlightenment has often been judged harshly for its apparently simplistic optimism. Now a master historian goes back to the sources to give a fully rounded account of its true accomplishments.- Print length592 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateJuly 17, 1995
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.1 x 8.2 inches
- ISBN-100393313026
- ISBN-13978-0393313024
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
― R. R. Palmer, Journal of Modern History
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Revised edition (July 17, 1995)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 592 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393313026
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393313024
- Item Weight : 15.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1.1 x 8.2 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #569,264 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,186 in Modern Philosophy (Books)
- #1,307 in England History
- #22,053 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
e complete objectivity. Much like Bloom observed about reading critiques of Shakespeare the man - you learn nothing about Shakespeare and everything about the the critic. This author partially overlaps other writers and covers their omissions. He includes Franklin and Jefferson at least as peripheral players. (Certain eurocentric authors dismiss anything on the western side of the Atlantic as anomalies)
Kant is quoted that although it was the Age of Enlightenment it was not an enlightened age. The idea here is that the philosophers of the age sought enlightenment but the world they lived only began the process of attaining it rather than achieving it. Presenting the Enlightenment as a "process" rather than a well defined philosophical system is one of his interpretations I found especially useful.
Gay spends some time distinguishing mythic vs critical thought. Mythic he associates with the Christian medieval period. That is a concept that may be difficult for a modern reader to truly comprehend -- a world where your daily life, thoughts, and motives are immersed in a body of unchangeing revealed knowledge as opposed to a world of evidentiary knowledge which is contantantly subject to the possability of change. It was against the mythic character of that medeival world that the philosophes of the Enlightenment rebelled.
To say that this is a difficult book to get through is an understatement. Indeed it is the chief reason why I got distracted several times from reading it. It is certainly not for the uninitiated in the history of the enlightenment period (which unfortunately I was); and it is far from a chronological narrative. Rather it is an intellectual history of the period, and as such it is an interpretation of ideas predominantly of the 17th and 18th centuries.
The book is organized more by subject, rather than strictly by chronology. Although some semblance of chronology is there, the author consistently jumps back and forth between different time periods as relevant to the subject he is discussing. As the author is of Germanic origin (he emigrated to the US when he was 18) the prose is somewhat difficult due to the uncommon placement of verbs, twisted use of language and somewhat archaic grammar (keeping in mind that the book was published in the 1960's). However, that is not to say that the prose is not at all fluid. The flow stoppers, at least for me, were the constant and numerous references to different people, their works and the occasional vocabulary words I had to look up.
The reader gets introduced to the "little flock of philosophes", who were the chief players during the enlightenment period. But far from being a synthesis of their respective philosophies, the author's focus is on the various influences upon the philosophes, from intellectual to sociological. In that sense, it's as much a social history as it is an intellectual history. Instead of, say, analyzing Voltaire's ideas and his contribution to the enlightenment, the focus is mainly on what Voltaire himself read, who and which schools of thought influenced him, his interaction with his peers and contemporaries and etc.
The first half of the book focuses and analyzes the influences that the antiquities had on the philosophes, from Plato to Cicero and Lucretius, to Erasmus and the philosophers and scientists of the middle ages. The second half of the book analyzes the stance of the philosophes toward Christianity and the various different ways in which that interaction and relationship manifested. The book finishes with analyzing David Hume and the methods he employed, with much success, in mounting his opposition to, and ultimately decidedly destroying Christianity and other revealed religions, and their accompanying doctrines.
All in all, the book is very scholarly, learned, erudite and sophisticated. However, it is not to be taken lightly or skimmed. And if one loses focus, better to reread the relevant passages than to keep heading down the black hole. As mentioned, although the prose is not the most fluid, it's far from a pedantic or a dull read. Indeed, the writing at times is witty, sarcastic and sharp. So, don't be put off too much by the prose and its occasional difficulty, but be prepared to do some heavy lifting at times. The knowledge gained from this book will be of high quality and satisfying, and the decision to read the book unregrettable.
This is an amazing book. It probably should not be a readers first introduction to the Enlightenment period, but it can be the reader's second. The book is very erudite and I was constantly looking up words and people or schools of thought on my Kindle, the author does presume the reader is very familiar with the philosophers of the Enlightenment and who they read. I would not have been able to finish this book in book form because of the constant stream of new concepts the author uses, but, on the Kindle (or equivalent device) this book is a delight to read. Wikipedia tells me the book was originally published in 1967 and was revised in the 1990s, but basically as I was reading the book it became apparent almost all of the citations were pre-1967. That gives the modern reader an interesting perspective on how the scholar from the 60s saw the thought of the 1700s.
Top reviews from other countries
I should also add that thanks to Gay's command of the written word, the book is truly a joy to read; there were times when I found myself wondering how much I could really be learning, given how beautifully the sentences flowed. I suppose it says something about the mediocre standard of writing in most modern scholarly works that one's suspicions should be aroused when encountering a volume by as accomplished a stylist as Peter Gay.


